Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 18.8%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.2%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 91 27.1%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 54 16.1%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 124 36.9%

  • Total voters
    336
Who gives a fuck what Schneider may or may not think about Nick or how much Montagraph is paying him. All that should matter to Nick is whether the guy has a chance at wining. Schneider could be the Devil himself, it just doesn't matter but I suppose acting like a bitchy faggot makes Nick feel like he's winning.

Never mind all that money Schneider isn't being paid Nick, what about you nigga, how much money are you going to piss away on this?
 
Back when I still watched, I'd often see the same bottle over multiple shows. He was rarely visibly plastered by the end, much less starting out obviously reeling like the village drunk in an Irish comedy and then continuing to get more incoherent as it went on. People say he was already licking the bottle like a fucking degenerate at that point, but I don't remember seeing it. If he did it wasn't nonstop to the point you could make a supercut of it minutes long.
Like you say, he wasn't going through bottles that quickly a few years ago, and he wasn't (visibly) holding onto the glass like a baby holds onto a rattler.

He also generally wasn't giving soliloquys to (imagined) people while slurring for hours. Although it feels like he's talking to whomever he's talking about, so it's weird. Tragic? Sure, but Shakespeare, this guy ain't.
 
Nick's explanation this time appears to merge both of these stories. Schneider is still mad about the polo and shorts. But now Nick concedes that he was there to submit the responses to the interrogatories and they were two days late, but he blames the client, saying he initially refused to answer them.

Can’t find it, but in the lawsuit thread I think it was mentioned that the submission of the interrogatories would have been in December so why would he have been wearing shorts in the wintertime in Minnesota? That’s a hell of a heat allergy.

Anyway, despite reading his thread & keeping up on all the online chatter about himself, how is it that Nick still doesn’t know that Monty never did lose a pedo allegations lawsuit? It’s been said to death in this thread & he keeps bringing it up like it bodes well for him. Every time he says it he sounds more retarded.

ETA was Nick wearing normal person shorts or his favored 3-5 inch inseam shorts? If it was the short shorts, a long-standing grudge would be even more understandable. That should be a crime against humanity.
 
Can confirm PC is not Kalea. I have heard both voices in a setting where they had no reason to conceal identity.

Kalea was on Nick's channel for his Un-Banning celebration stream.
OH SHIT! I had forgotten all about her being on Nick's stream! You're right! I should have just said that. No further debooking would have be necessary.

For those who have never heard or seen her before, this is Perception Check:


Forget what I said about my being 99.9998% it's not the same person. It's 100% not the same person. I dunno if Kalea has been on cam before, but the voice is obviously different.

Anyways, I dunno why Cynthia said what she said. If she's gonna peddle crap like that every time she wigs out at people, I'm glad she fucked off. Nobody cares about her spat with Kalea and the weird paranoia that comes with it.
 
Could one of you guys or girls more talented than me with image manipulation, please make the attached photo be more avatar friendly, so that I can use it here.

View attachment 5489948

Not really what you asked for (kinda wordy), but it was fun to make:

Rekieta Reviews.jpg

Rekieta Reviews pfp.jpg
 
Can’t find it, but in the lawsuit thread I think it was mentioned that the submission of the interrogatories would have been in December so why would he have been wearing shorts in the wintertime in Minnesota? That’s a hell of a heat allergy.
December is when Rekieta was replaced as counsel. I have no idea when this incident occurred.

Anyway, despite reading his thread & keeping up on all the online chatter about himself, how is it that Nick still doesn’t know that Monty never did lose a pedo allegations lawsuit? It’s been said to death in this thread & he keeps bringing it up like it bodes well for him. Every time he says it he sounds more retarded.
I mean, he lost the lawsuit, but it was because it was pro se garbage and it was thrown out for procedural reasons that the lawsuit against Rekieta has already cleared, like failure to state a claim and failing to serve the guy properly under CO law. It had nothing to do with the veracity of what was claimed.
 
Jesus, what is going on with his voice in the latest locals stream, why would you even record anything when you sound like that.
Cocaine.
Cynthia has some weird obsession with Kalea. I don't get it. She's a weirdo. I don't think anybody here really cares about Kalea except insofar as Nick acted like a thin-skinned faggot towards her, and the meme that was born out of Cynthia's crazy theories that multiple people are Kalea ("We are all Kale
Not just Kalea. Seems she had a problem with every female.
I am Kalea.
No, you are Faran or a Cynthia sock. But as long as you don't go all weird and shit the place up nobody cares. So stay normal.
Anyways, I dunno why Cynthia said what she said. If she's gonna peddle crap like that every time she wigs out at people, I'm glad she fucked off. Nobody cares about her spat with Kalea and the weird paranoia that comes with it.
Because she is nuts. Could be menopause. Women get all fucked up when they get that.
 
Lets work through this-
To be perfectly honest with you, I almost think your considerable talents are wasted in trying to make sense of the alleged Spectre/Schneider phone call.

Let's assume... arguendo... that Spectre is telling the truth, Rekieta is telling the truth, or the truth is some amalgamation of the two. Given their past histories when it comes to lying (especially Spectre, but Nick really isn't too much better these days), I have serious doubts as to whether any of those scenarios are true, but whatever.

What does any of that actually get Rekieta?

This whole Spectre phone call thing is seemingly designed to create FUD as to whether Monty actually has a case, to cast doubts on the propriety of Schneider taking Monty's case, and to try and get Nick's fans to hate Schneider and Monty. Meanwhile, Rekieta has done everything possible to bury the fact that he called Monty a child molester. Even going as far as to lie right to Null's face. It's all obfuscatory bullshit.

I don't think it really matters if Schneider hates Rekeita with the heat of a millions suns. To the best of my knowledge, there's no rule that says he has to like Rekieta. That's a requirement Rekieta imposes on others and then he gets mad when people don't suck his dick. It's certainly not a legal requirement.

Am I missing something here?
 
Last edited:
Originally there appeared to be two separate stories about what happened at the office.
There is also a third entirely different story where Schiender supposedly hates Nick because Nick made fun of retards.
I still can't come up with a reasonable explanation of why an attorney who doesn't know spectre would talk to Spectre about any of this stuff.
 
I mean, he lost the lawsuit, but it was because it was pro se garbage and it was thrown out for procedural reasons that the lawsuit against Rekieta has already cleared, like failure to state a claim and failing to serve the guy properly under CO law. It had nothing to do with the veracity of what was claimed.

Right. Yet Nick acts like Jake Morphonios called Monty a pedo, was sued by Monty for defamation, & Morphonios won the case based on the merits of the claim. Nick is saying that therefore, he will likewise win his own case. It is bonkers that he doesn’t seem to realize that no, Monty has not been proven in court to be a pedophile or anything like it. It was a pro se filing error that caused Monty to not prevail against Morphonios. Completely different circumstances & it has no bearing on Nick’s case.
 
He should send out an e-mail explaining it, but he has to decide on a mass mailing service
This is such unbelievable cap. You can get a free Google Workspaces trial and BCC 1,000 people a day from a noreply address. I cannot imagine this taking longer than 2 hours, tops.
Better yet, make a Locals post titled URGENT: 5K SUB G(R)IFT, push it out to everyone’s email and have them resubmit their shipping information. That way you only have to send it to the ~150 original subscribers that are still retarded enough to give you money, Nick.

I wonder how many original 5K subs lurk or post in this thread?
 
Not at all, and haven't done for many decades, or longer. It's far more likely to incorporate economic theory than epistemology, and today/at schools like the one Nick attended it's likely straight basic principles, caselaw and clinics/ practical application.

I did suspect I might be showing my age. The place where I studied was philosophy heavy and was really about teaching you how to think. Hardly any caselaw at all. Just the bare minimum to cover the principles.

All that other stuff was really covered under professional training, when you decided whether you were going to be a solicitor or a barrister or what have you. Most of the people on my course had already qualified and were leaving practice for academia.

I can't remember much economic theory at all. I think that whole Rawls/Nozick business was about as close as we got. Again, probably showing my age here. It was a burning topic back in the early 80's.
 
I wonder how many original 5K subs lurk or post in this thread?
There's part of me that wants to get it regardless just as a "back when times were better" momento. But that requires me to give Nick a shipping addresss, or some recipt showing I was a member at the time he promised the gift, and I'm not interested in that.
I wonder if he's gonna require that we be currently paying to get access to the gift, otherwise it's forfeit or some shit. It wouldn't shock me, that's for sure
 
- He claims that Scandinavians do not know how to be happy. They rely on outside people to tell them what opinions to have. If there is this (TOTALLY) hypothetical guy who has helped people and someone else thinks he is bad for swearing in public and looking at women, they will ostracise him for bot upholding Christian ideals.
This had me super fucking confused until the comments made it clear that he was talking about Americans. As a Scandinavian, nothing about this characterization made any kind of sense. You'd be hard pressed to find a culture in which external validation is regarded with less importance than the Scandinavian. Generally, we couldn't give less of a fuck about other peoples' opinions. We tend to stubbornly hold on to our views and nothing pisses us off more than someone who tries to tell us what to think or how to act. Oppositional Defiant Disorder is in our DNA - when my country was occupied by Nazi Germany and they tried to ban flying our national flag, we bred a breed of pigs in our national colors as a "fuck you".

The American preoccupation with their families historical lineage is considered weird and bizarre everywhere outside of America. You're not Scandinavian because your great grandmother arrived on a boat and pooped out some kids. You don't know our language, you have no idea about our culture, you don't know the first thing about our politics - you're just an embarrassing American poser that would be greeted with the same indifference as any other tourist if you were to come here.

Also, we swear a lot in public. That's one of the impressions Americans leave with. The shock of hearing our fucking filthy vocabularies. But it's true that 99% of us would consider Nick Rekieta a disgusting, Balldo-wearing degenerate. You may consider us progressive but we don't take kindly to friends of pedophiles.
 
Back