Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 64 20.1%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.3%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 86 27.0%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 51 16.0%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 113 35.5%

  • Total voters
    318
She just looks so fucking white trash. I've thought that ever since I first saw her but didn't feel like cluttering the thread with another "sHeS uGlY aNd lOw ClAsS" post here.

But Jesus fucking Christ I can't keep my mouth quiet any longer. That tattoo is God damn horrendous and looks like something that would be on a tee shirt that a 60 year old man who eats at least 4 meals at a Cracker Barrel a week would wear. Throw the fact that the wolves symbolize her throuple and it's just too fucking much for me to comprehend how someone would choose to look this way.

But what's worse?
A) Choosing to look like that
-OR-
B) willingly fucking a woman who looks like that
You just don't get it. These are famous celebrities. Trend-setters even. Just like Johnny Depp.
 
I would dearly love to know who chose Kayla's lawyer and to what extent they're advising her to take actions which will protect Nick.
It's a serious violation of the RPCs, particularly 1.8(f), relating to conflicts of interest.

Minnesota's version:
(f) A lawyer shall not accept compensation for representing a client from one other than the client unless:
(1) the client gives informed consent or the acceptance of compensation from another is impliedly authorized by the nature of the representation;

(2) there is no interference with the lawyer's independence of professional judgment or with the client-lawyer relationship; and

(3) information relating to representation of a client is protected as required by Rule 1.6.
Or to put it briefly, the lawyer's client is the one he is representing. If he puts the interests of a third party over that, even if that third party is paying his fees, he's committing a violation of RPC 1.8(f) and faces disciplinary measures up to and including disbarment.
She is just a dumb bitch tied to a lying faggot forever, I dont know why people keep giving her the benefit of doubt...
She's lost all presumption of a benefit of the doubt. If she gets rid of the rage twig, protects her kids, or even just tard wrangles him into some degree of sanity, then maybe she gets it back. For now, she's on the same level of Hell as he is.
 
She's lost all presumption of a benefit of the doubt. If she gets rid of the rage twig, protects her kids, or even just tard wrangles him into some degree of sanity, then maybe she gets it back. For now, she's on the same level of Hell as he is.
I don't understand how she can't see Nick is trying to replace her with this new woman, destroying their shared life of 20 years and 5 kids. I don't get how she can't feel angry at all about that. It's pathetic.
 
Here is a concurring opinion of the State Supreme Court denial:
He did not say "maybe" I should talk to a lawyer. That was a quote from an entirely different case. He said what he actually said.

“"if y'all, this is how I feel, if y'all think I did it, I know that I didn't do it so why don't you just give me a lawyer dog cause this is not what's up."” State v. Demesme, 228 So. 3d 1206, (La. 2017).

The concurrence cited the case where the defendant actually did say "maybe" which actually is ambiguous to claim that "give me a lawyer, dog" meant he was actually asking for a "lawyer dog" and this was "ambiguous" according to some reasoning that might make sense to a crackhead.
There's a couple personality disorders like this.
There's also a couple of substances that cause delusions like this.

I don't think Nick actually believes there's a conspiracy against him, he just knows it might sell to the tards he has as balldo washers.
Nick doesn't believe he's really being persecuted by the government.
If he does believe it, a combination of arrogant self-delusion and drugs convinced him of it. Narcs will do this splitting thing where they eventually start to believe lies they've told long enough to preserve their fragile self-image.
 
Last edited:
He did not say "maybe" I should talk to a lawyer. That was a quote from an entirely different case. He said what he actually said.

“"if y'all, this is how I feel, if y'all think I did it, I know that I didn't do it so why don't you just give me a lawyer dog cause this is not what's up."” State v. Demesme, 228 So. 3d 1206, (La. 2017).

The concurrence cited the case where the defendant actually did say "maybe" which actually is ambiguous to claim that "give me a lawyer, dog" meant he was actually asking for a "lawyer dog" and this was "ambiguous" according to some reasoning that might make sense to a crackhead.
the lawyer dog thing is dumb but why don't you just give me a lawyer isn't exactly emphatically and explicitly asking for a lawyer. It's fucking retarded legalese but he didn't actually ask them to get him a lawyer, and when dealing with the government you have to assume everyone involved is autistic
 
I don't understand how she can't see Nick is trying to replace her with this new woman, destroying their shared life of 20 years and 5 kids. I don't get how she can't feel angry at all about that. It's pathetic.
From Aaron's stories, which are probably more true than not, that marriage wasn't exactly happy to begin with and she was the one that wanted to explore options.
 
1724543816418.png

[ELECTROCHEMISTRY - Impossible - Failure]: Attempt to stop making "The Expression"​

Oh no... it won't come off.
Do you really think this is a good look for a man in his forties? You plan on inflicting this 'expression' on random young women from the driver's seat of your Rustang, don't you?
NEW THOUGHT UNLOCKED: Juju the Cow
Rampant anal sex in damp hotel rooms, and cocktails of experimental drugs imbibed in stuffy backrooms at convention centers. It makes the anal dildo slip inside you more easily. You wish that was your life, don't you? Well, never say never! 55 is the new 25! (+2 Electrochemistry when using cocaine, -1 Logic, -1 Composure)
[SHIVERS - Trivial - Success] Aaron Imholte wakes up next to your slumped form. Hungry children pound at the door. There are only two forms of nutrients in the home: Carbohydrates, and empty carbohydrates in the form of whiskey.
 
the lawyer dog thing is dumb but why don't you just give me a lawyer isn't exactly emphatically and explicitly asking for a lawyer. It's fucking retarded legalese but he didn't actually ask them to get him a lawyer, and when dealing with the government you have to assume everyone involved is autistic
That's more practical advice than saying what the Louisiana courts here did is okay.

And yes, I'd advise if you're going to exercise your right to counsel, you quite simply say "I am exercising my Sixth Amendment right to counsel immediately and demand this conversation end" and then fall completely silent. If they then try to continue, inform them that they are violating your constitutional rights and again demand counsel. That should then be your only response.

If they're recording this shit by policy, even better, because they are not going to fuck with that, probably not even LA Ramparts Division pigs even if you're black.

But most people don't have that shit memorized and shouldn't be expected to. Basic rights should not require what Scalia might call the "talismanic invocation" of specific magic words, like casting some spell or carving Elbereth.
 
nick is a retard, but people here really don't understand how to read,
Where the fuck are you getting any of this (other than Nick's fantasies)? The warrant does not say "I watched the suspect's video on the suspect's YouTube channel," it says:
>says kiwifags don't know how to read
>fails to read the warrant


They're not sending their best, folks.
There is a condition diagnosable where one feels that there is a conspiracy against them... I cannot recall what it may be called...
If you sent Nick to a psychiatrist they would have to spend months just diagnosing him.

You have:
-Paranoia (what you are obviously alluding to)
-Delusions of persecution
-Pseudologia fantastica (compulsive lying to the point of building an entirely new persona that does not correspond with reality, i.e. Nick thinking he's a successful lawyer who knows the law)
-Erotomania (he really thinks Null loves him and wants to fuck him, he's just playing hard to get)
-"ODD" aka retarded trust fund retard syndrome.
-Affluenza
-Anosognosia: Nick is so cooked he is completely unaware that he's gone turbo retard.
-Hebephrenia: See Denny's joke and the cokestream.
-Somatic Psychosis: this nigga picking his skin.
-Avolition: this nigga isn't paying his fucking traffic tickets and could not be bothered to wash his clothes or make spaghetti-os.

If I had to go on I'd just list the entire DSM-V and tack on the entries its missing from the DSM-IV for good measure, those are a few off the top of my head I can totally-legit-internet-diagnose Nicky with, and as we know internet psychology diagnoses are serious business.
 
Last edited:
That's more practical advice than saying what the Louisiana courts here did is okay.

And yes, I'd advise if you're going to exercise your right to counsel, you quite simply say "I am exercising my Sixth Amendment right to counsel immediately and demand this conversation end" and then fall completely silent. If they then try to continue, inform them that they are violating your constitutional rights and again demand counsel. That should then be your only response.

If they're recording this shit by policy, even better, because they are not going to fuck with that, probably not even LA Ramparts Division pigs even if you're black.

But most people don't have that shit memorized and shouldn't be expected to. Basic rights should not require what Scalia might call the "talismanic invocation" of specific magic words, like casting some spell or carving Elbereth.
that's why you should practice saying some form of "I am invoking my right to counsel I will identify myself and comply with reasonable law enforcement commands, but I will not answer any questions related to the investigation, thank you." Be prepared. You don't expect to end up in these situations but if you do if you have rehearsed it helps when your adrenaline is running.
It sucks that it's come to this and they can play jew magic trickery to fuck you in court but the 21st century is what it is until we butt fuck the judicial system
 
From Aaron's stories, which are probably more true than not, that marriage wasn't exactly happy to begin with and she was the one that wanted to explore options.
He also said that they are extremely codependent, which I find to be highly plausible. Even if the love has faded, there's an attachment of decades that might be hard to shake--especially since they seemingly enable one another's addict behavior.
 
EVS says that Nick told him that the police touched his daughter's hair with cocaine on their gloves and that is why his daughter tested positive.
God, Nick is such a nigger. Blacks make the retarded arguments and refuse to take responsibility for their failures because they refuse to understand "per capita". Nick does the exact same thing because he refuses to understand "metabolite".
 
Null already said what his thought was.
It was that they would let Kayla plead out and claim they were her drugs so that Nick and April could plea innocent over Kayla’s admission of guilt, then turn around and tell the internet that Kayla lied and it was all Aaron’s drugs
This is idiocy. At least if anyone believes that might work.

Believing that Balldo might do something completely idiotic isn't.
Saw these in the Lawtube thread. I thought he snaked but I don't know.
It's not snaking to realize you were tricked by some scumbag into thinking he was something he wasn't (in this case an actual human).
I don't understand how she can't see Nick is trying to replace her with this new woman, destroying their shared life of 20 years and 5 kids. I don't get how she can't feel angry at all about that. It's pathetic.
I'm sure she actually does. She's just succumbed to it and decided she's okay with her kids getting harmed by their shitty abusive father. And perhaps she's done more than we know about herself in that department.
 
It's not snaking to realize you were tricked by some scumbag into thinking he was something he wasn't (in this case an actual human).
Wrong again, Kiwi child. Nick MADE Joe and what Joe is doing to him now is classic snaking. When Nick needs him most, Joe caved and sided with the Farms. If Nick went live and ripped Joe a new asshole I'd really have to respect him for it. It's the man thing to do.

gOoDLawGiC!!! gOoDLawGiC!!! More like good dick sucker. Bish.
 
Wrong again, Kiwi child. Nick MADE Joe and what Joe is doing to him now is classic snaking. When Nick needs him most, Joe caved and sided with the Farms. If Nick went live and ripped Joe a new asshole I'd really have to respect him for it. It's the man thing to do.

gOoDLawGiC!!! gOoDLawGiC!!! More like good dick sucker. Bish.
Just wait until Ethan Ralph finds out where that no good jew Joe NoLogic lives.
 
Back