Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 21.6%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.4%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 83 28.4%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 42 14.4%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 100 34.2%

  • Total voters
    292
This post is fucking:winner:
@Null needs to add a "Prophetic" reaction.
A couple days before that post Nick and Kayla Rekieta streamed from their Hedonism II room and Nick said "we have to hurry up because we have to go have sex with other people."


A few days before that, Rekieta joined a D&D stream and was asked when he left if he was going to the "swingers' banquet".

The idea that it was some kind of secret thing by the point of that post is absurd. Rekieta, who at one point refused to contest being described as an "exhibitionist", was probably getting sexual satisfaction from rubbing it in the face of his then still sizeable audience.
 
@Null needs to add a "Prophetic" reaction.
Balldo's Grace.png
 
The smaller the community, the more the gossip gets to every single member of the community. Every single person in this small community knew Nick was a complete and utter piece of shit.
I grew up in a small community myself. It shocked me several times, how people I barely knew personally turned out to know an absurd amount of detail about what I was up to, who my friends were etc.
Also, in communities like this, it's usually not well received, when people "act out". As in, not doing what everyone does. I'm sure Rekieta resented that, since he fancied himself some kind of rockstar and the people in the community hated Rekieta, since he is an asshole.
I seem to remember him saying he took MDMA during Matsuri 22' but I'm not 100% sure
I remember MDMA on some occasion, too. Don't know when it was though. Might actually have been JuJu the cow who mentioned it.

I'm a very grown person, and until I had some specific experiences (as an adult, and not even a young adult), I had zero ability to spot functional or even unfunctional addiction, and wouldn't even think to identify drug use. It literally took multiple experiences and having things crash and burn to develop a nose (heh) for it.

I know kids today are savvier than I was, but most people don't have direct experience with addiction off the rails, and even most kids of today I have known are fairly insulated and also protective of their families.
The children certainly knew something was up. At least to the older ones it was probably obvious. I'd assume, even the young children knew something was off, they should lack the vocabulary and understanding to figure out what exactly though. But I also doubt they could identify specific drug use. Personally I could tell he was on something more than alcohol, but had you asked me on what, I only could have guessed (until the retard showed up with coke on his nose of course)

I don't think anyone coached them. I just doubt Rekieta ever considered he might fuck up and get caught. No clue how cps questions children in situations like this. I guess, similar to opinion-poll results, the results depend a lot on how the question is asked. "Have you ever noticed your parents are on cocaine?" would result in a different answer than "Were your parents acting different lately?".
 
Credit where it's due, Warski called it as cocaine relatively early.
Takes one to know one.

Yes he was on shrooms in 2022. Page 640. Some funny shit around that time. I seem to remember him saying he took MDMA during Matsuri 22' but I'm not 100% sure. One of the videos of him being stepped on.

This post is fucking:winner:
View attachment 6160124
The signs were there.
🍺 :really:>ehhhh officer, I already did speed today, three lines in fact
🚓:null:>you... what?
 
A couple days before that post Nick and Kayla Rekieta streamed from their Hedonism II room and Nick said "we have to hurry up because we have to go have sex with other people."


A few days before that, Rekieta joined a D&D stream and was asked when he left if he was going to the "swingers' banquet".

The idea that it was some kind of secret thing by the point of that post is absurd. Rekieta, who at one point refused to contest being described as an "exhibitionist", was probably getting sexual satisfaction from rubbing it in the face of his then still sizeable audience.
I quoted it less for any predictive qualities and more for the final line: "I guess what I'm saying is that I really hope Nick does not turn out to be a sex weirdo." Fucking hilarious. Fast forward nearly 2 years later and who could have predicted all of it?
 
A couple days before that post Nick and Kayla Rekieta streamed from their Hedonism II room and Nick said "we have to hurry up because we have to go have sex with other people."


A few days before that, Rekieta joined a D&D stream and was asked when he left if he was going to the "swingers' banquet".

The idea that it was some kind of secret thing by the point of that post is absurd. Rekieta, who at one point refused to contest being described as an "exhibitionist", was probably getting sexual satisfaction from rubbing it in the face of his then still sizeable audience.
>loves lying and deceiving people
>extreme distaste for authority, like constantly getting speeding tickets because it's an easy quick way to get this behavior out of your system, and openly doing this on stream
>impulsive behavior, like never feeling satisfied with the type of job he has and going through various occupations before losing interest once more
>narcissistic
>compartmentalization of different aspects of his life, hidden away from prying eyes

What gives, antisocialpersonalitydisordersisters?
 
Last edited:
Found this on another forum that was discussing Nick. If this is true then it makes me wonder how much of a chance there is to get a sympathetic vote on the jury when it/if it goes to trial.

It doesn't sound credible to me. It also doesn't explain his rants against the weird incel prudes in the local area. The only thing that might support it is Nick's rant about secret church degenerates, but that seem far-fetched to me.

I’m not questioning your overall thesis, but this is something I’ve wondered for a while: Do we know of ANY locals Nick was friends with in the first place (not counting fellow aspiring e-celebs the Amholes)? It seems like Nick thought he was too good for the normies in his midst, to the point where he’d rather buddy up with fucking Ethan Ralph online. (AFAIAA, Drexel the degenerate was someone he’d been out of touch with for an extended period and only dredged up from the past so Nick could show off his black friend.)

I would never trust any adult who has no long term friendships.
Soter, his head Discord janny, is at least reasonably local to him.

Q used to count too, but he had a bad falling out with Drex years ago, so I dunno if he is even part of the Balldoverse anymore.
Q isn't local anymore. He was moving around the country a lot and eventually living out of an RV with his family, and he scammed Doug Tennapel out of 5 figures either to get the RV or ... something. I think it was documented either here or in CG thread, albeit poorly because it was just stupid.

If Nick had a local support group, aside from the qover, it was the co-op and church(es), but he obviously burned those bridges.
Let us attempt to call the local and non-local roll:

Soter - Formerly paid DISCORD moderator (100 American per month) washed balldos even until now and swept like a good janny.

Quniton 'Q' Duranji - Used to host 'Out of the Darkness', a religious based current events talk show on YT with some local boomers. Leaned into the 2020 election grift and got yeeted. Also a grifter in real life where Nick represented him and his wife in debt collection services. Has loved the last year or so in an RV with 5 figure money he 'borrowed' from Doug T.

Drexel - semi-local manosphere grifter.

Dick Masterson - You know this... E-daday more than friend

EVS - Unrepentant grifter

Doug Tennapel - Anti-EVS grifter

Dick Show People- Kian 'Mr. Peacock', Josh, Joel 'Chaco' Churry, Stuart Davis, Heath (the teaxher), and Stephen Birch

As someone soon-to-be married myself, I wonder about all the advocation for divorce in this thread.
Is there anything to be said for "better or worse, sickness & in health"?

Would it not be better for them to stay married, and hopefully, eventually pull out of this together?
Or even separate - like Kayla could clean up, move out, get sober. But support & drive her husband to get better himself?

Again, this is all on paper because they already violated the marriage with adultery - so moot point in their case. But if it was just drugs, no cheating - wouldn't not divorcing, and instead honoring marriage vows be the better option, even if you have to spend some time apart & alone (but not cheating or adultering)?

Is it possible, yes, always. Is it likely, no. As others have said, they would need to *want* to change. Even then, it is begging against the odds.

Case in point: For a while, I thought he was on something like an opiate. Abuse/misuse of prescription painkillers is very common in the U.S..

I am largely ignorant when it comes to illicit drug use, and I didn't appreciate what I was seeing was actually a hardcore stimulant. That said, you are correct that I knew damn well he was on something. That something ending up being way worse than I ever imagined. Alcohol alone would simply not explain the behavior we were all seeing.

Credit where it's due, Warski called it as cocaine relatively early.

Warski probably sees cochise everywhere.

You aren’t allowed to deduce anything from his behavior or even observe the changes unless you are also a father of five, that was once the most superchatted streamer on YouTube, insufflate at least $20k of cocaine a month after growing up a trust fund baby turned coomer degenerate.
Checkmate incel Prudinavians.
View attachment 6158963
I rest my case your honor Pussy Booze, do not pass Go enjoy one million Balldos on your way to prison stalker child cokehead.

This is what Nick thinks, unironically.

I remember MDMA on some occasion, too. Don't know when it was though. Might actually have been JuJu the cow who mentioned it.

Anime Matsuru 2022. It was a self-report when Nick started leaning into breaking his trad image. It was a 'funny and weird' thing you can do occasionally to have silly fun.
 
I'm sorry, this is not subtle at all. The guy was clearly on drugs. You might not be able to guess what specific drug he was on but you do not need ANY experience with drug use at all to determine that this guy was using something.
I was pretty clear in saying this is the case for children in general and that while kiwifarms had him dead to rights for a long time, kids (who aren’t watch his streams) don’t make the same leaps.

Children who have never been around drugs don’t automatically know what they’re looking at when an adult (esp a parent) is high and acting strangely. This is just fact, and observable from the people here that have mentioned their experience but also in general when if you’ve ever been around adults reflecting on the substance abuse of their parents. Once they learn that lesson they don’t forget, as is with most threatening things kids encounter for the first time. CPS workers talk about this too, children are not objective about their parents, it’s just “dads acting scary again, better stay away” not “dads on coke, better stay away.”

Kids are innocent, again, which is why they need protected because they accept far too much. They literally don’t know any better. They do need that initial learning experience. We have no idea how directly Nick interacted with his kids off his most intoxicated streams. He’s already acclimatised them to a lot by getting drunk so often and bringing in other adults on drugs. His children are very young, heavily sheltered and dumped on other people constantly, with the eldest of the house out most of the time. They easily could have known, sure, but to make the argument the children in his home should know because you did via his streams isn’t the most compelling.
 
Last edited:
I just want to say that everybody saying the kids would "obviously" have known the their parents were on drugs...nah. they wouldn't. First off, the kids were home schooled so that puts them at a massive disadvantage for knowing anything is up. Second, the addicts were the ones teaching them so they would have been able to steer them in a different direction.

But possibly most important: parents are god in the eyes of their kids. Especially young kids. The 16 year old might have had a clue but I doubt it. I would expect all the kids to be clueless other than "mom is acting weird" or "dad isn't feeling well this morning". Kids entire baseline for how people should be IS their parents, especially sheltered kids like those. If you have kids or have been close with young kids, you probably found out pretty quickly that they will believe nearly anything you tell them because they really have no functional lie detectors. It's why you have to constantly reiterate not to go with strangers and not to take candy from strangers and all that. So if Nick and Kayla say whatever lies they do about why they look like ghouls, of course the kids would believe it.
 
Or even separate - like Kayla could clean up, move out, get sober. But support & drive her husband to get better himself?
If Kayla got her shit together enough to say "this is an unsafe environment for my children, I'm taking them and leaving" or "my children are currently in foster care due to my behavior and my husband's behavior, if I want this to change I need to change my behavior", she would also hopefully recognize that any effort that could go into "supporting" Nick would be better spent on her sobriety and her children. The only person who can drive Nick to better himself is Nick.
They've both had plenty of opportunities to do the right thing and they haven't.
 
I was pretty clear in saying this is the case for children in general and that while kiwifarms had him dead to rights for a long time, kids (who aren’t watch his streams) don’t make the same leaps.

Children who have never been around drugs don’t automatically know what they’re looking at when an adult (esp a parent) is high and acting strangely. This is just fact, and observable from the people here that have mentioned their experience but also in general when if you’ve ever been around adults reflecting on the substance abuse of their parents. Once they learn that lesson they don’t forget, as is with most threatening things kids encounter for the first time. CPS workers talk about this too, children are not objective about their parents, it’s just “dads acting scary again, better stay away” not “dads on coke, better stay away.”

Kids are innocent, again, which is why they need protected because they accept far too much. They literally don’t know any better. They do need that initial learning experience. We have no idea how directly Nick interacted with his kids off his most intoxicated streams. He’s already acclimatised them to a lot by getting drunk so often and bringing in other adults on drugs. His children are very young, heavily sheltered and dumped on other people constantly, with the eldest of the house most of the time. They easily could have known, sure, but to make the argument the children in his home should know because you did via his streams isn’t the most compelling.
Ill argue the opposite. Kids can be extremely perceptive. They might not know exactly whats going on, but they can definitely tell something is catastrophically wrong when their mom is even more pilled out and their dad is all at once hyped up and nodding off, and suddenly there are these people you dont know living with mom and dad in their room. They know enough to know that this shit isnt normal to how they were living just a year ago. Drug abuse, especially to the level they mustve gotten too, is very obvious. Its a noticeable change because it wasnt even a gradual change. Theyll know that 2 years ago mommy and daddy were kissing them goodnight and reading them stories, and now theyre passing out in their beds stinking like shit. Theyll know their comfy life where they go to school with their close childhood friends is collapsing because their parents are passed out and cant be roused from sleep, and theyll know that they were hungry and dirty in a manner they never have been before, because mommy and daddy arent feeding or bathing them anymore.

Excuse the power leveling. I hope nick aspirates on his own vomit and Mrs. Rekieta slips into a pill induced coma.
 
I think collectively assuming that they all knew something was up or had no idea is a little naive.

The 16 year old was out of the house all the time, from my understanding. Some of that was school, but it also wouldn't surprise me if he was spending more time at his friend's houses to avoid being at home.

Whether or not he explicitly knew knew exactly what was going on I think it's safe to assume a 16-year-old knew something. Especially if he seems to be avoiding being at home as much as possible.

The second eldest is also old enough to likely have an inkling that something is going on, if only because he remebers how different things were before.

The three youngest? Unless the older two filled them in that mommy and daddy used to be different (possible) I don't feel confident in saying anything more than they've picked up on a shift in mood.
I'm not sure that they have the capacity to understand that Mom and Dad have fundamentally changed from how they used to be, or the cause of that. I just think they are too young to process or have those kind of thoughts organically.

For the six year old, she really might not remember life any other way. Which is horrifying.
 
I think collectively assuming that they all knew something was up or had no idea is a little naive.

The 16 year old was out of the house all the time, from my understanding. Some of that was school, but it also wouldn't surprise me if he was spending more time at his friend's houses to avoid being at home.

Whether or not he explicitly knew knew exactly what was going on I think it's safe to assume a 16-year-old knew something. Especially if he seems to be avoiding being at home as much as possible.

The second eldest is also old enough to likely have an inkling that something is going on, if only because he remebers how different things were before.

The three youngest? Unless the older two filled them in that mommy and daddy used to be different (possible) I don't feel confident in saying anything more than they've picked up on a shift in mood.
I'm not sure that they have the capacity to understand that Mom and Dad have fundamentally changed from how they used to be, or the cause of that. I just think they are too young to process or have those kind of thoughts organically.

For the six year old, she really might not remember life any other way. Which is horrifying.
Yeah man, that really makes me feel kind of sick thinking about what these kids are going to go through. Watching their parents battle the government. Dad is probably going to get some prison. All your friends and their families know all the dirt on your failed parents. My heart goes out to those poor kids. How dreadful. Shame on Nick.
 
Back