Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 18.8%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.2%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 91 27.1%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 54 16.1%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 124 36.9%

  • Total voters
    336
Didn't he claim to practice Taekwondo before getting into cheerleading (to get the cheerleaders into Taekwondo no less)? I seem to recall him also bringing it up in a "I'd kick X's ass because I used to practice martial arts" context. I have a hard time believing this twig could kick anyone's ass.
Maybe he meant he did alot of "Guy Juan Blow"
 
That's what 5 pregnancies does to ya
More like what being married to a failed alcoholic cokehead lawyer husband with a need for control and an outsized ego, who insults you publicly does to you.

The problem here is that Lawyers have been reprogrammed to view everything through a relativistic, argumentative legal-eese lense and have lost their sense of basic moral decency. (of course they pretend to have it for the streams and views though). Combine that with loyalty and you get a complete fucking disaster that dwarfs the skeptophere collapse.
Camelot is not a lawyer, though, right?

But the actual problem with the lawtubers is that they fail to put their commentary in the correct perspective, not identifying when they're stretching to articulate a potential legal argument vs actually giving an opinion on whether that position has merit, and their audience doesn't understand the difference.

Lawyers - good ones, anyway - know when they are stating hypotheticals based on law/practice and when they are trying to justify a personal opinion, and typically are or should be very clear about which one. People constantly misinterpret or confuse the two, and responsible lawyers should not play that for likes. It's very simple to say, "here's how this looks or will likely play," or "if I were in x position I'd argue y bc I think that would help my client, bc that's what the law says [but if you ask me personally, I'd rather see z/I'm not speaking about what is right or wrong, just what is likely]." Or Alternatively,"I'd do a, b, c, even if I knew it's bullshit, but it's a tool in an advocate's arsenal, and that's the way it works."

They don't clarify when they are giving an advocacy position and when they are speaking neutrally, and online they take a position while pretending neutrality. Because that plays. And when they do the opposite, the neutral assessment is interpreted as a viewpoint. They should be crystal clear about which they are asserting. Because what should happen and what you might want to happen (in truth or for argument's sake) are not at all always the same thing.

Of course, too, some of them are just wrong and/or blinded by bias, but their real failure is not disclosing the difference between considered assessment and advocacy. And for Rekieta to be butthurt and perceive someone saying, "warrant looks supported, and if there were 26.7 grams of coke in your house discovered by people who entered based on the warrant, I'd advise rehab and contrition as your best first step, and law aside, get your shit together, man" as offensively disloyal and that those people are mean just points up why he's faulty as a human, and why as a lawyer he can't be taken seriously. I'm sympathetic to his obvious emotional and tangible investment here, but if he wants to be a human then he needs to take off the (inexperienced) lawyer hat - or vice-versa.
 
Slight PL, Taekwondo is the biggest load of shit martial art you'll ever learn. You'll get shoved to the ground in the middle of a fancy kick and you'll get your ass beaten. The only way Taekwondo works is if you spend literally thousands of hours working out your legs to a degree where you can make these moves work. But even then, pivoting on one foot is extremely dangerous. On top of that, most of these schools don't teach their students how to strengthen themselves. So all of these moves and forms are completely useless. Rackets surely has not done any of this. He would do his kick, get knocked to the ground and get another black eye to even out the other one. A street thug could easily win, even against a black belt in Taekwondo.
100% agree. Martial arts fall on a spectrum with "useless in a real fight" on one side and "actually works" on the other. Taekwondo is all the way on the bad side of that spectrum. I think the most physically dangerous person I have seen in my lifetime was Mike Tyson in his prime, and he didn't need a black belt to accomplish it.
 
I miss the Titanic Sub. That was hilarious. I'm glad I got to live through that. All that counting down, people genuinely thinking there was any chance of saving them. It was such a hilarious LARP. The Xbox controller, the victims we don't even feel sorry for, etc. etc. Even if it was a government PsyOp, at least this one was fun.

FBI Agents, can we do another one of these?
Some other idiot billionaire is about to do it again. To prove something to somebody?
Camelot is not a lawyer, though, right?
I don't think he even graduated Middle School.
 
Wow. There was a time she actually looked really cute.

You go from this...
View attachment 6052604

To saying this...
View attachment 6052613

Then finally...
View attachment 6052614

To this.
View attachment 6052618

BUT JUST WHEN YOU THINK IT'S OVER...
View attachment 6052620
Laziness and insecurity about their own body seams to be a common trend in cuck/swingers circles. It reminds of a drunk passive aggressive rant that Nick had on his locals about his shoulders being small. Like... You don't exercise and your diet is just alcohol. What body did you expect to have?

It also reminds me how Ms. Rekieta first act to improve her own body was plastic surgery. Exercise? Nutrition? Too hard. Let's go direct to plastic surgery.

Everybody who is into swinging shit wants to feel sexy; but don't want to put the effort into making themselves sexy. Extreme low willpower.
 
More like what being married to a failed alcoholic cokehead lawyer husband with a need for control and an outsized ego, who insults you publicly does to you.
You act like shes blameless, whos to say she didn't start the drugs? She was the one that was going to mysterious hospital trips and shit; probably rehab and plastic surgery. Nick is a pile of shit, but lets not pretend kayla is an angel who dindu nuffin.
 
Last edited:
He almost deserves a thread of his own, or maybe there should be a lolyer thread just for grifters like this.

The shit he did with Rittenhouse is not unique. He also pulled this shit with Nicholas Sandmann, a repulsive clown act I had forgotten, resulting in Sandmann having to denounce him publicly.
View attachment 6053342View attachment 6053341View attachment 6053340
1717519148255.png(A)
1717519176841.png
Archive of the thread

1717522860577.png(A)
He also got called out by Nick's lawyer


1717522490231.png(A)
He implied that he filed a complaint against Reza Asian who said Nicholas had a pinchable face.

1717524297726.png(A)
1717524401021.png
1717524355078.png(A)
He also shared an article which implied the same thing.

1717524217386.png(A)
After he got called out. he backtracked

1717523194729.png(A)
1717524614038.png(A)
1717524003737.png(A)
He was shit talking Nick's lawyers all the way back to March 2019 because they told him to stop implying he was part of the legal team.


1717520791255.png(A)
1717521423405.png(A)
1717520889414.png
Screenshot 2024-06-04 200926.png(A)
Also, lmfao

1717524916971.png(A)
1717524981393.png(A)
articles about the situation

1717519335791.png(A)
1717519485376.png(A)
1717521333595.png(A)
1717521518922.png(A)
1717521955688.png(A)
And then this faggot called everyone on this site a bunch of pedos. Anyone defending this faggot grifter piece of shit at this point should kill themselves. He was always at best sus. He is now a mask-off scumbag.
Lmfao, okay Barnes.
 
Last edited:
100% agree. Martial arts fall on a spectrum with "useless in a real fight" on one side and "actually works" on the other. Taekwondo is all the way on the bad side of that spectrum. I think the most physically dangerous person I have seen in my lifetime was Mike Tyson in his prime, and he didn't need a black belt to accomplish it.
Stuff like boxing and MMA are about as good as you can get for transfer to an actual fight which is over in maybe 5-30 seconds max. Throwing a flashy kick is a great way to get caught and stuffed to the ground. And yeah, prime Mike was untouchable.

Seeing the pictures of Nick back then, even when he's a self described "buff cheerleader", was no threat to anyone unless he's carrying a weapon. Frail, dorky, weak dude. Got by on other parents money, is good at lying, and got really, really lucky. Until now.
 
Some other idiot billionaire is about to do it again. To prove something to somebody?
I hope he at least uses a PS5 controller.

Seeing the pictures of Nick back then, even when he's a self described "buff cheerleader", was no threat to anyone unless he's carrying a weapon. Frail, dorky, weak dude. Got by on other parents money, is good at lying, and got really, really lucky. Until now.
To be fair, if I looked like Nick and was a male cheerleader, I'd lie about being a buff cheerleader too. In the words of our man with nostrils of now rusted steel, "how embarrassing".

On a side note, we really need "HOW EMBARRASSING" put at the bottom of the page like Ethan Ralph's "You're Gonna Carry That Gunt". Especially since they're so similar, it's only appropriate.
 
But the actual problem with the lawtubers is that they fail to put their commentary in the correct perspective, not identifying when they're stretching to articulate a potential legal argument vs actually giving an opinion on whether that position has merit, and their audience doesn't understand the difference.
Even Nick in his actual law commentary period was careful to note when he was stating his opinion of what things should be, versus what they actually are, like his bizarre opinion about Marbury which he was careful to note was a fringe opinion.

Barnes just stated that bail, in and of itself, is unconstitutional, in stark contrast to the actual language of the Constitution.
Everybody who is into swinging shit wants to feel sexy; but don't want to put the effort into making themselves sexy. Extreme low willpower.
"Swingers" are scum. Utter degenerates. In fact, I even reject this dumb "swinger" word. It's a pathetic attempt to make repulsive and loathsome behavior somehow look cool. What they are is just disgusting, pathetic cucks.

There is no excuse whatsoever for ever being a cuck, or a "swinger." It's just disgusting, subhuman behavior.
 
EVS's moral character has been chronicled in the CG thread for 6 years now.
He has no morals.
I have had no prior knowledge of EVS before he went on stream last week to argue why Nick’s 16 year old should be taking care of his siblings to toughen him up or some gay shit like that. I have to assume he doesn’t have kids of his own.
 
I have had no prior knowledge of EVS before he went on stream last week to argue why Nick’s 16 year old should be taking care of his siblings to toughen him up or some gay shit like that. I have to assume he doesn’t have kids of his own.
He has an adult son from his first marriage and, from his new wife, a young autistic daughter that he uses as a shield whenever he's criticized.

His younger brother is also an artist (Noah Van Sciver) and has drawn a quirky book about the abuse they experienced at the hands of their crazy dad when they were kids. Very mentally ill family, EVS himself is probably a narcopath.
 
Male cheerleaders that are good at it (ugh why) have to be able to move 130 lb girls and hold up at least 200 lb in like those pyramids.

Nick was creeping and wanted access to girls.

As stated many times in this thread, Nick is a liar.

Nick’s best skill, probably above all else, is lying and deception.

He learned early on how to lie. Families with wealth have a lot of that since you need to stay on good terms to keep the welfare flowing.

He’s a loser that snagged an airhead but never had the opportunity or means to become as much of a degenerate or coomer, until now.

Elissa clips has been hitting it out of the park with snippets from the May 22nd stream. So many of them are Nick responding to questions that we now know, after the April blowjob stream and arrest warrant, are absolutely false.

There is more and more direct evidence out now and coming out with the body cams that directly contradict him.
Nick admitted himself that he never was a good lawyer.
So if Nick thinks he can just lie to the court and it will be like his locals sycophants he’s totally fucked.

Livestreams of the court hearing is going to be lawtube’s OJ. Instead of a nigger killing a mudshark blonde it’s a creep killing his real life for an american beauty degenerate fantasy.
 
It astonishes me that, in what is now a thread of well over 5000 pages, the real victim of Nick Rekieta's runaway degeneracy has scarcely been acknowledged.

Picture, if you will, the following: A teenager on Christmas morning. Kneeling beside the tree, his trembling fingers prise apart the wrapping around a long box, revealing inside a doll of Magneto - the principle villain of the X-Men. He unfastens the wire ties that hold the action figure in place. Removing it from its packaging he tries out the various accessories. He shuffles-off the tight fitting helmet that amplifies Magneto's already formidable powers. Holding it up to the blinking festive lights, he admires its phallic art deco contouring, as if Frank Lloyd Wright had redesigned the human penis for a more sophisticated age. If this were larger, he thinks, I could fit both of my balls inside.

Time passes. Pages tumble from the calendar like leaves in Autumn. The Magneto doll either breaks or is sold on eBay, or at a yard sale. A collage of spinning headlines presents a dynamic picture of a world in continuous flux:

Lara Croft discovers rare Sonichu Medallion in Peru

Lara Croft: "Inside me there are two wolves, both trans"

Millionaire heiress, Lara Croft, avoids jail after wolf sex video leaks online

Pervert Croft imprisoned after locating/fucking missing father

The boy is now a man of college age, navigating the internal politics of the Title IX dating scene. He has a girlfriend who refuses to allow him to nut inside her. 'But what if I were somehow able to place my nuts inside her?' he thinks. What then?

What then, indeed.

Drawing on Magneto's helmet for inspiration, he designs a bullet-shaped device that, with the insertion of the testicles, will assume the role of a hamster-cheeked secondary penis; one that has been fashioned not by God but by the artifice of man, who now dares to tamper with the fabric of creation itself. Weeks later, while on a mushroom bender, he will christen this apparatus 'The Balldo'.

The man creates a prototype from a cardboard tube. Incredibly, it holds both his gonads securely. The cardboard is both sharp and yielding; unlikely to survive long in the moist environment of a vagina A different medium is required. He convinces a friend - William, who is majoring in Applied Material Sciences - to manufacture a mock-up in hard plastic. William is a man of limited vision who cannot conceive penetrating a woman with his balls. He buys the story that the device is a portable bird feeder. The man files the relevant documents in person at the patent office. Giddy with expectation he imagines a world where the Balldo is more object d'art than sex toy; where it has transcended its trademark and has become a household name; where miniature Balldos, rendered in platinum and silver, dangle from charm bracelets; where the Top Hat playing piece in the board game Monopoly is permanently phased out and is replaced by a Balldo.

The years that follow pass in a blur:

He is in the corner office of a skyscraper, standing before a group of angel investors, pointing confidently with a stick at a pie chart on a whiteboard.

A montage of female news anchors, wearing pastel-toned jackets, utter the word "Balldo" approvingly in chorus.

Kyle from Nickelodeon orders 100,000 Balldos in the colours of the trans flag, for Gay Pride Month.

From her prison cell, Lara Croft accuses him of culturally appropriating the Balldo from the Mayans.

He is contacted by a man named Nick Rekieta - a lawyer - who offers to promote the Balldo within the respectable legal sector.

Alas, Rekieta is a control freak who is spiraling out of control; a degenerate scumbag worshipper of a pink anthropomorphic cow who, in the depraved mythology of his pantheon, is periodically fucked in the arse by a woman who has been hand-stitched from leather in a Mexican sweatshop. Rekieta has opened his marriage to all coomers. They film the overtures to their sordid bedroom dalliances in the sex pond he has incorporated into his formerly-christian home. He is a cocaine prepper; a man at war with his creator, and he is made to suffer the consequences. When the police break down his front door, they enter a house strewn with guns and filth, that bears the footprints of unwashed children dressed in soiled clothing. The Balldo will forever be associated with this individual. The brand is dead and with it dies the dream.

Another montage, this one documenting the fall of a man who challenged the notion of what could be inserted into a vagina: The same chorus of female news anchors, having seemingly swapped pastel-toned jackets with each other, utter the word 'Balldo', only this time with contempt. Kyle from Nickelodeon calls to cancel the Balldo deal. "Market research confirms that our demographic prefer well-groomed children with clean feet," he says. An article in the Wall Street Journal announces that the Top Hat in games of Monopoly is to be replaced by a baseball cap modelled on the one sold by the ailing Internet milliner, Jimothy Metokur.

100,000 Balldos, bedecked in trans flag colours, dangle from the branches of the tree outside the trailer that the man has been forced to move into. It is as if they have hung themselves in shame. William, his friend from college, visits. Spotting the hanging Balldos, he enquires of their inventor whether he has been successful in marketing his bird feeder design. The birds will not venture anywhere near this strange fruit. It is as if nature itself seeks to distance itself from Nick Rekieta.

One afternoon, the man receives a package in the mail. He opens the lid. A strange medallion stares back at him with green anime eyes. Wearily, he puts it on.
 
Last edited:
Even Nick in his actual law commentary period was careful to note when he was stating his opinion of what things should be, versus what they actually are, like his bizarre opinion about Marbury which he was careful to note was a fringe opinion.
Is that the fringe opinion where the court was never actually charged with the duty of saying what the law is, and conducting judicial review, under Article III? I don't know what Nick said, but I have heard that one before elsewhere.

I never understood that one, because if Marbury is wrong, then how the fuck can our judicial system function?

I don't dispute SCOTUS has does asspulls before, but I don't think that's one of them. It seemed the intent from the very beginning.

EDIT: Typo.
 
Last edited:
I have no idea why I posted that but I assume I was being accused (as I am, continuously, without any merit) of doing good will towards people for money. I most definitely did not receive any $10K from EVS, and I definitely would remember it, because 2019 was a financially very hard year for me.
Theoretically speaking, if you received some large sum of money during this financially hard period of time for you, would you sweep some dirt on the site connecting to person donating? I don't mean like deleting thread or something that severe, more along the lines of what you said in one of your streams, I think in was about Rakieta, where you said that you try not to talk/don't like to talk about drama associated with him, becouse you like the guy.

P. S. I not insinuating anything, just curious what would your actions be in this hypothetical situation.
 
This is 100% the guy who pretends he is gay to lure you into a false sense of security around him (which Nick admitted he did), or thinks up the idea of imposing an ‘underwear only’ rule on boys and the girls!! in his dorm so he can get some mental images for the spank bank for later (again, another one of Nick’s FUNNY & WEIRD tales).

View attachment 6052956
This should be told as a cautionary tale of what happens when a total loser dork gets attention for this first time in his life at mid-life crisis point.
Maybe it's already been said but what the fuck is with that hair style on him? The bowl cut bangs are atrocious.
 
Back