Patrick Sean Tomlinson / @stealthygeek / "Torque Wheeler" / @RealAutomanic / Kempesh / Padawan v2.5 - "Conservative" sci-fi author with TDS, armed "drunk with anger management issues" and terminated parental rights, actual tough guy, obese, paid Quasi, paid thousands to be repeatedly unbanned from Twitter

[Anonymus Fluhre]

I don't need a Palantir to be skeptical of Ms Zebrak's claim. But it seems weird to pretend to be a part of another ethnic group. Is this that transracialism I keep hearing about?
View attachment 6115030View attachment 6115034View attachment 6115046

Ah yes, one white woman speaks for millions of people. I can tell she's a Karen.

 

[OtherLastTrainHome]

I don't need a Palantir to be skeptical of Ms Zebrak's claim. But it seems weird to pretend to be a part of another ethnic group. Is this that transracialism I keep hearing about?
View attachment 6115030View attachment 6115034View attachment 6115046

"someone is lying."

Rick doesn't know how right he is. and he will never accept the answer, either.

Spoiler: polisperging

in a bit of sperging, here's what was going on prior to Trump's victory. Trump had (and still has) his own pollsters. "professional pollsters", the likes of which that Pat believes, tell their clients what they want to hear. mccain had no idea that he'd lose. he believed Steve Schmidt's dishonest polls. bidet's election in 2020 was accompanied by articles like these wherein the brainless expressed confusion for why 2016's polls were so wrong.

Trump's victory can be broken down into three main points:

1. people changed their minds at the last second
2. supporters of Donald Trump don't participate in polls (an important fact).
3. people who have never voted before are not polled and they can't be polled.

old folks are the most reliable voting cohort. since they were most vulnerable to COVID-19, they took advantage of mail-in voting so that they didn't have to go out and stand in line. people in the 18-34 range don't even use the postal service - young people don't vote anyway, but they don't even know what mail-in ballots are. so, add another massive factor in Trump's favor. anywhere from 25 to 40 percent of people at Trump rallies had never voted before. that alone was an insurmountable advantage for Trump. up to half of the people at the rallies were democrats, too, another insurmountable advantage.

one more factor: in deep-blue states (California), the polling stations had (and will this year have) booths marked "REPUBLICAN". when you sign in, the crones behind the tables will shame you. lots of people can't go through that because it will impact their businesses. see, when you rig an election, you don't have to alter numbers or votes - creating a hostile environment and promising swift armageddon for dissenting opinion is just as much a way to rig the election as to find magical bundles of votes that secure an impossibly historic victory for your walking vegetable.

pollsters couldn't gauge Trump's level of support. Period. that holds true for the upcoming 2024 election. the history of the 2016 election has been rewritten. as said, most people change their minds at the last second, most Trump supporters refuse to be polled, and first-time voters can't be polled. in fact, whenever Trump announces a rally, the people in the city/state he's visiting all shit their pants regardless of affiliation. it's a once-in-a-lifetime event.

all Democrats think that everyone not them think the same way they do, and that's why their failure cascade accelerates faster and faster... and they get crazier. prior to the 2020 election, another celebrity lunatic wrote another insane article decrying Trump as the worst ever and that he'll kill us all. frank luntz is a windup toy who said the same exact thing back in 2016:

"The GOP pollster said Trump must record a game-changing moment against Biden at the final debate Thursday to have a chance to win the election.

"'If Donald Trump doesn’t score a knockout then there’s not enough campaigning or mindshare to give him a chance to catch Joe Biden."

the polls in 2020 had bidet outperforming ALL CHALLENGERS IN AMERICAN HISTORY. by 300 percent. that was not a strategy by the democrats, that was a fucking frenzy. think about every crazy leftist you've seen in a video destroying their neighborhood, rioting or screaming into the air: they all were and still are a part of this insanity.

in 2016, the democrats and the press said that Trump's campaign was dark and negative. that was their failure cascade ramping up. frank luntz's undecided voters are imbeciles if they decide who to vote for based on a debate, so who cares what they think? the people who matter are the Democrats and Independents doing research because they understood that Biden was never viable. the good thing is that they aren't required to sign a loyalty oath.

in this video, Joe Biden blamed the public for his corruption. bidet's rationalization is that of a garden-variety sociopathic con-artist. every con artist who ever lived blames the victim. in this video, Trump called him out.

the expense of a candidate's run for office is that person's first test. if your platform is appealing to voters and to industry and to various other institutions, you'll be able to raise money without compromising yourself. bidet rationalized being corrupt by blaming the rest of us for building the system that the politicians themselves built. prostituting yourself is a shortcut. plenty of political novices with no money win against massively funded opponents. hell, Brandon Herrera almost won! hillary outspent Trump two to one. corruption isn't built into the system - corrupt people are attracted to politics in order to make money, live out their fantasies, and exercise power. as the old adage goes, "politics is rock stardom for ugly people." groupies, limos, adoration, money, influence. but it isn't the American public who did this. it's politicians. the worst thing you can say about American voters is that too many are uninformed and want too many benefits.

politicians created a corrupt system but they blamed the rest of us for it. that's what allows them to rationalize ripping us off. just ask Sleepy Joe. pollsters and democrats said (and once again say) biden is so far ahead of Trump that there's no way for Trump to win. in fact, in 2020, i saw a CNN headline saying "Trump lashes out as reality sets in". what a vapid, peurile remark. unreality, more like. but, the press never acted like Biden was winning.

look at everything they did to Trump's friends. there was the claim Giuliani got himself caught up in a mess filmed by Sascha Baron Cohen. so what? it wasn't Trump. also, according to Trump's tax returns, Trump has a 'previously unknown' bank account in China. well, if it's on his tax returns, it ISN'T UNKNOWN. it was fucking illegal for the Times to possess Trump's tax returns, but the democrats don't care. an entire political party, the press, and multiple entertainment industries completely destroyed themselves in a futile effort to prevent mass improvement. it was too late to stop the cascades and we're all still living in them.

eat arby's.

 

[Triplethreat]

has anyone posted Eric Hildeman’s dating profile on Local Match yet? Here it is: https://www.localmatch.com/members/saganjr
archive.

lol at his user name. So stupidly pretentious.

 

[Mourning_Cloak]

has anyone posted Eric Hildeman’s dating profile on Local Match yet? Here it is:

>My Religion Is: Atheist
>I Attend Services: Once A Month

What kind of services? Does he mean a DND meetup or going to the local elementary school playground? Nice capitalization stupid.

 

[PS2 Nishiki]

It's 12 AM in Wisconsin right now and Fatrick is not having a good night, he's writing out various different forms of stalker child pastas rather than the same old one.


Looks like Pat added another word to his list of retarded vocabulary, now we have "EDUMACATION"! You can tell he was really angry when he wrote this.
Archive

"Lolcows do not exist, stalker child, these are just your delusions"
Archive

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

If lolcows don't exist, why did New York Magazine mention them in Pless terrible article? He's just upset that he'll never be a lolcat and forever a lolcow.

 

[JustSomeDong]

If bitchtits put in half as much effort writing his schlock scifi books as he did childin' da twitters, he'd have more (still shitty) books than Steven King. Of course, Steven King is a retarded liberal who doesn't even try at his craft anymore, so maybe they have more in common than I'd thought, already...

 

[AngryTreeRat]

one more factor: in deep-blue states (California), the polling stations had (and will this year have) booths marked "REPUBLICAN". when you sign in, the crones behind the tables will shame you. lots of people can't go through that because it will impact their businesses. see, when you rig an election, you don't have to alter numbers or votes - creating a hostile environment and promising swift armageddon for dissenting opinion is just as much a way to rig the election as to find magical bundles of votes that secure an impossibly historic victory for your walking vegetable.

This throws me for a loop, as something like that is so far from the spirit of a democratic process that you might as well just revoke the right to vote (and some states are starting to determine that their state constitutions don't actually grant the right to vote). As a Canadian I am more familiar with our own voting system. Actually really familiar with it as I work my federal (and infrequently my provincial) elections; and as a result I am very familiar with the code of behaviour we must maintain and the almost mind numbing amount of measures to avoid any form of partisanship or revealing who someone might be voting for. That said, election officers can actually find out who you voted if you need to go to their ballot box for if they want to, but the window to do so is small and under a lot of scrutiny and they frankly won't have time to do so and your vote will already be casted. This is a power exclusively used by us to stir up family drama later when we have to service our relatives. It also helps that a lot of election officers are actually pretty young in Canada, so the apathy towards that type of nosiness is common as most of them under 30 are just there for a solid single day pay cheque.

Spoiler: Canadian Polisperging About Voting Procedure

In a Canadian election, at any level of government, you cannot have anything that identifies the chosen individual the voter might be choosing in where things are placed or divided, all booths are non-partisan and everyone working at the location is to present themselves in a non-partisan way.

Here's how insane these rules go for both election officers (people like me who run the polls) and for candidate representatives or even candidates who arrive to oversee the process personally to ensure everything is going according to the policies intended to maintain a fair election, as well as anyone else who is, in some official capacity, involved in the voting process:

• You cannot show any partisan or candidate leanings in any form.
• You cannot make or agree with comments that are dismissive of the election process. Example: If someone comes up and says "I'm only one vote, not like it matters" you must respond with something like "Every vote counts, sometimes it is tipped by just one individual."
• If they tell you who they are voting for you can't show approval or disapproval.
• You cannot discuss who you are voting for as an election officer with the voters. If they ask you are supposed to say something like "I am not permitted to share that information as I can't allow myself to influence your decision."
• You may not do anything to intimidate, discourage, or make voters feel at ill-ease. This rule actually even goes for the voters, though if they act up usually we'll drag them by the ear to their ballot box, help them register and see that they vote and then GTFO after collecting their fine.
• If they admit to being on the fence about who to vote for we are supposed to, if we have them, hand them a small pamphlet that is non-partisan that lists a few bullet points for each of the local riding candidates and say "this can maybe help you make up your mind", but since those are very rare to have anywhere (most years nowhere has them) we simple say "Just pick who you think will do best."
• If someone asks a question about the platforms of the candidates we're supposed to point them to platform pamphlets that exist for that individual at a centralized location.
• No one working the election in an official capacity are allowed to dress in a partisan manner, this naturally includes no pins or other obvious accessories, but also includes not wearing party colours, makeup that is in party colours (so not even red lipstick), not wearing the "grey of independence " (this is usually ignored due to the fact grey is one of the few neutral colours that don't show partisan leanings, but if there are any strong independents in your particular riding they get a bit harder about this).
• You do not get close enough or allow others close enough to see how voters are voting nor allow others to do so. Exceptions made for those who need assistance due to disability, physical or mental, at the discretion of the voting officer. Usually this means that I might help a physically disabled person fill in the ballot, but if you're bringing your retarded inbred son to vote to give an extra vote to the family chosen party I just wave you through and tell you that you need to keep it down so you don't interfere or influence others in the room, but if they are physically able they must hold the pen as I am the only one allowed to hold the pen for a voter at my booth if I determine they are unable to do so.
• Only the election officer who oversees a particular booth may touch the ballots before or after they are handed to a voter. We're not just the ones that register you to vote at the polls, we're the ones that count them. There's no counting office elsewhere to handle that. All votes submitted through alternative means will have already been done before election day, and will be revealed at time of counting.

A few extra rules just for the the representatives of the candidates and the candidates themselves:

• They are not permitted to talk to voters once they step onto the property.
• If they for some reason get approached by a voter, they can state who they are representing and confirm the implication that they voted for that individual or party.
• They may not interfere with the voters arriving on the property, but they may provide means to assist voters in arriving on the property.
• They can't see any of the books or handle the ballots in anyway.
• They must follow the direction of voting officers to ensure a lack of interference to the godly discretion of the voting officers. Some of us are more hardline than others on how we enforce this and what we determine might be interference. I, for example, am willing to tell them if someone they are counting on as a vote has voted or not, but I won't let them see the books nor will I allow them to stand any closer than five feet when someone is at my table receiving their ballots. Other officers won't even talk to them and won't permit them anywhere near their table. So long as you have the same policies for everyone you can bully them all you want, and if you are putting special limits on one of them you really need a good reason. We can even order them to be escorted off the property if they break the rules too much. Election officers, once you enter the voting site, are gods and you don't piss us off because we are up too fucking early and work too many hours on election day to take any shit.
• They may not get closer than some ever shifting distance from the ballots when they are being counted. I think this election it is going to be defined as two meters, one year it was six meters. It gets silly at times.

So you can see how to me the fact having a "republicans" booth is just baffling to me. That violates the privacy of the vote, that creates potential intimidation of voters, and it shows partisanship. It's just insane to me. It undermines the sanctity of the democratic system and ideals by creating pressure to vote a certain way on election day and therefore effectively makes your vote as inauthentic as if someone else filled it out for you or had you fill it yourself at gunpoint. People doing that don't deserve their democratic rights.

To explain that bit about telling them if someone has voted, since I have learned Americans often are confused how we could know that:

Everyone for a given ballot box and voting location is on a list and each booth covers a certain geographic area containing a certain population size. If you want to vote, you go to your location for your ballot box. If you go somewhere else there will be issues, but we can sort you out if we need to, just know that when you register at the wrong location we call up your correct location and have them cross your name out there with a special mark. This list includes name, address, and some other identifying information. We cross names off as they arrive so as to count voters, this number must match the number of ballots when we count them that night so as to confirm none of them are likely to be fake nor any are missing. We also write your ballot number beside your name before handing it over, that way we can verify that the ballot went to a unique person so that there's no voting fraud through fake ballots and ensure the ballot is real when it is counted and not one someone is stuffing in the box. I had someone stuffing the box one election and disregarded the twenty something extra ballots simply because their ballots weren't in the book. I've only ever had to throw out four ballots total for being improperly filled or submitted/damaged. It was almost five, but after a debate between the representatives if I was being too picky on a particular mark I let it get called. I should also note every single one of those ballots in that box also must have my specific signature on them, except for those done when I took my breaks since I am working for over 12 hours during an election.

This does mean if there's ever a reason to find out who someone voted for, they can unseal the ballot box (which are sealed at the end of the night and not opened ideally ever) and do a recount and see who voted for who. Ideally the only person who knows who you voted for will be your election officer if they actually check your name and not just confirm loudly "this is ballot number X, and it is in the book, they voted for Y" during counting while going down that column and typically this is done in pairs so the person confirming the number is different than the person declaring the vote. So if you're at my booth I will know you voted for that cuck Justin Trudeau when I verify your ballot if I get nosy. I don't have time to get nosy. Your privacy is safe through practicality and a lot of duct tape.

All of this information means I can tell the representatives that one of their voters didn't show up, and they can make their call to get them to the polls. Higher turn out is better for the democratic process in my opinion, and its my discretion if I share that information so long as I hide the actual book from them and don't share actually private information.

 

[Maude Snew]

No, stalker child, tweeting at children all day does not make me a pedophile.

Well no but his membership in the SFWA raises some questions. As he says, if there are nine pedophiles in a club with you and you don't leave there are ten pedophiles. Paraphrased of course. That's not even getting into the people he claims to be friends with on social media, he is at the very least knowingly looking the other way.

 

[Hitlerswag420]

View attachment 6114425
Guy who spends all day tweeting at children doesn't like being called a pedo.

Lol. His lack of self awareness is such that he has absolutely no idea that he sounds like a complete lunatic every single day

 

[Oliver Onions]

Honestly I am just wondering how this will impact those unwittingly airBNBing his half hovel because it will just take one wrong word or badly timed laugh for him to decided its a stalker child and charge through the door shrieking about the gay porn assassins

I've long maintained Pat's story ends when he pulls a gun on a random person who says one of his utterly innocuous Manchurian Candidate phrases. I know he's a huge pussy who fears actual confrontation, but he's also actually insane and getting worse every year.

If Nicky ever leaves him I predict jail or suicide by cop within the year.

 

[Jeff_the_Thriller]

View attachment 6111287

Raul Julia never died. Those are merely your delusions. He is rebranding as mukbang youtuber. Enjoy prison atalker!

 

[Triplethreat]

Here are a bunch of new things I found, courtesy of my insomni.

Nikki is offering a new SEO course! Just $149!!!!

https://postsbyghost-u.teachable.com/p/google-search-console-secrets

The Archive is just showing a blank page, not sure why.

also according to the 2023 mom2.0 conference:
”As president of Posts By Ghost, Niki Robinson’s current passions include SEO/data analysis and practical applications for artificial intelligence. She’s the creator of the 90-Day SEO Bootcamp for Bloggers and serves as the Milwaukee StorySLAM Producer for the international live storytelling organization, The Moth.”

https://mom2.com/2023-speakers/

Archive.

 

[Immortal Technique Vol.2]

Kiwi jam session if you're bored. Thanks to the power of AI you no longer need to be able to sing or play instruments. You just need to be able to type and select prompts. https://www.udio.com/

 

[Battlecruiser3000ad]

I still don't understand how Fatrick dares to go against a man with five bathroom sinks AND a fancy smartwatch.

 

[Maude Snew]

Nikki is offering a new SEO course! Just $149!!!!

What does that get you you ask.

Not even an hour of content. Fucking ripoff if you ask me. 35 seconds of enhancing the experience.

"Growing team", what a load, any growing they're doing is getting fatter.

Free would be paying too much also it's very much not free.

Jumped around a bit with my VPN, the price changes seemingly at random for different countries. As someone currently doing some online certifications you get actual six month courses from actual serious organizations for that price, not just an hour of a zonked out lesbian talking at you about shit she knows nothing about. Why us though.

Edit: archive

 

[Drama Trauma]

Another AI song about Patrick S. Tomlinson:

 

[Orange Rhymer]

>My Religion Is: Atheist
>I Attend Services: Once A Month

What kind of services? Does he mean a DND meetup or going to the local elementary school playground? Nice capitalization stupid.

My favorite is the salary. $30k - $45k. You know the truth is the first number. But he says he works as a Travel Agency Accountant?
Interns in most PROFESSIONAL fields require double that salary.
Accountants get $150k+. Accounting is a tedious job with personal liability and state certifications.

Dis nigga is either lying or one broke bitch.

 

[Helvetia]

Jumped around a bit with my VPN, the price changes seemingly at random for different countries.

$195 dollars in Switzerland - but the conversion means if someone paid in francs then they'd only pay the equivalent of $170. Bitch can't even convert properly.

 

[PS2 Nishiki]

"My name is not Rick, stalker child"
Archive