- Joined
- Dec 21, 2015
Can we get a rundown of his actual knowledge of movies again? I'm under the impression that it's either nonexistant or mostly self-effacing, hyerpretentious fuckery.
I'd assume he has seen a lot of movies, considering he's managed to fill at least three or so books with content from his reviews. However, like the NC, he doesn't really have an idea on how to criticize a film properly, and his writing is poor and obviously biased. He's willing to overlook critical flaws in movies solely because of what the movie is tied to (The SMB movie?), and he generally seems to exaggerate or inflate his own attitude about whatever he watches. If he was really that mad about Pixels, I think he would've had a heart-attack by now.
In short, he's a prolific, if casual, movie fan, but his writing is utterly useless as criticism. That's my theory, at least.