Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I am seriously debating contacting OAPS.
Major papers always prewrite several drafts of stories for major events. They want to publish copy as fast as possible to start farming clicks while the iron is hot. It doesnt take a fourth estate rebbe to predict this as one of the primarily likely outcomes. they probably had six different stories written up on Tuesday and started editing the one that became relevant while the debate was still ongoing. Dim Fool trying to read tarot off uno cards as usualMeanwhile, Tim Pool links an article claiming they had pre-written Biden hit pieces. I.e., this whole thing was planned.
What, like did away with it entirely?SCOTUS THREW OUT CHEVRON
THIS IS NOT A DRILL
I dunno if I can take much more of this... However, the USSC is doing some good, some bad back and forth, But been a good 24 hours for sure.SCOTUS THREW OUT CHEVRON
THIS IS NOT A DRILL
What, like did away with it entirely?
People were calling me optimistic for saying it was gonna happen, but the writing is on the wall, there's only one thing the SCOTUS has been consistent on this cycle; reducing the power of the alphabet soup agents.
SCOTUS THREW OUT CHEVRON
THIS IS NOT A DRILL
Trump lies and you're an idiot. Biden-Harris 2024."Trump Lies" isn't exactly an effective message when it's coming from the camp that insists that the Economy is actually really super right now.
We have the Chevron cases.
They are by the Chief.
Chevron is overruled.
The vote is 6-3 (although 6-2 in Loper-Bright because Jackson is recused). Kagan dissents, joined by Sotomayor and Jackson as it applies to Relentless, from which she is not recused.
Like the affirmative action cases, the court did this as one opinion.
The question in this case was whether to overrule the court's 1984 decision in Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council, holding that courts should defer to an agency's reasonable interpretation of an ambiguous statute. As I mentioned, the court today does overrule Chevron.
The Administrative Procedure Act requires courts to exercise their independent judgment in deciding whether an agency as acted within its statutory authority, and courts may not defer to an agency interpretation of the law simply because a statute is ambiguous.
Thomas and Gorsuch have concurring opinions.
Chevron, Roberts explains, "defies the command of" the Administrative Procedure Act, the law governing federal administrative agencies, "that the reviewing court--not the agency whose action it reviews--is to decide all relevant questions of law and interpret ... statutory provisions. It requires a court to ignore, not follow, the reading the court would have reached had it exercised its independent judgment as required by the APA."
Chevron's presumption that statutory ambiguities are implicit delegations of authority by Congress to federal agencies "is misguided," Roberts explains, "because agencies have no special competence in resolving statutory ambiguities. Courts do."
Roberts notes that today's decision does "not call into question prior cases that relied on the Chevron framework. The holdings of those cases that specific agency actions are lawful--including the Clean Air Act holding of Chevron itself--are still subject to statutory stare decisis despite our change in interpretive methodology."
How in the ever loving fuck are any of the conservative justices -alive- right now?
Oh shit! Wow.SCOTUS THREW OUT CHEVRON
THIS IS NOT A DRILL
I assumed the exact same thing. This is a massive blow to the state as a whole, Leaving aside it now leaves every single federal agency massively open to lawsuits (The ATF -entirely exists- off of Chevron), but this means Trump was just handed an arsenal of nuclear weapons if he gets in to just outright destroy agencies.I'd presume this would be leaked and they'd "deal with it" before it got out, tho.
As Trump said, are you tired of winning yet lads? Holy shit lmao. ATF in shambles.