- Joined
- Mar 24, 2013
It happened in most Communist countries at some point or another. The Viets largely did it as a symbolic gesture rather than actually being hungry; intimidate the enemy some. In NK it was a real thing and this was to prevent the family from starving. I’m told it’s no longer practiced in China but I have no idea if that’s actually true. I also don’t want Hooves here getting any ideas (though it would be funny if he was advocating for Cannibalism when previously he advocated for Veganism).
Cannibalism is weird to me. I would probably try to eat bark or grass before I did another person. I don’t have any kids though, if I did I’d still even go fishing before I ate a person. That’s just me.
Many Westerners have the image of China being entirely modern and urbanized like Beijing and Shanghai since they do have insanely massive urban centers there and the CCP has worked for decades to sell that image. The fact is that China is a massive country like the US or Russia, and even with their gargantuan cities China is still largely rural. There are still countless small, remote, rural towns in China with few or no modern conveniences like running water, internet, connection to the electrical grid, etc. Towns where the people would consider a prosperous year to be one where they made the equivalent of $100 per person. The CCP is loathe to have the rest of the world know that these tiny, poor, remote towns without indoor plumbing exist because for years they've been trying to sell the image that they are a modern and prosperous super power that is so successful that they've abolished poverty and starvation. FYI: there is no official metric agreed upon by the world community to determine if the population of a country is mostly living above the poverty line, but unofficially it's assumed that if a citizen of a country is making more than $10 per week or something like that then they are considered "out of poverty".
So, yeah, I have no doubts that there are still plenty of very poor Chinese, both in the major cities and the tiny far-flung towns no Westerner has ever heard of, who are still starving in the modern day and have had to resort to some very drastic measures to feed themselves. I'm sure some have even resorted to cannibalism in the 21st century.
Fishing was probably banned like foraging, people would get shot trying to comb through already harvested fields. You'd be less keen on eating grass after watching your neighbors die horribly after eating grass and dirt soup. We can't digest the stuff. Bark can be made into a bread but it's incredibly labor intensive, and it's more a Nordic tradition. The slav peasants might not have known.
I read an account of a guy that got stranded in that one high altitude plane crash. After a week of no food he said he just started seeing the frozen bodies as cuts of meat, something clicked over in his brain. Cannibalism during starvation isn't 100% a conscious decision, there's a physiological component to it.
Starvation, TRUE starvation and not the kind of "starving" a gluttonous lard golem like Phil has had where they may have had to miss one or two meals in their entire life and had a little rumbly tummy, is absolutely horrific. It's miserable, painful, agonizing, maddening, and all-consuming. When you're genuinely starving all you can think about is the hunger, the pain, and how you are slowly dying. Real starvation has driven people literally insane and caused them to do terrible things, like murder and cannibalism. It's malicious, plodding, and monotonous misery, and some have even talked about actually being able to feel their body consume itself essentially from the inside out just to keep itself alive. It's one of the most horrific and agonizing ways to die.