Skitzocow David Anthony Stebbins / Acerthorn / stebbinsd / fayettevillesdavid - Litigious autist, obese livestreamer, elder abuser, violent schizo, ladyboy importer, hot dog enjoyer, wereturkey.

[AnOminous]

The fact that I have a right to bear arms doesn't mean I can close my eyes and fire it randomly without consequences. For speech, obscenity laws exists.

And despite this, your right to bear arms can't be taken away arbitrarily (I mean it can by certain states hi there New York) without due process.

The right to litigate is similarly fundamental and requires due process before limits are put on it. A single U.S. District Court judge doesn't have the right just to take away the right of a person to seek redress through a lawsuit.

Giving a single judge the power to do this is frightening.

 

[Sperglord666]

And despite this, your right to bear arms can't be taken away arbitrarily (I mean it can by certain states hi there New York) without due process.

The right to litigate is similarly fundamental and requires due process before limits are put on it. A single U.S. District Court judge doesn't have the right just to take away the right of a person to seek redress through a lawsuit.

Giving a single judge the power to do this is frightening.

Okay I agree the same thing about lawsuits. My question is, why the heck does it take hundreds of spurious lawsuits before we decide, "nah, you need to chill"? Why couldn't it be stopped after the first 10 or after he sued his dad for being stabbed by him?

I'm not saying arbitrarily revoke the right, I'm saying people deserve consequences for abusing it.

 

[Counterfeit Obol]

Okay I agree the same thing about lawsuits. My question is, why the heck does it take hundreds of spurious lawsuits before we decide, "nah, you need to chill"? Why couldn't it be stopped after the first 10 or after he sued his dad for being stabbed by him?

I'm not saying arbitrarily revoke the right, I'm saying people deserve consequences for abusing it.

Methinks its a slippery slope deal, and the threshold for declaring someone vexatious can vary from court to court (or is that judge to judge?). We've already seen what happens when a company bends the knee to someone who complains enough times with Cloudflare. It sets a precedent and lets the floodgates open.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

And are you saying that you believe ruling someone a vexacious litigant should never happen?

You asked why "does it take this many frivilous [sic] lawsuits to even begin talking about declaring someone a vexacious [sic] litigant in the US ", and I answered you. I never said that it cannot or shouldn't happen, merely that "petition[ing] the courts for redress of grievances" was a "constitutional right", and that away taking such right (or any other) shouldn't be an easy task ("Having your rights taken away should be a massive thing"). I even went so far as to point out that it had happened to Acerthorn before.

Certainly, you have the right to file a lawsuit in the event you believe you've been wronged, but what about someone who is clearly just filing lawsuits with malicious intent and no real goal of winning based on the facts? [...] If not, then what is your limit?

I am entirely convinced that Acerthorn, like Russ, fully believes that he has a "real goal of winning based on the facts" and that he has been wronged. Taking away rights, specifically ones such as fundamental as this one, is difficult precisely because so much of it is subjective. Rights should be taken away in only the most extreme circumstances. Courts have mechanisms in place to minimize the harm of actions such as ones by Acer. If the federal government actually spent money on courts and not funding UN campaigns of child rape worldwide (as per UN report, in half the countries they go to help, they instead rape children there), maybe the courts wouldn't be as overworked and could actually use said mechanisms.

The fact that I have a right to bear arms doesn't mean I can close my eyes and fire it randomly without consequences. For speech, obscenity laws exists.

This is the most retarded thing I've read in a while. Please reflect on the poor choice of a comparison (mass manslaughter (an objective) compared to something you place a lot of subjectivity to (intent, belief on his chances of success, etc). I will not even bother trying to explain how child pornography is just not a very good comparison either.

You can believe in what you believe without making retarded and nonsensical comparisons (you should try that).

I'm sorry if this breaks your illusion of the US Bill of Rights, but there are limits on pretty much all of them. The limits we currently have are mostly cultural and decided by the courts. I'd love it if things were simple, but they simply aren't.

I'm sorry that you are having trouble reading my words, and feel the need to pretend that I have said things I have not.

My question is, why the heck does it take hundreds of spurious lawsuits before we decide, "nah, you need to chill"? Why couldn't it be stopped after the first 10 or after he sued his dad for being stabbed by him?

Because if he feels he has been wronged, he has a right to try to solve these grievances. And despite the many meritless lawsuits, he does have some that have a lot of merit (Stebbins v. CMDR ImperialSalt for one). The meritless ones suck, but I'd rather there'd be a hundred of those, if it means, at least, one with merit is heard.

And that's coming from someone who genuinely believes Acer is befitting of being limited like in his home state.

 

[AngryTreeRat]

It is worth noting that vex lit is not a full revoking of a right, just a severe limitation. I do think the US should be more willing to use it, but also should have an additional middle ground mechanism that is more easily applied and is across all districts. A simple tag of "this guy is a dumb fuck, make him dot all his 'I's and cross all his 'T's before going further, and check that they aren't abusing the courts a little more closely than normal." I feel like such an approach would catch a lot of cases of people jumping between cases, and reduce the abuse of the courts.

 

[AnOminous]

I am entirely convinced that Acerthorn, like Russ, fully believes that he has a "real goal of winning based on the facts" and that he has been wronged. Taking away rights, specifically ones such as fundamental as this one, is difficult precisely because so much of it is subjective.

It's a good thing Rule 11 was revised to remove the requirement of subjective bad faith, because that was virtually impossible to prove and vexatious litigants were given nearly entirely free rein under that requirement. Now the requirement in almost all jurisdictions is merely advancing arguments that no reasonable person would make. So now it doesn't matter if you're filing crazy bullshit lawsuits in "good faith," and the adverse parties don't have to prove you actually intentionally and deliberately made arguments you knew were vexatious.

I do think Acerthorn is actually vexatious in that sense because he consciously dissembles. His filings are full of outright lies that I do not believe he even believes.

 

[MongolianMongoose]

I found this picture showing Acerthorn's living conditions are much worse than anyone could imagine.

Covering my ass here... Your honor, this picture was reupload to kiwifarms.net to prevent serial vexacious litigant David Stebbins from removing it in an attempt to stifle discussion. This photo is relevant to an ongoing million dollar lawsuit by Stebbins in which claims claims his pneumonia was caused by stress from online "harassment" (criticism). This photo of him in a apartment with what appears to be mold covering the walls casts doubt on his claim.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

I found this picture showing Acerthorn's living conditions are much worse than anyone could imagine.
View attachment 4760701
Covering my ass here... Your honor, this picture was reupload to kiwifarms.net to prevent serial vexacious litigant David Stebbins from removing it in an attempt to stifle discussion. This photo is relevant to an ongoing million dollar lawsuit by Stebbins in which claims claims his pneumonia was caused by stress from online "harassment" (criticism). This photo of him in a apartment with what appears to be mold covering the walls casts doubt on his claim.

You know, using the same tools women use to make their tits bigger, won't convince me the image is real. Where is this from?

 

[Mikoyan]

I found this picture showing Acerthorn's living conditions are much worse than anyone could imagine.
View attachment 4760701
Covering my ass here... Your honor, this picture was reupload to kiwifarms.net to prevent serial vexacious litigant David Stebbins from removing it in an attempt to stifle discussion. This photo is relevant to an ongoing million dollar lawsuit by Stebbins in which claims claims his pneumonia was caused by stress from online "harassment" (criticism). This photo of him in a apartment with what appears to be mold covering the walls casts doubt on his claim.

I keep being unable to reconcile this thing with the sections of his legal filings that are vaguely coherent. And that's regardless of how accurate the image is.

 

[MongolianMongoose]

You know, using the same tools women use to make their tits bigger, won't convince me the image is real. Where is this from?

Sorry. Meant to include this in my first post. https://i.postimg.cc/5ybmGsVj/A.png

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Sorry. Meant to include this in my first post. https://i.postimg.cc/5ybmGsVj/A.png

View attachment 4761662

So, is this like from his stream, video...? 'Cause this ain't saying much to me.

 

[RodgerDodger]

It is worth noting that vex lit is not a full revoking of a right, just a severe limitation. I do think the US should be more willing to use it, but also should have an additional middle ground mechanism that is more easily applied and is across all districts. A simple tag of "this guy is a dumb fuck, make him dot all his 'I's and cross all his 'T's before going further, and check that they aren't abusing the courts a little more closely than normal." I feel like such an approach would catch a lot of cases of people jumping between cases, and reduce the abuse of the courts.

A simple rule of forcing a broader review of ANY Pro Se Informa Pauperis applicant's full litigation history before allowing it to proceed would easily clean up most of the problem.

 

[Mikoyan]

A simple rule of forcing a broader review of ANY Pro Se Informa Pauperis applicant's full litigation history before allowing it to proceed would easily clean up most of the problem.

Oh man, I can only imagine the lolcows bringing an Equal Protection Clause suit over that.

 

[MongolianMongoose]

TLDR Acerthorn commissioned songs on Fiverr and put them in ContentID. They are used in the background of his new videos. If you're responding to one of his videos you should remove the background music with Spleeter.

Spoiler: Excessively documenting 3 times Acerthorn uploaded his new songs.

No archives because he removed or privated them so quickly. If you must listen to these dull and uninspired songs check out his new videos. He would sue me 10 times over if I uploaded them here.

On March 5th Acerthorn uploaded 10 songs as 30 second Youtube Shorts.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7fT99LjtAnE "Acer's High" #shorts
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HVLCCEjVJYU Blinding Rage #Shorts
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CmD4MSxPy7U Slow Prat Fall #Shorts
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wYYzHuiwMEw Sigh of Relief #shorts
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f5iXa-21a4c An Epic Moment #shorts
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VV6MnZxN1Ek Smile on My Face #shorts
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SfmFi3uFnhM There is No Hope #shorts
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MSzCjVqhHSA Ready for Action #shorts
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G-AkJT6zij0 Sample of Life #shorts
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4rj8lK1OZQ4 Section of Life #shorts

Descriptions said "Check out Creativa over at www.facebook.com/creativaroca He's a hell of a composer and a pleasure to work with composing the channel's new official soundtrack!" and each had a link to the "full video."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ijg_iOFiI6M "Acer's High" (full video)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GF39Z0iCu20 Blinding Rage (full video)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kBj6knmMMwI Slow Prat Fall (full video)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rGu3jSgbois Sigh of Relief (full video)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9E5ySUaXbh0 An Epic Moment (full video)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I7DjBpip2AI Smile on My Face (full video)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NCNrQ7qW5ZQ There is No Hope (full video)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5jg6D88EnEU Ready for Action (full video)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SHn_Y0oOWs0 Sample of Life (full video)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ayrb68fkLAE Section of Life (full video)

The full songs were gated behind a $1 channel membership.

He deleted everything above and on March 10th uploaded these.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B9mjFU-mAcs "Acer's High" by Creativa (The New Channel's Main Theme)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AL3aGVRdqQQ Blinding Rage by Creativa
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_vtYtHuvdY4 Slow Prat Fall by Creativa
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gqq6FF4g5QU Sigh of Relief by Creativa
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-oILP8X36k An Epic Moment by Creativa
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4V4Kdqv7wmM Smile on My Face by Creativa
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vKcO8FaIG9E There is No Hope by Creativa
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3dPRb_6Ge00 Ready for Action by Creativa
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qHxvI6bGaAs Sample of Life by Creativa
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SxiYan0MWuE Section of Life by Creativa

descriptions said "Check out Creativa, who composed this awesome track: https://www.facebook.com/creativaroca He's a hell of a composer and a pleasure to work with, composing the channel's new soundtrack!"

Later this question appeared on Avvo.

How do I provide proof that I am the sole copyright holder of a work for hire?
I commissioned a few musical tracks to be composed for me by a composer on Fiverr. At the outset of our working relationship, I asked him, and he agreed, that these tracks would be considered "works for hire" and that I would be the sole copyright holder for them.
Now, I'm trying to put these tracks into Content ID. However, both Identifyy and MusicDiffusion insist that I must prove that I have "license of use," but they aren't telling me exactly what kind of proof they want me to provide.
How am I supposed to prove this? Does anyone have any experience and insight into this situation?

Avvo is anonymous. I wasn't sure it was Acer until he commented.

"How much do you charge, exactly? Because I'm on food stamps as it is. Maybe if you only charged $50 to draft the paperwork that I and my composer need to sign, I could afford it."

Ladies and gentlemen. We got him.

He writes in an Avvo comment

According to that statute, tracks prepared as supplemental works (e.g. soundtracks for movies or video games) are eligible to be works for hire. I commissioned these tracks so I could use them as background music in my YouTube videos. They were never meant to be stand-alone tracks.

Not true. He uploaded each song by 3 times with the full songs requiring a $1 channel membership. I'm not sure how legally significant that is. Perhaps he removed the uploads for this reason

I'm not sure if the "license of use" requested by these Content ID services indicates these songs already exist in Content ID and are plagiarised (as is rampant on fiverr) or if that is standard and Acer can't fill out a form without someone holding his hand.

Weird seeing a unemployed person living off government handouts hire a musician to compose a soundtrack. I hope the judge takes notice of this when he sees Acer's next inevitable In Forma Pauperis request.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

This dumb fuck really needs to learn how to use google. Took me a 3 second search to find the information and the American copyright site doesn't even have it listed anymore so I had to go to a cached version. It's harder to prove "work for hire" if you've only ever done business with someone once compared to say a website that always goes out and get's the same person to write articles for them.
Further such information can be found on Youtubes site for Contend ID match. Given that he ahs no money this is one of the dumbest things he can do. I look forward to the milk it will produce.

 

[Mind Goblins]

TLDR Acerthorn commissioned songs on Fiverr and put them in ContentID.

I bet if Acer slung those moobs into a cheerleader outfit and took a picture from the right angle he could have got Russel Greer to write the songs for free.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

I bet if Acer slung those moobs into a cheerleader outfit and took a picture from the right angle he could have got Russel Greer to write the songs for free.

There are no camera angles that would allow David to look like a 10/10 cheerleader. Russell wont settle for anything less.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

David should sue this guy, he took his bit

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Stebbins v. Google LLC

Spoiler: 36

Spoiler: 36-1

Spoiler: 36-2

Spoiler: 36-3 (emails)

Spoiler: 36-4 (emails)

Spoiler: 37

Spoiler: 37-1

Spoiler: 37-2

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

Stebbins v. Google LLC
View attachment 4794114

Spoiler: 36

View attachment 4794136
View attachment 4794140
View attachment 4794142
View attachment 4794146
View attachment 4794150
View attachment 4794154
View attachment 4794158
View attachment 4794162
View attachment 4794164
View attachment 4794170
View attachment 4794172
View attachment 4794176
View attachment 4794178
View attachment 4794182
View attachment 4794184
View attachment 4794188
View attachment 4794190
View attachment 4794194
View attachment 4794196
View attachment 4794198
View attachment 4794200
View attachment 4794204
View attachment 4794208
View attachment 4794214
View attachment 4794216
View attachment 4794220
View attachment 4794224
View attachment 4794226

Spoiler: 36-1

View attachment 4794232
View attachment 4794236

Spoiler: 36-2

View attachment 4794240
View attachment 4794242

Spoiler: 36-3 (emails)

View attachment 4794244
View attachment 4794250
View attachment 4794264

Spoiler: 36-4 (emails)

View attachment 4794290
View attachment 4794294
View attachment 4794296

Spoiler: 37

View attachment 4794320
View attachment 4794324
View attachment 4794328
View attachment 4794332
View attachment 4794338
View attachment 4794340
View attachment 4794342

Spoiler: 37-1

View attachment 4794348
View attachment 4794352

Spoiler: 37-2

View attachment 4794356

That was difficult to read. I feel sorry for the court.