Skitzocow David Anthony Stebbins / Acerthorn / stebbinsd / fayettevillesdavid - Litigious autist, obese livestreamer, elder abuser, violent schizo, ladyboy importer, hot dog enjoyer, wereturkey.

[Kendrick]

Oh god his documents become worse and worse. I can usually stomach 2-3 pages before noping out, but for this one I read half of his first page and was absolutely crushed by headaches. He's really stretching the in forma pauperis leniency with every sentence on his deforestation.

 

[S.C.U.D.]

I like his pleadings better than Russell Greer. Both get impassioned in their writings and yell at the court and make demands. Stebbins has the edge in making up edge cases and hyper focusing on them “did I just do this to silence criticism?? Prove it!” While Greer rambles about his plights and sues the wrong people over and over.

Greer also tries to use legal-sounding language and phrasing to try and pretend his filings aren't just his personal blog, while Acerthorn makes no such attempt.

 

[thhrang]

Because YT is dumb, there is no way to see if this is a real Acerthorn

There actually is an extension that adds the ability to check channels in livestream chats.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

There actually is an extension that adds the ability to check channels in livestream chats.

That should be by default (you know, how it fucking used to be? Fuck YT)

 

[Useful_Mistake]

View attachment 4829773

Spoiler: 39

View attachment 4829781
View attachment 4829785
View attachment 4829789
View attachment 4829793
View attachment 4829797
View attachment 4829801
View attachment 4829805

Spoiler: 39-1

View attachment 4829809

Spoiler: Images

 

[Star Platinum]

View attachment 4861068

"fair use" is an affirmative defense, not a cause of action. any overflow of cases is not coming from "fair use absolutists." in fact, it is your stupid ass that would make it easier to flood the courthouse, which you already do, by weakening the fair use defense.

 

[MongolianMongoose]

Acerthorn got into law school!
As an exam question.

https://quizlet.com/458586065/law-exam-other-torts-flash-cards/ (a)

Stebbins v. University of Arkansas
Stebbins was a student who registered disabilities with the university. However, after he had violent outbursts and made threats to shoot up the school, he was suspended. The student petitioned after the deadline to come back, and when he was denied readmission, he claimed that the school A) was not accommodating his Asbergers and B) should have given him grace/not taken the threats seriously.
The school provided reasonable accommodations. Disabilities do not supersede threats of violence or other behavior in violation of the code of conduct. Also, threats only need to be reasonably perceived.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

Acerthorn got into law school!
As an exam question.

https://quizlet.com/458586065/law-exam-other-torts-flash-cards/ (a)

These are normally questions you'd find at a diploma mill like CDI or something. My guess some paralegal diploma mill or something like a ABA Approved Paralegal Program

 

[lolwatagain]

These are normally questions you'd find at a diploma mill like CDI or something. My guess some paralegal diploma mill or something like a ABA Approved Paralegal Program

It's probably a diploma mill if his case is being referenced in a Torts Class, but his case is also present in "The Law of Disability Discrimination for Higher Education Professionals" published by Lexis, which would be a law school text book for some specialized classes. https://www.amazon.com/Disability-Discrimination-Higher-Education-Professionals/dp/1632807637


And his case is also brought up in some primers on disability discrimination as well:

A Primer on Disability Discrimination in Higher Education

This article provides an overview of key issues and a focus on some of the most significant and important recent developments that should be given a high priority by university attorneys and higher education administrators and policymakers. It emphasizes the role that administrators responsible...

www.mdpi.com

Basically, he's used as an example for the common sense notion, that it is not a violation of the ADA to kick out someone as a result of a direct threat.

 

[Sneedfully and Peacefully]

Alright, how long until Wereturkey files for royalties and/or copyright to his name because this is printed without his knowing. Or damages because they bring up that he was in the wrong.

 

[AngryTreeRat]

Fucking hell I'm so tired of everyone not understanding Fair Use.

I am going to make it very easy for everyone to understand what an affirmative defense is, in particular the wereturkey who we know reads this. Fair Use is an affirmative defense. What that means is it only comes into action after you are in a court of law. Not before. If you claim copyright on someone, and then they contested on YouTube pointing out fair use, up until then fair use doesn't actually fucking matter to the situation. What needs to happen next is somebody needs to initiate court proceedings. Once you are in court, they can then say that your legal motion to have their video removed, which is what the DMCA is, was not valid because while they did use your material it was covered by fair use. Fair use is a meaningless, pointless little bit of law until you are in court.

As an affirmative defense, it is basically saying that "Yes your honor. I did do this thing that is illegal under 90% of circumstances. However, I believe that I am within the 10% of circumstances where it is legal."

The only reason you point out fair use before you get to the courtroom is to point out that once you are there the person invoking fair use is a liable to win and fuck the asshole trying to pull down their content. It is a way to tell the other guy that it is not worth bickering and fighting about this in court, because the judge is liable to make a ruling very quickly based on very little evidence, because the case is just that clean cut.

I wish people would stop trying to invoke fair use where it does not matter. I wish people would stop thinking that it is up to YouTube to enforce fair use, legally do not have the power nor should they have it nor do they have the right to determine such. The only thing that YouTube should do regarding fair use is provide sufficient education on the subject to both people submitting DMCA take down notices as well as channels which have been targeted by DMCA takedown notices and would like to contest them.

 

[he who has thus come/gone]

Acerthorn got into law school!
As an exam question.

https://quizlet.com/458586065/law-exam-other-torts-flash-cards/ (a)

Damn it's even in Quimbee (a very often used and well reputed study resource for law students, both for classes and for the bar exam).

https://www.quimbee.com/cases/stebbins-v-university-of-arkansas

This is the recitation of the facts:

David Stebbins (plaintiff) was a student at the University of Arkansas (university) (defendant). Stebbins lived with Asperger’s syndrome and requested an accommodation to help negotiate what he called his tactlessness with professors. During the fall of 2007, Stebbins had several difficult interactions with university staff. For example, Stebbins often became enraged over what others perceived as minor incidents. When the university’s health center had to reschedule Stebbins’s appointment to renew his prescriptions because Stebbins was late to the appointment, Stebbins said that if he did not get his medications refilled, there could be another Virginia Tech incident, referring to a mass shooting that had occurred at another university, killing a large number of people, only months earlier. According to a university official, this was not an isolated comment. In December 2007, the university banned Stebbins from its campus. Several years later, Stebbins sought to re-enroll at the university. During that process, Stebbins sent a profane and malicious email to the university’s chancellor, although the only express threat in the email was to sue the university. The university denied Stebbins’s request to re-enroll. Stebbins sued the university for violating § 504 of the Rehabilitation Act by failing to accommodate his disability. The parties completed a bench trial in the district court.

It's in this one casebook on disability law, which is why it appears in law curricula: https://www.amazon.com/Disability-Discrimination-Colker-Grossman-Hardcover/dp/B011DC2Y9I

I'd love to actually look at the book and find what the author says about the case, because usually casebooks have notes from the authors/editors where they ask deeper questions, poke fun, make witty remarks, etc. depending on the personality of the writer. Getting your name into a casebook is a top tier achievement. Congrats to Acerthorn. Stressed out law students studying disability law will know your name for years to come.

 

[lolwatagain]

It's in this one casebook on disability law, which is why it appears in law curricula: https://www.amazon.com/Disability-Discrimination-Colker-Grossman-Hardcover/dp/B011DC2Y9I

I'd love to actually look at the book and find what the author says about the case, because usually casebooks have notes from the authors/editors where they ask deeper questions, poke fun, make witty remarks, etc. depending on the personality of the writer. Getting your name into a casebook is a top tier achievement. Congrats to Acerthorn. Stressed out law students studying disability law will know your name for years to come.

Wow, it was actually covered in a Disability Rights Law class at Berkley Law School.

Stabbins has hit the big time.

Edit: Stabbins is clearly a goldmine for anyone looking to write journal articles on ADA related issues.

https://lawreview.law.ucdavis.edu/issues/50/3/Articles/50-3_Carle.pdf

 

[Meat Target]

Alright, how long until Wereturkey files for royalties and/or copyright to his name because this is printed without his knowing. Or damages because they bring up that he was in the wrong.

*snort* huff*

"Berkeley is operating with UNCLEAN HANDS and DOXING me! UA denied me my rights because I'M DISABLED! Berkeley has 24 business hours to retract my name from their journal, or they owe me EIGHT QUADTRILLION dollars for defamation!"

*turkey noises*

 

[Adr1anD]

Fake Acer confirmed:

Well, real Acer's messages wouldn't be seen.

Spoiler: reason

Getting blocked from comments should shadowban your attempts at interacting within the live chat.

Did I forget about this, or is this new?

You forgot about it.

Shortly after this post (Archive of the post, archive of the thread) has been uncovered, Stabbins' main account and one of the Stabbins' alt accounts got suspended.
Almost immideatly he created a new account under the same name, but it took him several days to actually start posting again, and it's immideatly clear it's the same guy.

On that note, I find it ironic how he makes typos and mistakes in his legal motions but goes to reddit afterwards to point out other people's mistakes ( archives of comments)

 

[Lake Cresva Diver]

do you think he gobbles with impotent turkey rage that lawbook makers and educators are getting money off of his retardation?

 

[prolapsed_cranium]

if he can only be declared to be an annoying retard cunt in a single district at a time whats to stop him from continually being an annoying retard cunt in a new district?

Nothing. But the more courts that find you vexatious, the easier it gets to earn that label in the new district.

Okay I agree the same thing about lawsuits. My question is, why the heck does it take hundreds of spurious lawsuits before we decide, "nah, you need to chill"? Why couldn't it be stopped after the first 10 or after he sued his dad for being stabbed by him?

I'm not saying arbitrarily revoke the right, I'm saying people deserve consequences for abusing it.

And they do get sanctioned....eventually. It once again come down to protecting individual rights against the rights of society as a whole.

I don't want the prohibitive actions of government to be able to move swiftly. It should be slow to move, as it was previously said on here, the government gets it wrong.

Stebbins will get his soon enough.

 

[DrJonesHat]

Question for the old-timers in this thread: Does Stabbins really expect his insane demands to be granted like Russell Greer does, or is he is knowingly just being a pest? I can't really tell.

 

[Adr1anD]

Question for the old-timers in this thread: Does Stabbins really expect his insane demands to be granted like Russell Greer does, or is he is knowingly just being a pest? I can't really tell.

He's Narcissistic, delusional and paranoid. He really does hope that his demands will be met if only he gets to explain himself uninterrupted. But the latter is a nice bonus considering he is under impression that "government is against" him, "local law enforcement officers and clerks feel genuine disdain towards anything [he does]" and "the entire judicial system is completely corrupt", so might as well teach what will happen if demands won't be met on the first possible occasion

 

[Kendrick]

Question for the old-timers in this thread: Does Stabbins really expect his insane demands to be granted like Russell Greer does, or is he is knowingly just being a pest? I can't really tell.

Nobody can say what's inside Stabbin's head. He's clearly deranged, but at the same time he may be truly certain that he found the scam of the century to get a shitton of money, to get out of his moldy shithole.

What we can tell is that he's unable to process being told "No", or "You're wrong". He stabbed his father for god's sake. He believes him being unable to do his job doesn't mean he should be fired, but that they should hire someone else to do his job while keeping him hired.