Trashfire MNPublicRecords CHIPS file on Rekieta's 9-year-old testing positive for cocaine - All parties are assumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
"Your honor, my client´s 9yo has the god given 1st amendment right to chase the dragon or whomever she wishes! This is America, goddamit!"
I'm actually expecting his lawyer to make this argument, because Nick CANNOT take the L. He's probably going to bring up coca cola, mark my words
 
You guys don't know the full story, and actually you don't know how the kids feel about it, and that local government set him up, and if you defend it you're a bootlicker, and whoever leaked this document is actually a bad boy, and you're actually a fed if you don't believe Nick, and L + Ratio on all your mothers.
 
>Confirms that at least one kid was getting into the cocaine at a level they have "repeated user" come up on the test.

Well that's that then, both are going away for a long time. It was still up in the air that they might have been able to play the system for a slap on the wrist, but they are in full jail time territory now.

Hope it was worth it Nick.

Edit: Taken from the main thread, because it applies even more now.
 
So what are the odds that Null got a shower call and not his lawyer confirming the validity of the leak?
Also, Rekieta was probably dosing his favourite because he probably thought Monty would take that once he loses the defamation case.
 
@Provably Wrong
Why would he admit defeat when he’s claiming everything is wrong? Especially if he’s right? Why would he beg people not to draw conclusions when they’ll do that anyway because they find it funny or hate him or like drama? Why would he ask people to say think of the kids when a majority do not care for them?

Indeed. Why would he act like an innocent person who has had the earth shattering news their kid tested positive for coke?
 
I am begging people to read the specs of the 5-panel EIA test. It only detects that the antibody binding sites are occupied, not what they are occupied with. They will bind to either cocaine or cocaine metabolites, so if you only perform the antibody test on a sample of pure cocaine containing no metabolites you WILL get a strong positive. It says in the machine specs that they confirmed this to be the case while designing it, specifically by contaminating coke-negative hair with external contact.
I am begging people to think critically. Is it that much better if your child’s hair is caked with enough cocaine to score high? It’s a powder not an aerosol. You have to get in close contact to get it on you. Just walking around a room where cocaine is present isn’t going to have it attaching to your hair follicles. What’s the defense? “She dried herself off with my cocaine towel.” Untrue she was dirty and smelly from a lack of cleaning.
 
How long do metabolites stay in the hair? I'm thinking this is the "worst night ever" that Nick mentioned back in January.
you don't even have to go back that far. he genuinely looks like he's been crying here, and he still didn't pull up. I'll repeat that, if his FAVORITE daughter got into his stash he STILL DIDN'T PULL UP AND ACTUALLY PUSHED FORWARD.
 
Here's a thought, might have been articulated here before, relatively dark.
If the kid "accidentally'" got to the cocaine stash she'd have overdosed, kids have no fucking idea what safe amounts of anything are or what drugs are, she'd have taken tons. The fact that she had long time usage (evidenced by micro dose amounts in hair) and she is still alive heavily implies she was given it by someone at a consistent basis.

I would love to hear a logical counter theory to this, looking at you Nick, feel free to explain it any time.
Also, Imholte has repeatedly mentioned some kind of small/portable "safe" being used to carry the stash around. IIRC this was mentioned in the arrest report, too. It's possible small baggies were left lying around, or the cocaine bullet, and these could've been gotten at. But it seems that Nick was taking some care to keep the drugs locked up. The implications of this are very, very bad.

Maybe it was often left open...

:optimistic:
 
All I gotta say is, if this is true and Nick and Kayla are responsible for what's being alleged then him paying tens of thousands of dollars to avoid spending even a night in custody makes sense beyond not wanting to take a drug test and all that. He'd be butchered by the inmates if they found out.

Innocent until proven guilty and all that but Jesus Christ this is another level of neglect. Thoughts and prayers to the children, they didn't deserve to become collateral damage just because Nick decided to blow up his own life.
 
I tend to think that Kayla was unable to handle the nine year old after the nanny left so kept her dosed on alcohol at night and cocaine in the day so she could watch star trek in peace
I may be late on this but I can’t imagine, under any circumstance why someone would give a young child cocaine regularly. And I don’t mean in a “it’s abusive and sadistic” way (it is).

Assuming it’s awful parents not wanting to deal with their kid so they can be degenerates in peace, cocaine is not a drug that will make a child chill out or be more compliant. Especially if it’s a kid who already tends to be a bit wild. It will do the exact opposite. It would be a nightmare dealing with a coked up kid.

Assuming this doc is real and unaltered, the only thing that makes any sense to me is she was ingesting it occasionally because it was accessible. But even that seems odd because it tastes awful. Weed gummies or alcohol make more sense because it would at least calm the kid down. I just can’t imagine a benefit (to a degenerate junkie) of a child being given cocaine.

Edit to not double post: Foster care would be very traumatizing. It’s highly likely the kids would be separated and god only knows the conditions they might end up in. The courts will always try to keep them together with a family member if they can. I can’t imagine the grandparents or aunt, who have a lot of resources, wouldn’t do everything possible to keep the kids with them. Maybe it’s a cope but I don’t think they’ll end up separated in the foster care system. Even CPS knows that’s the worst case scenario.
 
Last edited:
Cocaine is primarily being metabolized through plasma esterases and the liver.

Cocaine is a weak base and is therefore poorly absorbed through the stomach when you eat it. You therefore wouldn’t see levels that high.
Hypothetically, had the child assumed it was sugar, most of it would have been absorbed through her gums and cheeks. I digress though, you're just making things up and doubling down on your abject stupidity.

The extent of absorption of cocaine into the systemic circulation after nasal insufflation is similar to that after oral ingestion.
 
btw for the kid to have snorted or ingested coke, the Rekietas 100% did drugs in front of them. A 9yo wouldn´t know how to get high by herself, specially if she doesn´t go to public school.

Sorry for this, but if the 9 yr old is his favorite (I think she is, but there are so many kids...) I can see drunky druggy daddy seeing her after a late night :

"Daddy I'm hungry"
"Here babygirl, have some of Daddy's special medicine. It helps me stay skinny-hot."

Easier than opening a can of Spaghettio's.
 
I am begging people to think critically. Is it that much better if your child’s hair is caked with enough cocaine to score high? It’s a powder not an aerosol. You have to get in close contact to get it on you. Just walking around a room where cocaine is present isn’t going to have it attaching to your hair follicles. What’s the defense? “She dried herself off with my cocaine towel.” Untrue she was dirty and smelly from a lack of cleaning.
I'm not saying it's a good thing, obviously it's still a sick scenario if the kid "merely" had cocaine smeared in her hair. Still, rate me autistic if you must but I can't help but see a significant moral difference between a 9 year old being incidentally exposed to cocaine and a 9 year old being a habitual user of cocaine. It's a difference I find meaningful enough that I feel obligated to point out the former could still be possible.
 
Since the gov took his guns and they're home alone now they should probably just idle the balldo mobile in the garage until they don't wake up ever again.

5,000 on a 500 cutoff is insane, that kid was hitting it hard. What a disaster. This is ghetto nig behavior.
Nick has proved he’s blacker than Eric July at the very least.
 
Indeed. Why would he act like an innocent person who has had the earth shattering news their kid tested positive for coke?
This is exactly how an innocent person would act if being accused of horrible stuff due to deliberate lies and/or a clolassal fuck up on the part of the lab in a document that may very well have been deliberately leaked.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back