Here I thought Robert Barnes would be the one to place his total credibility on the line, but David Freiheit (Viva Frei) did not want to be left out.
*"Nowhere in the application for the search warrant does it allege the children were the source", as he shares a screenshot with the section on the children reporting their poor condition to a teacher, circled in red:
*David notices that there seems to be "a lot of other overlapping accounts" from the trolls. He claims this is "CoIntelPro type chicancery" organised, noting that they follow the brother of someone David claims "was framed by the government", & are "now trusting the government". Not the brother, but an account following the brother:
*David complains that the "definitive evidence" of Nick powdering his nose was not included in the application for the search warrant:
*When called out on this, David contends the application referenced "hours of streams (literally, hours)", & "even based on the screengrab, observations differ". David argues it is improper, "with no video/screengrab submitted to the judge":
*The commenter specifies that the picture comes from the specific timestamp cited, to which David falls back on the fact the picture was not part of the application & wonders how much the affiant was influenced by the chat:
*Someone compares Robert Barnes & David's analysis of Nick's case to that of Sidney Powell & Linn Wood, of
Kraken lawsuit fame. David asks whether he meant his & Robert's analysis of it, or directly comparing the two to Robert & David. The commenter clarifies that David is ignoring the concept of totality of evidence, which allows for each of the issues to build up to granting the warrant, when taken as a whole. David brushes this off, with the commenter quipping that David & Robert brushed off the children reporting their neglect to a teacher as "'not legitimate'":
