Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[That Other Dude's Persona]

The "best case" (=least dark) scenario I can think is that he was using coke to "medicate" the kid.

We know she was the one with the night terrors, and if Aaron is to be believed, a lot of Rekieta's coping about his coke usage revolved around portraying it as self-medication/stress relief. He's definitely deluded enough to believe he can use drugs to treat his kids himself, who would trust the government/doctors to do it?

 

[keke]

Their grandparents (kayla's parents) did foster several children and are/were licensed foster parents

They raised her to be so open minded her brain fell out.

 

[General Disarray]

First thing I thought, if not a mixup at the lab, is that maybe the 9 year old was losing their larger teeth and they used coke to numb the pain. Who knows at this point? Might as well throw it out there with all the other theories.

 

[Third World Aristocrat]

Some Q&A about the cocaine found in Rekieta's 9-year-old child’s hair - an autistic analysis

---

#1. How long does cocaine stay in one's hair?

One of the first questions I've seen some people asking about was how long cocaine could be detected in someone's hair. I've seen that people already responded to that one, but I thought it was nice to give an answer based on the published literature.

One study about the pharmacokinetics of the disappearance of cocaine from hair after discontinuation of drug use found that it could take about 3-4 months for cocaine abusers' proximal hair to be drug-free. This finding was supported by previously published information in the literature. It's important to note that this finding can vary somewhat with the half-life of your own hair.

Garcia-Bournissen F, Moller M, Nesterenko M, Karaskov T, Koren G. Pharmacokinetics of disappearance of cocaine from hair after discontinuation of drug use [published correction appears in Forensic Sci Int. 2015 Dec;257:83] [published correction appears in Forensic Sci Int. 2015 Dec;257:83. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.08.001]. Forensic Sci Int. 2009;189(1-3):24-27.

---

#2. Could we extrapolate the data of the cutoff points from adults to children?

It's important to note that children's hair is different from adults' hair. They differ from adult terminal hair in structure as well as in growth properties. However, considering Rekieta's case, this difference could be ignored, as the hair from children > 3 years can be interpreted in the same way as an adult's hair.

Pragst F, Krumbiegel F, Thurmann D, et al. Hair analysis of more than 140 families with drug consuming parents. Comparison between hair results from adults and their children. Forensic Sci Int. 2019;297:161-170. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.01.039

---

#3. Was that ACTIVE use or PASSIVE exposure?

That is a more difficult question to answer. Generally, from what I've found, the differentiation of cocaine usage vs. external contamination is based on levels of cocaine > 0.5 ng/mg + its metabolite above a cutoff value. Also, the washout data from the analysis process can be used for this interpretation. We don't have this data yet, so I don't think we can reliably differentiate contamination from active use.


Tsanaclis L, Andraus M, Wicks J. Hair analysis when external contamination is in question: A review of practical approach for the interpretation of results. Forensic Sci Int. 2018;285:105-110. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.01.028

But one thing to consider is that the levels of cocaine found in the child's hair were reported to be ABOVE 5,000 pg/mg (> 10 times the cutoff value).

So EVEN if it was a finding of external exposure, how can you guarantee that this level of contamination wouldn't implicate that the child ALSO ingested it from other contaminated sources?

---

# Disclaimer - I have no power level within this topic. I just asked some questions and looked at the literature. Someone with more experience and knowledge within this area probably could raise other answers/questions.

---

Edit: grammar and clarity.

General discussion and Q&A about the PDF and the tests are best suited for the split thread. All of these questions and opinions already exist here.

https://kiwifarms.st/threads/mnpublicrecords-chips-file-on-rekietas-9-year-old-testing-positive-for-cocaine.193896/

Null has asked for limiting the discussion about these tests to the other thread (above). Sorry about posting it here, I forgot about the other thread.

 

[D_Tractor]

View attachment 6103475

 

[Angry Crustacean]

Narcissistic parents often have a favorite child.

Relevant Psychology Today article

 

[HodgePodgeRogerDodger]

Three things that are kinda getting missed during all this.

• Aaron gave a date for when he totally broke with the Rekieta’s. April 13th, the emergency cancellation with Megan Fox.
• Nick fucking hates Sean. Like really hates him. He can poke at Legal Mindsets insecurities easily, but Sean is someone omitted or talked about vaguely. When superchats brought up Sean you can see frames of him seething
• Those technical difficulties were probably him seething and having a tantrum
• His father was interviewed by Alisha as was Aaron

@Himedall All-seeing Waifu do you or @Balldo's Gate remember when April was on Simpcast with Nick? I might draw two simple time lines for shit and I need a few extra dates.

Edit: a fourth thing.

The fucking names of every official involved make me laugh.

Joshua Moonson -Josh Moon

Jim Felt- Jim Metokur

Alisha Sweeps - Elissa Clips

It’s like a fucking bad gag from a comedy.

 

[Vibralldo]

View attachment 6103475

Mumkey found himself in an eerily similar situation a few years back. Cheated on his girlfriend, started taking drugs, said if his fans didn't like it, too bad. He managed to (somewhat) pull himself out of it, though.

 

[BaddestSeagull]

Three things that are kinda getting missed during all this.

• Aaron gave a date for when he totally broke with the Rekieta’s. April 13th, the emergency cancellation with Megan Fox.
• Nick fucking hates Sean. Like really hates him. He can poke at Legal Mindsets insecurities easily, but Sean is someone omitted or talked about vaguely. When superchats brought up Sean you can see frames of him seething
• Those technical difficulties were probably him seething and having a tantrum

@Himedall All-seeing Waifu do you or @Balldo's Gate remember when April was on Simpcast with Nick? I might draw two simple time lines for shit and I need a few extra dates.

Simpcast 54, 12th December 2022. Were they together on more than one?

 

[Musashi's Son]

(A)
>If this turns out to be true
DeOrio are you high? Nick confirmed the existence of the leaked documents:

EDIT:

Another instance of Nick admitting to the existence of the documents and going off at the government official named in the documents.

 

[FuhrerMustang]

Mumkey found himself in an eerily similar situation a few years back. Cheated on his girlfriend, started taking drugs, said if his fans didn't like it, too bad. He managed to (somewhat) pull himself out of it, though.

Mumkey's downward sprial had a lot to do with Horse face Susan fucking him over on YouTube. He never got that account back. Rackets actually interviewed Mumkey around that time.

 

[Balldo's Gate]

@Himedall All-seeing Waifu do you or @Balldo's Gate remember when April was on Simpcast with Nick? I might draw two simple time lines for shit and I need a few extra dates.

It was a long time ago, I believe December 2022 or earlier.

Nick fucking hates Sean. Like really hates him. He can poke at Legal Mindsets insecurities easily, but Sean is someone omitted or talked about vaguely. When superchats brought up Sean you can see frames of him seething

Disagree. I would say he hates Andrew more because Andrew was in his inner circle. The seething from Nick started a long time ago, in December, which based on what Andrew has said appears to be around when Andrew started declining requests to appear on Nick's show. It was also around when Andrew gave Nick an "F" for his take on the Carano lawsuit which I'm pretty sure even got the cause of action wrong.

He was mad at Sean because he views him as an extension of the Farms, so when Sean made a minor shower call joke he flipped his shit at Sean.

Don't think it's fair to keep legal mindset on the balldo washer list because he's been going in on nick after the details emerged

Andrew was Nick's strongest sweeper when Nick was at his peak. Andrew had distanced himself, but even he was getting ready to pull out his broom with his first stream.

I guess he figured out which way the wind was blowing. If you wanted to be charitable you could say he changed his opinion with new evidence but Nick was clearly drugged out of his mind on multiple streams and went nearly 5 months where he was unable to do 90 minutes without taking a lengthy "bathroom break", and in some instances came back with things like white powder on his nose or a nosebleed.

>If this turns out to be true
DeOrio are you high? Nick confirmed the existence of the leaked documents:

Commentary YouTubers, ladies and gentlemen.

 

[Not A Bug]

For some reason I cannot quote from @Third World Aristocrat post, one of the questions stoked a thought.

Passive vs. Active use: I was more surprised all the kids didn't test positive, their environment and hygiene is ripe for cross contamination. That all of the kids were negative for cocaine, and the one was 10x the cut off for incidental/negative exposure; makes it unlikely to be incidental exposure in my wee brain power.

 

[Vibralldo]

View attachment 6103513(A)
>If this turns out to be true
DeOrio are you high? Nick confirmed the existence of the leaked documents:

View attachment 6103514

"When he was just getting high around his kids, driving them around while inebriated, and allowing them to starve in a house of filth while wearing smelly, unwashed clothes, I felt bad for him because that stuff doesn't really matter..."

Deep Fried Oreos' arteries can't clog up fast enough

 

[Procrastinhater]

Don't think it's fair to keep legal mindset on the balldo washer list because he's been going in on nick after the details emerged

He's a piece of shit thats now trying to sweep it up for that pedo VTuber KiKi that did the fetish list about how she loves child molestation and scat.
Same one that used to be a school teacher.
Hes a fucking creep.
Leeghul Dicksuckah just can't put down the broom.

 

[Butt_Pouncer]

View attachment 6103513(A)

this fuckin waste of space is still around?

 

[Molag Bal]

What's the status with the bodycam footage? If the government stalls on this one, I'm forced to consider that there actually is some kind of conspiracy.

I just read on Twitter that one of his Children as ADD and if that's true and it's actually her the fucker might either have given it to her as "medication" because he doesn't understand the difference between coke and speed or he might use it as a qover up for the grooming. If one Child has ADD and gets prescribed Ritalin we should've seen it on the the test but with a note that it has a Prescription right?

Holy fuck both of those sound very plausible.
1. Coke as an improvised medication. Child as an issue, Nick ran out of the meds and gave her cocaine instead
2. Drugging the child to cover up molestation. - I brought up the Sophie Long case some time ago as an example where social media attention actually benefits a legal case. Kelly and her boyfriend were doing the exact same shit. They were putting sophie's brothers on hard drugs to make sure they're too zonked-out for Sophie's abuse to register, so they wouldn't confirm it to their father when Sophie came forward.
However in Nick's case, I don't think that's what it was, because one child tested positive and all the other ones negative. If this was what was going on, it would be the other way round. All the children would have been drugged except the one that was molested, to prevent them from noticing and talking about it.

But I also don't believe that this was some accident, like her finding the coke once. The result on the test came out at over 5k, which means she was taking coke every week, at least it would with adults. Even with a child, it must have happened multiple times, so they definitely drugged her on purpose.

 

[Daddy's Angry Juice]

View attachment 6103513(A)

DeOreos is a fat faggot and the internet was better when i forgot he existed.

 

[FinnSven]

However in Nick's case, I don't think that's what it was, because one child tested positive and all the other ones negative. If this was what was going on, it would be the other way round. All the children would have been drugged except the one that was molested, to prevent them from noticing and talking about it.

Or they would have drugged all of them.

It would make accounts of abuse even less compelling, and let’s be honest, once you are drugging one kid, it’s not going be morally difficult to drug the rest.

Personally I think that they may not have been outright abusing them, but they were clearly exposed to an abusive situation.
This one kid was probably just stealing drugs and copying the parents.

This doesn’t excuse Nick and his wife, they shouldn’t have such things in the house.

A nine year old, especially one who sounds like they have problems one way or the other can’t be blamed for aping the behavior of such irresponsible parents.

 

[sum ting wong]

So how long do these hair follicle tests take? Because they were arrested and released within about 24 hours with the 3 charges each, I'm thinking the child abuse/endangerment charges are just from having drugs and guns near the children. This document was labeled for sometime in June, is it possible they get another charge added now that it's proven that the 9 year old tested positive?