hbomberguy / Harry "Harris" Brewis / Slazenger Rapemachine Whiteshaf - "Rational" SJW, former SA goon/LPer, sexual harassment apologist, raised $350K+ for child abuse cult

[Safir]

Stealing kahntent for your youtube video is scummy. I don't know if it's "legal" or not, like 80% of the "tech" "economy" is theft. But it's scummy. If you're going to adapt an article, pay the fucking OP.

Other than that --
to quote a wamen on xitter,

I refuse to learn about streamer or YouTuber drama so whenever I see it I just see “omg I knew Yoyo was biphobic after that stream they did with Bitzy and Snoorf but this is new I expected this from Poogy but not from Gleet “

(I don't normally threadshit in the featured, but youtubing threads are impenetrable. Most cow threads bring a normie up to speed on whatever the cow is into, be it rasslin', or Thomas the Tank Engine, or genital mutilation. With youtubers, you've got to be a bit pozzed yourself.)

 

[Null]

Absolutely wild how you will say "Copyright is bad, if you can't make money off of something you deserve to have it stolen" and then mald like a faggot over someone doing what is essentially the same thing because some balding British breadtuber told you it is heccin' bad, and now stealing someone's intellectual property is bad. Or something, you kind of changed gears to complain about how KiwiFarms sucks now because nobody else noticed anything about Somerton but you... When @BestFriendsAnimalSociety already did.

Copyright is bullshit and my opinion of this is informed by its broken legal framework. The way that copyright is implemented in the United States necessarily precludes legitimate uses by default. The way the DMCA is written has allowed a Canadian woman to hire a Greek man without a right to practice law in any country to try and compel an American company (Google) to hide relevant search results of the Kiwi Farms worldwide, despite my users having used the works fairly to begin with. There is no opinion one can form about that sentence is except that it is total bullshit.

However, morally and ethically speaking, taking a writer's work and narrating it to make money without even acknowledging the original author is obviously wrong. Even if you want to say he should be allowed to do that without compensating the original author, and perhaps he should, there is no reasonable excuse for not acknowledging the author except to hide that you copied his work. (Edit: And there is a case to be made that IH felt compelled to not credit the original author because that author would then be notified of the infringement and feel compelled/entitled to file a takedown notice or sue, which would not be an issue if copyright was not as it is.)

Also, eat shit you petulant whinging queer.

 

[Maniacal Foreigner]

Hbomberguy is the definition of the "Heartbreaking: The worst person you know just made a great point" meme

 

[WelfareNiggerQueen]

Was IH supposed to make a big apology video and beg for forgiveness and start crying or something

Yes.

 

[Henri Barbusse]

I'll stan IH any day of the week but I also consider voicing and animating an article to be transformative enough that I'd give a full pass regardless of stan level.

Voicing and animating the article doesn't make it not plagiarism. The lack of using the article's text verbatim without citing a source is what makes it plagiarism. But since it was probably a fuck up from IH's researchers and the reupload actually cites its sources and the issue situation is already resolved, this is 100% just hbomber taking a swing at someone he doesn't like with the most plausible justification he could find.

 

[Anti Snigger]

Josh we know you're mad about people reading KF threads on youtube, it's okay to just say that, I get it

 

[BlackDragoons]

Voicing and animating the article doesn't make it not plagiarism. The lack of using the article's text verbatim without citing a source is what makes it plagiarism. But since it was probably a fuck up from IH's researchers and the reupload actually cites its sources and the issue situation is already resolved, this is 100% just hbomber taking a swing at someone he doesn't like with the most plausible justification he could find.

Pretty much this. I think the only reason IH was in the video was because he did not like him.

 

[Saddam Hussain Obama]

Yeah but that's fucking gay.

So much of Internet content is these lazy shithead aggregators that just take other people's pictures, videos, articles, and social media posts, then just reposting them. Almost always, the context is neutered and the identities scrubbed. Half the time they even remove dates, so you can't notice the thing you're supposed to be angry at happened literally 10 years ago.

YouTube, TikTok, Facebook, and Xitter are all competitors competing for attention. It really doesn't benefit them to be proactive about large channels on their platforms wholesale stealing people's shit. A considerable amount of money changing hands from Facebook Ads to "meme channels" is literally just for going to YouTube, downloading a video, and reuploading it to a new audience (existing, in legal terms, in the same reserved market).

And as someone who doesn't like copyright as a concept I still find this aggravating because of how far out of the way these people go to make sure you CANNOT FIND the original source, even when you want to. I agree with hbomberguy that this is a symptom of guilt. These people know what they're doing is wrong and instead of not doing it they just choose to cover their tracks better.

Even xQc, who people point and gawk at as being the king of copyright theft, does not infringe as much as these people do. He is playing videos with source information on screen from the perspective of an average viewer. If he watches something you think is funny, you can find it on your own easily. The information and content laundering building careers across the Internet is done through deceit and people with merit, creativity, and work ethic are left behind when they don't have the built-in audience to benefit from selling to.

It's quite frankly fucking bullshit.

so whats your solution to it?

 

[Fluoxetine Man]

Is the "A measured response" thing normally part of his video titles or is that an example of MauLer continuing to live in his head rent free?

It was his standard modus operandi for a while.

 

[Mango Cobra]

Also, eat shit you petulant whinging queer.

You'd know this if you bothered to look into it beyond just swallowing whatever soyslop the Balding British Breadtuber told you to in the video, but IH already got copyright struck on it months ago, took the video down, and reuploaded it giving credit to the guy as well as making changes that were requested by the guy. hbomberguy is a faggot stirring up dead drama from months ago, and you fell for it because you are the quintessential niggercattle who just accepts what you are told without any thought.

Also, if you want to talk about "petulant whinging queers" maybe you could address how you go into the Woman Hate Thread to stir shit, and then cry like a faggot about "Muh mentions" when people reply to your shit posts, before spite-banning people for replying to you, because apparently you are the only person who can expect to go into a thread, act like a faggot, and then NOT be replied to.

 

[Henri Barbusse]

Copyright is bullshit and my opinion of this is informed by its broken legal framework. The way that copyright is implemented in the United States necessarily precludes legitimate uses by default. The way the DMCA is written has allowed a Canadian woman to hire a Greek man without a right to practice law in any country to try and compel an American company (Google) to hide relevant search results of the Kiwi Farms worldwide, despite my users having used the works fairly to begin with. There is no opinion one can form about that sentence is except that it is total bullshit.

However, morally and ethically speaking, taking a writer's work and narrating it to make money without even acknowledging the original author is obviously wrong. Even if you want to say he should be allowed to do that without compensating the original author, and perhaps he should, there is no reasonable excuse for not acknowledging the author except to hide that you copied his work. (Edit: And there is a case to be made that IH felt compelled to not credit the original author because that author would then be notified of the infringement and feel compelled/entitled to file a takedown notice or sue, which would not be an issue if copyright was not as it is.)

Also, eat shit you petulant whinging queer.

Intellectual property theft is a legal issue and current copyright laws are retarded, bullshit, and, dare I say it, evil.

Plagiarism is a moral issue and in practical terms, it makes it harder to find original sources of information and claims. You can plagiarize without infringing on copyright. If you take the text of Wuthering Heights, put your name on it and claim you wrote it, you're a plagiarist even if the work itself is public domain.

Obviously, for a forum that documents retards on the internet, not citing sources should be a big deal.

Hbomberguy is the definition of the "Heartbreaking: The worst person you know just made a great point" meme

More like "Heartbreaking: The worst person you know accidentally arrived at the correct conclusion through the most erroneous means possible."

 

[QwahlityKahntent]

either watch some of the video or read some of the thread before leaving a reply.

no. i just came here to say hbomberguy is a faggot and literal pedophile and i hope he dies

 

[Tablet County]

It was his standard modus operandi for a while.
View attachment 5540382

Those videos all came out after MauLer's day-long, multi-part criticism of his shitty Dark Souls 2 video, which says to me that he's still malding over it. What a loser.

However, morally and ethically speaking, taking a writer's work and narrating it to make money without even acknowledging the original author is obviously wrong. Even if you want to say he should be allowed to do that without compensating the original author, and perhaps he should, there is no reasonable excuse for not acknowledging the author except to hide that you copied his work. (Edit: And there is a case to be made that IH felt compelled to not credit the original author because that author would then be notified of the infringement and feel compelled/entitled to file a takedown notice or sue, which would not be an issue if copyright was not as it is.)

Also, eat shit you petulant whinging queer.

I agree with you, especially on the whinging queer part. That said seeing as IH and the copyright holder already settled the matter, I wouldn't say it's as big of a problem as it's made out to be. That IH did it in the first place puts his integrity into question and speaks to a general decay in the quality of his videos, but if it were any other youtuber (say, TheActMan) he would've made an entire video and several social media posts about his video getting taken down. Ozzy history man at least handled it like an adult, which says to me that he's not a complete subhuman.

 

[LinkinParkxNaruto[AMV]]

He regurgitated the article verbatim. He just straight out made a voiceover of it with fancy animations

At least he did the funny animations. Turkey tom literally just reads threads from this site and sits back to collect the money.

 

[Null]

You'd know this

I did know this and it doesn't change he tried to get away with it and got caught. You are a dumb faggot and you should feel bad about being both dumb and a faggot.

 

[Saddam Hussain Obama]

i know im putting my account on the line replying to this but fuck it null you in your own words said you hope artists starve and that copyright is fucking bullshit but now all of a sudden you changed view and are sperging out at any one who points this out

 

[Blacklight]

Copyright is bullshit and my opinion of this is informed by its broken legal framework. The way that copyright is implemented in the United States necessarily precludes legitimate uses by default. The way the DMCA is written has allowed a Canadian woman to hire a Greek man without a right to practice law in any country to try and compel an American company (Google) to hide relevant search results of the Kiwi Farms worldwide, despite my users having used the works fairly to begin with. There is no opinion one can form about that sentence is except that it is total bullshit.

However, morally and ethically speaking, taking a writer's work and narrating it to make money without even acknowledging the original author is obviously wrong. Even if you want to say he should be allowed to do that without compensating the original author, and perhaps he should, there is no reasonable excuse for not acknowledging the author except to hide that you copied his work. (Edit: And there is a case to be made that IH felt compelled to not credit the original author because that author would then be notified of the infringement and feel compelled/entitled to file a takedown notice or sue, which would not be an issue if copyright was not as it is.)

Also, eat shit you petulant whinging queer.

And then IH took the video down, and gave proper credit? What else do you want him to do?

 

[Born in Summer]

And then IH took the video down, and gave proper credit? What else do you want him to do?

He wants him to give the guy money for using his article for a big portion of the video.

 

[johnny johnny yes papa]

i might just be retarded but i fail to see the issue with IH and the cave video. he handled whatever issue there was behind the scenes. he changed whatever needed to be changed to make the copyright owner happy so why does it matter. was IH supposed to make a big apology video and beg for forgiveness and start crying or something? i just fail the see the issue here.

that aside my only other issue with the video was hbomb himself he just comes off like he is talking down to you the whole time. others have said it but sooner or later someone is going to make this style of video about him and i am curious how he will handle it.

Leftists can't just call you a nigger or faggot so their only other avenue of approach is trying to act holier than thou.

 

[Half Empty]

Never heard of this guy before, but YouTube keeps recommending this video to me.

The best part was when hbomberguy plagiarized a smaller Youtuber's AVGN video in the AVGN segment of his YouTube video about plagiarism on YouTube:

Compare with

Obviously this isn't actually plagiarism, every conceivable angle of the AVGN/Screen Wave drama has been discussed and memed to death, it's a topic that literally can not have anything new said about it.
However the above example could still be argued as plagiarism (by retards.) It could be said that Harry just showed "Rental Reviews" on screen rather than read it off script like Dylan then slightly reworded Dylan's observation.
I know it's a stretch but when I squint my eyes and tilt my head it seems like plagiarism in a video about plagiarism... which is funny.

Shitpost aside, don't you just know that people are going to go out of their way to find comparisons like this? I feel like people will find comparisons that are equally as dubious as my example just to clown on Harry because he's kind of a smarmy prick. I mean Dylan's "Downfall of AVGN" video alone is full of similarly worded sentiments to what Harry said in his AVGN segment. There's lots of material out there to mine for gotchas as Harry's 5 hour long video covers several topics and offends just as many parasocial relationships. I feel like there's a shitstorm 'a comin on the heels of this but maybe I'm just retarded.