Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

When will the Judge issue a ruling regarding the Motion to Dismiss?

  • This Month

    Votes: 67 14.6%
  • Next Month

    Votes: 55 12.0%
  • This Year

    Votes: 73 15.9%
  • Next Year

    Votes: 153 33.3%
  • Whenever he issues an update to the sanctions

    Votes: 111 24.2%

  • Total voters
    459
I notice he only asked for until June 15th. He seems to realize demanding 90 days at once was flying too close to the sun.

He also shoots himself in the foot by pointing out that he got an extension BEFORE the request that was denied. He's telling the judge he ALREADY got extra time to respond and didn't, in the same breath as asking for more extra time because he'll totally do it this time

I said before, the one thing he learned from DJF and monkey-see-monkey-did was that you can ask for infinite more time over and over and over again with no work in between if you keep making up excuses
 
Dammit, I need to go to bed and can't read Rusty's latest tantrum.

One thing I agree with, though: now that the Supreme Court has decided to not hear our case, it's time Greer is made to follow the rules. Either he's a competent adult who can follow the court's rules, including their deadlines, or he's an incompetent retard who should drop the case.
 
One good thing about hail maries is that when they are denied, we get a better understanding of where we are as a society. In this case, a circuit court decided something that 1) goes against 30 years of copyright law precedent and 2) goes against Supreme Court precedent. And the Supreme Court still doesn't want to hear this? It's not a stretch to imagine that it really is because they don't want the grief of controversy. For all its prestige, the Supreme Court is as gay and stupid as the rest of the judicial system. May this be a lesson to anyone who had any hope that the system works.
 
The court didn't "violate long-established 10th Circuit precedent", it noted Greer's argument didn't apply to the situation
Not so. Greer argued that “preference” is binding. The Utah court said it was not. They could have waited, but they really just couldn’t give a shit.
IMG_2096.jpeg
 
WELL WELL WELL ,*licks bottle* SHOULD'NT HAVE BEEN SO JUDGEMENTAL, COULD'VE HAD AN ARSENAL OF FRIENDS AND SOBER LEGAL MINDS*hic* COULD HAVE MADE A MILLION DOLLARS BUT NOOOOO *hungry child cries in the background* NOW YOU GOTTA EAT CROW, YOU GOTTA EAT CROW LIKE A CERTAIN MOVIE MAKER FACTUALLY AND ALWAYS EATS BABY DICKS!! *a little more hair dies* THIS IS LIKE HOW THE COPS..AND THE DENNY'S .... AND GRAND SLAM DEAD BABIES. *drunken giggling at an unfinished nonsensical joke* YOU SHOULD'VE PUT ON THE BALDO JERSH!

No 'Stephen Hawking is crippled!' joke? FAKE NON-PRACTICING LAWYER!

Motion for more time... how long has it been since the stay was officially denied? Almost a month now? Maybe he should have started on these replies a while ago.

Also, Russ, you see this ":" you're supposed to put the Judge's name here, or if you don't know then just leave the whole bit out.
View attachment 5987018

He does realize that even if Null totally loses the case and has to sell everything we're still just going to form Cassowary Farms to continue making fun of him.

He probably thinks the judge's name is Madge, and she is announcing she is heterosexual-- '(I) straight', so he thinks he has a chance at a date with her.
 
Not so. Greer argued that “preference” is binding. The Utah court said it was not. They could have waited, but they really just couldn’t give a shit.
View attachment 5987280
Which is all academic. The 11th circuit can get rid of this shit under Rule 41 and not have to worry about circuit splits, the constitutional issue of reposting DMCA filings and all that jazz.

Greer clearly had the time to file all this nonsense about being confused. Incidentally, Greer seems to be "very confused" every time he asks the court for something. At this point someone should point out how very "confused" he is every time he asks for shit from a court.

Where is the response to the Rule 19 motion Greer? Where is the lawyer you said you needed a few months to hire Greer? It needs to be banged loud and hard that Greer is wasting precious ink and the courts time filing bullshit completely unrelated to the tasks he, as the PLAINTIIFF, has been ORDERED by the the Federal Court to do. This shit should not even be responded too.

Gloves off. Motion to strike under Rule 12(f), for motions that are redundant, impertinent or scandalous. Greer already filed for an extension. That request was DENIED. Yet he still got it anyway through procedural bullshit. Asking for it again is a clear violation of the rules at this point and should be sanctioned. After that, Rule 41(b) motion to end the case for failure to prosecute. or in the alternative an order for compliance in a time allowed by the court.
 
Last edited:
One more bit of hilarity:

1715660240402.png

Lawsuit investors? Russ thinks the value of his shitty song and book are so high, he's sitting on a money-making opportunity? He's going to extract enough damages from Joshua Moon, international hobo, and Kiwi Farms, a website, to pay for a lawyer and pay off speculators?

Be careful Null, Greer's coming for your media empire!
 
He left out his explanation of what the fuck he's been doing for the last three months instead of writing motions or hiring lawyers. What's he planning to do in the next month to stop being confused and scared?

It looks like he has zero chance of affording the DJF, who I bet quoted him a go-away price.

Russell said:
So Greer needed time to either approach lawsuit investors or to fundraise.

I wonder if the lawsuit investors have offices in the same building as those whorehouse investors he was counting on.
 
One more bit of hilarity:

View attachment 5987454

Lawsuit investors? Russ thinks the value of his shitty song and book are so high, he's sitting on a money-making opportunity? He's going to extract enough damages from Joshua Moon, international hobo, and Kiwi Farms, a website, to pay for a lawyer and pay off speculators?

Be careful Null, Greer's coming for your media empire!
He probably thinks we're "lawsuit investors." Which is stupid once you think about it, but my rate of return on entertainment value alone makes me think he's onto something...
 
Lawsuit investors? Russ thinks the value of his shitty song and book are so high, he's sitting on a money-making opportunity? He's going to extract enough damages from Joshua Moon, international hobo, and Kiwi Farms, a website, to pay for a lawyer and pay off speculators?
Western common law jurisdictions used to (for many hundreds of years) despise the whole concept of third parties funding litigation for a proportion of any proceeds. It's known as champerty and the contracts behind it were voided (and in some jurisdictions still are) , gave rise to civil liability as a tort and, also gave rise to criminal liability.

This was all in the interests of combating frivolous litigation. Strange how the removal of rules aimed at a specific problem would result in exacerbating that problem Who could possibly have foreseen such an outcome?
 
Gloves off.
One thing I agree with, though: now that the Supreme Court has decided to not hear our case, it's time Greer is made to follow the rules. Either he's a competent adult who can follow the court's rules, including their deadlines, or he's an incompetent retard who should drop the case.
Is it is time for Hardin to go on the offensive? I think Hardin has not because he has been unsure about how the Florida court views all of this stuff. The only thing we have learned about the Florida court is that they are a bit retarded because they thought this case was still in Utah.

But Hardin could very easily file a response to a motion to extend pointing out that Greer has gotten so much time already and he had plenty of time to file useless motions in Utah.

Hardin could also wait and see how the court responds to the motion to extend and the 4 motions Greer needs to reply to before doing anything. Greer is such a fucking retard that those 4 motions can cause him to lose his case if he is not careful anyway.

I think Hardin is still waiting to see what Florida is like before going gloves off. Though we shall see soon depending on whether or not Florida grants the motion to extend.
I notice he only asked for until June 15th. He seems to realize demanding 90 days at once was flying too close to the sun.
Can Greer write that fast? He is so retarded that 30 days is not enough for our little confused retard to file 4 ENTIRE REPLIES. That is a week and half a day for each motion. Way too fast.
 
"I can't believe my reputation is so radioactive that no one wants to support me. It can't be because I say batshit insane stuff like this, it's clearly the fault of Soviet Jews".
It isn't going to be people with super duper niggercattle appeal who test the boundaries of our alleged legal system. If the law fails to protect him (and us by proxy) just because of his reputation, accelerationist destruction is a very reasonable response
 
Last edited:
It isn't going to be people with super duper niggercattle appeal who test the boundaries of our alleged legal system. If the law fails to protect him (and us by proxy) just because of his reputation, accelerationist destruction is a very reasonable response
Hey man, if you want to do a Fight The Power larp while sounding like an Eric Harris diary entry, you're well within your rights to do so. Just don't get pissy when it inevitably blows up in your face and no one wants anything to do with you.
 
"I can't believe my reputation is so radioactive that no one wants to support me. It can't be because I say batshit insane stuff like this, it's clearly the fault of Soviet Jews".

Equal Protection is in the 14th amendment. That means the law is supposed to treat you the same whether you're a nigger or five far-left rags have opinion pages stating that you are a big meanie doo-doo head. It's a legal principle that goes back to ancient Greece and is one of the corner stones of democracy.

We are already in some seriously uncomfortable territory where the 10th circuit has ruled that linking to copyright infringing material, is in itself contributary copyright infringement if you subsequently mock a DMCA notice about it, OR, in words you might understand, LINKING to something that infringes copyright somehow magically goes back in time to CONTRIBUTE to that violation happening in the first place.

IF your response to this is, well, no wonder, hysterical blue-hairs on the Internet scream about how shitty you are, and even though you have never been convicted of anything you are accused of, expect the law to re-write time and space to fuck you over, well...

may you get what you deserve from the world you are willing to kneel to.
 
Back