Margaret Pless / idlediletante / Stan - Official Kiwi Farms Advertiser and Enthusiast Who Has Proudly Eaten Ass. Now Posting Her Tits to Own the Troons!

[56 others]

Marge told me Stan is short for Stanislav but I will always feel it's short for Staniel

 

[AgendaPoster]

lmao just get a Bond lair.

I am not into that Anglo individualist bougie crap.
I want a comfy collectivist, democratic society where the majority is respected and catered to.

Men excluding women from objectively sex-neutral-topic "spaces" has historically- and affirmatively, deliberately, and/or intentionally - broadly hindered women in their ability to advance in the world; the inverse is not broadly true.

So? I thought we already established we're in some sort of competition where women will not make ANY compromises anyway.

but where those create institutional or fundamental inequities society-wide and serve only to keep an entire sex down or under thumb, or are premised on sweeping characterization that prevent individual merit from common consideration, they should have a higher hurdle for justification.

Inequities lmao.
I am starting to sour on your account. The world is full of inequity, yet you obviously have an oversized preoccupation with maintaining the privileges your group is afforded, by virtue of a state the protects you for some idiotic reason.
The more you cling to maintaining these new institutions that work in your favor, the more I want to see them broken to pieces and everyone involved shamed and made to suffer.

---

First things first.
The lies of liberalism, progressivism and human rights must be dismantled and deconstructed. There is no negotiation that can take place while lies are promoted as truth by the richest and most powerful in this abominable society.

 

[derpherp2]

Stanislav

Anton don't hurt me
Anton don't hurt me
No More

also who's anton again.

Yes welcome back handmaiden-crone Otterly are the asspats from this loser worth it?

Someone's mad scant gratification from BP isn't enough to fill the void asseating left behind?
Have you tried outputting something worth reading? Maybe people will stop hating you.

 

[RichardMongler]

It’s more to do with how the school system has changed from final exam focused to coursework focused.

Doubtful. Academic standards have been dwindling for decades now and the teaching profession is overtly ideological. I can't blame young lads for being cynical and disinterested. English teachers are no longer teaching proper grammar, no longer teaching the great authors.

I strongly detested my high school literature teachers. The literature department was home to the worst partisans which bled into the curriculum. My American literature class was taught by a freshly minted feminist teacher with a hyphenated surname who openly said she believed in queer theory and once opined that garbage collectors should have wage parity with medical doctors. She also had twin boys she was raising to be gender neutral. Amazingly, they so far haven't trooned out, but I wouldn't put it past them to identify as people of gender sooner or later. The curriculum consisted of poetry by communist blacktivist Langston Hughes, "Lone Rager and Tonto Fistfight in Heaven" by Sherman Alexie, "The Crucible" by Arthur Miller, Transcendental poetry by Henry David Thoreau (not inherently bad), "Catcher in the Rye" by J.D. Salinger (likewise) and "The Great Gatsby" by F. Scott Fitzgerald.

In my British literature class, my unwed Becky cat lady teacher openly said during our courses covering "Pride and Prejudice" by Jane Austen, "I'm not having you read a bunch of stuff written by dead White Men." I can't imagine a British literature class whose curriculum consisted of books written by living colored women.

Finally, my World Literature teacher once flatly said that one in three women will be raped. When we reacted with complete silence, she flew right off the handle.

This is the caliber of people young Ameicans have for schoolteachers in ritzy-ass White suburbs. If these ideas are being inculcated into the class of people who will grow up to be functionaries and eventually industry leaders, then these will continue corroding away at the very notions that ideas that founded this country. America has already been reduced to an economic zone running on inertia. These people will only worsen what is already a dire set of problems.

I am starting to sour on your account. The world is full of inequity, yet you obviously have an oversized preoccupation with maintaining the privileges your group is afforded, by virtue of a state the protects you for some idiotic reason.

Friend of Dorothy Parker argues in bad faith just like Stan does. Take nothing she says seriously.

 

[umami's milk]

since this thread always becomes a shit flinging contest norbert wants the age of consent to be 16 and possibly lower i just want everyone to know that.

 

[Shidoen]

since this thread always becomes a shit flinging contest norbert wants the age of consent to be 16 and possibly lower i just want everyone to know that.

@Stan could've used that instead of the holocaust nonsense but that's why she isn't a good journalist. You've done way better research too.

 

[AgendaPoster]

since this thread always becomes a shit flinging contest norbert wants the age of consent to be 16 and possibly lower i just want everyone to know that.

Is this some sort of an own or?
You Americans live on your own planet, and you non-stop try to patronize everyone else, far too often.

 

[umami's milk]

Is this some sort of an own or?
You Americans live on your own planet, and you non-stop try to patronize everyone else, far too often.
View attachment 5813824

You're so right kang! My mistake..
Norbert actually wants the age of consent to be 14! Don't worry, this time I've checked.

I do not have all the answer but I think an age of consent of 16 is absolute folly, especially in a society that is hyper pornographic and sexualized, and excuses and condones all sorts of profligacy and vice in seemingly every other context. If I made the rules I would probably relegate freshman back to junior high, and make age of conset at entry in high school.

But I do not think that is what OP means by "pedo." I think he means teenage minors. First, age of consent laws in the United States are high. The only place higher than 16 is Ireland, 17. Much of Europe is 14-15. UK is 16. IIRC correctly, 11 states had an age of consent of 18, but that number has gone up, it seems. Age of consent that high makes this country similar to places like Iran.

Presuming OP is not talking about actual pedophilia but hot teachers fucking 16-17 sophmores or juniors in high school, it is important to stress that men and women are different, and the mechanism of attraction is different for men than women. Women rely a lot more on social proof, such that a young man who had relations to an attractive teacher (in a situation that could get her in lots trouble, losing her job at a minimum) is going to make him very attractive to women, probably for the rest of his life.

No, pedophilia pertains to sexual attraction or activity to PREPUBESCENT children. Do you not understand the difference? If you cannot acknowledge this fundamental distinction, there is no point in discussing this further and Will place you on ignore.

It is really pretty simple--the meaning of words matter, biology also matters. A prepubscent boy, say seven or ten years old, is simply not the same thing as a sophmore or junion in high school. And yet this is a distinction I see all the people callign me names or leaving me negative stickers refuse to make. The former is a child. The latter is typcially, perhaps usually sexually active, for better or worse. Equivocating a woman 18+ having relations in that age range with child molestation is intellectualy sloppy, to put it mildly, and it also ignores important distinctions that hold true even in the US where age of consent laws are markedly higher than Great Britain, the originator of our common law, or much of Europe.

He was actually called out previously in this very thread by Stan herself. Did she just have a brainfart and forget what is effectively a nuke?

 

[Shidoen]

@Norbert the Tiger don't hump kids, that would be too Jewish of you.

 

[AgendaPoster]

You're so right kang! My mistake..

You people are fucking obsessed with consent laws and pedos. From both sides. One side is some sort of prude "let's not let them fuck till 20/married" and similar lunacies and the others want fat 50 yrs old males forcing themselves upon 14 yrs olds.
It's quite morbid to see these endless spergouts about it. Just respect the laws of the place you're in and maybe stop seething.

 

[umami's milk]

lol nice backtrack save buddy. i'll just let his posts speak for themselves.

 

[Norbert the Tiger]

This again? YAWN.

Did she just have a brainfart and forget what is effectively a nuke?

Not a nuke. I am still standing, unphased.

@Norbert the Tiger don't hump kids, that would be too Jewish of you.

I dont, have no interest in doing so either. Did you clutch your pearls when Mark Renton took home Diane in Trainspotting?

nd similar lunacies and the others want fat 50 yrs old males forcing themselves upon 14 yrs olds.

I don't and nothing I wrote could be fairly construed as such.

 

[Shidoen]

This again? YAWN.


Not a nuke. I am still standing, unphased.

I dont, have no interest in doing so either. Did you clutch your pearls when Mark Renton took home Diane in Trainspotting?


I don't and nothing I wrote could be fairly construed as such.

No because I never watched the movie. Are you in your late Thirties by now?

 

[Trombonista]

@Norbert the Tiger isn't a pedophile. He just really wanted to bang one of his high school teachers.

 

[Shidoen]

@Norbert the Tiger isn't a pedophile. He just really wanted to bang one of his high school teachers.

Would not recommend

 

[Begemot]

Can we get this insolent TERF to bend the knee for their hate speech, please? I'm sick of her inchoate bigotry.

 

[Gay Baby Jailer]

If it were up to me the age of consent would be 99 so I never have to hear about eating ass again.

 

[Tablet County]

This again? YAWN.


Not a nuke. I am still standing, unphased.

I dont, have no interest in doing so either. Did you clutch your pearls when Mark Renton took home Diane in Trainspotting?


I don't and nothing I wrote could be fairly construed as such.

I just want you to fail because you type like the most midwitted pseud I've heard since Carl Benjamin.

 

[World Famous Quasi Payer]

The reason for opening up spaces like the Board room or the golf club is that there is no rational reason for excluding women from them. Golf and business aren't in themselves premised on sex-based interests or some kind of emotional connection that benefits from exclusion. In addition, golf (and tennis, etc.) clubs that permit both sexes still have separate ladies' and mens' leagues (or also offer mixed leagues in addition, as a choice) and facilities, and in some cases sex-specific physical social spaces.

The rational reason is "I don't want them here" and it works for race, religion, sexual orientation and any other characteristic you could imagine besides sex. There is no logical reason why I or any other adult should be forced to hire or allow people I don't like, access to none necessities like who sits on my board of directors or who has membership to my golf club. Freedom of Association is a right just as important as any other.

and women's business networks don't keep qualified men in general out of plumb corporate positions.

The type of "board room exclusion" you complained about earlier is just as prevalent in those women's networks. It most certainly has a chilling effect. It is nearly impossible for a white straight man to get anywhere in the corporate world nowadays do to his sex, race and sexual orientation, and that's despite the fact he is in all likelihood one of the better candidates on offer.

Even the existence of the relatively few powerful women who hire women exclusively (such as who? Idk) don't make it all-but-impossible for men to make a living.

"You can still earn a wage, so being locked out of positions where you can express your full potential is acceptable." Of course, this standard would have never have flown for women, and it in fact didn't as we see by all the pushes to put women in everything. Even when the women themselves prefer to do something else, even when there is no active discrimination going on.

That's the historical and still-relevant difference. When women have hundreds of years of dominating all positions of public power disproportionately to their existence, and systematically, institutionally prevent men from having a snowball's chance of advancement, and when the ethos is that men have no place in public society, then it's maybe approaching analogy.

This is literally like a black person in America crying about how they can't get ahead and they need affirmative action because of slavery. Past injustices do not justify current injustices (assuming those past injustices to even have existed in the first place).

The "war*" started with one sex arrogating to itself to decide what the other is capable of, and where they "belong."

*don't agree with the terminology as apt, but I'll use it since you did

And 99% of that sex that was decided for happily went along with it and even encouraged it to be so. I'm not aware of a single suffragette that demanded to be conscripted to be given a rifle and ordered to charge a machine gun in WW1. Though they thought they deserved a say in a government that didn't even give the majority of the men that got sent off a right to vote. Nor am I aware of a single woman who doesn't think men shouldn't have to provide for them when the two are in a relationship. Nor am I aware of a single woman who thinks men aren't obligated to jump in and help them should they be attacked by a criminal. Whatever you or any other woman would like to believe, when these decisions were made by men, there was most certainly a very large group of women standing right beside them nodding in agreement and cheering them on in those decisions.

They still exist. And the grads of them that I know aren't crying. They are adapting, as any good Darwinist - or realist -would do.

Adapting to lower standards.

 

[AgendaPoster]

If it were up to me the age of consent would be 99 so I never have to hear about eating ass again.

You assume that act was consensual...