You can. See, for example, (Franklin v. Murphy, 745 F.2d 1221 (9th Cir. 1984) where the district court dismissed 41 actions by the plaintiff as being frivolous under IFP statutes and he was allowed to appeal) Only that you may, if the district court declares so, lose your IFP status and require to put up an appeal bond.
Isn't it an autistic thing? Their obsession suddenly stops when they find a new thing that catches their interest. So maybe Dave found something new to do with his time and he's no longer interested in legal proceedings.
Hopefully.
As someone who is going to IT, I hope to never have to encounter acerthorn having a tech issue. He's the type of person who will never take anyone's input for a solution.
Does this faggot know that you can’t just subpoena a tech company for personal info on a civil case? They don’t just produce that because you asked. At least they never did in the past. It usually has to be criminal and coming from law enforcement.
He's tried running actual Mail Fraud Scams on State Attorney Generals. So no, no he does not know anything at all about how the law works, beyond just enough understanding of how to file shit to be a menace.
Blah blah blah the government is corrupted blah blah acerthorn is really a fucking hypocrite blames the government but at the same time realize he on government money
I'd say lying. The thing is the court system is actually doing it's job fairly well in fighting corruption (it's you David, you are the corruption)
Having a temper tantrum and acting like a turkey because you're literally retarded isn't evidence in an argument. Sure as fuck not evidence in the court of law. Go lick the mildew and black mold off your walls. Be sure to film yourself doing it too, you'll actually get some viewers if you live stream it.
If you're suing an unknown defendant pro se, you can request the court clerk issue subpoenas in your name, and they generally do. Generally, ISPs almost automatically respond to these in legitimate lawsuits. Pro se nutjob lawsuits? Sometimes. It depends on how much they're willing to put into it. Some ISPs fight them tooth and nail regardless of who the plaintiff is, some literally just ignore them until you do something else to compel them, and some just cave in immediately and don't care.
He bitches and moans about corruption and abuse...despite him literally abusing a court privilege time and time again, all for retarded frivolous lolsuits, with a long history of consistent attempts at trying to get rich quick, and screwing over any who oppose him in the process.
GivenStabby's legal history with Google I suspect they will automaticlly flag anything with his name on it for extraspecial legal review.
I’ve only seen a handful of times where subpoenas have been issued in civil cases asking a site/service disclose the identity of a user. It’s never worked in the times that I’ve seen.
Bungie tried to get Youtube to hand them information on a user and they said no so I don't know what hope Acerthorn has. Now even with my limited knowledge of the law, I do know what sorts of forms he'd need fill out and send, but I'll let David here Google that information. He should figure out by the time the statue of limitations on it ends, if there is such a thing for this type of case. I'm not sure on that part.
Google is definitely in the "good luck fucker" category for Stabby.
It's worked most of the times I've seen, which were in actual cases, not crazy bullshit from lolcows. If Microsoft sends your ISP a subpoena, they're getting your shit.
Posting your own Lolcow thread over in Proving Grounds
