Skitzocow David Anthony Stebbins / Acerthorn / stebbinsd / fayettevillesdavid - Litigious autist, obese livestreamer, elder abuser, violent schizo, ladyboy importer, hot dog enjoyer, wereturkey.

How much will David sue the farms for?

  • $0/no suit

    Votes: 118 5.3%
  • Hundreds

    Votes: 17 0.8%
  • Thousands

    Votes: 45 2.0%
  • Millions

    Votes: 185 8.2%
  • Billions

    Votes: 136 6.1%
  • Trillions

    Votes: 483 21.5%
  • A steamy night with Null in a lace negligee

    Votes: 1,259 56.1%

  • Total voters
    2,243
How would Acerthornes filing restrictions for copyright claims now come into play? Given that Acer filed this case slightly before that ruling, and as near as I can tell, did not inform this court of those sanctions, could Zel at a minimum force a re-evaluation of Acers filing status?
Strictly speaking there shouldn't be any effect, however should he relay all the fraud upon the court and other misgivings that gave way to those restrictions, and asked the court to reconsider (especially if he mentions that the case never could have been filed as the copyright wasn't registered at the time), something might just happen
 
I’m spitballing here but since the case is filed and in motion it probably wouldn’t be sent back for review and screening. But a lawyer could definitely load up a Motion to Dismiss and Launch Plaintiff Into the Sun under the Federal Rules of I Don’t Like This Guy.

Attacking the validity of the copyright claim, bringing up his other dismissed cases to show a pattern of frivolous lawsuits and going after any procedural errors would probably be a productive strategy.

Acerthorn is entitled to copyright protection but in my opinion he’s more like patent trolls where he sues anyone who touches his content in hopes of getting a payday.

He puts in a fair use analysis in his lawsuits but it’s heavily slanted in his favor as the copyright holder. No surprise there, any lawyer would do the same. What gets ridiculous is the level of damages he seeks against commentary videos.
 
Haven't the people of Hiroshima suffered enough? First we turn them into rice crispies, then bioterrorize them with a stabhabby gaijin covered in mold and Oscar Mayer grease?

At least give them guns or katanas to defend themselves.
Oh in that case, use Stabby as target practice for missiles. I am sure we can send him over to Palestine as aid, get him shot at Israel, and see if the iron dome will be able to detect fat
 
I wonder if Stabbins will threaten the judge over this. That would be funny so I'm rooting for it.
Not a lawyer but I'm pretty sure this would lead to police kicking in his mold-infested door and arresting him on the spot. It is a really bad idea to fuck with the people who write the warrants that authorize police to come to your house.

Oh in that case, use Stabby as target practice for missiles. I am sure we can send him over to Palestine as aid, get him shot at Israel, and see if the iron dome will be able to detect fat
This reminded me of a thing. Someone once said in the Patrick Tomlinson thread that, were he dropped into an active warzone between the IDF and Hamas, he'd have a joint IDF-Hamas death squad hunting his ass down within hours because of how much of an unlikable prick he was towards everyone, even his allies. I feel like it's kind of the same case for David--except at least Patrick has his wife, Jackie Singh, and whatever other friends he might have with SFWA that he hasn't totally pushed away with his behavior. David has nobody.
 
Not a lawyer but I'm pretty sure this would lead to police kicking in his mold-infested door and arresting him on the spot. It is a really bad idea to fuck with the people who write the warrants that authorize police to come to your house.


This reminded me of a thing. Someone once said in the Patrick Tomlinson thread that, were he dropped into an active warzone between the IDF and Hamas, he'd have a joint IDF-Hamas death squad hunting his ass down within hours because of how much of an unlikable prick he was towards everyone, even his allies. I feel like it's kind of the same case for David--except at least Patrick has his wife, Jackie Singh, and whatever other friends he might have with SFWA that he hasn't totally pushed away with his behavior. David has nobody.
Don't forgot Paul, he doesn't like it you forget him.
 
Don't forgot Paul, he doesn't like it you forget him.
The man whose superpower is how utterly forgettable he is (child predation and creepiness is not a superpower) hates being forgotten.

And they say God doesn't have a sense of humor.
 
Stebbins v. Baz Docket 16 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION REGARDING CLAIMS PREVIOUSLY STRICKEN
stebbinsvbaz16_3.pngstebbinsvbaz16_4.pngstebbinsvbaz16_5.png
The court reaffirms that, despite Acerthorn's protest, his claims for libel and DMCA misrepresentation are to be stricken and defendant's statement "The one who sent the copystrike [i.e., Stebbins] seems to have erroneously assumed that it wasn’t fair use simply because I used his content on my videos, but that’s simply not true.” is obviously an opinion and protected by the First Amendment.

The Court has to remind Acerthorn that Baz can't be held liable for defamation from other individuals. Last page.
As for libel, which is a form of defamation claim, a plaintiff pursuing such a claim under
California law must show that the statement at issue “has a natural tendency to injure or causes
special damage.” Kieu Hoang v. Phong Minh Tran, 60 Cal. App. 5th 513, 531–32 (2021) (citation
omitted). Stebbins’s allegations here do not show any natural tendency of Garcia Baz’s alleged
statement to injure (instead suggesting only that Stebbins held an erroneous view of the fair use
defense), and the only actual damages he alleges as a result of any defamation were apparently
caused by earlier statements by other individuals, for which Stebbins seeks to hold Garcia Baz
liable on an attenuated theory of vicarious liability. See ECF No. 8 at 23, ¶ 104–07 (analogizing
Garcia Baz to a “driver of a getaway car” for previous harassment and defamation, with no
allegation that Garcia Baz acted in concert with anyone who previously defamed Stebbins). The
undersigned is aware of no legal support for such liability under these circumstances.

Stebbins v. Baz Docket 17 OBJECTION TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT & RECOMMENDATION
stebbinsvbaz17_1.pngstebbinsvbaz17_2.pngstebbinsvbaz17_3.pngstebbinsvbaz17_4.pngstebbinsvbaz17_5.png

Summary. No Judge, you're wrong. This Tiktok said so!
Acerthorn talks down to the Judge repeatedly.
3. First, I take issue with Judge Cisneros's conclusion that I was still required to present the
claims to a duty judge, even if I was filing an amended complaint in a case that had already
passed the duty judge. That was never included in Judge Thompson's order. If I was supposed to
read her mind and somehow just know that, then that is unconstitutional.
4. That said, Judge Cisneros made the bold assertion that, as long as the defendant includes
such words as “seems,” “think,” “believe,” or any other such weasel words, it automatically
qualifies as a non-actionable statement of opinion, full stop, as a bright line rule, and that this
applies “whether or not Garcia Baz’s conclusions were correct, or even reasonable.”
5. This finding is so backwards, and so disconnected from reality, that it is honestly baffling
to me how any reasonable person could possibly come to this conclusion.
14. Her other grounds for finding the libel and misrepresentation claims to be meritless are
also incorrect, albeit not for reasons as ludicrous on their face as that. She also insists that the
Defendant's statement does not imply any facts, but that is a lie. They do imply facts.
Specifically, they imply my scienter when issuing the DMCA Takedown. How can you honestly
not see that his accusations are implying that?

Agreeing with SidAlpha means defendant is conspiring with him.
15. Lastly, Judge Cisneros claims that I failed to allege sufficient facts to prove that Baz was
actively cooperating with all the others in such a way as to make him vicariously liable for the
injuries that I am seeking to recover from in Case 4:23-cv-00321-DMR (Stebbins v. SidAlpha).
There are multiple problems with this finding.
18. [...] In my First Amended Complaint, I included
unlisted versions of the Defendants' infringements in a YouTube playlist. I explicitly stated that
this was so the Court could see with its own two eyes how delusional the Defendant's case was
for fair use. One of those videos – which was originally titled “No, Acerthorn, You are NOT the
Victim,” but which I retitled the “Victim Video” for purposes of the First Amended Complaint –
is Video #13 of the playlist I provided.
19. This video clearly depicts Baz siding with the collection of trolls who have made my life
hell for the past few years and parroting their viewpoints. That alone demonstrates the sort of collaboration and conspiracy that is necessary to tie him in with all the other injuries I've suffered.
 

Attachments

Ahhhh more gobblings

We shall enjoy them!


Seriously...can Stabby not be a giant asshole to a judge even for a single second? Eh...never mind I know the answer

edit: lol mutherfucker is citing Legal Eagle as a authorize source for his "legal knowledge". That's almost more then I can bear. My poor sides
 
Last edited:
Ahhhh more gobblings

We shall enjoy them!


Seriously...can Stabby not be a giant asshole to a judge even for a single second? Eh...never mind I know the answer

edit: lol mutherfucker is citing Legal Eagle as a authorize source for his "legal knowledge". That's almost more then I can bear. My poor sides
Imagine if it was Rekieta.
 
  • Horrifying
Reactions: 306h4Ge5eJUJ
Imagine if it was Rekieta.

See...I can feel for Rekieta. A man brought low by his own hubris is a tale as old as time. You have to remember in the before before times Nick was a friend of the Farms and a pretty decent guy with a nice family and people who loved and admired him. We can all understand Nick and what brought him low and thus shake our head and say "there goes but us with luck" and mourn a opportunity lost.

But David A. Stebbins? He's none of that. He's the human equivalent of a black hole, of a diseased carcass rotting in the sun. He's nothing more then a source of misery and affliction towards anyone unlucky enough to cross his path since the very day he was unfortunately born. From his poor parents who were cursed with such a heinous malformed offspring to the very American People who are forced to both provide for his daily hotdog needs and provide him the avenue to inflict himself upon others via the court system and welfare.

No one looks at the human refuse that is David A Stebbins and says "there but for the grace of God go I". He's created such a perfect blackguard that any ills that befall this...homunculus is nothing but sheer schadenfreude for the rest of us. Everyone loves watching the town asshole get roughed up by the police and we all enjoy watching Stabby get thrashed by the Courts and reeee'ing into the void that is his dung filled cage.

Nick went and did a very human, very understandable, if very bad thing. He let the fame go to his head and forgot his responsibilities in a particularly shamefully way and will now suffer for it but one day he will move past it I think and go forward a hopefully better person.

David? David will learn nothing. He will continue to be a pustular sore upon the world until the day his heart succumbs to all those nitrates he imbibes and the cockroaches go on to consume his bloated, fetid corpse. No one will notice, let alone care that he's gone from the world. Indeed many may celebrate his passing.

There is a lesson there David, since I know your reading this, maybe you should think about it.
 
Nick went and did a very human, very understandable, if very bad thing.
I get the point you're trying to make but this is just wrong. Nick was keeping illegal substances (and firearms, I believe?) unlocked, in his household where young children could easily reach them. Multiple members of his church's clergy reported his children coming to class dirty and hungry. These are not understandably bad things that anyone would do; they are the hallmarks of a failure of a parent that loves booze and drugs more than their own children.

You are still entirely correct on whether or not Nick will be able to bounce back from it, though. It's a long shot, but if he really loves his kids, he'd do it. Stabbins has exactly zero motivation to get better. For God's sake, he stabbed his own father in the face over fucking internet speed. If I pulled even a tenth of the shit Stabbins pulled towards his folks I don't think I'd be able to forgive myself.
 
Acerthorn petitioned the Supreme Court twice back in 2011. (pdf SC.gov)
CERTIORARI DENIED
11-5779 STEBBINS, DAVID A. V. RELIABLE HEAT & AIR, LLC, ET AL.
11-5780 STEBBINS, DAVID A. V. WAL-MART STORES ARKANSAS, LLC
Can we read these somewhere?

Failed Supreme Court Petitions
Kiwi Farms: 1
Acerthorn: 2

Kiwi Farms wins again.
 

Attachments

Acerthorn petitioned the Supreme Court twice back in 2011. (pdf SC.gov)

Can we read these somewhere?

Failed Supreme Court Petitions
Kiwi Farms: 1
Acerthorn: 2

Kiwi Farms wins again.
Looks like they'd be paywalled at Lexis Nexis or WestLaw.
Maybe one of our Legal Kiwis has access or someone is near a law library with access.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Not a bee
A while back Stabbins posted a video called "SidAlpha just handed me a huge W."
Has anyone gone over it or made a tl;dr? I don't want to actually watch any of his videos.
He crows about his second amended complaint and how all his examples prove that SidAlpha can never ever have Fair Use protections and is smelly and dumb and will have to pay a quadrillion dollars in damages forever and ever.

Edit: I dug around and since Stebbins’s video there was a flurry of filings in the SidAlpha case but no resolution:
 
Last edited:
He crows about his second amended complaint and how all his examples prove that SidAlpha can never ever have Fair Use protections and is smelly and dumb and will have to pay a quadrillion dollars in damages forever and ever.

Edit: I dug around and since Stebbins’s video there was a flurry of filings in the SidAlpha case but no resolution:
Brilliant, thanks
 
Templar Dragonknight, Son of Thunder's Youtube channel (a) has been reinstated on Youtube. This is the channel of the defendant in Stebbins v. Baz. Last year this channel was deleted by Youtube after Acerthorn submitted multiple copyright infringement claims. All 7,000 subscribers and 4 million views are back

Acerthorn's video from last year celebrating the deletion of this channel.
Templar Dragonknight, Son of Thunder is no more! He got what he deserved!
 
Back