Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 18.4%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.2%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 92 26.9%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 53 15.5%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 130 38.0%

  • Total voters
    342
Wasn't the timeline of events:

>nick gives a defamation take on locals
>mindsets gives him an F for this take
>mindset gets clipped, nick sees it, copes and seethes
>nick does a gina carano stream, this time actually reading it (i didn't watch any of this but judging from the next part below, he still gives a defamation take)
>mindset does another stream, this time making a power point presentation to explain again this is not defamation so anti slapp does not apply (didnt watch much of this either so I'm not sure if mindset is responding to nick's actual stream reading the suit or still responding to nick's locals seethe)
>ralph gunts at mindset

Am I wrong here? Was I mistaken in thinking that nick did a stream reading the complaint and still claiming it wont pass anti slapp?
 
And I kind of agree with Ralph, it was a bit unfair to evaluate Rekieta as he's flailing around and making mouth noises. Yes it was 4AM, yes it was Locals, yes he hadn't read the complaint, but he was, crucially, drunk as fuck.
And my less than zero information opinion is employment discrimination is ludicrously difficult to prove. America is mostly a hire and fire at will country. Plus the other side is Disney, with more money than God. That said, she seems to have gotten a raw deal, and the question is whether it was an illegal raw deal, or whether this is just yet another thing where Disney gets away with everything.

Maybe the days of that are over.
 
Maybe the days of that are over.
From Elon's perspective, I get the sense that also seems to be what this lawsuit is intended to test. Everything Disney did functionally around Carano's firing was standard procedure; they warned her to stop saying stupid bullshit online, she continued to say stupid bullshit online, so they didn't renew her contract. The way it was handled, combined with Disney's fever dream approach to their expensive projects and their borderline hysterical obsession with DEI all seem to messed up what should have been simple dismissal.
 
And my less than zero information opinion is employment discrimination is ludicrously difficult to prove. America is mostly a hire and fire at will country. Plus the other side is Disney, with more money than God. That said, she seems to have gotten a raw deal, and the question is whether it was an illegal raw deal, or whether this is just yet another thing where Disney gets away with everything.

Maybe the days of that are over.
The real question is, can they make it enough of a pain in the ass to get it dismissed through legal avenues that it's more practical for Disney to settle? Keep in mind Disney is not in great financial shape. Almost every tentpole they had in 2023 flopped, their stock valuation is in the gutter, they're seemingly locked into years more worth of expensive capeshit movies which the public is rapidly losing interest in, and by Bob Iger's own admission they've lost 10 billion since buying the rights to Star Wars.
They probably have highly competent counsel but if they can't get a quick dismissal and this thing proceeds to discovery then it becomes a massive thorn in the company's side that they seriously do not need right now, from both a financial and PR perspective.
 
- The grounds for discrimination are evident in the public double-standard displayed towards her co-stars and how Disney is more lenient in policing their social media use,
I’ve said this before, but Pablo Pascal isn’t her “Co-Star.” He’s the Star. She was a series regular who appeared in less than half of the episodes kf the show. There’s no way her contract was even remotely like his, and there’s also the difference in what pascal says vs carrano’s situation.

What really baffles me is how hard the anti—woke people are going in on Gina’s side when she was the most woke character in the series. She was the strong girl who beat up the main character man and made him look weak. That was her sole role in the show, but that’s beyond the point of Nick and all of this.

Definitely don’t think she had a real shot at winning


To add more, I have seen many an actor’s contract, and many an entertainment employment contract. They definitely change based on how major the role is. You can replace a series regular super easily, you can’t replace the star without an elaborate stunt. Actors also don’t fall under most of the employment laws because they’re effectively freelance contractors. The big meme is that you’re only employed until the production wraps up, then everyone is fired. It’s never a given someone who worked on season 1 will be brought back for season 2. It’s a very volatile industry
 
Last edited:
Has Rackets even acknowledged Metokur or wished him millions of dollars from his stream?
Nick won't touch Metokur at all, and if anyone ever brings it up or superchat about it he will just laugh it off, he knows that if he ever tries to go against Metokur like he did with Eric July that will be his end (and I know that we saying this makes Nick seethe).
Eric July's fanbase is a bunch of comic nerds, culture warrior types that won't ever do something stupid or funny, Metokur or the "Sweetie Squad" are different, anything that Nick ever tries to do to Jim will first be covered inmediately by Warsky, PPP, Ralph, etc. Now mixing their fanbases, and then it takes Jim making a single stream with everything about Rekieta to bury him.

tl;dr: Nick is too much of a pussy to do anything about Jim mocking him, so we all just laugh at him
 
What really baffles me is how hard the anti—woke people are going in on Gina’s side when she was the most woke character in the series. She was the strong girl who beat up the main character man and made him look weak.
Primarily because Carano has a background in professional wrestling and, regardless of the tiredness of the trope itself, does a relatively good job of selling the idea that she could physically overpower someone. The fact that she was openly right-leaning didn't hurt either.
 
And my less than zero information opinion is employment discrimination is ludicrously difficult to prove. America is mostly a hire and fire at will country. Plus the other side is Disney, with more money than God. That said, she seems to have gotten a raw deal, and the question is whether it was an illegal raw deal, or whether this is just yet another thing where Disney gets away with everything.
And in my more than zero experience in wrongful termination cases and discrimination cases at one of the biggest global homo corps. YOU FUCKING SETTLE! You don't let this shit see the inside of a court room. You write a check to make the problem go away. Then after the dust settles you dismantle the jack hole management team who caused the problem. Some get volontold to retire. The stubborn ones get demoted and transferred to the shittiest areas of the country where they eventually quit or are put on a track to be fired.
 
Has Rackets even acknowledged Metokur or wished him millions of dollars from his stream?
I don’t think Rekieta wanted Jim after him. Jim really doesn’t go after people unless they give him reason to. So far Jim has made fun of the Balldo and alluded to Rekieta trying to fuck over Eric July.

Unless Rekieta pulls a Ralph starts attacking Jim and Jade out of no where it ain’t happening. I’ll be honest I want it to happen. I want Rekieta to get wasted and go after Jim for some perceived slight. I think Jim is like a vampire where he gets stronger the more retarded people are, he can beat his cancer if enough retards go full retard.
 
Ethan Ralph opened his show yesterday by cutting an eight minute promo on Andrew/Legal Mindset giving Rekieta an F:

Ralph tells Legal Mindset that REKIETA MADE YEW, BISH! and that he would like to see Rekieta "slap the shit out of" Legal Mindset. Ralph thinks Rekieta would, but if not, Ralph definitely would.

Ralph mocks Legal Mindset for claiming that Rekieta didn't even bother to read the complaint before trashing the lawsuit. "Yeah, for a bullshit lawsuit that's going nowhere? Fuck you. shyster piece of shit. Trying to dunk on a guy who made your fucking career who you'd be nothing without?"

Legal Mindset has no reason to turn on Rekieta. Ralph had a good reason, way better than the small reason that people said, but it was still a mistake because Nick is a good guy.

Ralph says that Legal Mindset is "fucking scum" who is trying to curry favor with Kiwi Farms.

View attachment 5724711
Here's the relevant part of Legal Mindset's stream that got the West Memphis rage hog a hollerin;
I'll leave it to others to decide if these are the words and reasoning of a "shyster piece of shit."
 
I can't imagine he will ever be invited back to visit Rumble in-person.
1708059425793.png

Yeah he likes cats more because of how low maintenance they are, he said something along the lines of just dumping a bunch of food in a bowl and occasionally refill it, he talked about it back around the time they got the dog
We have seen how he ignore his kids, they mostly eat snacks as their breakfast, lunch and dinner because Nick is drunk all the time and our wife is either watching star trek taking a million pills or getting railed by melanated gentlemen.
 
Primarily because Carano has a background in professional wrestling and, regardless of the tiredness of the trope itself, does a relatively good job of selling the idea that she could physically overpower someone. The fact that she was openly right-leaning didn't hurt either.
For her benefit she’s a good physical actor and seem’s to like fight scenes where her character doesn’t effortlessly win. Every fight scene I’ve seen with Gina incorporates grappling and holds. Very rarely is it a slug fest.
 
Almost every tentpole they had in 2023 flopped, their stock valuation is in the gutter, they're seemingly locked into years more worth of expensive capeshit movies which the public is rapidly losing interest in, and by Bob Iger's own admission they've lost 10 billion since buying the rights to Star Wars.
That is the most hilarious thing, and basically makes Disney a lolcow of a corporation. They bought one of the most lucrative IP properties in the world.

And then completely destroyed it.
 
I’ve said this before, but Pablo Pascal isn’t her “Co-Star.” He’s the Star. She was a series regular who appeared in less than half of the episodes kf the show. There’s no way her contract was even remotely like his, and there’s also the difference in what pascal says vs carrano’s situation.
Yes that's true, his contract was probably incredibly generous given he basically spent the next two seasons recording his lines from his house, but also, the reason Pedro Pascal is a poor comparison to make was that he did walk his controversial statements back. Carano was warned several times, was already getting controversial with fans, and refused to back down. And she had some bargaining power because the character was popular, but obviously not enough to shield her.

What really baffles me is how hard the anti—woke people are going in on Gina’s side when she was the most woke character in the series. She was the strong girl who beat up the main character man and made him look weak. That was her sole role in the show, but that’s beyond the point of Nick and all of this.
Strong female characters become woke when their capabilities aren't justified, earned or are irrational within the story. Cara Dune, the character, was a shock trooper with extensive military experience, and Carano had the physicality and training to make that believable. The character also wasn't flawless, doesn't drive the story and works with the Mandalorian rather than completely overshadows him. Compare her to season 3's Bo-Katan Kryze, who, while also played by a physically capable actress, the show literally bends reality around in order to make her the main character.

And yes, having strong conservative views would obviously be a bonus, which is probably the reason the Right was so quick to make this a fight about censorship.

Anyway, I'm derailing, the point is, we're all doing the fun back and forth that Nick should have been doing, but didn't, because he didn't even make it far enough to know what the complaint Carano filed was about. I assume the Council of Dick, however justified their skepticism, made a similar mistake.
 
Rekieta is returning to the topic again tonight. He came on Twitter after his show was scheduled to start to say it was going to be an hour late (midnight Central time).

I am not sure what the purpose of in depth coverage of yesterday's news is, but whatever. This is like doing three shows in a row on Vince McMahon after the story dropped out of the headlines.

He is in a perpetual backlog where he has become a breaking news headline reading streamer who can't cover the breaking news topic people actually care about that day.

This time it seems to be purely spite because I don't think anyone valued the social media expert's opinion on this one, mainly because it appeared to be constructed backwards to try to justify his talking out of his ass.

tweet_late.png
(Archive)

Not going to say Nick would have gotten anywhere near these guys but it was good eats today. I am sure he day late and dollar short coverage will be just as rewarding. Also noticed Branca was hoping around the smaller channels and having a fun time.
Expect Rekieta to cover this breaking news story by Monday or Tuesday of next week after people have stopped caring and those who did already watched earlier and better content about it.
 
We have seen how he ignore his kids, they mostly eat snacks as their breakfast, lunch and dinner because Nick is drunk all the time and our wife is either watching star trek taking a million pills or getting railed by melanated gentlemen.

Yes, & when he was shilling those $800 air purifiers he said he had two situated near the kitchen because the cat litter boxes were nearby & stunk up the kitchen.

Responsible parents would have regular chores for all of their kids. There is no reason why that litter box shouldn't be pristine. But that won't happen because building a routine and self motivation in children to do things without prompting requires parents who are consistent and follow through. I just imagine Nicki whining about "the man" and through words and actions showing his kids to take no responsibility for anything and how to blame everything on ODD. Through Nicki's own words, the kids are raising themselves on ipads and the internet, feeding themselves never ending junk food, staying up to the middle of the night because Our Wife is passed out from her pills and who knows what else. I think Nicki even said that the family doesn't bother to get dressed while they watch church on the TV to learn about some guy Jesus. If they didn't have the trust fund money and YouTube windfall, they would be barely better than the nigger parents who feed their toddlers cheetos and orange soda because they are too lazy to cook and its the easiest way to stop the kids from whining.
 
That is the most hilarious thing, and basically makes Disney a lolcow of a corporation. They bought one of the most lucrative IP properties in the world.

And then completely destroyed it.
Three of the most lucrative IP's in the world, if you include Marvel as a whole, as well as their own brand.
 
Responsible parents would have regular chores for all of their kids. There is no reason why that litter box shouldn't be pristine. But that won't happen because building a routine and self motivation in children to do things without prompting requires parents who are consistent and follow through. I just imagine Nicki whining about "the man" and through words and actions showing his kids to take no responsibility for anything and how to blame everything on ODD. Through Nicki's own words, the kids are raising themselves on ipads and the internet, feeding themselves never ending junk food, staying up to the middle of the night because Our Wife is passed out from her pills and who knows what else. I think Nicki even said that the family doesn't bother to get dressed while they watch church on the TV to learn about some guy Jesus. If they didn't have the trust fund money and YouTube windfall, they would be barely better than the nigger parents who feed their toddlers cheetos and orange soda because they are too lazy to cook and its the easiest way to stop the kids from whining.
This is the same man who tried to grift on the image of being a "Chad Dad" and saw it fit to lecture the audience about being a father. Chad Dad Nick must've taken his ideas on fatherhood from Drexel.
 
Rekieta is returning to the topic again tonight. He came on Twitter after his show was scheduled to start to say it was going to be an hour late (midnight Central time).
What the hell is going on in his house that he can't start his show on time? For fuck's sake he doesn't stream until 11 PM. Everyone should be in bed. And what a boring topic. It's like he intentionally trying to tank his channel.
This time it seems to be purely spite because I don't think anyone valued the social media expert's opinion on this one, mainly because it appeared to be constructed backwards to try to justify his talking out of his ass.
Nick hopes Gina makes all the money in the world.
 
Back