Cultcow Russell Greer / Mr. Green / @ just_some_dude_named_russell29 / A Safer Nevada PAC - Swift-Obsessed Sex Pest, Convicted of E-Stalking, "Eggshell Skull Plaintiff" Pro Se Litigant, Homeless, aspiring brothel owner

If you were Taylor Swift, whom would you rather date?

  • Russell Greer

    Votes: 117 4.5%
  • Travis Kelce

    Votes: 138 5.3%
  • Null

    Votes: 1,451 55.8%
  • Kanye West

    Votes: 285 11.0%
  • Ariana Grande

    Votes: 609 23.4%

  • Total voters
    2,600
if you allege defamation then you can sometimes get a court to put some kind of "you are forbidden from publishing any further lies about this person" order on the defendant, maybe that's what he's referring to when he says he got a restraining order.
He wouldn't have to go to such extremes. He's lied to the court before, and claimed that a screenshot full of incoming student loan spam calls (if you believe Google) were illustrative of the way that Kiwifarms users harass him. That sort of "evidence" would be exhibit A in any number of no contact petitions.

Restraining orders are stupidly easy to get, particularly when the person you're trying to restrain won't or can't show up. There's nobody to tell the court "those phone calls weren't me," so it's just going to take Russell's word for it. At least at the preliminary stage, he'd probably get the restraining order.
He thinks every guy would be a regular customer of the brothels if they were more widespread. He not only thinks that, he has implied he believes most guys have paid for sex at least once in their lives. He thinks he's superior to them because he's open about his sexual practices whereas most guys hide it.
Yeah because Russ views all relationships as transactional, so if you go on 3 dates with a new chick and then she lets you fuck her, as far as he's concerned that's basically the same thing as just paying a hooker $600 and "being honest about it." Instead you've got all those other losers trying to hide behind cultural dating "norms" that Russ perceives as merely a façade for loose women to exchange sex for money (or nice meals, anyway, which is the same thing).

Remember, those aren't women to Russ, they're basically vending machines in the game of life. Roll up to one of them, and as long as there's not some other dude who's currently staked out a claim on that machine, you put in 3 "dates," and you get "sex."
Pepper spray isn't gonna cut through that protective layer of cursed +1 grease-armor. It will wick right off, like water on wax paper. No, my friend, you need something with some cutting power. Duct tape your can of pepper spray to a can of degreaser, for a double barrel effect, and maybe, you'd have a chance.
Actually pepper spray is typically an ethanol solution, because ethanol is quite effective at dissolving lipids/grease (hence why it's a good solvent carrier for the capsaicin that makes up the active ingredient in pepper spray). So if you could stand to be near it, or Russ, for long enough, it'd probably do a fair job at stripping that wax.

Aside, this is also why pepper spray is an absolutely horrible hot sauce. Even if you like hot stuff, as do I, most of the sauces are vinegar-based, and swapping it out for Everclear is just a bit much.
 
Last edited:
This is all he has posted on ig thots of late. It's possible he hasn't tagged anyone or anything in his photo posts due to they will suspend you for spamming or other ig violation. I wouldn't be surprised if he got slammed with restrictions on his ig too.( I'm still working on trying to find out the difference in ig & FB violations).
This emoji reply is weird even for him.
Screenshot_20230328-124407_Instagram.jpgScreenshot_20230328-124359_Instagram.jpg
 
Last edited:
What does he mean by this? What does he expect people to think?
The court found a janitor on his break and talked him into playing a judge?

I wish someone would call him on this, I want to see how his two brain cells would explain "fake judges" to anyone.
I think he's referring to the fact that some attorneys will "fill in" a judge's position to get hours in (sorry, not a JD, so if I got it wrong, apologies). I've heard they generally will do some minor traffic court and minor small claims cases. Some of these attorneys do go on to becoming a full fledged judge, others don't for their own reasons.
 
I think he's referring to the fact that some attorneys will "fill in" a judge's position to get hours in (sorry, not a JD, so if I got it wrong, apologies). I've heard they generally will do some minor traffic court and minor small claims cases. Some of these attorneys do go on to becoming a full fledged judge, others don't for their own reasons.
He thinks a "real" (however he defines that) judge would understand his arguments and rule in his favor. Remember when he was trying to get the judge in his suit against Null to reconsider her decision, he wrote he was astonished she didn't accept his arguments. Russ thinks the only reasons people don't give him what he wants is either they hate the disabled, or they don't understand what he's saying. Skordas even had to point out that lawyers make arguments that aren't accepted all the time.
 
Remember in every lawsuit at least one person is wrong and possibly everyone.
I would argue that in the extreme edge cases where the defendant immediately gives it without any arguments and agrees to the demands of the plaintiff, no one was wrong. Why am I imagining such an absurd hypothetical situation? Because I was trying to think of a case where someone could win, and still be wrong, while never actually requiring a case of the judge making a bad ruling. And the only case I can imagine that happening is an immediate case of surrender, which led me to realize that the only way nobody could be wrong. Would be an immediate case of surrender.
 
I would argue that in the extreme edge cases where the defendant immediately gives it without any arguments and agrees to the demands of the plaintiff, no one was wrong. Why am I imagining such an absurd hypothetical situation? Because I was trying to think of a case where someone could win, and still be wrong, while never actually requiring a case of the judge making a bad ruling. And the only case I can imagine that happening is an immediate case of surrender, which led me to realize that the only way nobody could be wrong. Would be an immediate case of surrender.
In the extreme case where the potential plaintiff approaches the potential defendant and they resolve the matter quietly, out of court... sure. That wouldn't even be a lawsuit though.

If it's become a lawsuit, either some negotiations prior to filing a lawsuit were attempted and failed, or they were never even attempted. In either of those cases I'd still say at least one of the parties is in the wrong, if not both.
 
He did have his own subforum briefly but his content wasn't enough to justify keeping it up.
Wasn't so much content but we were too retarded to follow how it should be and ended up shitting up everywhere.
Wasn't he about to become labeled a vexatious litigant? Or was he already labeled one in Utah?
AGT lolsuit replies hinted at possibly going after him for that but never did
Did he work out in the polo shirt?
Shouldn't but it sounds like him, he's even worked out in a suit and tie
 
  • Like
Reactions: Drowningman
Pretty bummed we haven't got his news interview video yet, maybe it's taking awhile to put the subtitles together.
During the height of the #metoo thing, he actually made a video accusing Taylor Swift of abuse for ...not being sexual with him.

Unfortunately it seems to be lost media now. Though maybe @Yellow Yam Scam has it, if he's still around here. If anyone has his #metoo video, please upload it.
I saw it when he first posted it and it was peak fucking Russ, certainly one of his funniest moments. He starts it with some kind of weird courtroom roleplay showing off his True and Honest legalese by holding his hand up and declaring something like "I hereby testify that Taylor Alishunn Shwift dishcriminated againshit me" and then goes off on a whole pity me tangent comparing it to the #metoo movement. The best part was his hamfisted attempt at spinning it as one of those viral feel-good stories where the internet comes together to get someone a life saving surgery, a van for a cripple, birthday cards for an old lonely person, etc. He really thought the internet and society at large would see that in the same vein and embark on a crusade to shame Taylor Swift into sucking his cock. Truly one of his greatest moments in my opinion, it'd be a damn shame if it never resurfaces.
 
Last edited:
Wasn't so much content but we were too retarded to follow how it should be and ended up shitting up everywhere

Rusty was always a quality over quantity cow. Although his antics could easily be separated in several catagories:
Lawlsuits
Thots
Hookers and hooker accessories
Muh dishability
Day to day Rusty

I'm certain there are more, but these seem to be the main ones.
 
This is all he has posted on ig thots of late. It's possible he hasn't tagged anyone or anything in his photo posts due to they will suspend you for spamming or other ig violation. I wouldn't be surprised if he got slammed with restrictions on his ig too.( I'm still working on trying to find out the difference in ig & FB violations).
This emoji reply is weird even for him.
View attachment 4909229View attachment 4909233
His userpic, when it's that small, makes him look like he's kneeling on the floor clutching his dick. Which is probably about right for Russ viewing thots' social media.
 
Pretty bummed we haven't got his news interview video yet, maybe it's taking awhile to put the subtitles together.
It's typical of Russtard. Something "big" is on the horizon and he needs to tell everybody about it because nobody pays attention to him then it has all the impact of a wet fart and he moves onto the next thing.
 
Back