Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 64 20.9%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.3%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 83 27.1%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 48 15.7%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 107 35.0%

  • Total voters
    306
That's too bad.

Nick's going to flip at Andrew big-dogging him like that though.

This strategy also doesn't work with Nick either. He starts by being passive aggressive and ramps up the aggression slowly until you can't ignore it anymore.
Agreed. However, Andrew posted his response on 11/14/2023, and Nick's divulging of what Nick perceives as embarrassing information about Andrew was on Thanksgiving evening (IIRC). So I'm wondering if Nick saw or heard about Andrew's Locals on 11/14/2023, and his retelling of the story as Andrew's wingman during the Anime Matsuri convention was his response. Andrew has likely seen Elissa's clip or was told about it through someone in his community. So now the question is will he stay quiet. I think he will probably go the path of Sean (Potentially Criminal) and make jabs where he can, but otherwise will not come out overtly swinging.

Personally, I would be horrified and enraged if someone I considered a friend shared anecdotes regarding my sexual interactions with strangers. It was so clearly an attempt to humiliate Andrew. With that being said, I think it's very possible this friendship, or whatever you would call a predominantly online friendship, is done. I find most all of what Rekieta says gross, ultra negative or stupid these days, but the sharing of this anecdote added another layer of despicable. Not because the information was damning - I don't give a shit about who these creators are banging. What made it so despicable was the fact that Nick was actively trying to humiliate Andrew - someone who had white knighted for him in the past and someone he had on his show many times and purported to be a friend. Friends don't air one another's laundry. It wasn't for Nick to tell. In the end, it just made Nick look like an even bigger asshole (again). I hate how Nick throws a bomb in a room and then runs away. What a pussy move and a show that his inability to act like a fucking adult and ignore dumb adversity or commentary is damn near nonexistent, if at all.

I believe that bad family and friends co-sign on your bullshit, and good family and friends call your ass out. Nick doesn't seem to understand that people providing him with even an ounce of input regarding his behavior (that seems to regularly insult his ego) isn't always given for the purpose for dabbing on him. But for whatever reason, he sees any critique as anti-Nick or disloyal. His psychology makes mine look normal.

Yeah, sure Nick - you don't burn bridges. You prefer explosives.

What about all that debt he's dodging? "man of his word" pays his debts. Not fleeing from SEA country to SEA country.

At least according to what was dug up about mindset not too long ago.
I was merely giving the TLDR of the Locals stream and his response. I was just sharing information I found from the mouth of one of the involved parties with the thread.
 
Last edited:
I was surprised by Nick’s revelation that he’s consciously structured his daily caloric intake to allow maximum liquor. I wasn’t surprised he’s doing that, but that he admitted to it while simultaneously claiming he’s just a “social drinker” and not an alcoholic. I would have expected him to be a bit more stealthy, shall we say.

A family member of mine was once very Nick-like in his alcoholism. One year he tried to prove to everyone that he wasn’t a drunk by saying “I’m only going to drink when I’m golfing or grilling out.”

He golfed three times a week that winter and grilled out four times a week. thisisfine.jpg

Nick knows he’ll never be able to stop drinking, so he’s never going to even bother pretending otherwise. But him bragging about how clever his maximum alcohol intake scheme is shows just how detached from reality — and enslaved to a beverage — he’s become.

If only he put half as much thought and effort into his livelihood as he does to his drinking.
What's significantly more amusing is that he claims to not be an alcoholic while consuming the CDC's weekly cutoff for "heavy drinker" daily.

Let me explain, the CDC and NIH have decided that the "standard drink" in the US is 12 fl oz of beer, 8 fl oz of malt liquor, 5 fl oz of wine, or 1.5 fl oz of hard liquor. I've included a handy chart below. The CDC, while not having a medical definition for "alcoholic," does have a definition for "heavy drinker," which is the highest category of drinker the CDC recognizes. In order to qualify to be a "heavy drinker" by CDC standards, a woman must consume 8 or more standard drinks per week, and a man must consume 15 or more standard drinks per week.

Nick heavily prefers whiskey, and the average caloric density of a 1.5 fl oz pour of 80 proof whiskey is 105 kcal. Using the 1300 kcal number he, astoundingly, admitted to, is 12.38 drinks a day. That's fucking drinking, my guys, especially considering he's built like a twink except 30% body fat.

Alcohol_StandardDrink.jpg
 
What's significantly more amusing is that he claims to not be an alcoholic while consuming the CDC's weekly cutoff for "heavy drinker" daily.
Faggot who drinks alone with his internet friends typing at him thinks he’s a “social drinker.”

Ultimately, drinking is a problem not for meeting a specific amount threshold but for what it does to a person and their life. Nick will fixate on amounts and measurements until the end of time, just as long as he doesn’t have to look at what his enslavement to a beverage is doing to his family and other relationships.

He’s a garden variety drunk — nothing special.
 
Ultimately, drinking is a problem not for meeting a specific amount threshold but for what it does to a person and their life
Not really. I actually really dislike this take. It's boozebrain degenerate logic. "I am very functional, it isn't about the AMOUNT, it's about how I HANDLE it!" It sounds very cool and good until you are dying from late stage liver failure, cancer, or you drink yourself into being a diabetic because your pancreas is shot. There is no amount of drinking that is safe, and the damage from heavy drinking is cumulative.
 
I actually really dislike this take.
Maybe I didn’t explain it properly, because I don’t think my point landed.

People try to make drinking about the amount, comparing their drinking to how much others drink and using others’ intake — or some arbitrary amount — as a yardstick for whether or not they have a problem. “So-and-so drinks way more than I do! How can you say I drink too much?”

But there are people who don’t drink every night or even every other night who can’t drink without fucking up their relationships and their lives. It’s not about a specific amount, it’s what it does to you.

Nick just happens to drink a shitload of whiskey and he seems to do it almost every night. Even if he had it in him to cut back (he doesn’t), it would still be causing him these problems. And quitting cold turkey — which, again, he’ll never be able to do — would be even worse. As the saying goes, “What do you get when a horse thief stops drinking? A dry horse thief.” Nick as a dry drunk would be so insufferable that his wife and kids would be begging him to drink.

The enslavement to a beverage is just a symptom of a much deeper problem. Alcoholism is the tip of the iceberg with this degenerate.
 
Nick has “wet brain”, and that’s a good thing.
View attachment 5523771

I feel embarrassed that I've been reading the thread for a year and just had the epiphany that "wetbrain" specifically referred to Wernicke-Korsakoff (which I'm well familiar with).

I thought it was just a generic colloquialism and not disease-specific. Never heard it used that way IRL.

The CDC, while not having a medical definition for "alcoholic," does have a definition for "heavy drinker," which is the highest category of drinker the CDC recognizes. In order to qualify to be a "heavy drinker" by CDC standards, a woman must consume 8 or more standard drinks per week, and a man must consume 15 or more standard drinks per week.

There was a helpful infographic on A&N last week that helped to show the population distribution of weekly alcohol consumption (the A&N version was better, but this was the best I could Google).

imrs.jpeg

A third of the pop never drinks. If you average >2 drinks/week, you are already in the upper third.

There's also a crazy step even from the 80th to 90th percentiles.
 
Last edited:
What about all that debt he's dodging? "man of his word" pays his debts. Not fleeing from SEA country to SEA country.

At least according to what was dug up about mindset not too long ago.
The purpose of my post was to give the TLDR of his Locals video, not to take a stand on whether or not Andrew is a self-declared man of his word.
 
This strategy also doesn't work with Nick either. He starts by being passive aggressive and ramps up the aggression slowly until you can't ignore it anymore.
What Nick doesn't understand is you can always ignore it. Unless Nick is going to start going full Riley and digging up his dead granny to shit in the grave or something.
 
I feel embarrassed that I've bee reading the thread for a year and just had the epiphany that "wetbrain" specifically referred to Wernicke-Korsakoff (which I'm well familiar with).

I thought it was just a generic colloquialism and not disease-specific. Never heard it used that way IRL.
Same. Korsakoff syndrome is something that was talked about in one of my classes, really nasty condition. At its worst your capacity to form new memories is just permanently destroyed, the textbook had an example of a guy who essentially lived his life on a reset every single day because he just couldn't encode anything. Each day he would wake up with no recollection of the previous day, or even that there had been a past one. He wasn't really aware of the passage of time either. The condition's permanent too, once it gets that bad there's really not much to be done besides the theraputic equivalent of life support or pallatative care.

It takes incredible amounts of alcohol to fry your brain so badly that you lose the ability to mark down anything new, but if anyone's on their way there it's Nick. Even less severe cases are still significant, irreversible brain damage. Kinda morbid looking at this now given how for so long part of his gimmick was "haha funny drunk lawyer man yell at internet" and that was all well and good and jokey but then fast track to the present and this thread is wondering how close he is to an irrevocably life ruining predicament from all that alcohol.
 
Each day he would wake up with no recollection of the previous day, or even that there had been a past one. He wasn't really aware of the passage of time either.
I saw a documentary about it, and one of the guys literally couldn't remember a few minutes in the past. His wife would go out of the room and come back in and he'd act like he hadn't seen her in days. He could still play the piano though.
 
Back