You fucked yourself in less than two lines.
>Let them cough all over you, see if you don't get sick
>Yes some poeple won't get sick
>Must be that MY belief is correct and his CLEARLY cannot be.
Sometimes a nuclear bomb fizzles out, clearly this means nuclear energy is totally fake and made up by the science Jews. If every single person exposed to the influenza virus gets influenza or otherwise has antibodies against influenza in their system, and this influenza virus can be identified under a microscope with junk scraped from a person and then cultured, and this culture can be injected into someone else, that sounds like pretty good evidence this little particle is what gets people sick.
You argue like some retarded faggot on reddit. All bluster and smug dismissal with no substance. Appeal to perceived authority and concensus and total failure to refute the sources he cites or prove your case. If you have nothing, why are you continuing to rail against him? Are you personally injured he doesn't believe in your dogmas or are you desperate for updoots and a feeling of being On The Right Side Of Xirstory® ?
His claim was "viruses totes not real" and I gave a simple example of how he is wrong. BTW care to demonstrate how rain is not caused by winged elephants taking a piss on us from the sky? I'm using the exact same logic our flat earther AIDS man here is using.
The link he provided isn't even conclusive. Really, the language is this same old, "the symptoms are consistent with" and they never call it a spade.
Because the practice is fucked. No two doctors agree on anything fundamental anymore because they know too many variables escape their purview.
And, yet, whenever you bring this to term online, all the non-experts who saw CGI videos of what viruses supposedly do will tell you life's greatest mysteries were solved in the last century, science did it, and only fools will question it.
It's pure dogma.
Riiiiiiiiiiight, and some guy who makes Rumble videos and claims to have overturned 100+ years of scientific discoveries is clearly the one worth listening to instead of assessing every claim on its own basis. If Dr. Bam Sailey says that geology is fake and Earth is hollow and volcanoes are actually smokestacks for where the dwarves and their pet dragons are building mountains, and some internet rando who believes Dr. Bam Sailey says that it's a massive conspiracy and isn't fair no one listens to him, I'm going to assume that nobody listens to him for a very good reason.
One has only to look at the vaccines that have been manufactured in the last 4 years to realize this, but somehow it's this ludicrous concept that the very field that birthed these vaccines is also full of shit? Okay, then.
So where's all the smallpox these days? Or polio for that matter. Due to mass vaccination campaigns using vaccines that actually work, there has not been a single recorded case of the former illness anywhere in the world and the latter illness is pretty limited to abject shitholes and gimmegrants emigrating from there. Polio is so rare you're more likely to get the virus because of poorly storied vaccines. Based on your theory of spontaneous generation, something that matches the symptoms of these diseases should still exist, but somehow they don't.
Like virologists do all the time? Redefining isolation and purification, ignoring observable facts here and there, inserting their assumptions here and there, without need of proof (why even mention controls at this point), without sound methodologies or without any real want to engage in the scientific method. Whenever you post it's from a place of wild assumption that proves you haven't taken any time to investigate what I'm saying in any serious capacity. Like you said yourself, you're not willing to engage seriously, so I'm not gonna waste my time with you any further. I'd rather talk to the nearest wall, I'll probably get a more productive and interesting conversation.
Virology is consistently rooted in the scientific method because the claims virologists make are repeatible and reproducible. If they weren't, then you'd probably be dead of the smallpox-totally-not-virus. You clearly refuse to engage with the actual claims virology makes (hence why you don't know what the term "isolate" means in a medical context) and instead interpret it through the lens of a random loon on the internet because you
want to believe that.
Look, it's okay to believe you've discovered hidden truth and are smarter than the rest of us for believing us, but you shouldn't be surprised when you get called a brainlet for believing silly things.
