Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 18.8%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.2%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 91 27.1%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 54 16.1%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 124 36.9%

  • Total voters
    336
Just a bit of restructuring, I think. I will add some summary, images, and a paragraph about the arrest arc, but the Arrest Arc itself and the Imholte Arc can be summarised, then linked to the respective threads for comprehensive treatment.

I will reach out to the OP creators in those threads and see if we can collaborate to make them pretty encompassing.

All that will have to wait a bit due to personal cirxumstances, but that gives some time for things to settle. I knew this would be a project to maintain, but I didn't expect such progress in the meantime...
The community happenings posts on this have good summations you could lift
 
To think that there’s a major problem here, or that a beef with the judge will mean a chance of success at an appeal is really retarded.

Let’s follow the logic here.

IF the balldowashers are right, and the judge needs to recuse herself because of some stuff Nick said, what’s the logical outcome?

Well, any time some niggo gets caught for an armed robbery or slinging dope, all he needs to do to get another judge and/or delay the trial for a while, is to go on to YouTube and insult the judge.
I think the stronger argument for her to recuse is she is currently hearing a civil case against Nick.
 
Nick sees this and his barely functioning lawyer-brain sees it as a slight error he can poke at and pretend the cops planted evidence or are incompetent.
"There's a FRINGE on that flag!" Same energy.
How is this even possible? They spend their entire working life surrounded by firearms
It's not that infrequent that every single officer in a department has exactly the same service weapon.

It's also possible it's a legal category. Statutory language about guns is some of the dumbest and most obtuse stuff you will ever read, since they're usually written by absolute retards. When you write a complaint you're more or less forced to track the statutory language even if it's dumb or outright wrong.
I think the stronger argument for her to recuse is she is currently hearing a civil case against Nick.
If she's not biased in one case against Nick, I doubt she'd be in the other. I seriously think their past history warrants recusal but it's pretty discretionary. I don't see her doing it. Possibly the appeals court might disagree.
 
It's not 50 hours of footage, they're pulling 50 hours out of their ass as the amount of time it will take to edit the footage. $60x50hr of editing=$3k
Do you know that? We now know we had 10 officers involved in a search warrant and search of a large hovel full of crap, plus arrests, bookings etc. Dash cams are probably included unless someone crapped up the FOIA request.

4-5 hours is not that unreasonable for a call like this, pretty standard really. Despite my retarded Rekieta tier math in my last explanation of the ORR process. Fifty hours total is not that far-fetched.

The Way This Goes (minus the MN retardation):
  • Request is made, reviewed for completeness and compliance with FOIA. This is where most agencies are the most obtuse. "Oh, we need the 10 day extension to check with the AG and verify we HAVE to release this."
  • The BodyCams are identified and the files identified by either incident or date/time.
  • EVERY file is aggregated and then has to be watched all the way though to identify sensitive or other views, that need to be redacted to comply with HIPPA or other privacy laws. This can be done with pencil and paper or paused and flagged inside the same software used to edit.
  • Then gone through and redacted, muted, blurred or marked up. A one hour video could easily take 5-6 to complete that process.
  • Then it is reviewed, so watched again and re-edited if necessary, exported and parked on the ORR site for downloading or exported to media compatible with common systems (flash drive, DVD, etc.).
I pulled $60/hour because of a highly specialized role. I was assigned requests ONLY when they were touchy or very complex. Your average custodian of records ia somewhere between $15-$20/hour with department heads in the $30/range (Source: Post retirement boredom and subsequent job searches).

FOIA is a federal thing. How each state complies varies. But across the board, there are limited types of records that can be assigned fees to recover costs. Run sheets, simple data pulls, etc. Also there's a time threshold required to charge. Ours was 1.5 hours, where fees were permitted and then in increments of .3 hours.

A big deal like this could shut down a podunk county like this if they couldn't cover the deluge of requests they're getting.
:thinking:
I may have a thought there.

i dont buy it
if you go through all the trouble to go on a trip to a swinger hotel, surely you would bring viagra?
Viagra has its limits.

YES!
Fight the good fight! I want to see that body can footage so badly.

The PD is likely reacting in the usual regarded way for small rural police departments.

“Oh noes, this makes the community look bad! Set a high price and they’ll stop asking!”

Little do they know that this footage is easily worth tens of thousands of dollars. Nevermind the views the lawtube yards are fighting over. It could be a career maker for some small channel.
This and the excuse of "ongoing investigations is bull shit. The warrant, affidavit, inventory and report are all public. You see PDs release BodyCam on active cases all of the time, especially when they are being grilled or accused of offing a black man for no reason.

NOTE: Maybe that's it! Barnes' conspiracy sperging to all of his following is really 4D chess. He's working for us to get that footage! 🙄 Obviously you freaks have broken me.

You think Kyle has any tales about Rackets trying to proselytize the Church of the Balldo? I vaguely recall some borderline inappropriate comments toward Kyle onstream that he kinda laughed off
He looked so embarrassed! Screw you Nick.


Oof! Kurt says he'll probably post the bodycam footage if it comes out.
That poor celiac autist is just now getting to the "acceptance" stage of grief. He was pitiful calling Nick "my friend" after the way Nick has abused him over and over.

Oh dear lord, please have them read that aloud in court as evidence of how fucked and drunk he is on a regular basis!

“Mr Rekieta, what do you mean by ‘vaginal liquor’?!?”

“Mr Rekieta, in your years in the legal profession, have you ever come across a judge pouring liquor out of her vagina?”
Another reason to accept his faults, clean up and get rehab and no little amount of counseling. But he won't hear the hundreds of us that have warned, begged and ridiculed him to get help.

Go ahead Nick, you know you're a target of the deep state. Fight this. Take it all the way, you have a duty. I'll sit back and watch the collapse of a narcissistic wife abuser and child neglector. Make SURE those videos come in.

<SNIP>
Edit: She said she tried calling everyone she could possibly think of but couldn't get a hold of anyone. Ended up just giving me this email and said someone would get in contact with me if I sent an email. Said she wasn't sure if the body cam footage could be released to a private citizen or not.
Absolute bullshit. There's such an avalanche of legislation, AG opinions and case law saying it is releasable; given certain safeguards. Agencies still try to strain at the gnat to find a way to delay or stop the release because they are almost always acting out of school.

FOIA overrides all of that. Of course they can decide not to wear their cameras at all. That works for the ATF.

Correct. The claim of not being fed came from one of the 4 that talked to the pastor. Now, could the cop have seen Aaron mention the spaghettios story, sure. And that would only support the claim of the teacher. So while the claim doesn't come from Aaron, having a second independent source say the same thing would be interesting to the cop.
RAS becomes probable cause.

Aaron, the Liar claimed that the $3,000 was actually the month's grocery bills, and the reason it was framed as snacks is because it was all ready-to-eat foods that didn't require someone putting together as a meal.
With our specialized diets, a third of my monthly goes to groceries and that's without being prepackaged. But if we could eat those things, we could load up on Little Debbies, chips and a few cans of Spaghetti Os and work an ounce of coke in to boot.

Added in Edit: Charging fees under FOIA is very carefully regulated. The agency has to justify and document the charges in detail. Most AGs have people that audit and handle what goes on in their states. The feds can and have hammered agencies for obstructionism and fee gouging.
 
Last edited:
Don't know if this has been posted before, but if you look to the left, you will see Rackets furiously shaking his legs. (I wanted to zoom in but I have no idea how to do that).
View attachment 6034424
I wouldn't say furiously, it seems rather like the shaky leg movement that someone does when they are impatient or had too much coffee. But the fact that he's doing it with both legs is very odd.
 
Again, the people saying the children should take care of themselves can eat shit. There is NO WAY a 16 year old CHILD can parent/take care of 4 younger children, the younges of whom is 6, especially after the nanny quit and with no help from mom or dad.
it's absolutely doable. back in the day when life was tough, kids routinely had to put in serious work around the home, including being responsible for taking care of their younger siblings to some degree.
the difference is that those kids were raised appropriately to be able to handle these responsibilities, whereas the rekieta kids apparently were pampered and had everything taken care of by mommy and the nanny. but then mommy falls down the coke hole and the nanny quits, now all of a sudden nothing is getting done and the kids have no idea how to deal with it since they were never trained or prepared for this situation.

tl;dr: a 16 year old is definitely capable of doing the laundry and cooking dinner for his siblings - if he has been taught and trained on how it's done. i think that's probably where a lot of these comments are coming from: "i was able to take care of these things at 16 so why shouldn't rekietas kids be able to do the same?"
 
I used to watch Viva a few years back, wtf happened to turn him full schizoid like this? Or am I just remembering h
The covid lockdowns broke him and turned him insane. He went from polite well groomed youtuber and father to wild haired freedom fighting crazy person. Like a low rent Russel Brand. It was both sad and fascinating to watch.
 
Don't you just love blaming the victims and taking zero accountability for you own actions?

The people who are saying that the children should be able to take care of themselves and defending the neglect can eat shit.

I feel the most for the 16 year old.

The people saying shit like:

"The oldest should be able to keep the house clean and cook for his siblings, make sure all of their clothes are washed, they're fed, doing their homework, and make sure they are staying out of trouble. It's really the children's fault for not doing their chores and feeding themselves!"

Again, the people saying the children should take care of themselves can eat shit. There is NO WAY a 16 year old CHILD can parent/take care of 4 younger children, the younges of whom is 6, especially after the nanny quit and with no help from mom or dad.

Fuck the Cokieta defenders
Even if a 16 year old CAN take care of 4 younger children, several cats, and a dog it's not their responsibility. It's the parents'.

The youngest is SIX YEARS OLD, and eternally trapped in the house because they're likely not part of the home schooling co-op activities yet. Just awful.
 
I'll repeat that this is not an attitude befit for a civilized society. Go to Brazil or Africa if you think you are justified to be a vigilante. Just don't be surprised when someone else decides to put on a tire around your neck and set it on fire when they claim to have "undeniable proof" of your commission of a crime.

the latter would not be justice, it would be vigilantism. and when vigilantes become the norm, then just about everyone will take "justice" into their own hands (especially when they don't agree with what a court of law rules in cases relevant to them). at the same time, the actual meaning of justice will become distorted.

standards matter, and they are more objective than emotions such as "righteous fury."

edit:
additionally, i went to law school. in short, due process is "the opportunity to be heard."

there is procedural due process and substantive due process. one is laid out in procedural law, the other is a right given to a citizen by the Constitution. if you just hand out street justice/ commit vigilantism, then you (not Yellow dude; you as in a person in general) Ignored due process. hopefully, no one Decides to Deprive you of your right to due process.
Erm, simply don't let yourself get murked perhaps? There are circumstances where you have firsthand knowledge and don't need a jury. Also killing child abusers when the authorities fail to is in fact very civilized. What about when they're convicted but only get 2 years or have their sentence suspended?
 
They were in pre-school and probably know, love, and trust their former pre-school teacher
Someone mentioned many fucking pages ago that the woman that was cited as the pre-school teacher is actually the head of like 90% of the church activities or something crazy. So the kids definitely see her a lot in general.
 
I can't put a figure on how much Aaron is right. To be sure, he has reasons to lie, exaggerate, or omit certain stuff. That said, I do think there is some truth in his Kino Casino appearance.

That’s like saying “There’s a reasonable chance the earth is round”, my guy…

No, I’m not saying he’s 100% correct about everything, but:

*The things he alleged before the arrest were true.

*The stories he told “Snow Angel” etc, BEFORE the arrest has been corroborated at least in one instance.

*His stories and “testimony” haven’t changed in any significant way.

*He generally comes across as truthful. You don’t see any of the typical liars tells, and most answers come without any weaving.

*He resists the temptation to sensationalize stuff. If he really wanted to make the Farms happy, we’d be hearing about Drexel and gay shit and Nick getting pegged with a balldo.

I’d say we’re a lot closer to “80% true” than “20% true.”
 
I can't put a figure on how much Aaron is right. To be sure, he has reasons to lie, exaggerate, or omit certain stuff. That said, I do think there is some truth in his Kino Casino appearance.
Although I cant stand his Cumia mannerisms, I believe a good portion of it. PPP would fire these probing questions that should trip up liars and Aaron seemed to handle them without any delays. He would just answer them.
 
The weird time he compared Jesus Christ to Brokeback fucking Mountain was the clearest sign he's no longer a man of God and doesn't want to be. That's the "playing chess with God" equivalent to flipping the chessboard and punching the timekeeper.

Reminds me of the few times this year he would single out someone in his chat by saying their IRL first name and making references to their personal going-ons to taunt them. Something about some guy owning a restaurant. He has a pattern of doing this to people to keep them in line.

Nick's pretty fucked up in the head.
Yeah, looking at him it's been obvious exactly what Nick is for a long time.
You're a fucking fool if you let someone like that know anything personal about you, they just store that shit up to use against you.
 
There are three judges and she is the senior judge. With the amounts of drugs involved and the sort of case this is, she was probably going to get it. I think she would also get it because she is going to have to arrange the scheduling of the discovery in Nick's civil case and the trial for Nick's criminal case.
What will be fun is she probably doesn't know about the Vagina Vodka rant yet. All she has seen is what was presented in the search warrant application. She just read the descriptions the cops gave her and took them at their word.

Imagine if they play that full video in court with her unprepared?

Damit we really need the hearings livestreamed!
 
How is this even possible? They spend their entire working life surrounded by firearms
They are only surrounded by the one they are trained on and issued. Even in the ATF-E, most field agents are just FLETC graduates that got accepted into ATF. They aren't trained gunsmiths, or experts at identifying firearms. They have specially trained people just for that. ATF-E agents are trained at investigating and capturing people in relation to ATF-E related laws. "Hey is that guy making Alcohol without paying taxes? Get'em!.. Hey is that guy got a pile of guns? Get'em!"

They do an inordinate amount of target practice with K9 targets however.
 
Back