- Joined
- Mar 12, 2021
The 1934 National Firearms Act was intended as an outright ban on machineguns, silencers, and then handguns. Rifles and shotguns with short barrels were defined in there so that people wouldn't just shorten down long guns into handguns, and by those definitions a pistol with a stock isn't a normal rifle unless it's long enough.I mean, I still don't fully understand the situation of handgun stocks
The National Rifle Association makes a strong enough lobbying effort to get the provision for handguns specifically removed from the bill, but the SBR and SBS definitions, intended to prevent loopholes for handguns, are just kind of left there and they don't strictly serve any purpose on their own for the original intent of the law.
The C96 Mauser is actually exempt from SBR status (I think up to like 1940 production, not sure how much of it was taking place after that point), due to being an antique-ass fucking 1800s design, and presumably for being weird and different compared to later pistols which became the convention, making it a Curio & Relic item. That is, as long as it has an original stock or a fitting replica of one. I believe that the typical Spanish clones are also mostly exempt, but don't quote me on that.(imagine not having stocks or having to pay a premium for Stechkins, C96s or your Spanish copies).
A few of the holster-stock pistols made in Spain also have some similar exemption, but not to the same sweeping degree.
The Stechkin was only ever made as a select-fire weapon to my knowledge, so that's an NFA item regardless of the length and if it has a stock or not. If someone ever managed to get their hands on a parts kit or something and then built a semi-auto Stechkin pistol, potentially it could have been petitioned for to have an individual exemption made for it due to being rare and unusual, there's a small number of pistols which have gotten an explicit pass on being an SBR that way.
A Stechkin parts kit build would get a premium regardless of NFA status just for rarity, however.
Because it's fucking important?Discussing gun laws with Americans is useless, it's too much of a .... existential problem for them.
Yeah, it's actually very good that common people are forced by law to outsource their self-defense to a societal minority widely known for ineptitude, poor work ethics, and outright corruption, before even considering that they're completely unhelpful to the vast majority of people who live outside of urban areas, or women, who will just have to accept that they'll simply always have a significant disadvantage in force projection against any common criminal at all times, and they don't have a choice in the matter.and sometimes a license is a useful tard filter
It's really much better that you don't feel embarrassed by the unrefined rabble and plebes who aren't as smart as you.