hbomberguy / Harry "Harris" Brewis / Slazenger Rapemachine Whiteshaf - "Rational" SJW, former SA goon/LPer, sexual harassment apologist, raised $350K+ for child abuse cult

[Smar Mijou]

And as someone who doesn't like copyright as a concept I still find this aggravating because of how far out of the way these people go to make sure you CANNOT FIND the original source, even when you want to. I agree with hbomberguy that this is a symptom of guilt. These people know what they're doing is wrong and instead of not doing it they just choose to cover their tracks better.

Even xQc, who people point and gawk at as being the king of copyright theft, does not infringe as much as these people do. He is playing videos with source information on screen from the perspective of an average viewer. If he watches something you think is funny, you can find it on your own easily. The information and content laundering building careers across the Internet is done through deceit and people with merit, creativity, and work ethic are left behind when they don't have the built-in audience to benefit from selling to.

It's quite frankly fucking bullshit.

Despite what you say, I don't think you actually disagree with copyright as it was originally intended, simply because of other comments I've seen you make on the forum. Now, the distorted and perverse monstrosity, especially in the US that is modern IP/copyright law, I agree is completely fucking bullshit and goes against the original intended purpose. And the fact that copyright trolls and the DMCA abusers will get videos flagged for even a couple of seconds of incidental background music in videos is completely asinine.

Spoiler: Copyright sperg enclosed

Disney especially being the most egregious example of abusing and manipulating law. They've benefitted from co-opting public domain literature and stories for decades, only to bribe their way into locking it up afterwards behind their IP copyright protection. It's gotten so bad with Disney that they've sued a Japanese bakery for having a logo that was 3 circles, and they've tried to prevent Deadmau5 from trademarking his logo, because apparently the public are idiots and they think all caricatures of a mouse  MUST be Mickey Mouse... It's just as well though, because come January 1, 2024 Disney FINALLY loses their copyright on the original "Steamboat Willie" Mickey Mouse, 95 years after the original creation date. This is of course assuming they don't pour a few million bucks in "campaign donations" into the proper pockets before then to rush through yet again another emergency copyright law extension. If it were up to Disney, they'd have every single IP locked up as their own until a week after the heat death of the universe.

Spoiler

Man, between Stephen Crowder, illuminaughti, Boogie, nickisnotgreen, The Completionist, the whole react drama with xQc, Hasan and other reactions to the Israel-Gaza War, and now this. 2023 has been quite a wild ride in exposing to the masses YTers are no better than celebrities and mainstream entertainment we the internet has come to despise.

Not against you personally, but LMAO to anyone who thinks highly of any of these Jewtuber or other online "personalities", regardless of their political stripe. They're all less than Z-list actors and grifters who are only interested in pushing their own brand, shilling for sheckels and/or pushing a narrative. They're no more "relatable" or closer to being your friend than say, Tom Cruise, or Taylor Swift. Just because you can throw a few bucks at a Cameo or a Patreon and get a quick pre-recorded response or pay for a photo at some convention, doesn't mean that they're on a first-name basis with you. These people are doing it for the cash, plain and simple. I can't fault them for hustle, because everyone has to make a living, but there's a reason you don't see Tom Cruise, (insert famous nigger here), or a Kardashian slumming it at a con or pitching their Cameoz outside of meticulously structured media and PR appearances. No, it's always D-lidt character actors, voice over artists who you couldn't pick out of a police lineup, and a smattering of out of work typecast Harry Potter actors. And they've ALWAYS been this way. From the minute that YouTube monetization was a thing, it lost it's authenticity and became just another way to sell you shit. Sure, you can still find some informative stuff, if you're looking to fix an obscure problem with a niche hobby or whatever, but now you have to sift through algorithm-tainted bullshit, and try to avoid the "creators" who are just thinly disguised pitchman trying to get you to [CONSUME PRODUCT]

 

[Null]

Making a timeline of a real event does not grant you copyright on the event.

He plagiarized the article word for word.

New years resolution: Stop featuring anything tangentially related to politics on the front page.

This is a lolcow thread.

I'd have to imagine he's fine with the reuploaded version, given he didn't just take it down again

I'm sure, because it's inferior and removes all the plagiarized work. My point is that he should have just paid the guy he stole from instead of doing this lazy, cheap, shifty bullshit. If he had done what was the most correct, he would have the original video up.

 

[Male Idiot]

Nobody noticed this because KF has become complacent, lazy, stupid, and more dedicated to A&N tardrages over politics rather than funny lolcow content. The queer movie critic who half of this video was dedicated to has DFE'd. I've only heard of this because of a guy who sent me an email, who should definitely join the forum.

View attachment 5540058
View attachment 5540056

He also said something on Patreon.

---

https://kemono.su/patreon/user/11472149/post/93982135

https://archive.is/wip/Rk162

Firstly, I would like to thank all of you for supporting me in the first place.

However, it seems as if this channel has come under target from a significantly larger creator than myself and Nick. I know the majority of you were around last year when these accusations were first brought up; I have spoken to many of you privately and in live streams to explain the situation in detail. I am shocked to see that I was worth seemingly two hours of a four-hour video — especially when all of these issues have been discussed before one year ago today. Especially since there was nothing new brought up in this video.

If you have any concerns about these issues, please message me and I will answer all of your questions in detail.

Again, I am so grateful for your support. I love you all, and thank you.

James

Not all cows are liked by everyone.

 

[ScatmansWorld]

This is a lolcow thread.

Null be honest with yourself, nowadays at least half of all lowcows are politispergs or have a thread made about them for politisperg reasons. The lowcow of this thread in question got noticed by OP from making a Sargon of Akkad response video, and is still widely known for streaming DK64 one time to donate to a trans advocacy group. There still exist other lowcows who don't touch the politisperg/grift wars poop that you could feature instead.

 

[Getting Sentimental]

He plagiarized the article word for word.


This is a lolcow thread.


I'm sure, because it's inferior and removes all the plagiarized work. My point is that he should have just paid the guy he stole from instead of doing this lazy, cheap, shifty bullshit. If he had done what was the most correct, he would have the original video up.

The "guy" he stole it from is a content farm called mental floss.

IH videos are made by a team of people, its not at all unlikely that this is an AVGN situation where a editor ctrl V + ctrl C'd the original article, and IH himself read the script none the wiser.

The fact that the takedown was done by the company mental floss and not the author itself suggests that they were the ones taking issue with it, even in your hypothetical scenario the original author has probably already been compensated for his work by mental floss, and all the money would be going to mental floss, the current owner of the work.

I also doubt this company would let the original video slide, considering after discussion the conclusion was to redo the video rather than not cite it on the original video.

You're making alot of assumptions based on information you don't know, coming from someone with an axe to grind, who sandwiched his IH section in between two sections of actual serial plagiarists while making jokes about a content thief he's friends with.

 

[Null]

The "guy" he stole it from is a content farm called mental floss.

ok

IH videos are made by a team of people, its not at all unlikely that this is an AVGN situation where a editor ctrl V + ctrl C'd the original article, and IH himself read the script none the wiser.

why are you making excuses for this? what is your motivation? explain to me your logic.

Null be honest with yourself, nowadays at least half of all lowcows are politispergs or have a thread made about them for politisperg reasons. The lowcow of this thread in question got noticed by OP from making a Sargon of Akkad response video, and is still widely known for streaming DK64 one time to donate to a trans advocacy group. There still exist other lowcows who don't touch the politisperg/grift wars poop that you could feature instead.

Shouldn't have to work around other people's mental illness. We used to be able to just laugh at retards.

Not all cows are liked by everyone.

Then don't post in it??? What the fuck is the point of this message?

If people didn't reply to featured threads they absolutely did not care about at all, it would improve the quality of the site. To the point where not allowing people to post in a featured thread they've never posted in prior to it being featured is something that's on my to-do list for a forum rewrite.

 

[Haramburger]

This 4-hour video and the fuzzy peanut who made it are so interesting to talk about it's getting hundreds of replies on 4chan's /tv/ and /v/ boards despite not being a movie or video game. Accept that people find this drama interesting.

 

[Getting Sentimental]

why are you making excuses for this? what is your motivation? explain to me your logic.

I'm not making excuses for it, and neither is IH considering he re-did the section of the video after the copyright strike, and as of now it seems the company that did the strike has no issues with the current upload. It seems like people are getting mad over a resolved situation and you're just mad it wasn't done to your own specific satisfaction where the original owner was compensated monetarily.

 

[Musashi's Son]

Here is hbomb admitting he was part of the METOKUR troll group:

https://archive.is/6tjAs#selection-173.0-173.225

Here is one example of the things he did when he was in METOKUR:

https://archive.is/4kqPp#selection-6103.42-6107.36

(WARNING: The ED article has NSFW images)

 

[wtfNeedSignUp]

He plagiarized the article word for word.

And? Changing the wording wouldn't have mattered. It's (assumingly) an objective recounting of a real world event that probably also partially copied word for word its own sources.

If it was fiction, or used very colored language then there might have been a case here. But it's very matter of fact and plain.

 

[Null]

I'm not making excuses for it, and neither is IH considering he re-did the section of the video after the copyright strike, and as of now it seems the company that did the strike has no issues with the current upload. It seems like people are getting mad over a resolved situation and you're just mad it wasn't done to your own specific satisfaction where the original owner was compensated monetarily.

Correct, because he stole first, then made his money, and then only after being caught did he take it down and do what he should have done to begin with: use his own language to produce his video. This is an amoral behavior. Pretending otherwise means you choke on dick.

In civil law, there is a concept called Conversion. If you take something from somebody and use it to create profit, under common law, you actually do owe them the gains from your misuse of their property.

And? Changing the wording wouldn't have mattered. It's (assumingly) an objective recounting of a real world event that probably also partially copied word for word its own sources.

If you had watched the video (too much to ask for of retards), you'd have noticed that the new version was inferior. IH didn't just steal a timeline of events. He borrowed precise, poetic language which invoked strong emotions and that was noticeably absent in the redraft, to the point where hbomberguy could find comments demonstrating that people missed the better written original.

 

[Getting Sentimental]

Correct, because he stole first, then made his money, and then only after being caught did he take it down and do what he should have done to begin with: use his own language to produce his video.

In civil law, there is a concept called Conversion. If you take something from somebody and use it to create profit, under common law, you actually do owe them the gains from your misuse of their property.

Again, this situation was resolved with the current owner of the copyright to their satisfaction, we don't know the details of that, for all you know they could've been paid monetarily with the money the video made. As of now you're just getting mad at the Internet Historian on behalf of a company who is no longer mad at the Internet Historian.

 

[Articles and Nudes]

Where are you getting the idea IH personally stole the text and used it, knowing it was plagiarised?

 

[Null]

Again, this situation was resolved with the current owner of the copyright to their satisfaction, we don't know the details of that, for all you know they could've been paid monetarily with the money the video made. As of now you're just getting mad at the Internet Historian on behalf of a company who is no longer mad at the Internet Historian.

Answered this in the next paragraph which you did not address. He already made his money off the video going viral. Fixing it months after the fact does not undo the possible conversion.

You actually don't know if this company or the individuals involved are OK with this arrangement. How could they be? All you know is that they don't have standing to copyright claim the new video.

Where are you getting the idea IH personally stole the text and used it, knowing it was plagiarised?

It's his money so yes I will.

 

[reptile101]

Why is null dick riding a breadtube faggot who's a confirmed lolcow so hard

At worst ih copied an article than worked it out behind closed doors

If ih makes a video flogging himself and going over every detail he did to make it right will null stop dick riding faggots?

 

[Null]

Why is null dick riding a breadtube faggot who's a confirmed lolcow so hard

He made a good point and too many retards are just going to ignore his good point because they literally cannot put aside personal opinions of the people involved long enough to be objective. Old Kiwi Farms probably could have.

 

[Top Skink]

>IH may have stolen someone else's hard work and made money with it, and then did his best to hide that fact, showing he himself thought he was doing something immoral, but I like his content...
>Ah, it was exposed by a breadtuber and anyway why doesn't he make videos on bigger problems? He hasn't even criticized literally everyone else who does anything wrong on the entire internet first either.
>Phew, for a second I thought I had to engage with information that makes me uncomfortable.

I don't care about plagiarism in real life let alone for shitty meme youtube videos, I have frequently committed plagiarism and so has everyone else, journalists are not people and I explicitly support actions that disenfranchise them, the DMCA is evil, and anyone pretending that they do care about citing sources for youtube videos is either a mentally retarded pearl clutcher or pretending to care to use it as an attack vector
the worst part about that hole video is the video itself, IH fell off when his videos stopped being about, uh, internet history, to the point now where his fancy videos are outright bad and, ironically, are very badly informed

not to mention socialists and communists do not believe in rights of intellectual property, and as they so frequently claim when acting against their espoused principles, 'no ethical consumption exists under capitalism', so attacks on ethics of consumption are inherently bad-faith and only meant as a mindless attack against opposition.
source: i made it up, cope, nigger, sneed, etc.,

Crediting on the reupload doesn't make it not stealing. You wouldn't want a person of socio-economics to steal your bike, even if he paints your name on it to give credit.

 

[Articles and Nudes]

It's his money so yes I will.

You will...what? Throw another bitch fit to avoid answering a direct question about where you're getting your ideas from?

 

[Null]

You will...what? Throw another bitch fit to avoid answering a direct question about where you're getting your ideas from?

There were things that IH could have done to make this right that involved direct compensation which he chose not to pursue in favor of pocketing the money made from stealing someone else's work. If IH had compensated these authors for their work, he would have the original video up. He redid parts of the video to avoid paying anyone from the profit he made using someone else's work.

 

[reptile101]

He made a good point and too many retards are just going to ignore his good point because they literally cannot put aside personal opinions of the people involved long enough to be objective. Old Kiwi Farms probably could have.

I mean what good point though

Literally worst case scenario a YouTuber copied an article

There are too YouTubers and streamers who just watch whole videos without adding a word pushing shit out daily

Ok if ih purposely copied an article and then edited to make sure the author couldn't copyright. Ok dick move, that's about it