Ukrainian Defensive War against the Russian Invasion - Mark IV: The Partitioning of Discussion

tl;dr: Hawk system originates from the 60s but has gotten round after round of modernization. Its not 1:1 but compares to the S-300. The systems are shorter ranged than the S-300, but more mobile and faster to deploy; to give an example, the Marine Corps was the last US operator and the replacement was Stingers. It was conceived to move with an armored collumn, so this might make Russian attack helos have to work. And sort of like the S-300 can interoperate with S-400, modern Hawk launchers can be integrated into NASAMS or Patriot batteries.
It's nothing like the S-300, the Russian equivalent of the Hawk is the Buk system.
 
The original post said the encryption was in "Motorola 256-bit encrypted tactical communications systems," which I took to mean something more akin to walkie-talkies than drones. If they're Motorola branded they're probably something a little bit better than Alibaba junk, but yeah, if they were intended for the consumer market, there's a good chance they're using reused keys or keys from a limited pool. That said, a quick search shows that Motorola does make stuff they claim to be military-grade, so who knows. Russia lying or counter-intelling about having this stuff cracked could be a possibility too.
I'm pretty sure the "motorola 256-bit encrypted" is someone spouting off buzz words. Motorola's government service branch is the main manufacturer of US's wireless communications equipment (radios). Motorola Radios were digital not just for walkie talkies, so you could tx/rx data directly. Its possible if its COTS they were modified or flashed/hacked to access the naughty spectrums.

If they are able to get good packet capture for storage/replay they are probably able to decrypt comms in a couple days/hours. Real time would be where I'd be a little sus.

It's nothing like the S-300, the Russian equivalent of the Hawk is the Buk system.
You're right. I was trying to think of something old but still viable.
Though I don't think Buks can integrate in an S-300/400 battery.
 
You're right. I was trying to think of something old but still viable.
Though I don't think Buks can integrate in an S-300/400 battery.
They can integrate with the S-300 with the help of a Polyanda-D4

Unlike the Hawk which has been phased out, the Buk is still receiving upgrades, so both systems are old but the Buk is a bit more viable in it's m3 configuration, and it always was more mobile than the semi-mobile Hawk system.
 
Ukraine's a big country, bad old shit is still pretty useful to cover all that airspace, especially if the west can supply the missiles ad infinitum. I'm guessing for Taiwan this is just an opportunity to upgrade to something newer, given the real fear of Chinaman. Considering there's an obvious interest in keeping Taiwan a thorn in China's side, their burger friends probably gave them an excellent deal on some fancy new AA, with the cost partially written off by taking these old ones and covered by the Ukraine support budget.
 
The Armchair Historian channel did a video on the development of the Ukrainian military since the Soviet fall. They do simple animated videos about historical stuff, not always military-related - like OverSimplified but not comedic. They go over weapons, recruitment and drafting, modernization and anti-corruption programs, and so on. Probably nothing new if you're one of the smarter people in this thread, but I (not being one of those people) learned some things.

 
Regarding the live decryption:
1.png
So it's not that they can do it on general principle, but that they did it at least once (stated by the Ukrainians, perhaps they got the information another way).

How the Ukrainians knew the Russians knew isn't said but later in the document they write this:
2.png
Source: that same report
 
Kharkiv hit by Russian rocket artillery (BM-30 Smerch) firing cluster-munitions, 9 Ukrainians civilians killed.

"We haven't used cluster munitions"
- Putin

Levity break:
 
Last edited:
I'm going to tl;dr here:
It is very unlikely that Ukraine is using military grade aes-256 on its expendable drones. they are probably using Alibaba specials that promise "256 bit encryption" but have simple and reused keys. These are the same radios that russia is using having been embargo'd.
It is also possible these off-the-shelf radios are being used for squad-level coms

The original post said the encryption was in "Motorola 256-bit encrypted tactical communications systems," which I took to mean something more akin to walkie-talkies than drones. If they're Motorola branded they're probably something a little bit better than Alibaba junk, but yeah, if they were intended for the consumer market, there's a good chance they're using reused keys or keys from a limited pool. That said, a quick search shows that Motorola does make stuff they claim to be military-grade, so who knows. Russia lying or counter-intelling about having this stuff cracked could be a possibility too.

I'm pretty sure the "motorola 256-bit encrypted" is someone spouting off buzz words. Motorola's government service branch is the main manufacturer of US's wireless communications equipment (radios). Motorola Radios were digital not just for walkie talkies, so you could tx/rx data directly. Its possible if its COTS they were modified or flashed/hacked to access the naughty spectrums.

If they are able to get good packet capture for storage/replay they are probably able to decrypt comms in a couple days/hours. Real time would be where I'd be a little sus.

So it's not that they can do it on general principle, but that they did it at least once (stated by the Ukrainians, perhaps they got the information another way).
It was actually pretty hard to get info on Ukrainian comms. I was able to pick up this internet archive from the start of the war:

According to this article (which isn't official news, so I'm taking this with a grain of salt) Ukraine's foot soldiers are using Motorola DP2400 for communication. This is a digital device, so they aren't transmitting their voice unfiltered like a ham radio. But my cursory glance of the specs says nothing of encryption, amd the specification of the standard it uses doesn't say one word about encryption either. So maybe Russia was just able to listen to otherwise encoded comms.

And lastly, I wanted to drop this post in here to show that streaming ciphers with strong algorithms can be attacked when the wrong streaming solution is used. https://zachgrace.com/posts/attacking-ecb/
 
BLU-108 anti-tank submunition armor penetration animation:
Local Archive


In case it's not clear, this is an old video from the first days of the invasion.
SSDD

Edit:
 
Last edited:
Kharkiv hit by Russian rocket artillery (BM-30 Smerch) firing cluster-munitions, 9 Ukrainians civilians killed.
Before Kharkiv offensive vatniggers have routinely bombed Kharkiv with cluster munitions, especially Saltivka area. You are encouraged to look up the pictures from it right now. It's like Bakhmut in miniature.

Yet ziggers from the cope thread say that Ukrainians are niggers for requesting cluster munitions.
 
According to this article (which isn't official news, so I'm taking this with a grain of salt) Ukraine's foot soldiers are using Motorola DP2400 for communication. This is a digital device, so they aren't transmitting their voice unfiltered like a ham radio. But my cursory glance of the specs says nothing of encryption, amd the specification of the standard it uses doesn't say one word about encryption either. So maybe Russia was just able to listen to otherwise encoded comms.

Excellent autistic detective work.
I looked at Motorola's site and the DP2400 offers something called "Basic Privacy" with an option for handsets to have "Enchanced Privacy". It looks like this involves scrambling packets over the bandwidth of the selected channel. So no encryption, but dedicated intercept is needed.
tl;dr: Russian OSINT is able to watch cable titty channels.
 
He just updated to WE WUZ NIGGERS MELANODERMITES N SHIEET:

View attachment 5214408

I think he's losing western supporers, which is a good thing.

View attachment 5214413
Post this shit under the name Dugin, and all Western Russophiles will openly suck your dick.
Post this shit as an anon on Deep Thoughts, and you get 100 Autism ratings and the same Russophilic people above telling you to commit unlife.
 
Post this shit under the name Dugin, and all Western Russophiles will openly suck your dick.
Post this shit as an anon on Deep Thoughts, and you get 100 Autism ratings and the same Russophilic people above telling you to commit unlife.
It’s funny how easy it is to understand the inclinations of /pol/ and the Thunderdome.
 
Back