Cultcow Brad Watson / Richard Bradshaw Watson / Brad Watson_Miami - Jesus & Albert Einstein reincarnated, discoverer of GOD=7_4 Theory

How do you grade Brad Watson? This is an official poll that reflects the will of GOD.

  • Excellent A - Freedom from corporeal shackles and permitted audience with THE LORD.

    Votes: 168 13.6%
  • Passing B - Freedom from corporeal shackles and free attendance of GOD's Kingdom.

    Votes: 22 1.8%
  • Fair C - Freedom from corporeal shackles. Given limited, general attendance of GOD's Kingdom.

    Votes: 22 1.8%
  • Poor D - Reincarnated as Man to be given a second chance at attempting to earn GOD's graces.

    Votes: 39 3.2%
  • Fail F - Reincarnated as a non-human for 326 years, 221 days, and 14 hours.

    Votes: 76 6.2%
  • Fail F - Sentenced to eternal tortures in HELL for crimes against THE LORD GOD.

    Votes: 106 8.6%
  • Fail F - Forced to post on the kiwifarms.net for 24 years, 30 days, and 2 hours.

    Votes: 802 64.9%

  • Total voters
    1,235
@ChurchOfGodBear
Careful, dude, that was dangerously close to agreeing with Brad!
Oh, I'd be GLAD to agree with Brad, if he actually could answer this. But he can't, because even his own logic is self-contradictory. If he's saying that Jesus was NOT the son of God, but was in fact just the product of a norman union between Mary and Joseph, then Jesus would have had no miraculous biological resistance. We can fully expect that what would have happened to any human, massive and terminal infection, would have happened to Jesus. Especially considering that the divine version of Jesus (that 99.999999% of modern Christians believe in) did in fact die and even in his resurrected form was scarred from his assault. If Brad is saying that Jesus was "only human" and that Jesus was just some kind of man being God-by-proxy, then it would be unthinkable that he would have survived the crucifixion.

On the other hand, divine Jesus conquers death because he's God. Not much more to explain there. Makes sense.

Personally, I think Brad just doesn't like the idea of having to end his Jesus fantasy when the man was so young, and wants to add lots of chapters to his SJFF where he's boinking Mary Magdalene and teaching 7_4 to thousands of people, none of whom remembered him or bothered to write any of this down. Nope, everyone just focused on that boring stuff he said during his three-year ministry, and completely forgot the other four decades when he was revealing the numerological secrets of the universe.
 
There is no 'destruction of the world'; that's always been a mistranslation/misinterpretation of Matthew 24:3 which correctly refers to the "end of the age".
Various translations are split 15/10 between "end of age" and "end of world". However, ALL versions agree that this question was asked in response to Jesus prophesying the destruction of Jerusalem in Matthew 24:2 --
Truly I tell you, not one stone here will be left on another; every one will be thrown down. (NIV)
Do you see all these buildings? I tell you the truth, they will be completely demolished. Not one stone will be left on top of another! (NLT)
Truly, I say to you, there will not be left here one stone upon another that will not be thrown down. (ESV)
Truly I tell you, not one stone here will be left on another; every one will be toppled. (BSB)
Do you not see all these things? Truly I say to you, no not even a stone shall be left here upon a stone, which will not be thrown down. (BLB)
Do you not see all these things? Truly I say to you, not one stone here will be left upon another, which will not be torn down. (NASB)
See ye not all these things? verily I say unto you, There shall not be left here one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down. (KJV)
Don't you see all these things? I assure you: Not one stone will be left here on another that will not be thrown down! (HCSB)
You see all these things, don't you? I tell all of you with certainty, there isn't a single stone here that will be left standing on top of another. They will all be torn down. (ISV)
Do you see all these things? I tell you the truth, not one stone will be left on another. All will be torn down! (NET Bible)
Do you not see all of these things? Truly I tell you, there will not be left here one stone on another, that will not be thrown down. (NHEB)
Behold, do you see all these things? Amen, I say to you that not a stone will be left here standing, which will not be pulled down. (ABPE)
You see all these buildings, don't you? I can guarantee this truth: Not one of these stones will be left on top of another. Each one will be torn down. (GWT)
Do you not see all these things? Truly I say to you, not one stone here shall be left upon another, which will not be torn down. (NAS1977)
See ye not all these things? verily I say unto you, There shall not be left here one stone upon another that shall not be thrown down. (JB)
See you not all these things? verily I say unto you, There shall not be left here one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down. (NKJV)
See you not all these things? truly I say to you, There shall not be left here one stone on another, that shall not be thrown down. (AKJV)
See ye not all these things? verily I say unto you, There shall not be left here one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down. (ASV)
Do you see all these things? Amen I say to you there shall not be left here a stone upon a stone that shall not be destroyed. (D-RB)
Do ye not see all these things? Verily I say to you, Not a stone shall be left here upon a stone which shall not be thrown down. (DBT)
See ye not all these things? verily I say unto you, There shall not be left here one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down. (ERV)
See ye not all these things? verily I say to you, There shall not be left here one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down. (WBT)
in solemn truth I tell you that there will not be left here one stone upon another that will not be pulled down. (WNT)
You see all of these things, don't you? Most certainly I tell you, there will not be left here one stone on another, that will not be thrown down. (WEB)
Do ye not see all these? verily I say to you, There may not be left here a stone upon a stone, that shall not be thrown down. (YLT)
When dealing with different Bibles, it is not unusual to see different interpretations of statements or events. But here we have 25 Bibles that are all saying the same thing. Whether it's "end of days" or "end of world" Jesus prophesied that it would be preceded by the complete destruction of Jerusalem.

Has Jerusalem been destroyed?

Not last time I checked.

I will not argue the other points in your lengthy post as I have already debunked them in other posts.
 
-snip-
Which of course is why I remember the news footage and eye witness testimonies of Reagan and Bush getting their asses kicked by Jesus and thrown into a lake made of fire during their 1984 re-election campaign. I also remember that George HW Bush and Joseph Ratzinger being the same guy and kissing Reagan's ass to a horde of people after Reagan uses voodoo magic. Oh wait, that never happened. That I and @voiceguy have pointed out that you are getting Revelation wrong on a mindboggling level and you insist on repeating this over and over again, even with the honest to God passages shoved in your face to further rub it in, proves you are a willful liar.

You are a fraud Richard Brad Watson, and you know it.
 
Wrong. But thanks for reminding of Aomori. Have you seen the documentary and/or read the book Jesus Family Tomb? I bet $74 you haven't. But don't let not doing any homework stop you from acting like you're a frickin' expert!

See Section 7.4 of http://wikipedia.org/wiki/Aomori_Prefecture
I already read about the Aomori Tomb somewhere else, and that conclusively showed that Jesus was buried in Aomori. The 7.4 makes this true, btw. Does the fake Jesus family tomb have some random 7_4 attached to it?

By not dying on the Cross, that meant that Y'shua suffered much more!
Washing away the sin of mankind isn't done by blood and suffering alone, it is only achieved by death. You can't just "suffer away" the original sin. If that had been possible, Adam and Eve would have gotten rid of it after they were thrown out of Eden.

This is the best question I've received in two guckinf years on KiwiFarms! I went up into the heavens: off-planet.
I'll repeate this just for emphasis: "I went up into the heavens: off-planet." Wanna know why I feel a need to point this out?
Heaven is an ideal state-of-mind where one feels very close to GOD. Heaven shouldn't be confused with the heavens: the sky, low-Earth orbit, deep space.

These are dictionary definitions. If you have problems with them, contact those in charge of the dictionaries.
This was in answer to me pointing out that Elijah ascended to heaven after experiencing rapture (ie: he did not die). You basically said heaven isn't a place one can be spirited away to.
Also:
Wrong. This is heaven. To live is to pursue happiness and joy!
This was the very next post. How can heaven be both a different planet and be this planet and still be nonexistent, Brad? These aren't even just 2 mutually exclusive theories, you managed to make a contradictory triangle.
:story:
Logic, science, and a dictionary. The definition of 'death' is final. In 1974, the term 'near-death experience' (NDE) was coined. Now, I hear that 1-in-25 people experience a NDE.
http://wikipedia.org/wiki/Near-death_experience
You have a weird concept of Religion and Christianity, Brad. You claim that God made everything, yet you don't believe he can give life back to the dead (and even mocked me for pointing out how that's what the bible says for Judgement Day).

So, God is powerful enough to create everything, rule everything, influence everything, but the one thing that is rather prominent about his abilities in the bible (namely that he can give life) is the one thing you don't believe in? Are you aware that some apocryphical stories tell how Jesus made birds out of clay during his childhood and breathed life into them? Kind of like a chekov's gun to the later resurrection of Lazarus...

@Brad Watson_Miami I am trying to figure out my reincarnation history. So far I have figured out that I was previously living as Freud, James Madison, and John Hancock. But I am kind of stuck now.
So far all I found out was I was Ivan IV of the house of Rurik and some wacky Serbian inventor using the art of the ouija board and consulting a cheese pizza.
Dibs on William Marshal and John of Bohemia. That's how this works, right?

Now you can't tell GOD, "I didn't know!"
What if I tell him "I didn't care" instead?
You've got it. What animal(s) would you like to be reincarnated as and why?

It's awefully nice to ask. As long as these 10.000 years allow me to be a cat or otter every once in a while, it would be nice. I always could cheese it by being a certain type of clam that lives for several hundred years. I doubt clams have particularly bad days, just sitting underwater filtering nutrients from the flows around them. Sounds kinda relaxing to me and it's a nice way to breeze through a couple centuries on one incarnation. Though a fluffy animal every now and then isn't something to be sneezed at.
 
Dibs on William Marshal and John of Bohemia. That's how this works, right?
As one of my other reincarnations once said "sure".

@Brad Watson_Miami
3vin3.jpg
which one of these fine gents were you?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
if the Templars took the bones of Jesus to the Pope, then whose bones were in the ossuary when it was found in 1980?
As I remember, there were no bones found in the Y'shua bar Yosef ossuary in 1980.

Are you going to actually watch the Jesus Family Tomb DVD and/or read the book? Or are you going to continue to act like you know what you are talking about without doing your homework?

http://JesusFamilyTomb.com


Synchronism: 20:40 It started raining and "Forcast the weather on Neptune" - Secret History of the Voyager Mission, Space's Deepest Secrets (S1/Ep5, 2016) on SCI

@Brad Watson_Miami So far I have figured out that I was previously living as Freud, James Madison, and John Hancock.
Check the timeline of James Madison's birthdate & deathdate and John Hancock's birthdate & deathdate. I think you've got a BIG problem there!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Brad, I would be interested in hearing your definition of "facts".
Regarding the definition of any and all words, I have a really BIG dictionary.

Question: if you contend that Jesus was beaten, and hung on a cross, but did not die, how exactly would he have survived the mf nightmare of an infection caused by being pierced several dozen times by unsanitary weapons, nails, then being wrapped in a blanket over any number of open wounds, then left without water or nourishment for days? Even today with full knowledge of modern germ theory, it's nearly impossible to think someone would survive that. In Roman times, when even a superficial cut could be lethal in the long run, it's unfathomable that he would have survived.
Jesus' wounds were immediately cleaned after he was taken down from the Cross and cleaned really well before he was left in the tomb.

Frankly, it would actually be more miraculous for him to have survived that than to have died and risen from the grave, IMO.
That's correct! Very good. Most people think that the reality of Y'shua surviving his 39 lashes and crucifixion takes away from the miracle of his death and resurrection. Not at all. It was a HUGE miracle that he survived the ordeal and appeared outside the tomb around sunrise on Sunday - about 38 hours after being taken off the Cross. But it was all calculated and prepared for by him and those closest to him: Magdalen, Mary Mother, Apostle John, and Joseph of Arimathea.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Mr. X
Last edited:
Jesus' wounds were immediately cleaned after he was taken down from the Cross and cleaned really well before he was left in the tomb.

...which likely would have made things worse, as he would have been cleaned with non-sterile well water and oils, with no antiseptic agents. Not to mention the fact that the wounds would need to be re-cleaned on an hourly basis. Cleaning them with first-century materials would guarantee an infection. So exactly how were his wounds "cleaned"?
 
I was Confucius
Confucius
Born: September 28, 551 BC, State of Lu
Died: 479 BC, State of Lu
I was Pythagoras.
Pythagoras
Born: 570 BC, Samos, Greece
Contradiction #1 confirmed. You are a compulsive liar.
Thanks for bringing that to my attention. Either those dates are wrong or I was not Confucius.
Sorry, Brad, you don't get to backpedal after someone else has pointed out your stupidity. You made two statements of fact that were contradictory, claimed to be two people who were alive at the same time. This casts severe doubt on all of your reincarnation claims, including your current one.
Sometime in the 40 years after the Crucifixion in 30 AD, Jesus the Christ died. His bones were placed in an ossuary which was put in the Jesus Family Tomb on the highest hill of East Talpiot (between Bethlehem and Jerusalem). The tomb was discovered in 1119 by the Knights Templar who took the bones of Jesus to the Pope.

As I remember, there were no bones found in the Y'shua bar Yosef ossuary in 1980.
Watch this, Brad, and pay attention to the first 40 seconds.
Did you see the bones in the ossuary? I sure did. I saw them when I watched the entire documentary. Are you sure YOU watched this DVD? Or are you going to continue to act like you know what you are talking about without doing your homework?

Contradiction #2 confirmed. You are a pathological liar.

"Them bones them bones gonna rise again
Gonna catch ol' Brad in his lies again
Now he's in it up to his eyes again
It proves that he is an ass!"
 
I already read about the Aomori Tomb somewhere else, and that conclusively showed that Jesus was buried in Aomori. The 7.4 makes this true, btw. Does the fake Jesus Family Tomb have some random 7_4 attached to it?
There's no such thing as "some random 7_4"; it's a program/algorithm that produces a recurring pattern. East(4) Talpiot(7). In that tomb, one ossuary was marked Y'shua bar Yosef (Jesus) and another Mariamne (Magdalen)...

Y'shua=74=Y25+S19+H8+U21+A1 (Jesus=74)
Mariamne=74=M13+A1+R18+I9+A1+M13+N14+E5


Washing away the sin of mankind isn't done by blood and suffering alone, it is only achieved by death. You can't just "suffer away" the original sin.
2,000-year-old myths are hard to let go of. But in this case - and in all cases - the historical Y'shua bar Yosef is stronger than the mythical Jesus Christ. The mythical Jesus Christ never returns. That's why the Roman Catholic Church, the Othodox, and almost all of the Protestant churches love the mythical JC - they won't lose their power, prestige, and money. At least, that's what they think!

If that had been possible, Adam and Eve would have gotten rid of it after they were thrown out of Eden.
NEWS FLASH! There was no 'original sin' except for Eve and Adam wanting to be as smart as the God-guy. That was no sin. You think you're smarter than me; that's a sin.

I'll repeate this just for emphasis: "I went up into the heavens: off-planet." Wanna know why I feel a need to point this out? This was in answer to me pointing out that Elijah ascended to heaven after experiencing rapture (ie: he did not die). You basically said heaven isn't a place one can be spirited away to.
Wrong. Elijah died like Enoch died: off-planet.

How can heaven be both a different planet and be this planet and still be nonexistent, Brad?
The heavens is not heaven. You can experience 'heaven on Earth'; I AM in heaven right here & now.

Nobody is leaving Earth unless through a spacecraft or stargate for the next 1,000 years. All our eternal souls are NOT going up in the heavens after death including mine.

You have a weird concept of Religion and Christianity, Brad.
Duh! That was established in the 1st post of this thread by the late Gene Parmesan.

You claim that God made everything, yet you don't believe he can give life back to the dead (and even mocked me for pointing out how that's what the Bible says for Judgement Day).
PLEASE go to a dictionary and look up 'dead' & 'death'. Then go to a medical dictionary and look up 'dead' & 'death'. After you do this, get back to me with those dictionary definitions. If we can't agree on dictionary definitions, then we'll never agree on anything.

So, God is powerful enough to create everything, rule everything, influence everything, but the one thing that is rather prominent about his abilities in the Bible (namely that he can give life) is the one thing you don't believe in?
First, you are confusing GOD & God. Second, the term 'near-death experience' was coined in 1974. Now it is estimated that as many as 1-in-25 people experience a NDE. I was in Barnes and Noble Bookstore today and there's a new book by a doctor who spent many years documenting NDEs. Before Jesus son of Joseph was crucified, there were myths of gods resurrecting from the dead after three days. Jonah was in the whaleshark for 3 days. This stems from nature where the ancients with their crude instruments needed 3 days after the winter solstice on December 21 or 22 to tell that the days were getting longer. Hence, December 25 marked the 'return of the light' long befor Y'shua bar Yosef was born on April 17, 6 BC.

Are you aware that some apocryphical stories tell how Jesus made birds out of clay during his childhood and breathed life into them?
I think I have all the gnostic gospels at home and read them years ago. Again, myths are hard to let go of.

resurrection of Lazarus
I think that's a mistake to interpret that literally. Are you familiar with the ancient sacred Mysteries and how those few who were chosen were initiated into the Mysteries? It's been kept secret for at least 3,500 years (the time of Moses).

It's awefully nice to ask (about what animal reincarnation I'd prefer). As long as these 10.000 years allow me to be a cat or otter every once in a while, it would be nice.
Ok. I love cats - I have 5 and my gf 1. We don't get otters down here in South Florida, but they seem real cool.

I always could cheese it by being a certain type of clam that lives for several hundred years. I doubt clams have particularly bad days, just sitting underwater filtering nutrients from the flows around them. Sounds kinda relaxing to me and it's a nice way to breeze through a couple centuries on one incarnation. Though a fluffy animal every now and then isn't something to be sneezed at.
How about those HUGE Galapagos tortoises? Don't they live to be 200-years-old?!

tortoise.jpg
 
Last edited:
Brad, the Gnostic gospels are pure bullshit. This was decided fifteen centuries ago. Why? Because they treat salvation as if it were some secret code to be unlocked, whereas anyone reading Jesus' actual words would see that HE NEVER HIDE HIS MEANING, and his lessons were easy to understand for everyone who wanted to listen. It's also stated several times that Jesus said and did much more than what was written down, but what was written down was the MOST important. Hence, there is no secret knowledge that was left out for numerologists to find.

BTW, that's also why I know you're full of shit about Jesus living to be 70. If the most important part of his ministry took place after the crucifixion,it would have been written down.
 
Back