Skitzocow David Anthony Stebbins / Acerthorn / stebbinsd / fayettevillesdavid - Litigious autist, obese livestreamer, elder abuser, violent schizo, ladyboy importer, hot dog enjoyer, wereturkey.

How much will David sue the farms for?

  • $0/no suit

    Votes: 118 5.3%
  • Hundreds

    Votes: 17 0.8%
  • Thousands

    Votes: 45 2.0%
  • Millions

    Votes: 184 8.2%
  • Billions

    Votes: 136 6.1%
  • Trillions

    Votes: 483 21.5%
  • A steamy night with Null in a lace negligee

    Votes: 1,259 56.2%

  • Total voters
    2,242
Acerthorn was looking for a video about a 9 year old boy being stabbed.
https://old.reddit.com/r/findareddi...ubreddit_where_you_can_describe_a_news_story/ (a)
A subreddit where you can describe a news story and get help finding the appropriate news article
For example, I remember hearing on TV back in the 1990s a news story about a "thrill killer" (someone who kills just for fun) who waited at a beach's restroom for a prebubescent boy - ANY prebubescent boy; he didn't care who - to be in the bathroom alone with him before grabbing the boy from behind and stabbing him to death. When in police custody, the cops asked him to re-enact the murder but without the weapon, and the cop testified that, when the killer was strangling him, he (the cop) could literally feel the adrenaline coarsing through his veins.
I even found a video a few months ago on YouTube that showed the CCTV footage of that interview.

But now, I can't find it anywhere. I searched my YouTube watch history, I tried every google search term I could think of. I even checked the Wikipedia page on "Thrill killing," and found a list of the most notable instances, but this specific incident wasn't on the list.

It would be really nice if there was a subreddit where I could give the aforementioned description of the news story and somebody could provide me with a link to a news article documenting that story.

EDIT: I finally found the video in my YouTube watch history. But I still think a subreddit like this would be helpful.
I watched the video. There's no mystery, forensics, or criminal psychology. It's just the murderer describing how he killed the boy.
Acerthorn's fixation on this murder is really creepy when considering his BDSM fetish and fantasies about murder and torture. Another disturbing parallel, it what a knife attack. What does Acerthorn get from hearing about this boy's death again and again?
 
I saw a vid recently of six martial arts professionals competing for a title and in one of the challenges they had them in a small room with an attacker armed with a knife.


One out of six got away with non-lethal wounds once. Every other time they determined they sustained lethal damage from the attacker. It was sobering how deadly knife attacks can be (or any edged weapon).

Seems like the gobbler has one attack on record, hopefully there aren’t any more in the future.
 
Acerthorn's fixation on this murder is really creepy when considering his BDSM fetish and fantasies about murder and torture. Another disturbing parallel, it what a knife attack. What does Acerthorn get from hearing about this boy's death again and again?
He's planning his second attack on his father when his internet slows down again
 
He's planning his second attack on his father when his internet slows down again
Given that it's up to the government to pay for his internet the court house next time him better hope they keep the internet fast enough for his liking or he's going a slicing.
 
New entries in Stebbins v. CmdrImperialSalt

Docket 51 Zellzander responds
Claims uploading the Elden Ring Debate to the Kiwi Farms was for educational purposes and falls under fair use.
Claims the value of the copyrighted work is negligible and defendant is seek maximum damages out of greed and malice.
Believes reuploading the debate days before Acerthorn registered it means he can't be held liable for statutory damages.
Claims defendant is a creepy weirdo.
StebbensV.CmdrImperialSalt_51.0.1.pngStebbensV.CmdrImperialSalt_51.0.2.pngStebbensV.CmdrImperialSalt_51.0.3.pngStebbensV.CmdrImperialSalt_51.0.4.pngStebbensV.CmdrImperialSalt_51.0.5.png

Exhbit E - Acerthorn's CREEPY text messages to Jones from 2 different numbers.
StebbensV.CmdrImperialSalt_51.5e.1.png
StebbensV.CmdrImperialSalt_51.5e.2.png
(912) 550-4097
(281) 930-6678
IMO Jones shouldn't have blocked the numbers. Let Acerthorn run his mouth and hurt his case.

Exhbit F - Email between Jones and Acerthorn.
StebbensV.CmdrImperialSalt_51.6f.png

Acerthorn says he's going to obtain medical record, phone and email records, bank and paypal records. Acerthorn appears to be using this as an incentive for the defendant to settle out of court.

Exhibit D - Submits a broken link to a video

Docket 52 Amending Docket 51 Exhibit D
Another broken link

Docket 53 Amending Docket 51 Exhibit D again
Another broken link
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Docket 51 Zellzander responds
1718310209252.png

Even stabby knows you have to fill this part of the template in :lossmanjack:

Exhbit E - Acerthorn's CREEPY text messages to Jones from 2 different numbers.
What a creepy fucker, Jesus. He acts like a kids cartoon villain ffs. It must get his chub really going as this is the closest he has ever been to winning a case.

1718310397753.png

Thanks for the shoutout stabby! you should have included the whole quote though

Let this retard's gobbling be a lesson my fellow isis/kkk members. This is what happens when you touch da poopoo, you get covered in shit. @ZellZander was told by us that he was being a retard many, many times over. He couldn't help but to cowtip in the gayest way possible.

You shouldn't give this rape fantasy having, turkey gobbling, father face stabbing vexatious litigant (thats not vulgar abuse stabby, its true) any sort of ammo in these retarded lawsuits.

I'm sure this will be thrown out since he wants to basically enslave him but still.

Do not touch da poopoo

Now, i need to find more blackies to fire. I love my job!

lol
 
Last edited:
I think Zell's on the right track here

Show the court that the video is worthless
Show that Stabby sues people out of malice and greed
Show the video wasn't even copyright at the time
Show that Stabby has a large history of vexatious lawsuits born out of greed

Hopefully the judge will just toss the case but I have my doubts.
 
4 new entries in Stebbins v. CmdrImperialSalt

Docket 54 - Acerthorn's MOTION TO STRIKE OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE FOR PARTIAL JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS
gov.uscourts.cand.397981.54.0 - 1.pnggov.uscourts.cand.397981.54.0 - 2.pnggov.uscourts.cand.397981.54.0 - 3.pnggov.uscourts.cand.397981.54.0 - 4.pnggov.uscourts.cand.397981.54.0 - 5.pnggov.uscourts.cand.397981.54.0 - 6.pnggov.uscourts.cand.397981.54.0 - 7.png
Says transferring the case because the defendant moved is stupid. Agreed

Acerthorn's accidental livestream PTSD
20. The stream is obviously one of human authorship, as evidenced by the fact that I began
talking as soon as I appeared on the camera, and was clearly speaking a way that showed that I
knew I was livestreaming to my audience.

Says Zellzander is wrong, he can seek statutory damages because he registered the stream within the 3 month window. I think he's right.
17 USC § 412(2)
In any action under this title, other than an action brought for a violation of the rights of the author under section 106A(a), an action for infringement of the copyright of a work that has been preregistered under section 408(f) before the commencement of the infringement and that has an effective date of registration not later than the earlier of 3 months after the first publication of the work or 1 month after the copyright owner has learned of the infringement, or an action instituted under section 411(c), no award of statutory damages or of attorney’s fees, as provided by sections 504 and 505, shall be made for—
(1) any infringement of copyright in an unpublished work commenced before the effective date of its registration; or
(2) any infringement of copyright commenced after first publication of the work and before the effective date of its registration, unless such registration is made within three months after the first publication of the work.
The only reason Acerthorn bothered to register the stream is because someone reuploaded. If Zellzander had a waited a few this wouldn't be an an issue.

Exhbit A - Requests the Court take notice of exhibit B
Exhbit B - A screenshot of his Elden Ring copyright registration from the public catalog
Application Title: Elden Ring Sucks: The Livestream Debate
Date of Publication: 2022-06-25
Registration Number / Date: PA0002364261 / 2022-06-29
Zellzander uploaded the stream on the 28th.

Docket 55 - Acerthorn's MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
gov.uscourts.cand.397981.55.0  - 01.pnggov.uscourts.cand.397981.55.0  - 02.pnggov.uscourts.cand.397981.55.0  - 03.pnggov.uscourts.cand.397981.55.0  - 04.pnggov.uscourts.cand.397981.55.0  - 05.pnggov.uscourts.cand.397981.55.0  - 06.pnggov.uscourts.cand.397981.55.0  - 07.pnggov.uscourts.cand.397981.55.0  - 08.pnggov.uscourts.cand.397981.55.0  - 09.pnggov.uscourts.cand.397981.55.0  - 10.png
Basically saying everything he's said is true and the defendant is wrong about everything.
Does his usual insane request for the defendant's electronics to surrendered for forensic analysis so the downloaded stream can be deleted.
Maybe the Court should impound all of Acerthorn's electronics since it appears he hasn't deleted the 26(f) recording even after the Court ordered him to! Google even brought this to the Court's attention but Acerthorn didn't respond or show any futher effort to comply.

Oh no guys.
45. (b) if anyone who saw that Kiwi Farms thread had downloaded a copy of that video to
their own devices, that the Defendant be ordered to ensure, by any means necessary, that their
devices are likewise impounded and purged of any/all instances of infringement in a manner similar

Stupidity. How does this make any sense?
If someone reposts the stream after
downloading it from some anonymous torrent app, and Jones cannot prove that the origins of that
video file came from an original source other than him, it should be presumed that his posting of
the video to Kiwi Farms that fateful day was an ancestor action that enabled the other party to
obtain the video without paying me.

52. Does that sound like it would be impossible to ever achieve, especially the part
mentioned in ¶ 45(b)? Well, even if that is true,
maybe the Defendant should have thought about
that when he was reposting my video with the express intention of inflicting an injury onto me
that can never be fully undone. After all, it would be the epitome of a pyrrhic victory if the
defendant was enjoined to stop circulating my copyrighted content, but not ordered to clean up
the mess he had already made. That would be analogous to ordering an arsonist to stop burning
down the plaintiff's house after the house had already been reduced to ashes, but not ordering the
arsonist to repair the damage he had already inflicted.
53. It may indeed be true that the defendant will never, in his entire lifetime, be able to fully
comply with this injunction
The stream costs $1. Get over it.

Kiwi Farms shout out
55. To be clear, I am only asking for this nuclear injunction because this is the ideal case for
it. As explained in Sec. II-3 above, the Defendant's actions were flagrant and blatant, done out of
a willful and malicious desire to sabotage my ability to make money off the stream, which itself
was motivated primarily by Kiwi Farms' purely evil desire to inflict as much pain and suffering
on its “cows” as humanly possible, solely for the demented amusement of its psychotic userbase.

Docket 56 - Acerthorn's MOTION TO SET SCHEDULING ORDER
Acerthorn wants a case management conference on July 12, 2024. I think this is the same thing as the 26(f) meet and confer that Acerthorn secretly recorded in another case. Maybe Zellzander could bring that up to the Court along with Acerthorn apparently violating a court order.
gov.uscourts.cand.397981.56.0  - 1.png

Docket 57 - Zellzander resubmits docket to fix the missing plaintiff and defendant names
This confirms he still reads this thread since he fixed the issue after it was mentioned here.
Zell you can talk to us! Make a post.
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Ole Stabby's doing the same song and dance he's trying with Sid Alpha with the insane completely impossible demands to turn back time and "restore my personal reputation to the state it was before the events of this suit".

The defendant needs to do the impossible and well if he can't he should go to jail until he does. If he complains this is unfair then he really should have thought of that before he went and did the no no thing to me.

Yah Stabby, your insane demands of the impossible isn't going to make the judge take your case any more seriously.

Zell you need to make sure the judge is aware of ALL of Stabby's greedy and vexatious lawsuits and paint him as the greedy scheming asshole he is. Show the judge how often Sabby has tried to sue people and places for insane amounts of money over the smallest issues. Use the Google lawsuit which listed the complete set of Stabby's vexatious history.

Also point out the fact that Stabby himself said his whole video catalogue is worth only $40 a month so asking for 150K is extreme greed on a video that has zero commerical appeal and you can try to minimize the money the court will award Stabby if the fat greedy sack of shit wins.
 
Last edited:
Says Zellzander is wrong, he can seek statutory damages because he registered the stream within the 3 month window. I think he's right.
I disagree. Fourth Estate Pub. Benefit Corp. v. Wall-Street.com, 139 S. Ct. 881, 203 L. Ed. 2d 147 (2019) states that you can only commence a lawsuit once "the Copyright Office registers a copyright". It is a requirement. He has filed before he registered, and therefore he is neither entitled to victory nor the statutory damages. Indeed, had he registered and sued, he would be entitled to them even for infringements before the registration, but he has no such right for suing before registration. To the extend that post-hoc reproduction of a live stream counts as republication of a live broadcast (which I dispute), Supreme Court has mentioned that such things still require preregistration before lawsuits. "If a copyright owner is preparing to distribute a work of a type vulnerable to predistribution infringement—notably, a movie or musical composition—the owner may apply for preregistration. §408(f)(2); 37 CFR §202.16(b)(1) (2018). The Copyright Office will “conduct a limited review” of the application and notify the claimant "upon completion of the preregistration.” §202.16(c)(7), (c)(10). Once “preregistration . . . has been made,” the copyright claimant may institute a suit for infringement. [...] In the preregistration option, §408(f ), Congress provided that owners of works especially susceptible to prepublication infringement should be allowed to institute suit before the Register has granted or refused registration. See §411(a). Congress made the same determination as to live broadcasts. §411(c); see supra, at 4.6 As to all other works, however, §411(a)’s general rule requires owners to await action by the Register before filing suit for infringement." (highlights mine)

It's a technicality, but by law, in this case Zander is in the right. Should Acerthorn refile however...not so much then.
Docket 56 - Acerthorn's MOTION TO SET SCHEDULING ORDER
Russell Greer completely felted.
 
Ole Stabby's doing the same song and dance he's trying with Sid Alpha with the insane completely impossible demands to turn back time and "restore my personal reputation to the state it was before the events of this suit".

The only way David will repair his public image is if he jumped off the nearest high level bridge with a rope tied around his neck.
 
Like clockwork, here's another person to bully the poor jannie who will have to clean up that corpse. Have you no shame?
If there is a god the body would float down river and head out to sea. That way all that remains is a shoe that washes up on shore with a foot inside like over in BC.
 
Back