Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Watching Rekieta]

So, I skimmed through rapidly everything since the highlight for Nicks interview, I'm probably blind and this has been asked before, but what're the odds this dumbass interview is used in court against him? 100%? 105%?

Zero percent for his trial. No one to testify about the video. It's different than the video of Nick w/ coke on his nose or picking sores on arms where an expert describes the behavior. They will absolutely use it to determine pleas and strategy, though. They will have watched Barnes nonsense on hair follicle testing. Nick publicly insinuating that the county prosecutor/KCHHS lied to the court or the cops planted drugs is not going to get them to use their discretion in a way favorable to Nick. Nick is the kind of dickhead that would verbally berate cops prior to arrest and then request to be handcuffed with hands in front and not understand why they don't. I can hear Nick at a plea deal negotiation with the lady prosecutor: "Listen hear you vodka dripping cunt, statistically non-violent 1st time drug offenders get no jail time. It's weird and funny that you think I deserve 3 years of hard time for the drugs you planted in my house and cocaine you rubbed into her hair? And if I don't agree to 3 years, you're going to ask for 7 years at trial even though you have the discretion to request no jail time? I'll see you next tuesday."

Another use may be pre-trial stuff when judge makes decisions about what's admissible. Nick on stream today tried the "my clients were denied access to their lawyer" insanity. Particularly, he's going to try and use that to get Kayla's "April is our live-in nanny" statement tossed. Nick on the stream then demonstrated his complete lack of understanding of both unwaivable conflict as well as what the right to an attorney means as well as Nick stating not having an attorney wasn't that big a deal for him. Rekieta's next admitted that LE properly stopped questioning Kayla after she invoked right to remain silent. Had Nick just kept his mouth shut, the defense attorney might argue that KCHHS, represented by the county prosecutor, is LE and the questioning was improper and should be suppressed. But Nick vouched that it was all good.

His house strategy was another one. April living in the other house and brought up in superchats gives clues to KCHHS and LE. Suddenly both houses are subject to inspections. Hardly any effort required when he does the leg work.

 

[Das Kätzchen]

Gives opinion on @MNPublicRecords : "Very interesting Kiwifarms account... seems to have access to documents before anybody knows they're around... some of them are public and some of them aren't"

P.S.: This, but Kiwi-style, is something I'd love to see in the next patch run, if it ever happens.

 

[Prokhor Zakharov]

Take a look at the tattoo itself. Hanging from the dream catcher thing are FIVE jewels. One for each child, maybe? Three necklaces and two chains, representing three girls and two boys? Is she really adopting the old white-trash tactic of getting a tattoo in honor of your kids as a way to get them back?!

I don't know if anyone else already pointed this out, but adding further to your theory, note that 3 of the gems have identical cuts, while the other 2 are quite different, but similar to one another.

 

[zyclonPD]

View attachment 6243350

P.S.: This, but Kiwi-style, is something I'd love to see in the next patch run, if it ever happens.

Its been made before

 

[Chode]

Interestingly, it appears slaying DWI tests doesn't pay all the bills, as after some years doing lab testing, he abruptly shifted to...content creation! Which is apparently his main gig, having added the consultancy later.

This is irrelevant but amusing (from his blog), given current day: extolling Mr. Beast.

Also from his blog: "I write books, a blog, and produce a podcast about entrepreneurship, health, fitness, nutrition, philosophy, stoicism, existentialism, and self-improvement."

On FB, he says, "9 months ago, I changed industries completely. went from being a forensic scientist working in a government lab to doing content for a B2B Saas media company. I used the @hackingcareers method to level up. Here's what I did."

Why are Millennial men like this?

All that said, he maintains his forensics-related linkedin and showcases some wins, though everything I've seen from him there or on the linked "DWI Journal," which has 2 articles, both his, is about alcohol testing. He is EIC, naturally, and the journal was started 6 months ago. Does have an editorial board, though.

Aaron Olson on linkedin:

https://www.linkedin.com/in/aaronolsonblog

His youtube:

https://www.youtube.com/@AaronOlsonBlog/videos

He interviewed a furry during the 2021 Bitcoin pump:

Most of his 'success' on the channel came from his fitness days a decade ago:


His facebook:

https://www.facebook.com/aaronolsonblog

That article about switching away from lab testing appears to be gone.

The Mr. Beast article (a) is mostly a puff piece about Iced Coffee Hour, a grindset podcast the youtube algorithm feeds you at some point.

His article about The Useful Lie (a) is a summation of a book that says addiction isn't a disease but a sin, and because of that AA doesn't work(?) and 'most addicts outgrow their addictions'

He goes on to say a person has to choose "the slow painful boredom of diligent living" (How prudish!)


In another article he talks about how he tokenized his time on the blockchain:


As for why Nick would choose this guy? He is willing to deviate from the general medical narrative:

Talking about the book When Natural Cures for Cancer became Illegal (a)


Interview with biochem phd/immunologist about covid:


I 'm looking forward to this guys testimony about how someone's vape can show up as crack in a hair follicle test.

 

[parsnip]

this will be nick's next explanation

 

[John Andrews Stan]

I didn’t get caught possessing cocaine.
And if I did, it wasn’t that bad.
And if it was, that’s not a big deal (bleach is a bigger deal).
And if it is, that’s not my fault (it’s the fault of incel prudes).
And if it was, I didn’t mean it (I was just trying to manage my anxiety).
And if I did, my kids deserved it.

My daughter didn’t test positive for cocaine.
And if she did, it wasn’t that bad…

Basically any narrative this fag tries to sell about his fuckups will always follow the Narcissist’s Prayer:

That didn't happen.
And if it did, it wasn't that bad.
And if it was, that's not a big deal.
And if it is, that's not my fault.
And if it was, I didn't mean it.
And if I did, you deserved it.

 

[TrainWreckWatcher]

So, I skimmed through rapidly everything since the highlight for Nicks interview, I'm probably blind and this has been asked before, but what're the odds this dumbass interview is used in court against him? 100%? 105%?

Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law.
So probably.

 

[daffodils]

That article about switching away from lab testing appears to be gone.

It's here, but it's not very interesting. The general impression I get from his blog and Youtube channel is that the guy has spent a decade jumping from grift to grift: fitness, mental health, career advice, self-improvement, crypto, ... If he's back to opining on lab work, I guess he failed at all of them.

As for why Nick would choose this guy? He is willing to deviate from the general medical narrative:

Talking about the book When Natural Cures for Cancer became Illegal (a)

He's also interviewed libertarian economist Bryan Caplan, who's a pretty smart guy but wedded to a weird theory that mental illness isn't real and the mentally ill merely have "socially disapproved preferences". Caplan has been in a years-long back-and-forth with psychiatrist blogger Scott Alexander over that one.

So as you say, Nick most likely picked this guy because he's willing to go against the scientific consensus.

the claims of Aaron are the only ones you should be able to talk about you retard. if what he said aren't true there's literally no downside to saying "Aaron is a fucking liar, and the fact that he's going around saying he creampied my wife is disgusting"

It's interesting that Nick has no problem accusing a CPS worker of lying under oath but suddenly becomes very careful whenever Aaron is mentioned.

 

[AltisticRight]

This would appear to imply that a) Nick has been watching Aaron, b) Nick has been reading Kiwi Farms, or c) Nick has been watching Kino Casino or similar streams which cover Rekieta news.

d) all of the above

Nick mentions that exposure to smoked drugs can cause a hair follicle test to be positive even if the person was not smoking themselves.

It can't.
So he's now admitting that he did cocaine around his children? Did he think this will make him look better?

Updated version:
View attachment 6242673

It looks like coony adopted those kids and they're happy.

 

[Father Balldo]

Prove the substance was cocaine, prove it belonged to Nick, prove it existed in the first place.

Protip:

Spoiler

you can't

 

[daffodils]

You know the situation is bad when Drexel is the voice of reason

 

[Annealing Crater]

When Nick looked like he was jerking off on stream he was pressing a wound on his leg so the pain response would keep him awake

A minor thing, but Nick did not try to play it off like it was just a joke making fun of DSP. I know there were a lot of doubts, but for me this is confirmation that the DSP moment was real.

Edit: also, why does he have a wounded leg?

 

[John Andrews Stan]

You know the situation is bad when Drexel is the voice of reason


View attachment 6243990

IOW: You’re supposed to take one red pill, not the whole bottle.

He’s making the same mistake many others do, which is thinking Nick is a mostly normal person who’s just made a lot of batshit choices. When you realize he’s a fundamentally fucked up person whose own comfort and glorification will always be his first priority, the logic for his life choices becomes crystal clear.

 

[AltisticRight]

You know the situation is bad when Drexel is the voice of reason


View attachment 6243990

This slattern Sally could do with more cloths. Even Drexel looks disinterested.

 

[John Andrews Stan]

This slattern Sally could do with more cloths. Even Drexel looks disinterested.

Sally looks like she can’t follow anything Drexel says during the entire conversation. Just another one of Nick’s fucking moron fans.

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

Hold on a second - Nick claims that the hair follicles of kids can be tainted by drug use in their environment, but was there any evidence listed in the police reports indicating the presence of crack pipes or any other paraphernalia related to smoking drugs as opposed to snorting them? I could be wrong, but I don't recall anything smoking-related being documented.

What's Nick's next genius claim going to be, that the kids are testing positive, because he and his wife were bathing the kids in cocaine?

Someone ELSE might have done it. That is the genius that you are missing.

Nick constantly tries to hide behind hypotheticals then say 'You don't have all the facts.' It us a tortured version of the 'beyond a reasonable doubt' standard where he tries to fragment the whole issue until small enough pieces with enough uncertainty that it undermines the narrative. What Nick is missing is the 'reasonable ' part of that test.

I 'm looking forward to this guys testimony about how someone's vape can show up as crack in a hair follicle test.

So as you say, Nick most likely picked this guy because he's willing to go against the scientific consensus.

Have you considered that this guy is a streamer? Maybe he has 5 kids to homeschool, so he uniquely understands Nick's position? This guy may be a font of non-faggy advice!

It can't.
So he's now admitting that he did cocaine around his children? Did he think this will make him look better?

Sew above on Nick's bastrdisation of 'reasonable doubt'. He is pretending the standard for felony conviction is as high as he thinks it is when people are found guilty all the time by juries for dumb reasons.

A minor thing, but Nick did not try to play it off like it was just a joke making fun of DSP. I know there were a lot of doubts, but for me this is confirmation that the DSP moment was real.

Yes, he did.

 

[Konstantin Romanov]

A very interesting case of it happening can be seen on the excellent but disturbing documentary "West of Memphis".
Basically some new evidence came to light after years of the innocents already being in prison, so instead of setting up a new trial, which would expose major corruption and bias of the people involved in the previous one, including the judge, the prosecution just offered that deal, and it was accepted. It's sad as fuck and no one suffered the consequences for it, but at least the kids got their names clean in the end.

>He fell for the true crime meme
Damian Echols 100% killed and raped those kids and while I believe juvenile defendants should be given a path to rehabilitation, the fact that he is still attempting to avoid what little accountability he got for his crime indicates that in retrospect he should have been hanged. His name is not clean because he acknowledged in his plea that the state had sufficient evidence to convict him, a statement which makes a lot of sense given that nothing has changed about the evidence which already did convict him. The "new evidence" the histrionic california jew was screeching about was in fact not new, it was not old evidence retested, it was just her latest in a series of attempts at reframing the evidence found at the scene 20 years prior. Meanwhile the fact that you watched a fucking "true crime documentary" uncritically indicates you should seek institutionalization.

 

[AbyssStarer]

I agree that there's potential for embarrassment here, but I don't know that there's that much danger. There's only a loose affiliation between FNT and Chrissie. If things got really bad, they could part ways with her.

Like I said before, she's doesn't seem to be very aware at times. It could be that she's still bamboozled by this guy she thought was her friend the way so many of Nick's other "friends" couldn't figure out that he was playing them. But my guess is that this comes down to her personal friendships with Keanu and April. What pressure does Chrissie feel to defend Nick because her friends are on his side and now the expectation is that she has to prove her loyalty to them by coming to Nick's defense?

Again, I don't know if she's clueless or if she knows Nick is guilty. Maybe she's convinced herself that he has to be innocent? Rationalizing the situation, because the alternative is that she'd have to take sides against her friends which could jeopardize their friendship?

The night Nick did standup was the night Chrissie's father was shot and murdered (murderer never found) and Nick talked her through it a and she called off her appearance at that show.
Chrissie talks to pretty much anyone and interviews people she doesn't agree with but she generally doesn't blast them; the point of the interview is to get the interviewee to answer questions not debate about them.

Chrissie has never sounded all that aware of all the allegations against Rekeita and said before that addiction is hard and she hopes Rekeita gets through it. Rekeita was a good friend to her so it's not hard to see how she got there. Chrissie is also a new mom so can't blame her for not wasting her time trying to wade through this shit. She probably didn't completely realize what a can of worms interviewing Balldo would be. But I guess "I'm praying for him" counts as noseguarding to this thread for some reason. Should just post "wow! Fat and would not!" and farm some upgoats instead.

 

[Mourning_Cloak]

Lol, Trump is speaking at a rally in the Balldo capital (St. Cloud, MN) right now

In another life Balldo would've been there with live coverage.

Oh well! The siren song of the crack pipe was too strong.