- Joined
- Feb 4, 2020
Considered an act of war prior to the atom bomb...Supplying an enemy nation with arms, intelligence, advisers, and plans was considered an act of war prior to the world's two great powers acquiring nuclear weapons, after which point we had a gentleman's agreement that it didn't count because, well, we needed some way to fight wars against each other without saying we were fighting them. It's why the Germans sank the Lusitania and Lend-Lease was extremely controversial.
The gentleman's agreement is off because we used Cold War tactics to go directly after Russian military assets instead of constraining our proxy wars to puppet states.
Yet the two examples you provided of the US supplying arms to one side during the world wars weren't considered acts of war.