Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 16.9%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.1%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 96 25.7%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 64 17.2%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 146 39.1%

  • Total voters
    373
I don't think even Balldo has sunk to the level he'd have literal admitted pedophile Vito the Pedo as a guest on his show.
If he has/does that's pretty much a sign Nick has reached terminal velocity in his decline.
Dick only keeps Vito the Pedo around so he has someone to watch Cuties with.
He has had Vito on his show before. Not as a planned guest or anything but he did knowingly bring him on his stream.
On mobile and it doesn't seem to have an
option for time stamps happens at about 1hr 30 mins in.
 
Lovely conversation about how women are to blame for any time a man cheats...
It is very common to blame the person getting cheated on. If they are mentally/emotionally vulnerable (and not prone to violence), this instability can be leveraged into guilt on the victim.

What Nick and co. speak to the most is women cheating on men. It can be summed up as; when a woman cheats on the man, it's the man's fault. No reason to get mad at the woman. No reason to get mad at the man she cheated with. Drexel echoes this sentiment by blaming the "cuck" or "simp" (since blaming anyone else would make him either a perpetrator or accomplice of bad behavior).

This is a popular way for women who cheat (and men who help women cheat) to justify their behavior. It's an appeal to ego for the man being cheated on while offering a means of redemption, but only on their terms. The redemption comes from the victim accepting responsibility, though this means they have to accept the premise that they were/are weak and deserve to get cheated on.

The "weak" man gets to display a manly sense of responsibility, but the perpetrators remain blameless. It's abuse, because they do this while the victim is in an emotionally/mentally vulnerable state while leveraging any relational attachment they have toward the woman.

On the subject of cheating:

Nick had some words for someone who had in issue with Camelot331's homewrecking during a livestream that Elissa clipped. Not sure what the chats Wartooth sent entailed. What is said and what Nick hears are sometimes two very different things (especially when he's stressed). It would be interesting if he really was blaming Nick for all infidelity in existence across time and wanted Nick to "un-fuck" his wife (with graphic imagery) and making everything all right again, but I'm betting that's more Nick than Wartooth talking. In any case, the results were very revealing.



Lots to unpack, but let's focus on where the blame is/isn't.

Camelot331 is a confessed homewrecker. He says he banged these women because he just got divorced, and he was like "fuck these dudes, cause they were like me, an' ah was like punishin' m'self", so he was aware that he was reliving trauma as a coping mechanism. Some light details are shared, and the panel responds (categorized by panelist and not chronology).

Nick says that if it wasn't Drexel or Camelot331, it would be someone else. If the woman is seeking it out (and not being seduced) then... you know he doesn't endorse or condone what goes against monogamous relationship, but he's not the fucking parent of anybody so don't bring him into it and that he won't condemn Camelot331 and (many angry words). Women are stepping out on men and that's the man's issue and Nicks says that's not his issue.

The crux of the issue for Nick's interpretation of events is that he feels that someone is pressuring him to denounce someone based on their solely feelings. Remember, it's because of the feelings that Nick should condemn homewrecking, and no other reason because there is no moral/ethical component and neither does this behavior have an impact on society at large. It's pure emotion. Funny stuff considering how sensitive the topic is (and Nick is the one who brought it up).

Nick also pretends to be understanding enough to listen to this guy's story all day and talk it out with him. Somehow, I doubt this.

Flash agrees that Camelot is blameless, and says that the woman should be shamed. Camelot331 didn't make a mistake in doing what he did.

Drexel expresses confusion, but no cogent defense for the 3rd party (as is his custom). Camelot331 didn't make a mistake in doing what he did. Drexel welllll's and hmmmm's over a woman's capacity for love and tells Nick not to feel sorry for a man if their girl stepped out on them.

RenieDraws says women want their men to put their foot down and say no to this kind of thing (Drexel responds with "Wellllllllll").

This is Nick later, responding to the person he was willing to talk with all day. I don't know why, but he seems mad for some reason. Maybe it's the throbbing veins in his neck:


Let's hear more of Nick's sensible responses:


So, we finally have one chat that Nick reads aloud, and Nick's response is quite dramatic.

Wartooth says: Women who cheat and the men they cheat with are culpable.
Nick hears: Please, Nick, please grab Camelot331/Drexel's nipples and pull their cock out of my wife because you alone are responsible for all infidelity ever!

I bet Nick thinks this Wartooth wants him to save him or be his daddy too. I mean, "what do you want from me?". Funny stuff.

Nick finally confesses that the man who cheated didn't wreck the marriage because they didn't make the commitment.



Let's apply this logic to Nick. I didn't agree to his marriage, but I also didn't agree that Nick's house was his property. I respect both as an outsider regardless because both are legally recognizable statuses held in society at large to maintain order, and I'm also not socially retarded. Nick's take is short-sighted, self-serving, and ultimately what I've come to expect from Nick and co.

Best-case scenario, Nick ultimately neither endorses or condemns the behavior of the person the cheater cheats with, making it a non-issue for Nick. Nick did defend the behavior of the men the women are cheating with though, and his answer to a man who been cheated on is to just move on (it's that easy, just ask Camelot331). One would suppose that it would have to be this way considering the company he keeps and if he wants their content to continue on his channel. Ultimately, whatever results in the victim being the only one hurt seems to be the optimal result. How naïve.

Whoever is to blame, it seems that Nick, Flash, Drexel, can agree that men like Camelot331 and Drexel are holy, blameless beings who are just waking men up to the fact that some/all women can't be trusted. They are doing these men a service, and the best thing they can do for themselves is join the ranks of Drexel and teach other men the same lesson.

People don't like whining online, but it's incredibly naïve to think one could bring up painful subjects like cheating/homewrecking and not have to deal with the fallout in chat. Nick's confusion as to why he would have to deal with it is especially funny because Nick was the one who brought it up in the first place and continued to engage with Wartooth.

All in all, very amusing.
 
Alright, this is actually interesting. Someone in chat practices horticulture:
Why can't Nick's chat have more people like this? Oh, it's because he endorsed BPD behavior by cultivating thottery (eg. Ass Wednesday and complimenting women's bare bodies).
Nick did defend the behavior of the men the women are cheating with though, and his answer to a man who been cheated on is to just move on
Men are like this until their wives whore out and blame it on inane reasons. You didn't pay enough attention to me, you don't satisfy me, etc. It's (almost) never logical, and that's why it hurts so bad.

Camelot is that rare case where he adopts the traits of the person who hurt him. It's a self defense mechanism to try regaining control, not realizing that he's nothing but a slave to his trauma.

I would say that Nick wouldn't be talking this way if Lady Rackets cheated on him, but as speculated earlier, Nick might be the type who cries and swears he will do anything to "win her back". He's certainly more emotional after the drugs ruined his brain's wiring. The new touch sensations are proof enough of that.
 
I will re-state my original conspiracy theory: Skyler (who I like) is also the '@' spammer (RIP). Note that in your 500 pages, @Himedall All-seeing Waifu , the two of them tend to show up together, yet aren't frequent posters.

Reminder: '@' did 4 hours of spamming and totally hijacked Locals for 4 hours a month or so ago. While spamming, s/he took 1 min breaks every 20 min or so and allowed just 1-4 comments from others, Skyler was ALWAYS the first poster allowed in, and it was ALWAYS with a supportive/funny meme.

Who has memes that are 'at-the-ready with that kind of chaos'? Everyone else was, like, "WTF?", "Stop Spamming" etc. yet "@' had them ready bc that person was Skyler.

I know absolutely nothing about how spamming works but it seems intuitive that '@' would have his/her other handle at the ready for meme-chaos (the 9/11 meme was favored by Skyler along with anime monster things - I can find them if anyone cares).

Later in the chaos, HydroPX was let in quite a bit by '@'. I contend that all 3 are the same person... but the Hydro part is totally a hunch. He's a wily, sometimes-brilliant motherfucker who enjoys causing chaos. And Hydro low-key hates Rackets (depends on the stream and how drunk/high he is).
 
Whoever is to blame, it seems that Nick, Flash, Drexel, can agree that men like Camelot331 and Drexel are holy, blameless beings who are just waking men up to the fact that some/all women can't be trusted. They are doing these men a service, and the best thing they can do for themselves is join the ranks of Drexel and teach other men the same lesson.
Basically rekieta was being a bro and defending his friend Drex no matter now indirect the attack is. Any little condemnation would mean he disapprove of Drex's whole lifestyle and probably reason for being, totally ignoring that Drex is a hypocrit. Drex often goes off about womena nd lack of accountability, but he actually benefit from it the most.

I understand now why Rekeita doesn't go to church. A short conversation with the man probably tells everyone he really had no values worth a family man. For all the sympathetic toasts he used to give on his show, he showed no sympathy for a cheat victim, or make a stand for what is morally right just to stick by his bestfriend.
 
I don't think even Balldo has sunk to the level he'd have literal admitted pedophile Vito the Pedo as a guest on his show.
If he has/does that's pretty much a sign Nick has reached terminal velocity in his decline.
Dick only keeps Vito the Pedo around so he has someone to watch Cuties with.
I can’t recall when Nick was last in Los Angeles but I do remember it was at a time when there was worry about getting into places in L.A. without having a vax card. Anyway, whenever it was, I found it interesting that Nick & Kayla stayed at Dick’s home & Vito was a guest there at the same time. I can’t recall if it was for an evening, an overnight, the whole weekend or what, but I’m positive it happened, long enough for everyone to be chilling together having drinks. Reportedly, Nick & Vito got along well, to the point where I almost suspected their Twitter / online beef was highly exaggerated for dramatic effect & that in reality, they had no issues between them. Gave me a bit of an unsettling feeling but then I totally forgot about it till now. Can’t remember if I read about it in this thread or Dick’s or on Twitter, or heard about it on someone’s show, no clue, but they definitely met up in L.A. & had a fine time. I don’t think it was Nick that mentioned it though, or if he did it was very brief & hastily glossed over. I really don’t think Nick cares that much, if at all, about what anyone does, its just part of his ever evolving act & depends on who he’s pandering to.
 
Apparently Nick gave the link to Dick so he and Peacock could come on, and Vito was Dicks idea of a joke.
If that's true, Dick once again proves he's a tone deaf idiot. I don't know a single person that thinks Vito is the slightest bit amusing. In or out of Nick's core audience.

"SUPRISE! I snuck on the self-admitted pedophile! Isn't that funny?! He desires to fuck KIDS! It's so ZANY and EDGY!"

And if you suggest to Nick it's probably a bad idea to let Dick get away with it, he'll probably be like "Don't tell me what to do! Muh freeze peach!"

The decisions some of these people make truly baffle me at times.
 
I know very definitely Vito was in the chat on Null's last show appearance gloating about how KF was taken down by Keffals. I think I still have most of the caps I took of him acting like a complete jackass there.
Vito should be put against a wall. Not even in Minecraft. In reality.
 
Nick is going to do an episode of the biggest problem tonight while he is on Dick's house, Vito is going to be there too. In theory they were going to do a watchparty of starship troopers also,but I daubt eet.
Won’t let me edit a quote post onto my last but found this so this is likely around the date I was talking about. March 4, 2022
@Procrastinhater
 
Didn't Vito and Nick have a huge Twitter fight at some point? Or am I remembering wrong?

Like, I know Nick generally doesn't give a shit how scummy his associates and guests are (i.e. Masterson), but that typically only goes as far as them not actually throwing hands with him (i.e. Ralph). I sorta assumed he was no bueno with Vito.

I know very definitely Vito was in the chat on Null's last show appearance gloating about how KF was taken down by Keffals. I think I still have most of the caps I took of him acting like a complete jackass there.
I take it as Dick beginning to think it's funny to shit on Rekieta on his own show.

Keep in mind on last week's show Dick went on a lengthy diatribe about how Ralph was winning his legal cases, and even referred to Mrs. Vickers as a "whore swinging wife". That's a turn of phrase I think Dick has enough awareness to realize would also be "no bueno" with Rekieta.

That clip makes me speechless.

WTAF?????

I will re-state my original conspiracy theory: Skyler (who I like) is also the '@' spammer (RIP). Note that in your 500 pages, @Himedall All-seeing Waifu , the two of them tend to show up together, yet aren't frequent posters.

Reminder: '@' did 4 hours of spamming and totally hijacked Locals for 4 hours a month or so ago. While spamming, s/he took 1 min breaks every 20 min or so and allowed just 1-4 comments from others, Skyler was ALWAYS the first poster allowed in, and it was ALWAYS with a supportive/funny meme.
Looking at all the screenshots posted over the months: Locals prefixes "@" to the Locals username in the chat. For instance, Rekieta's account RekietaLaw displays as "@RekietaLaw". So if it just shows "@", that means the message is associated with a blank username. I really doubt Locals would allow for someone to create a username that's blank, so I think @Himedall All-seeing Waifu is correct that when somebody deletes their Locals account it wipes their username in the chats.
 
Basically rekieta was being a bro and defending his friend Drex no matter now indirect the attack is. Any little condemnation would mean he disapprove of Drex's whole lifestyle and probably reason for being, totally ignoring that Drex is a hypocrit. Drex often goes off about womena nd lack of accountability, but he actually benefit from it the most.

I understand now why Rekeita doesn't go to church. A short conversation with the man probably tells everyone he really had no values worth a family man. For all the sympathetic toasts he used to give on his show, he showed no sympathy for a cheat victim, or make a stand for what is morally right just to stick by his bestfriend.

If that's true, Dick once again proves he's a tone deaf idiot. I don't know a single person that thinks Vito is the slightest bit amusing. In or out of Nick's core audience.

"SUPRISE! I snuck on the self-admitted pedophile! Isn't that funny?! He desires to fuck KIDS! It's so ZANY and EDGY!"

And if you suggest to Nick it's probably a bad idea to let Dick get away with it, he'll probably be like "Don't tell me what to do! Muh freeze peach!"

The decisions some of these people make truly baffle me at times.

I think these two quotes and situations are related. I also think it is pretty normal.

Nick knows and gets on well with Drexel, Camelot, and Dick. There is also the fact that what they do has almlat no impact on his little village degenerate existence. When presented the option to make the situation awkward and corner one of them to satisfy an internet abstract person he is not going to.

I think this is a very normal thing to do. *I* don't moralfag my acquaintances for no benefit, and you have to do something pretty sever to make me say something. Most of the time, it is none of my business as long as you don't bring that drama to me. Everyone has a different line, but I think it is weird when people demand disavowed from others.

We are all hypocrites to some extent and we all have a hypocrisy limit we will accept from others. I adhere to the principle to never meet your heroes, ask a famous person theor politics, or ask a partner about their exes. It opens wounds and doors to the past best left closed.
 
Whoever cheats, is guilty, simple as that.

A woman or a man, can always broke up a relationship before cheating, always, no exceptions, because nothing stops them from taking the right decision, so there's no excuses for cheating.

And whoever makes excuses for it, is a fucking piece of shit.

Also, i saw through Drex shit right away... it's entertaining when he goes off, talking shit, at least when he's clearly just joking about it (because when it goes off on mtwow or whatever the fuck is that, it's insufferable)... everything else, is all bullshit, and it's clearly an hypocrite.

Which, knowing what i know about that kind of mentality, it makes sense.
 
I really doubt Locals would allow for someone to create a username that's blank, so I think @Himedall All-seeing Waifu is correct that when somebody deletes their Locals account it wipes their username in the chats.
Locals is written in a proprietary manner. If input is not escaped properly, it could allow for SQL injection and it's possible to input all kinds of variables in (even additional SQL) to effect display.

It's also possible that someone got past the login validation entirely using a similar loophole and was essentially posting as a nonexistent user. That could also get around a ton of filters (such as flood limits) if it is requires a checking against the DB to see if a user has posted X amount of times within X period.

Edit: (I wasn't there for any of this btw so just a thought)
 
Locals is written in a proprietary manner. If input is not escaped properly, it could allow for SQL injection and it's possible to input all kinds of variables in (even additional SQL) to effect display.

It's also possible that someone got past the login validation entirely using a similar loophole and was essentially posting as a nonexistent user. That could also get around a ton of filters (such as flood limits) if it is requires a checking against the DB to see if a user has posted X amount of times within X period.

Edit: (I wasn't there for any of this btw so just a thought)
If @ was the spammer, I have logs showing they were @livechatguy at the time of spamming.

Either of two things happened:

1. LOCALS purges handles of banned people and treats them like Voldemort

Unlikely since CynthiaLibtard is in my logs going forward, but maybe LOCALS coding does this inconsistently between archived chats.

The way to prove this would be to find a Cynthia comment with an empty handle.

2. When you delete an account, it clears your handle

More likely. The way to prove this would be to find 2 @ accounts replying to each other.
 
I think this is a very normal thing to do. *I* don't moralfag my acquaintances for no benefit, and you have to do something pretty sever to make me say something. Most of the time, it is none of my business as long as you don't bring that drama to me. Everyone has a different line, but I think it is weird when people demand disavowed from others.
I didn't expect Rekieta to call out Drex's behavior EVER, but he was the one who brought up the topic. Take the legalbytes drama, when he didn't want to talk about it he pretty much ignored or dismissed the superchats. This one he brought it up on his own. It's just weird and only serves to show that he himself isn't grounded in any moral standard and would defend his friend regardless. He also hadn't been voicing that opinion during the Depp trial even though he thinks Amber Heard was cheating on the Depp with at the very least James Franco.
 
I didn't expect Rekieta to call out Drex's behavior EVER, but he was the one who brought up the topic. Take the legalbytes drama, when he didn't want to talk about it he pretty much ignored or dismissed the superchats. This one he brought it up on his own. It's just weird and only serves to show that he himself isn't grounded in any moral standard and would defend his friend regardless. He also hadn't been voicing that opinion during the Depp trial even though he thinks Amber Heard was cheating on the Depp with at the very least James Franco.
I think it is a matter of getting rid of controversy that he does not want to address.

When he thinks the crowd is against him, he placate. When he thinks they are on his side, he bullies the one who mentions it. This also depends on his sober/emotional state.

You are right that he can ignore it to some extent, but it becomes harder to do when he brings them on stream more regularly.

It is catch 22 that is inevitable on social media: talk about it, and it bothers you; don't talk and you are hiding something.

He's just a man child ruled by his alcohol and emotions.
 
I'm not 100% sure he did. Yes, it fit his "ODD" personality. But I point to you again the Legal Bytes wedding as the counter. At the time most of us took his word that he had a scheduling conflict.
I am however, not convinced anymore if that is the truth or he didn't want to go. I think it is plausible that he skipped out and drama happened since the Legal Bytes stuff would be proof of a trend of this behavior.
That and his laziness compounding his reluctance to go.
I think both are plausible explanations.

I wonder if his wife got mad at him and did something to him over this blowup that caused the degeneracy spiral publicly. Certainly seems possible to me.

I didn't expect Rekieta to call out Drex's behavior EVER, but he was the one who brought up the topic. Take the legalbytes drama, when he didn't want to talk about it he pretty much ignored or dismissed the superchats. This one he brought it up on his own. It's just weird and only serves to show that he himself isn't grounded in any moral standard and would defend his friend regardless. He also hadn't been voicing that opinion during the Depp trial even though he thinks Amber Heard was cheating on the Depp with at the very least James Franco.

Rekieta the whiny dweeb going back to his college acting roots and being all upset in a performative way about cuckoldry and cheating of all things just fits the general slide to not only degeneracy but his bizarre schizo take on MGTOW. Bits of it are horrible and fake trad dad Rekieta tells men not to follow it but bits of it are awesome and fit perfectly with muh lolbertarianism.

It's so inconsistent that when you're dealing with a hypocritical moral and physical coward like Rekieta you know it's a sore point with him.
 
I think those locals people drank too much fo the Drex Coolaid.
I never watch alot of the drex stuff.

But I m gonna throw a butt out here.

I think nick and drex were talking about that reverse haram in Florida, the one where some fat woman had bunch of nerdy loser males "dating her" and she had a baby and one of the cucks boyfriends beat the baby.

Drex made the argument from the manosphere that women look to men for protection and provision. And because of those motivators women are more willing to put up with bullshit that men are less likely to put up with.

The other one if anyone remembers this stream and it woulda been in like 2018 2019.

Nick had a guest on who was younger and married and in college and he and his "wife" were the zoomer version of swingers as in they would have 3 ways and shit. Alcohol and drugs are involved of course

The wife wanted to husband to do gay shit with another dude, and he pushed back but somehow he got a dick in his mouth and he instantly wanted to un open the relationship and stop all the degen shit and figure out whats wrong.

Drex again IMO correctly pointed out that the wife was bullshit testing him and once he showed weakness in caving to having a dick in his mouth she lost all respect for him as a man.
 
Back