Nick's parents. They probably covered the basic necessities--or made up shortfalls. I know someone who fell on hard times, and their parents ended up helping them pay for groceries and utilities. I could tell it really bothered the man to have to go to his parents every month, and he stopped as soon as he could get back on his feet.
Perhaps something similar nursed resentment in Nick?
I think that Nick living in poverty is a lie, in one of two manners.
1) Nick is just blatantly lying about having money issues, his mummy and daddy gave him a blank check whilst he was studying his (multiple) degrees. Nick wants to paint himself as a self-made man so that he is that much more righteous to look down on the ordinary plebs for not living his lifestyle and "fucking in hot tubs". Pretty similar to his larp about growing up in the only part of Texas to still exist in the Jim Crow era and how it was a real struggle on dem streets mayn.
2) Nick did have financial restricitons during his time at college, but they are completely overblown. Poor little Nick might not've been able to buy a $50 bottle of Whisky every single day, or he may not have been able to buy every single warhammer model or unit that he wanted in a month. Far from poverty in the eyes of a rational human being, living in the gutter for our silver spoon princess Nick.
--------
I'll use this post about Nick and education to bring up two thing he said in his rant about Hawking. Hawking is a chomo bastard but that doesn't mean Nick is correct.
"Lots of people have way more than two doctorates" - Patently false and mind boggling. A PhD takes about 8-9 years to earn in the UK, starting as an undergrad, doing a masters and then the PhD itself, clearly a major investment of time and effort, regardless of what field you work in. As these concepts are anathema to The Balldo, he wants to diminish their importance and any rewards one can gain from their application.
The second point is when he is ranting about Hawking writing about Human interaction. There's so much to unpack there but I'll focus on his hypocrisy. Nick describes how Hawking is unfit to talk about human interaction because he is a "rich, elite, over-educated, academic", as he lounges in his hot tub. Needless to say, any points about the first two adjectives are self apparent if you have a passing familiarity with Nick.
"Over-educated" - Nick has at least two degrees and is a (
Non-Practising) lawyer, a profession that has always been regarded as being very prestigious due to the academic rigour that is associated with gaining the right to study, let alone qualify, as a lawyer.
"Academic" - This is partially Nick trying to paint himself as the common man, railing against an out of touch elite, and partially a cope because Nick's own academic career is littered with failure and underachievement because he had no drive to suceed, becuase, at the end of the day, mummy and daddy could always just afford to bail him out and pay for his kids.