- Joined
- Aug 24, 2023
Yeah and I'm guessing you believe 6 million died in the holocaust as well...Yes many nazis were and continue to be gay as well as pedophiles
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah and I'm guessing you believe 6 million died in the holocaust as well...Yes many nazis were and continue to be gay as well as pedophiles
I don’t like Jews either but it’s no problem pouring out a lot of rich Jews made sure the poorer ones got killed before they hitchhiked it out of there.Yeah and I'm guessing you believe 6 million died in the holocaust as well...
I'm very conflicted about abortion too.11 words: Abortion should be legal but women shouldn’t be allowed to choose.
I actually worked as a guard at the concentration camps and I can attest that 6 million Jews really did die in the holocaust. However… the way they died is not the same as it is in the history books. You see, there wasn’t a whole lot of supervision at the camps and the guards could pretty much do whatever they wanted to the prisoners. While my coworkers behaved themselves fairly well, I would routinely take a group of prisoners into what is now known as the gas chambers (which were really mortuaries, but I used them as a makeshift sex dungeon). Long story short, I somehow ended up raping six million Jewish prisoners and all of them killed themselves after their traumatic experiences. My superiors were horrified when they saw what I had done and made up the whole gas chamber thing because it’s far less disturbing.Yeah and I'm guessing you believe 6 million died in the holocaust as well...
Even worse, they were soyboys.Yes many nazis were and continue to be gay as well as pedophiles
sourceHitler's apparent enthusiasm for vegetarianism reflected the Nazi obsession with Aryan bodily purity.
A Hitler Youth manual from the 1930s promoted soya beans, which it called "Nazi beans" as an alternative to meat.
Or the fact Hitler still ate meat despite reprimanding others for eating meat. Yes he had the attitude of a militant vegan.
Worst thing about joining KF is all the degenerate terminology I pick up. At the very least that one is clever, but then again I feel that somehow only makes it even worse.K-on was the proto moe show so yeah the cunnyseurs are going to know of it and also linking loli to wignats is a stretch and a half unless you are talking about terminally online larping faggots.
Problem with that is a newborn doesn't have "consciousness" (definition: the state of being awake and aware of one's surroundings), their brain is not developed enough for that. Then there's the elderly whose brain has been impaired due to age-related disease, resulting in debilitating effects on their consciousness.Just for the sake of illustrating what I mean, if I wanted to explain my indifference to you, just I would follow the "clump of cells" argument. What makes this clump of cells a person is consciousness. Consciousness resides in the brain, the rest is just aperture that keeps the brain alive and moves it around. Therefore I wouldn't fully equate a person to a fetus that hasn't developed something we could call a functioning (that is, being able to process stimuli) brain.
I agree, but both parties need to argue in good faith, and I think an impartial observer would conclude that one party wasn't. For my part, I always do my best to do so. I'm open to the facts and any compelling moral argument a person can make, I just genuinely have never seen one that holds up to scrutiny.Throwing "baby murderers", "fundies" and "pedos" at each other will only lead to 70 pages of rather boring spergout, as evidenced in this thread.
Like peanut butter & jelly. I wonder, do they support loli too?Yes many nazis were and continue to be gay as well as pedophiles
Did you reply to the wrong person? Why do you always try and change the subject when someone says fictional child porn is bad? What's wrong with acknowledging the connection between pedophiles and porn depicting the (fictional) sexual abuse of children? What are you afraid of? It's not like anyone here has the power to criminalize drawings of the fictional sexual abuse of children.Idk, where do you think William Luther Pierce got the inspiration for the Turner Diaries? You think a violent white supremacist takeover of the entire world wasn't something he supported and fantasized about, and that he didn't take inspiration from previous historical attempts (especially since the book is overtly supportive of Hitler)?
>india times
Never said it wasn't (though watering down terms meant to describe actual child abuse is also bad).Did you reply to the wrong person? Why do you always try and change the subject when someone says fictional child porn is bad?
Who cares?Never said it wasn't (though watering down terms meant to describe actual child abuse is also bad).
As someone that's actually been gaslit the fact that the term has been abused to the point it means nothing makes me pretty pissed.Who cares?
If it looks like porn and the subject is obviously a child then why the hell shouldn't it be called what it is? What do you propose we must call it?As someone that's actually been gaslit the fact that the term has been abused to the point it means nothing makes me pretty pissed.
Shut up. Not just you but everybody still participating in this discussion just shut up. It’s over. It’s done. Kaput. *farts*As someone that's actually been gaslit the fact that the term has been abused to the point it means nothing makes me pretty pissed.
Not hard then.On the other hand, I don't think women should have any rights.
It's a mystery why someone who supports grooming would do that.Why do you always try and change the subject when someone says fictional child porn is bad?
Because it's rude as hell to basically say a gross cartoon is the exact same as horrific abuse of a real child that will effect them for the rest of their life. Just like it's shitty to use the term gaslighting for anything other than an abuse tactic that happens within the context of a close relationship (like an abusive parent or romantic partner).If it looks like porn and the subject is obviously a child then why the hell shouldn't it be called what it is? What do you propose we must call it?
Okay now you’re just being retarded.Just like it's shitty to use the term gaslighting for anything other than an abuse tactic that happens within the context of a close relationship (like an abusive parent or romantic partner).