"ADF" / Philip Vincent Haskins-Delici / Isabel Rosa Araujo - The Original Troon Commie Cow

It happened in most Communist countries at some point or another. The Viets largely did it as a symbolic gesture rather than actually being hungry; intimidate the enemy some. In NK it was a real thing and this was to prevent the family from starving. I’m told it’s no longer practiced in China but I have no idea if that’s actually true. I also don’t want Hooves here getting any ideas (though it would be funny if he was advocating for Cannibalism when previously he advocated for Veganism).

Cannibalism is weird to me. I would probably try to eat bark or grass before I did another person. I don’t have any kids though, if I did I’d still even go fishing before I ate a person. That’s just me.

Many Westerners have the image of China being entirely modern and urbanized like Beijing and Shanghai since they do have insanely massive urban centers there and the CCP has worked for decades to sell that image. The fact is that China is a massive country like the US or Russia, and even with their gargantuan cities China is still largely rural. There are still countless small, remote, rural towns in China with few or no modern conveniences like running water, internet, connection to the electrical grid, etc. Towns where the people would consider a prosperous year to be one where they made the equivalent of $100 per person. The CCP is loathe to have the rest of the world know that these tiny, poor, remote towns without indoor plumbing exist because for years they've been trying to sell the image that they are a modern and prosperous super power that is so successful that they've abolished poverty and starvation. FYI: there is no official metric agreed upon by the world community to determine if the population of a country is mostly living above the poverty line, but unofficially it's assumed that if a citizen of a country is making more than $10 per week or something like that then they are considered "out of poverty".

So, yeah, I have no doubts that there are still plenty of very poor Chinese, both in the major cities and the tiny far-flung towns no Westerner has ever heard of, who are still starving in the modern day and have had to resort to some very drastic measures to feed themselves. I'm sure some have even resorted to cannibalism in the 21st century.

Fishing was probably banned like foraging, people would get shot trying to comb through already harvested fields. You'd be less keen on eating grass after watching your neighbors die horribly after eating grass and dirt soup. We can't digest the stuff. Bark can be made into a bread but it's incredibly labor intensive, and it's more a Nordic tradition. The slav peasants might not have known.

I read an account of a guy that got stranded in that one high altitude plane crash. After a week of no food he said he just started seeing the frozen bodies as cuts of meat, something clicked over in his brain. Cannibalism during starvation isn't 100% a conscious decision, there's a physiological component to it.

Starvation, TRUE starvation and not the kind of "starving" a gluttonous lard golem like Phil has had where they may have had to miss one or two meals in their entire life and had a little rumbly tummy, is absolutely horrific. It's miserable, painful, agonizing, maddening, and all-consuming. When you're genuinely starving all you can think about is the hunger, the pain, and how you are slowly dying. Real starvation has driven people literally insane and caused them to do terrible things, like murder and cannibalism. It's malicious, plodding, and monotonous misery, and some have even talked about actually being able to feel their body consume itself essentially from the inside out just to keep itself alive. It's one of the most horrific and agonizing ways to die.
 
If you want to read a horrifying and frank account of starvation, “A River in Darkness” is a first hand account by a half-Japanese man who lived in North Korea. His description of watching his family wither away until their lips couldn’t cover their teeth haunts me. After escaping, he knew he had made it out because he saw a dog. All the dogs in NK had been eaten.

Phil is fat and doesn’t know anything about anything except being fat.
 
Phil is fucking boring these days. He hides away in his Section 8 apartment because he's pretty much pissed off or annoyed even the Leftards in Portland, has covered himself (including his face) in retard scribble tattoos, and spends his days playing Militant Leftist dress-up while LARPing as Billy Badass on the internet. He's gotten so boring and irrelevant that his own thread has shifted gears to discussing the childish meth addict he's letting couch surf at his Ain't-ifa Barracks.
The trouble is, he’s run out of ideas. Both for himself and for gaining attention. What edgy things can he say and do that he’s not already done? All I can think of is going Alt-Right, but that’s not an option when you’ve covered yourself with pro-communist scribbles.

I think he’s also run out of groups that will tolerate him. Those that do probably treat him like the retard he is - at his age, you can’t pass his stupidity off as the ignorance of youth. I can’t imagine that Mr Super Soldier likes being reminded that everyone looks down on him.
 
Cannibalism is weird to me. I would probably try to eat bark or grass before I did another person. I don’t have any kids though, if I did I’d still even go fishing before I ate a person. That’s just me.
It's weird to everybody until you find yourself in a position where there's no food except other people around you.

It's like that Uruguayan soccer team that crash landed in the Andes. It was either eat the bodies of the dead or starve. Sure they had a choice but when you're that hungry you go kinda crazy. There's an incredible desire to live in the human body. It's why people like Fatass Jack Scalfani and even fatter Steven Assanti are still alive even though they have multiple health issues and addictions. Sure you wouldn't eat a dead person today. Or tomorrow or even the next day. But when there's nothing else around and you've been starving for a week, you'll do the unthinkable just to take away the pain.
 
I think aging out is a big part of it. Most of these radical movements are uni students, or at least people in that range. Over 30 you don't stay in those circles unless you have something to offer. An aging, decrepit sped will not be well received by kids 10 years his junior.
Usually by age 30 you have a little more sense, a better understanding of the world and can see that this larp you're on can't carry you through.

There's a reason why most of the members of Antifa were college aged. That's the point in your life that you feel you're the smartest around and have like minded people in your social circle to larp with you. When you see people over 30 in these movements it usually means one of a few things.

1. They're the head / leader / organizer and have hitched their wagon to it.
2. They're making money off of it or are getting what they need from their followers.
3. Their brains have been fried by too many drugs / autism to understand that this isn't a tenable position to have.

Taters is obviously #3 on the list.
 
2022-08-18 12_49_30-Tweets with replies by ʀᴀᴄʜᴇʟ ꜱᴀɪɴᴛ, ᴍᴏᴛʜᴇʀꜰᴜᴄᴋᴇʀ (@story__of__rach) _ Twi...png

As a good hivemind warrior, if you are about to die shouldn't you save the food for the hive-units that are still viable.
That's like basic utility theory

pen2.png

"real girl" -- whoa tres transphobic duder!
ca$happ some bucks to a mexican mother in payment for my emotional labor educating you on your internalized transphobia
 
"real girl" -- whoa tres transphobic duder!
ca$happ some bucks to a mexican mother in payment for my emotional labor educating you on your internalized transphobia
These troons always give it away when they're either in a rare moment of honesty or, like this dude, too stupid and/or drugged out to moderate the shit that comes out of their mouths.

But they expect the population at large to pretend they don't see the obvious truth that these men are, well, men.
 
The trouble is, he’s run out of ideas. Both for himself and for gaining attention. What edgy things can he say and do that he’s not already done? All I can think of is going Alt-Right, but that’s not an option when you’ve covered yourself with pro-communist scribbles.

I think he’s also run out of groups that will tolerate him. Those that do probably treat him like the retard he is - at his age, you can’t pass his stupidity off as the ignorance of youth. I can’t imagine that Mr Super Soldier likes being reminded that everyone looks down on him.

Phil lives in the Pinko Commie Faggot HQ of the US, so if he were to totally 180 on his politics he would need to move somewhere else where the people around him won't literally try to beat him to death for his political view. Phil is a coward with a yellow stripe down his back a mile wide (no, it's not another tattoo), so I don't see him flip-flopping on his politics anytime soon sheerly out of fear of bodily harm. That, and I think he's too stuck in his Autistic ways to make such a drastic change. He's only capable of very minor shifts while ultimately remaining the exact same as he ever was.
 
50A1BEBB-68D2-4EB3-81A9-14CABE3C101D.jpeg

Hey fellas,
I used to report on Phil’s instagram antics but he eventually got hacked and lost access to his account. Pic related is his new account but he isn’t as active as he was previously.
Phil turned 37 on August 12th, Not too long ago and he is still panhandling for some sweet sweet cash from the few followers he still has.
Cheers.
 
but...food insecure

Now if Phil just getting fatter so he has more blank canvas to ink on?
i have to think it would be getting sparse
Please he's still got places where he can add tats. He originally said it was to reclaim his body and deal with the dysphoria of being male and when he got the chop he'd stop.

But like everything Taters lies and we just see him continue to add ink to his bulbous body because he's hooked on getting tats. Screw getting food. This is all about screwing over the taxpayers. Or at least that's what he'd probably say if pressed on the whole issue.
 
Back