Sneedforo & Reactions: The Future of Stickers

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Simple mockup of the extent Discord's rating system should be copied:
1715260975108.png
You don't want >3,700 unique emotes but you do want this form of displaying them under posts. The same way they show up in the current post reaction summary, but truncated to the icon and count only. That's how I did this mockup. And replacing the "Like" button with a "React" button since alarm clocks, trash cans and top hats aren't exactly a gesture of thumbs up.

Oh yeah, by clicking, for example, the "Informative" icon/count, it wouldn't add the "Informative" reaction, but would instead bring up the list of users who reacted to the post with that reaction. Giving reactions should stay as-is, in the reaction selection menu. Keep in mind that there is no cursor on mobile and even on desktops people generally don't understand that there are hover over functions, like with the greyed out Quote and Reply buttons, so making it clear that something is clickable and then have it do something on click is the best way to do it from the user experience standpoint.

Speaking of, I'd also change the behavior of the "React" button so that it doesn't have a hover over functionality, but instead opens up something like this after being pressed:
1715261605889.png
Just a rough mock-up but IMO this would be the ideal design for the reaction picker. The current Facebook approach is just bad with this amount of reactions that unlike on Facebook aren't all positive. It's also more text heavy, which improves usability. The category names are in text, and besides the reaction icons you have their names visible by default.

Alternatively, you could ditch the categories and instead have a single scrollable list with categories, since probably there aren't that many reactions to warrant category tabs, so something like this would be simpler and more user friendly. All reactions would be visible by default, less is more, the KISS principle and so on.
1715262442316.png

You'll want some sort of categorization and ditching of the Facebook style pop-up selector with the current amount of reactions available, just look at this:
1715262174903.png
It's 60% of the width of the post you're reacting to, it's silly and will get janky on narrower screens. A pop-up list would be the best way to handle it, it's readable, easy to use and scales well. It's also why browsers need to start moving away from the silly horizontal tab bar and implement vertical tab lists but I digress.

It's what I already said but with a bit of visualization. The current system is fine, but this is what I believe would make it more usable and manageable, both from the user standpoint and the admin standpoint if you were to add more reactions, assuming that the reason you've decided to not add any more is because of the current clutter from the UI standpoint. A list selector would alleviate that.
 
One thing I might do, depending on system style and specific implementation, and bring back the Weeaboo's Post Ratings table, as below. This was something on the profile. You did not receive a score, you instead received a tally of all interactions, given and received.
I would prefer a shortlist of a user's most reacted to posts on their profile, good or bad. Not only does that show you the kind of poster they are but it highlights everyone at their most Exceptional™ and gives people a new way to discover interesting posts. Even a ratings table people will subconsciously turn into a Reddit karma balancing game.
 
I know I'm late to the post but I've been working like a one-legged man in an ass kicking contest all week.

This is a pie-in-the-sky thing, but I've always thought reactions should be weighted. Like if you're the kind of person that gives out likes/dislikes/hats to hundreds of posts, they should count less than someone who barely ever gives any out, but is so moved by the hilarity, idiocy, or creativeness of a post that he chucks one. I mean I would rather see the weird random post in the music forum that got a Winner from a guy who has never ever given out a Winner sticker, than the post in A&N that gets 95 likes from people that give out tons of likes.

I mean both have their place, but I just think it would be interesting to see what the people who hoard their stickers like Grabbler Gold like or dislike, it's a bit more meaningful. Plus, I guess it could cut down on sticker clutter if people find out their stickers gain more meaning the less they use them.
 
The problem with suggestions like that is it implies certain voices are inherently more important, and complex rules is incentive for the biggest and most annoying faggots to gameify the system.

When you tie decision making into mass user input, it creates an environment of unequals like reddit or Wikipedia.

So it's best to keep it dead simple and purely informational so that there is no benefit in trying to abuse it.
 
If it ain't broke, don't fix it

I have no objection to the current response system. It is, in my opinion, simple and at the same time characterful.
What they said.

All these new ideas seem unnecessarily detailed and will just clutter up posts. The current setup is clean and clear. If you hate reactions so much, why are you you spending any time on them?

(I fear change. Also, get off my lawn!)
 
  • Like
Reactions: On a Journey
So it's best to keep it dead simple and purely informational so that there is no benefit in trying to abuse it.
Honestly, if your biggest concern is people trying to "game the system", stop giving it so much thought: not only you already said we're not getting the scoring system back, but this isn't a government agency. We don't need "Big Brother" making sure all the kids are playing nice. When I see that most people gave someone a dumb sticker, it doesn't mean I also have to, and neither does it mean my thoughts and morals are gonna flip to follow what the rest thinks: it just means that's what most users thought. If someone makes retarded decisions because of what they see, it's not because of bad forum design, it's just them being retarded. If you want to make it your problem, though, go ahead.

As for the system: I like it the way it is. No clutter. Just the top 3, and if I want to check the rest, I just need to clic and it'll show me everything I might want to know: which ratings were used, and by which user. It's a pretty neat and orderly way to showcase information. No need for anything else.

I'm also not opposed to what others have suggested: new stuff that's subforum-specific. I don't want to imagine what horrifying shit would be designed for the stinkdich, but there's plenty of fun you can imagine for Chris, Animal Control, Community Watch, etc.

Lastly, if you wanted to increase T&H's perks: you could make it so when a sticker exclusive to them was used, it's always the first. So instead of just the 3 most used when rating a post, there's 4: the one most T&H used to rate the post, and the rest. Example: Drink, Informative, Horrifying, Feels.
 
I'm also not opposed to what others have suggested: new stuff that's subforum-specific. I don't want to imagine what horrifying shit would be designed for the stinkdich, but there's plenty of fun you can imagine for Chris, Animal Control, Community Watch, etc.
I like this idea. Although If something like it is implimented, I think the subforum specific reactions should generally fit into a certain template, such as 'Agree', 'Dumb' etc, and there should be a limit to the amount of new reactions you can add. It would prevent reactions becoming too convoluted, and you would be able to get their meaning if you know the template.

It's more of an aesthetic change than anything else, but I think it would make subforums and threads just a bit more unique.
 
I like the idea of listing reactions under a post similar to discord because it's a nice clean layout, but opening it up to as many emoji as Discord (or allowing a user to rate some 4 different things) will cause massive bloat and make shit unreadable. I'd like to stick to the stickers we currently have, with maybe a few more thrown in to better express an opinion.

Also, maybe throw in the option to disable being able to see reactions for the people that don't give a fuck?
 
@Slav Power piggybacking off your idea, I think it might be better to keep the reactions laid out horizontally to condense things a bit, and have the actual window for picking them be a dropdown menu, similar to the "More options" tabs in the post toolbar.

So you'd click the React button, a menu scrolls down beneath the post with the reactions laid out, and you can switch between the different reaction types by clicking the appropriate tab within the window.

To help abridge things, you can also add a shortcut option that allows you to react to a post by double tapping an existing reaction's icon.
 
Last edited:
wow great suggestion "just don't think about it" wow that totally works great idea, that really works from a software perspective. "just don't think about it" good idea i'll code that in.
Sure, just go ahead and dismiss the message in itself. I meant that you should drop your concern about someone trying to somehow game the system (fucking how?) down a notch. It's not gonna happen. You're being too paranoid about the subject.

And regarding the stickers: realistically, you'll never get a consensus in an actual thread, because there's thousands of users that could be participating (I already said I'm fine with what we have and why), but don't. The only way to obtain a "concrete" opinion out of the users that'll never give this a look is to make a couple of polls with the current options you have in mind.​
 
I dismiss that entirely because all gays seem to be self-inflicted coomers who just do the worst things imaginable (sucking dick and eating shit) as the last stop of thrills before autoerotic asphyxiation suicide.
Ralph eats shit and he's probably the most heterosexual man to ever exist and also is definitely not 5'1". Really gets the noggin joggin.

What does this have to do with sticker fagging? Not much, but it seems like you've already made up your mind.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Space Police
Ralph eats shit and he's probably the most heterosexual man to ever exist and also is definitely not 5'1". Really gets the noggin joggin.

What does this have to do with sticker fagging? Not much, but it seems like you've already made up your mind.
Didn't we find out after he leaked his password that he used to use a gay messaging service?
 
I don't understand the aversion to being notified or given a dopamine hit for making good, agreeable posts. Null seems to think it's a bad thing too.
If users are using the pozrates on posts they like and getting pozrates makes you feel good, there's a general incentive to make likeable posts.
You can still get that pozrate dopamine by autistically clicking the reaction received tray every few minutes, so removing the option to get it in the notification tray is just removing UI that lots of people used, which is kinda dumb.
Its fine though, Null's not gonna listen to me and it's not actually that bad the way it currently is. I just miss the convenience of it all being in one spot.
For what it's worth I want the old system back but I also want to lose 50 pounds, purchase a house, and have a beautiful, loving wife, none of which will happen anytime soon, so it's useless asking for that. However, initially I thought Null's complaints about "using the forum wrong" was him being an autist mad at the Internet, but I kind of get the idea now: the point is to foster discussion, not coming up with the hottest take in the thread. That sort of thing is a massive problem in "feature tourism", which is where these problems are the worst. Was it a real problem? Yes. Do I personally think it was the best solution? No.

When I suggested that "negrates only get notifications" I was responded with "then the people will be afraid to post". I don't think that's a major issue, because the usual suspects know they'll catch shit for something and say it anyway (HHH, Stan). The only time it might be a problem is if it gives an inaccurate description of how your post is perceived, like if Marvin rates you Dumb for something everyone else with Agree or Like, but I know that not everyone is going to like what I'm going to say.
 
I dismiss that entirely because all gays seem to be self-inflicted coomers who just do the worst things imaginable (sucking dick and eating shit) as the last stop of thrills before autoerotic asphyxiation suicide.
I can't wait to see this post in sticker form.
 
#1 is fine. I think it's concise.
Shows the top 3 stickers & total reactions ("...and x others").
You don't get that with discord style.

I prefer 2 or 3 rows instead of a stretched one.
top row = negative stickers ; bottom row = positive
make every Unicode character a possible reaction
You mad man. Why would you consider copying Discord?
I don't want that much freedom of choice.

It would be an interesting situation, though.
Cows post nude selfies, degenerates out themselves with sticker choice 🍌🍆🌽🥒🍒🍑🥔🌵😍🤤
 
  • Deviant
Reactions: Safir
For what it's worth I want the old system back but I also want to lose 50 pounds, purchase a house, and have a beautiful, loving wife, none of which will happen anytime soon, so it's useless asking for that. However, initially I thought Null's complaints about "using the forum wrong" was him being an autist mad at the Internet, but I kind of get the idea now: the point is to foster discussion, not coming up with the hottest take in the thread. That sort of thing is a massive problem in "feature tourism", which is where these problems are the worst. Was it a real problem? Yes. Do I personally think it was the best solution? No.

When I suggested that "negrates only get notifications" I was responded with "then the people will be afraid to post". I don't think that's a major issue, because the usual suspects know they'll catch shit for something and say it anyway (HHH, Stan). The only time it might be a problem is if it gives an inaccurate description of how your post is perceived, like if Marvin rates you Dumb for something everyone else with Agree or Like, but I know that not everyone is going to like what I'm going to say.
it has the same energy as moot blocking the end of post numbers to prevent digit checking
then again checking digits lead me to a psychotic break so maybe he had a point
Do I have to clarify that you should not be considering the performance impact of things? Like, Discord literally has trillions of reacts. It's not going to break the site.

What people think is computationally intensive and what actually is are sometimes greatly different things.
let people type a whole response to each post
each post could have a comments section like on youtube
then it is like you have the best of both worlds and advanced discussion on every issue
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: GunCar Gary
Back