Mar-27-2023 - Chris is out of custody

Who posted bail?


  • Total voters
    2,617
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Two orders were added today on his case's page.
View attachment 4966845
I believe Vinelink was pretty clear he was already released, so maybe they just got around to filing the actual order. This might (or might not) just reflect what's already happened. Orders have shown up on this docket after the event they caused before.
Huh. So maybe he hasn't actually been released until today?
Vinelink has said "Released by Court Order" for several days now.
Screenshot 2023-04-03 132020.png
 
We don’t know. One would think he’s legally banned from anywhere Barb is, but Chris gets away with a lot.
The epo was only a temporary restraining order and since he's not being charged with rape I don't see any reason the court would do that. Barb could have filed for a restraining order against him but I don't know if those records are public.
 
You heard the man.
Precisely. Don't bother chris. Some cringey ween will inevitably do that.

All I'm saying is I don't think chris is as "tucked away" in a group/half-way home as people think.

Maybe I'm wrong maybe those places are actually super secure and have armed guards and H.I.P.P.A. type information lockdowns. But to my knowledge the only way chris would be fully removed from society where no one could get at him would be jail or the lunny bin
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Procrastinhater
I believe Vinelink was pretty clear he was already released, so maybe they just got around to filing the actual order. This might (or might not) just reflect what's already happened. Orders have shown up on this docket after the event they caused before.
Indeed, the case page is known for being pretty damn slow at getting updated. It is also unfortunate that it often displays the date the order was added to the page, instead of the date the order actually happened.
However, it's a bit strange that Chris is still noted as "in custody" on the docket, even after today's update.
I also wonder what the "other" pleading/order could be.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Procrastinhater
That geno ending was mystical, if only.

Also how hasn't this regard gotten his hands on a fellow tards cricket welfare phone??? I know that's optimistic but it's Chris.
 
Indeed, the case page is known for being pretty damn slow at getting updated. It is also unfortunate that it often displays the date the order was added to the page, instead of the date the order actually happened.
However, it's a bit strange that Chris is still noted as "in custody" on the docket, even after today's update.
I also wonder what the "other" pleading/order could be.
Vinelink is probably more accurate and up to date, since it's specifically for victims to be notified of the release of inmates. The information also comes directly from the custodial authority.
Could the fact that the docket was updated 3 separate times on the day Vinelink reported Chris was out of custody cast some doubt on this?
Possibly but Vinelink has said he's released on court order for days. That comes straight from the jail. I think they'd know where the guy they've had behind bars for over a year is more than the court would.

Also the public-facing website is probably more out of date than whatever they use internally, as stuff like this is only partially made public.
 
Does anyone know of some random Virginia criminal who served their time and I now released? I’m not confident that these database entries mean what a layman would interpret them as. When Chris went to the state hospital, the wording was something vague like “not currently in our custody.” It could be a similar situation where “release order” is different from walking out the jailhouse door

I checked the only one im aware of off the top of my head where the guy was charged with murder and was found not guilty after a jury trial. He paid bail before the trial, there’s a record of that, but no entry mentioning release from custody
 
Last edited:
Two orders were added today on his case's page.
View attachment 4966845

I really want to know what that means, If others are right and it's no biggie just a judicial delay in updating it fine but I really wonder if he's been released today.

Seeing as how he's still radio silent and is b& from the hoard house, "free" may not be entirely accurate.


If it's only happened today I think we could possibly get updates soon, I'm not holding my breath but it's possible.
 
Edit : No you can't be legally banned from using it at least not in America. It actually used to be possible however, in 2017 the Supreme Court ruled that it's unconstitutional and violates freedom of speech even in cases where the offender was a pedophile and used the internet to commit the crime. However all of this is a moot point anyways, since Chris's crime did not involve the internet. The group home however can restrict his internet usage if they choose to.
The prosecutor and/or Heilberg could easily point out that a lot of Chris' problems stem from the fact that he is terminally online and broadcasts his entire life to it. People online have convinced him of doing the dumbest things imaginable and it could very well be deemed for his safety that he stay off while in the group home. This is of course subject to the group home. I would also like to point out that while the SCOTUS deemed it unconstitutional to ban people from the internet, they are willing to make exceptions and have requested States make more specific laws in regards to banning internet use.
 
Chris took almost a year off after Bob died. I don't know why people say this.
He didn’t though, Chris is far too egocentric to not have himself plastered onto the internet a leaked Imgur hack in 2013 reveals that even in 2012 Chris was still actively posting on Facebook whenever he could in and out of court hearings. It was mundane shit but he couldn’t not bitch about stuff without exploding I think.
I can't help but notice nobody liked or replied to my question of whether anyone thinks Chris and Barbara did some lines of Bob's ashes between lovemaking sessions
because it was unfunny and not worth mentioning, people ignoring your dumb posts means you should use that as an incentive to do better. Otherwise you face further ridicule if you do get mentioned, post better and then you’ll get the respect you want, respect is earned.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back