To be perfectly honest with you, I almost think your considerable talents are wasted in trying to make sense of the alleged Spectre/Schneider phone call.
Let's assume...
arguendo... that Spectre is telling the truth, Rekieta is telling the truth, or the truth is some amalgamation of the two. Given their past histories when it comes to lying (
especially Spectre, but Nick really isn't too much better these days), I have
serious doubts as to whether any of those scenarios are true, but whatever.
What does any of that
actually get Rekieta?
This whole Spectre phone call thing is seemingly designed to create FUD as to whether Monty actually has a case, to cast doubts on the propriety of Schneider taking Monty's case, and to try and get Nick's fans to hate Schneider and Monty. Meanwhile, Rekieta has done everything possible to bury the fact that he called Monty a child molester. Even going as far as to lie right to Null's face. It's all obfuscatory bullshit.
I don't think it really matters if Schneider hates Rekeita with the heat of a millions suns. To the best of my knowledge, there's no rule that says he has to like Rekieta. That's a requirement Rekieta imposes on others and then he gets mad when people don't suck his dick. It's certainly not a legal requirement.
Am I missing something here?