Trashfire MNPublicRecords CHIPS file on Rekieta's 9-year-old testing positive for cocaine - All parties are assumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Perhaps why Aaron freaked out so bad about his kid being around the coke is because he witnessed Rekieta's kid OD on it.
It would be informative to have an Statement of the Cuck on this since this faggot loves to go around parroting his sob story. I believe he talked about having more things to say, perhaps now that the cat is out of the bag, he can talk about this.
 
Read the damn paper, they're assessing self-report in conjuction with hair testing the evaluate its accuracy and they found that cocaine users underreported their activities, it had nothing to do with the accuracy of the hair test itself.

Are we now Vaush? Just post an abstract and the results, everything in between assumed?

It even says in the first line.

In the case of a positive result, the important issue isn't the false negative rate but the false positive rate. How often does a false positive result occur?
self report always sucks ass, but it's probably very difficult to obtain permission for running an actual clinical study where you dose people with real cocaine in a controlled environment so you can actually generate reliable data about how well your testing methods work
 
There is no goddamn way he doesn't know The Farms, not at this point.
That coked up shitass had Null on his stream multiple times. He knows damn well who we are. In fact, he reads his threads. So he knows damn well we know damn well about his kids testing positive for coke.

Nick, I really hoped you could get yourself clean so you could salvage your relationship with your family. I still hope you do, but maybe it'd be best if you not have anything to do with your children until you can give them a father figure they can look up to. That's not going to happen for a while.
 
they decided to just roll the dice and hope she got over it rather than take her to the hospital (and get immediately arrested).
They absolutely did this. There is no fucking way they didn't notice their 8 year old tripping balls, and that high a reading in the hair follicle pretty much indicates she took a pretty hard hit of the stuff. It's just appalling, and really shows where nicks mind is. His own well being was more important then his own child's. It's absolutely fucked.

I didn't think this story could get anymore grim, but here we are.
 
Comparing a chink and pajeet mass produced Covid test to a hair sample looking for traces of cocaine is akin to comparing a fast food teenager's failure rate to a high end eatery. These are not unreasonable inferences to draw. Sociopath Nick hangs out with, under his own volition, self admitted pedophiles. He interacts with people who find the rape of children appealing. He is a drug addict. To think that his children are not at risk, ESPECIALLY his child who he has singled out as his favorite and has expressed traits common among the abused, would be totally separate from his depraved sex obsessed lifestyle is optimistic to the point of sweeping. Joe from Good Lawgic, is that you? Here to tell us how those stupid retarded pigs can't cut hair straight enough for the test to be valid? Go fuck yourself

You are a stupid nigger who apparently has reading comprehension problems. You aren't even responding to the points made, rather you're just having an emotional meltdown.
 
If you read the thread you'd know it was a her. The main guess is that she took from her parents stash to experiment and nearly OD'd. How exactly drugs got into a child will be investigated by the police because they sure as shit want to know to
The best/obvious option is that they left it on the table and forgot to clean it after they all zonked out for bed, Audrey goes in and wants to sample Daddy's Nose Clams. Probably saw him do it a few times. It's already cut in lines on the table, bam. You don't have to be a genius to figure out "put white powder on table, make it into line, happy fun time." Or maybe Nick left the safe open, left a bullet lying around, or hell maybe she swiped one of the little baggies Nick was keeping them in when nobody was looking and hid it under her bed. Maybe this went on for a couple days, possibly a week, and she did eventually OD and that's how she got caught. Maybe she never got caught and this was a surprise when they got arrested.

Now the thing about the OD and worst day ever theory is...You would think most drug addicts would see their kid get into their stash and go "Fuck. We have issues, this needs to stop". Instead what do these 4 geniuses do? THEY KEEP FUCKING DO IT. So no mercy, wall. All four of them.
 
1.The CPS docs specifically cites cocaine, you do not read the docs;

I READ the docs. Of course they’re talking about cocaine. Drug tests usually work on metabolites though. You wouldn’t see it in the court documents howvever, because that level of detail is irrelevant. The CPS doesn’t care about what kind of test with what method of action that was used in determining whether they took cocaine. It’s the cocaine that matters.

2.You have no idea what you are talking about regarding the tests and cocaine absorption, poorly researching it on the fly - I have little to none as well but certainly am not making statements about them;

I know enough about drug tests to know that they’re far from fool proof. Especially follicle tests. When the other circumstances don’t make sense (no reports of cocaine use by the kids, only one kid tested positive at high levels) then yeah: There’s a good likelihood that the FUNNY story to tell, isn’t what actually happened.

3.Null identified Dyn as a respectful source of information regarding the test - you may not trust Jersh but you would have to be better informed on the matter to counter, which you clearly arent.
Dyn was talking about a false positive. There are plenty of other possibilities.
[/quote]

I dont believe Nick actively fed his kid coke, that being said, but, the tests being confirmed, I believe they totally did drugs in front of the kids and the 9yo got curious.

I have no idea what happened but I’m leaning towards accidental ingestion. Especially given Nicks story of “watching someone making sure they were ok.”

(As for the kid getting curious, the levels in the test indicate more than just getting curious one time. Which is why I’m dubious about the test.)

Ultimately we will see what’s up. But if Nick had given lines to his nine year old, I’d expect to see additional charges filed, and that hasn’t happened.
 
Semi related thought : since Nicky went full retard on stream last night I hope Kayla is OK with it. Fucking up his own CPS case is one thing, but if she has a problem with Nick's online behavior and attitude and how it reflects for her defense with her case she could signal it by giving him another black eye.
 
there was a single instance dubbed Nicks worst day, where the stalker child got into balldos stash and went Henry the hoover, and this incident stayed in the childs hair so long the test freaked out and called her a recreational addict
The "worst day" was literally years ago and has nothing to do with this besides long-term precipitating his descent into cocaine. It's still not directly related to this situation.

That said the rest of your summation is mostly on-point, but it would've been a couple months ago earlier this year.
 
Dont know if this was the procedure in Rackets case but they say after a positive, it passes through a confirmatory stage:
The first step involves an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) test, which is a rapid screening method.

"If the ELISA test produces a positive result for a particular substance, a technician will retest the hair sample using confirmatory chromatographic testing, such as gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), to help rule out false positives."
https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/325013#what-is-it
 
Read the damn paper, they're assessing self-report in conjuction with hair testing the evaluate its accuracy and they found that cocaine users underreported their activities, it had nothing to do with the accuracy of the hair test itself.

Are we now Vaush? Just post an abstract and the results, everything in between assumed?

It even says in the first line.
This is why basic stats needs to be taught in highschool. In the current world we live in, if you can't even parse a study, you're pretty fucked.
 
That's what's so baffling. Why on earth would Nick refuse this to not get his kids back?
He’s refusing, and so is Kayla, because they don’t want a test on-record proving that they’re cokeheads. They paid the bond to get out from under mandatory drug testing for this very reason. Nick cut his hair super-short and will probably continue to do so every week or two hoping to have all the coke-positive hair off of him by the time the Court gets around to ordering hair tests on himself and Kayla. I’ll bet Kayla’s got a super-short haircut as well. Nick doesn’t give a fuck about his kids, and only cares about doing whatever it takes to avoid the consequences of his own actions.
 
You are a stupid nigger who apparently has reading comprehension problems. You aren't even responding to the points made, rather you're just having an emotional meltdown.
Keep sweeping you retarded faggot. Everything has been outlined in a concise and reasonable manner, if you cannot follow the conversation than you shouldn't interject your pavement ape "um but akhsully!!" nonsense.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back