Mar-27-2023 - Chris is out of custody

Who posted bail?


  • Total voters
    2,617
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
A lot of retards on YouTube think chris was bailed out by someone. Did someone ever confirm chris bailed himself out via a "promise to pay bailbond" or that heilburg/the court let him out.


Also anyone look into that group home heilburg tried and failed to move chris to?

If memory serves chris could go there on a technicality (he DEFINITELY committed a sex crime BUT hasn't been convicted or accused YET)
 

Attachments

  • HGxqA9T_.jpg_large.jpg
    HGxqA9T_.jpg_large.jpg
    226.2 KB · Views: 15
  • 3kKtLpWn.jpg_large.jpg
    3kKtLpWn.jpg_large.jpg
    152.7 KB · Views: 16
  • bi0aFqK4.jpg_large.jpg
    bi0aFqK4.jpg_large.jpg
    164.3 KB · Views: 17
Last edited:
A lot of retards on YouTube think chris was bailed out by someone. Did someone ever confirm chris bailed himself out via a "promise to pay bailbond" or that heilburg/the court let him out.


Also anyone look into that group home heilburg tried and failed to move chris to?

If memory serves chris could go there on a technicality (he DEFINITELY committed a sex crime BUT hasn't been convicted or accused YET)
stupid question perhaps, but is incest a sex crime? although sex is a factor, it certainly isnt sexual assault in and of itself

i firmly believe Chris did not rape Barb, not legally speaking that is
i think what he did can be considered simply an act of incest, knowing her, she's a very strange woman who often used Chris as a husband replacement in all things BUT sex, it only makes sense that he'd assume it comes in a package deal
lets not forget she used to cling onto him, behave very intimately with him, practically raise him attached to her skirt, and fully accepted his advances, or at the very least didnt seem to resist them- Chris is also has a bad cause of the aut's, and a person kiiinda sooorta sheepishly going "no... ok fine..." is for him the full length of consent, he can't read between the lines, understand unspoken language or body cues.... pin those scrote piercings in me boys, but this is one instance of "she shouldve seen it coming"
 
A lot of retards on YouTube think chris was bailed out by someone. Did someone ever confirm chris bailed himself out via a "promise to pay bailbond" or that heilburg/the court let him out.


Also anyone look into that group home heilburg tried and failed to move chris to?

If memory serves chris could go there on a technicality (he DEFINITELY committed a sex crime BUT hasn't been convicted or accused YET)
Chris is never going to be convicted for this, yes he probably did it but the court is going to need a little bit more than words from a madman with absolutely zero grip on reality and hallucinates his imaginary friends and words from a dementia ridden old woman who probably cant remember her late husbands name.

That's really all there is in terms of "evidence", and it's probably why this case is taking so long because the prosecution is probably stalling for time to get something against chris,.

Reason why he's being let out is probably because this case is going nowhere and they finally found a place to dump chris off at
 
Call me optimistic, but I’m going to suggest that Chris might be silent because he’s been getting treatment/medication for a year and it’s working. Normally, the court can’t force someone to be medicated or undergo treatment; but they have far more leeway to make that a condition of deferral which is technically “optional.”
The way Chris went from sending spergy letters to people to cutting off contact suggests that at some point it got through to him that continuing to engage with internet randos was not in his best interests, He's had quite a lot of time to get used to the absence of that contact now and his lawyer would have drilled into him how high stakes this release period is if he wants to avoid further incarceration.

I'm not sure that Chris can remain silent long term indefinitely, but it's possible he can do so for the short or medium term. iirc, there's been at least one previous period when he retreated from the internet for a while (I want to say it was prior to the fire).
 
stupid question perhaps, but is incest a sex crime? although sex is a factor, it certainly isnt sexual assault in and of itself

i firmly believe Chris did not rape Barb, not legally speaking that is
i think what he did can be considered simply an act of incest, knowing her, she's a very strange woman who often used Chris as a husband replacement in all things BUT sex, it only makes sense that he'd assume it comes in a package deal
lets not forget she used to cling onto him, behave very intimately with him, practically raise him attached to her skirt, and fully accepted his advances, or at the very least didnt seem to resist them- Chris is also has a bad cause of the aut's, and a person kiiinda sooorta sheepishly going "no... ok fine..." is for him the full length of consent, he can't read between the lines, understand unspoken language or body cues.... pin those scrote piercings in me boys, but this is one instance of "she shouldve seen it coming"
I dunno, the maximum sentence in Virginia for incest is 12 months from what I understand so getting a deferral for autism and being kept in jail for over seven months longer than that seems quite extreme if the courts didn’t think it was legally rape.
 
The way Chris went from sending spergy letters to people to cutting off contact suggests that at some point it got through to him that continuing to engage with internet randos was not in his best interests, He's had quite a lot of time to get used to the absence of that contact now and his lawyer would have drilled into him how high stakes this release period is if he wants to avoid further incarceration.
No way Chris ever learned anything. He got tard wrangled.
I dunno, the maximum sentence in Virginia for incest is 12 months from what I understand so getting a deferral for autism and being kept in jail for near 2 years seems quite extreme if the courts didn’t think it was legally rape.
That's the minimum. It's felony 5, which is 1-10 years (though it wobbles with the jury or judge able to lower it to the misdemeanor again).

It was 12 months before they upgraded it to a felony to continue holding him.
 
Chris is never going to be convicted for this, yes he probably did it but the court is going to need a little bit more than words from a madman with absolutely zero grip on reality and hallucinates his imaginary friends and words from a dementia ridden old woman who probably cant remember her late husbands name.

That's really all there is in terms of "evidence",

The court has the rape kit that was done on Barbara that would definitely show injuries/DNA consistent with forcible sexual contact against a body too old and frail to handle it anymore.
 
The court has the rape kit that was done on Barbara that would definitely show injuries/DNA consistent with forcible sexual contact against a body too old and frail to handle it anymore.
Can we really be sure chris forced himself onto barbara? He could have groomed her into it, which wouldn't have been difficult even for chris considering the state of Barbaras mind.
 
Oh I don't know, I guess he could be stoned and conditioned into something resembling normal.

It'd have to be consistent, with hardcore narcotics and Lake Laogai-style sessions, but anything is possible.
 
The court has the rape kit that was done on Barbara that would definitely show injuries/DNA consistent with forcible sexual contact against a body too old and frail to handle it anymore.
We don't know how long after they last had sex that rape kit was done. It could be useless from an evidentiary point of view.
 
Can we really be sure chris forced himself onto barbara? He could have groomed her into it, which wouldn't have been difficult even for chris considering the state of Barbaras mind.
IIRC he literally mentioned that she asked him to stop multiple times when he was doing it. I doubt she ever full on "consented".
 
Funny, I don't think I recall that being part of Chris's tard wrangling.

Consequently, I do recall belt whippings or the threat of a good belt whipping, to be my father's resolution for most things.

I hold down two jobs. I think we may be on to something...

Maybe if Chris had some fine, ass-whooping big brothers, he might have turned out a little differently.

All he had was a psychotic mother and his prehistoric father.
 
The court has the rape kit that was done on Barbara that would definitely show injuries/DNA consistent with forcible sexual contact against a body too old and frail to handle it anymore.
Do we even know that it was even done? As far as I know, you can't do a rape kit on someone against their will. It could be possible that Barb refused it and they just did a general check up?
 
Fair point, he might have done it against her will, but would she have had the ability to try and fight back and made chris end up having to use force to rape her?
If it can be proven she was not of sound mind, then Chris might get charged for rape. Rape is already bad as it is, but your decrepit old mom? Chris is in for a lot of hurt when he goes out.
 
If it can be proven she was not of sound mind, then Chris might get charged for rape. Rape is already bad as it is, but your decrepit old mom? Chris is in for a lot of hurt when he goes out.
I seriously doubt they'd have held him on a misdemeanor for a year, then upped it to a felony, then just given him a deferred adjudication and released him if they were intending to file rape, which has a potential life sentence.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back