Designated Whiner Shitting Street - General non DSP-specific discussion and stupid questions goes here

Lmao that backpeddle
How was that a backpedal?

I think just generally he's trying to keep things in check. People want this site to have a decent reputation, all things considered. So being known as "the place where they plan how to fuck with people they don't like illegaly" would be pretty bad.
You know how many times this website has been ddosed? Do you know how the average person feels about doxing? About a community made to discuss how much people dislike a particular individual? I seriously doubt this site's public image is at the top of Null's priorities. The occasional user going rogue and doing a gayop hardly affects this site's overall repuation to the demographic that uses it.
 
  • Mad at the Internet
Reactions: EmpGulcasa
You know how many times this website has been ddosed? Do you know how the average person feels about doxing? About a community made to discuss how much people dislike a particular individual? I seriously doubt this site's public image is at the top of Null's priorities. The occasional user going rogue and doing a gayop hardly affects this site's overall repuation to the demographic that uses it.
This is the viewpoint that makes it worse. It happens because of the occasional user going rogue, it happens because of gayops. The site does need to be above some kind of board just to be able to operate and the protections required to keep it afloat against those things represents a very significant amount of its cost.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: capefear56
Using Doxing to coerce is going into coercian law. Using threats or violence to force someone to do something. hurr durr. He speaks of his humanity in a fact way, not some philosophical way. You're both being willfully ignorant about this and discussing this with me now because he has you beat on this.
Really grasping at straws I see.

Coercion law... haha.
 
I agree with Null here. Everything that you share publicly online is fair game! That's just common internet literacy. If you share something publicly, but don't want people to know about it, then it's your damn fault. That's still not doxxing. By definition, doxxing is the act of publicly revealing previously private personal information about an individual or organization, usually via the Internet.
 
Edit: I love that I peek back to see what's new in the thread and there's just shittons of negrates on my last handful of posts saying what now Null has said like 8x times over. Wait till those faggots catch up and realize when I said they were complaining this cat is a shit dog that I was right. Take your wishing for trolling elsewhere. Or just go do it you sackless fags. Come back here to laugh about it.
If I were Null I'd be worried about you wearing my skin someday with how much you suck his cock, matching pfp and all. Please tell us more about how the negrates get under your skin pls.
 
Really grasping at straws I see.

Coercion law... haha.
Yeah, it would break laws against coercion. Extortion is using threats to get property or money, coercion is using threats to make someone act against their will. That's what doxing his supporters until he bends the knee is. It's especially damning since they literally pay him directly for his goods/services that you're interfering with. Keep digging up posts to give me stickers on since you're pissed that dear leader ooperated on you
If I were Null I'd be worried about you wearing my skin someday with how much you suck his cock, matching pfp and all. Please tell us more about how the negrates get under your skin pls.
The profile pic used to be different, this one is a noolie, a little fun art thing someone on the forum is doing mocking NFTs of null's avatar, mine is a spooky ghost noolie. I changed it within the last month or so. I don't suck his cock, someone said planning and suggesting trolling was cool here and we were boring because we didn't then proceeded to suggest trolling ideas. He was moderated plus a few others, then null came in himself to tell people to not. He came in saying what I was already saying and you were arguing with him.
 
  • Autistic
Reactions: capefear56
Seems kind of cut and dry at this point. The problem is people whining about not being enough trolling, people trying to encourage trolling here, and preplanning it for others to do and suggesting it. Why can't they do it? Why do they want you to do it? Because it often backfires and makes the person look retarded. Even the best laid plans in these regards, even when they go optimally, often backfire. They take more effort than they pay off. We all pay the price for a handful of retards.



Seems plenty of people get this. That's good.



Gee now all that's left is to slap those alerts on the post when people go against this, issue warnings, threadbans to get retards to get the drift. You've always been a good mod as far as getting shit done and I understand you're more busy now but you almost saddle up to these people prior to now when he's not in the thread explicitly stating how fucking retarded this shit is.
Worst part is, @Cistern Rumbler who started this convo again this time, is normally fine about this but it goes to show the mentality spreads. We all get restless. Phil's been asking for a hot load of shit on his plate more and more boldy with each passing day and we're all hungry for a good arc to see him squirm. This isn't the way though.
That's a weird way of saying you're exceptional, mate. However, do as you please.
I fully support your cause.
 
The real reason gay ops are actively discouraged is probably because Null doesn't want to be associated with the latest Sons Of Kojima lookalike when it inevitably falls apart due to internal politics and drama.
Weaponized autism only works when you're not trying to focus it, or for very short periods of time.
I'm sure it has quite literally nothing to do with them or DSP in general as this has been his stance since posts on the topic from 2014 pertaining to other more relevant cows of the time. What was that one, Jace?

We've seen other sites similar in nature or purpose eat themselves alive with gay ops and crossing legal lines imploding them. Even with as careful as this site is, it's just on the cusp of legality and many wish it wasn't as weirdly unamerican as that is.
 
Here's what you're doing. You're equating the forum when it had 411 active members, and really only a thousand as recent as when I joined to now when it gets a few thousand more per year. The site has more traffic, DSP does not have more dedicated detractors.
No I'm not. You said that we were almost at 10,000 pages when the hearing happened. I demonstrated that we weren't and now you're just flipping the narrative.
 
does dropping dox on people not count as fucking with them? stop acting like you're above it all, so fucking cringe
As far as the U.S. is concerned, doxxing is legal as long as it doesn't break these 3 guidelines:

1) The information found MUST be publicly available and can't be obtained via hacking.
2) It can't be done as a threat or blackmail
3) It can't be a Government employee - this rule mainly applies to people working in the CIA, FBI, etc. as doxing your mailman or congressman doesn't really matter

Every person I've doxed here I did on a whim and because I thought it would be funny. Whether or not they stopped being a mod/fan is just a reaction to realizing they got doxed.
 
Man who runs forum website whose physical hosting media in the United States tells users “don’t break US laws or get gone”. Subsection of users shits pants at this very reasonable request.

Null did not ask you not to harass people illegally because he thinks you’re meanie heads if you do. He asked because people watch this website like a hawk and when people post about doing illegal things or expressing an intent to do so he gets US law enforcement contacting him, and I don’t know about you but having a nice sit-down with the FBI when you’re sequestered somewhere in the former Soviet bloc doesn’t sound like a good way to enjoy the Fourth. Imagine if you said you were going to beat some derkaderk’s ass on a Britbong forum and next thing you know you’ve got a conference call with Scotland Yard at 3 AM your local time.

If you’re actively and knowingly making trouble on and for the Farms you don’t belong here, whether that fits with your edgy ethos or not.

EDIT to add: the warnings not to even approach the line of legality exist for the combination of the fact that a good slice of the userbase are not American and 99.9% of us are retards concerning the US legal system and I’m not sure AnOminous wants to field eight thousand questions from screaming idiots wanting to find out whether it’s kosher to stalk Phil through the Fred Meier frozen food aisle.
 
Last edited:
"Something something muh 'human rights'":

View attachment 3458352

It really is a childlike sense of right and wrong.
Null has just always hated this board. I'm not talking about planning gay-ops or anything he said about to do things legally, but he has defended DSP every single time meanwhile he's constantly pozloaded my neghole with Chris-Chan, the psycho girl who convinced Chris to rape his mom, and has engaged with Ethan Ralph. Tommy Tooter has his own thread where he spergs constantly. All of these people are worse and more fucked up than Phil.

But whenever Phil does something, he's been his white knight. Yeah, he's tame and doesn't do much, but it's hypocritical to front-page things like Ethan Ralph getting beat up in Portugal because someone chose to fly over there knowing Ralph would be there while saying that shagging his sister-in-law is a no no. There are obviously more examples of this but Phil is more than just a guy who sucks at vidya while begging.

EDIT: Just want to make it clear that this is not me complaining about what Null said about no trolling but rather just stating that he has always hated us and has defended DSP almost every single time
 
Null has just always hated this board. I'm not talking about planning gay-ops or anything he said about to do things legally, but he has defended DSP every single time meanwhile he's constantly pozloaded my neghole with Chris-Chan, the psycho girl who convinced Chris to rape his mom, and has engaged with Ethan Ralph. Tommy Tooter has his own thread where he spergs constantly. All of these people are worse and more fucked up than Phil.

But whenever Phil does something, he's been his white knight. Yeah, he's tame and doesn't do much, but it's hypocritical to front-page things like Ethan Ralph getting beat up in Portugal because someone chose to fly over there knowing Ralph would be there while saying that shagging his sister-in-law is a no no. There are obviously more examples of this but Phil is more than just a guy who sucks at vidya while begging.

EDIT: Just want to make it clear that this is not me complaining about what Null said about no trolling but rather just stating that he has always hated us and has defended DSP almost every single time
In my opinion he has the same view of him that a lot of people who don't know much about him do, most people think he is just bad at games and begs for money, there is way more under the surface and I'm not implying Phil is the physical manifestation of evil and that he needs to be killed, I'm just saying that all the scummy stuff, general retardation and toxicity is unknown by most people who don't follow him. Also as you said Null constantly white knights for Phil, in the thread he talked about how if you want to stop bad guys you should be a police officer instead of doing gay ops to cows, but that somehow doesn't apply to the cows he finds interesting, I know you can't plan ops in general on this site but his position of "ops are gay and stupid" is purely for a legal reason rather than a point of principle as he is trying to make it sound.
Now that I think about it, Null's argument of "become a police officer and do this to bad guys" is literally the same argument Phil makes about detractor channels when he says that they are obsessed with him and rather than posting slanderous and out of context unedited videos of him or discussing every aspect of his life on the internet they should put those efforts in investigating bad people rather than him (him being a person that just wants to chill, play games and have fun).

This policy of no ops is necessary due to legal reasons, but a lot of users took this rule and misinterpreted as "doing anything to get involved with a cow is stupid and the person should be mocked" even when it's things that make the situation much more informative and funnier like the guy that exposed his expenses while looking for no recognition or attention, I'm sure that a lot of the people who says "any involvement with the cow is gay and stupid" have a great time when Nigel doxes a wheelchair , I don't remember who did it but when Timbo got doxed everyone laughed at how he was bankrupt multiple times and he is still tipping Phil, but at the same time KF users hold the position that doing that is gay and wrong, it's hypocritical.

The real argument should be "I don't find Phil interesting, no one is allowed to use this forum to plan for ops in general no matter the cow because it will cause me legal trouble, but when it comes to Phil I don't find ops against him interesting or funny , I condemn them because I don't think he deserves it, but if you go to Portugal and punch Ralph(in self defense) that goes on the front page" I wonder what his reaction would be if someone followed Phil around the mall on his day off with a camera in hand and punched Phil in the face after Phil gets confrontational with the person following him, I don't think he would approve , not from a position of principle, but because he doesn't think he deserves it.
 
I don't remember who did it but when Timbo got doxed everyone laughed at how he was bankrupt multiple times and he is still tipping Phil, but at the same time KF users hold the position that doing that is gay and wrong, it's hypocritical.
That was me. I also doxed Timbo's entire family for shits and giggles after it was found out that he went back to tipping to Phil
 

Jesus Christ the e-beggars are multiplying!

I don't know what's more depressing: working people leading meaningless, empty lives throwing all of their expendable income at total strangers, hoping it'll give them some sense of purpose or happiness, or NEETs leading meaningless, empty lives begging for new toys from fans like they're a child on Santa's lap.
Posting this here since it's not relevant to Phil

There are tons of them, especially in the retro gaming community where you have people like John Hancock, HappyGamerDude, and MetalJesusRocks just e-begging for new toys and games while asking their fans to foot the bill. John Hancock has been scamming people about building a video game museum for his games only to ban anyone who mentions the museum, MetalJesusRocks begged his fans to pay the trip to Japan for him as well as fix a house leak and Pat and Ian scammed money for Ian's doctor visit which just amounted to Ian needing to do some stretches.

There was a youtuber called AfroGamerDude who made videos calling these people out for being the lying scammers that they are only to hurt some retard's feelings that he got doxed during a livestream and was basically threatened to take down all of his youtube videos because of it. You can still find reuploads which people have of them on youtube.

To answer your question, I'd say it's the working people who throw money at these retards because at least the loser NEETS are getting something and scamming these losers out of money, with many of these youtubers making a lot of money off of sponsorships, youtube and paymetons
 
Last edited:
Abortion specifically is not a right, but what about the right to have control over your body? If a woman can be forced to give birth because the fetus is considered a person, can she be required to maintain a specific diet and exercise regimen, and if she doesn't, she's charged with child abuse? How about ectopic pregnancy, where the fetus is never going to be viable?
The irony of this argument taking place during (after?) a global pandemic, wherein suddenly bodily autonomy as a concept became a very pesky inconvenience to a lot of people...

The justification of course is that you can spread the virus to others, making individual rights a secondary concern, but with abortion somehow it only affects the woman even though the procedure is itself a termination of a second life. If you're unvaccinated but never leave your house, you only potentially harm yourself, but if you abort your healthy pregnancy (especially after the stage of viability) you always harm another, even if you're stuck on a desert island.

You also brought up a hypothetical where the logic could justify controlling a pregnant woman's diet but in some ways we already do this when it comes to using tobacco, alcohol or drugs. Only a few states criminalize this in certain circumstances, but it's not uncommon in lieu of prison time to strip the mother of her parental rights.

Personally I don't think the right to abortion was ever within the 14th amendment's text. It was a fanciful reading of that amendment and was a ticking timebomb just waiting to blow up in women's faces. I personally have no problem with abortion access, but short of congress writing a bill and codifying it into law (in some way that has no connection to the 14th amendment) it's probably going to remain a states' rights issue.

Edit: grammar.
 
Last edited:
Back