Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Long-time Lurker]

Is he arguing that it was *technically* wrong, so it gets tossed so that he cannot be charged for the same crime again? Does this explain why he is so adamant to get it tossed out at this point? Does he 'win' if the warrant gets tossed, or could they re-charge him?

Since I don't see a direct response, maybe the following will help.

I cite the Honorable Judge Stephen J. Wentzell's Omnibus Order for case 34-CR-18-14. He is the judge in the current case.

“A search warrant is void, and the fruits of the search must be excluded, if the application includes intentional or reckless misrepresentations of fact material to the findings of probable cause.” State v. Moore, 438 N.W.2d 101, 105 (Minn. 1989). “When a defendant seeks to invalidate a warrant, the two-prong Franks test requires a defendant to show that (1) the affiant “deliberately made a statement that was false or in reckless disregard of the truth,” and (2) “the statement was material to the probable cause determination.” State v. Andersen, 784 N.W.2d 320, 327 (Minn. 2010) (internal citation omitted).

If the warrant is tossed, any evidence collected during the search of Nick's residence and person must be excluded from this and any future case. Legally it is as if the cops did not find coke in his house.

Edit (m): grammar

 

[Third World Aristocrat]

ALL of that shit. Our only problem is that while WE may feel that shit is fascinating as all Hell, the prosecution may not view it as terribly useful.

I get the feeling the prosecution might do it if Nick pisses them off enough. I can't imagine the DA being happy about now having to deal with conspiracy to intimidate witnesses.

Even if it's not useful, I can't see the prosecution being happy about all this.
Nick seems very confident that his Plan A (getting the warrant dropped) won't fail.
However, if his Plan A does fail, it might be wise to avoid being overly antagonistic with someone you might want to cooperate with in the future.

I'm finding this shitshow very amusing. It would be quite funny if Nick ends up with a really bad plea deal as a result of this (including Ralph's hollering).

 

[HackerX]

Even if it's not useful, I can't see the prosecution being happy about all this.
Nick seems very confident that his Plan A (getting the warrant dropped) won't fail.
However, if his Plan A does fail, it might be wise to avoid being overly antagonistic with someone you might want to cooperate with in the future.

I'm finding this shitshow very amusing. It would be quite funny if Nick ends up with a really bad plea deal as a result of this (including Ralph's hollering).

I think the Ralphashenanigans are a nothinburger, but could become something if Ralph doesn't let it go. And when has Ralph ever let anything go? This can't help Rekieta, only hurt him.

 

[Desktop User2]

Nick seems very confident that his Plan A (getting the warrant dropped) won't fail.

I cant think of a single time his smug confidence was shred in hilarious fashion...

 

[Friend of Dorothy Parker]

He also said that they are extremely codependent, which I find to be highly plausible. Even if the love has faded, there's an attachment of decades that might be hard to shake--especially since they seemingly enable one another's addict behavior.

Despite the term, Codependency describes one person's state, not a mutuality, exactly, though the person the codependent is attached to does get a benefit. It is inherently asymmetrical, though sometimes complementary.

Spoiler: Who's zoomin' who? There is only 1 answer.

Definitionally:

Definitions from Oxford Languages · Learn more

adjective
adjective: co-dependent; adjective: codependent

1. characterized by excessive emotional or psychological reliance on a partner, typically one who requires support on account of an illness or addiction.
   "you go with her all the time because you're a little codependent"

noun
noun: co-dependent; plural noun: co-dependents; noun: codependent; plural noun: codependents

1. a person with an excessive emotional or psychological reliance on a partner, typically one who requires support on account of an illness or addiction.
   "codependents confuse caretaking and sacrifice with loyalty and love"

The codependent person is the"giver."

See:

The term “codependency” first appeared in substance abuse circles to describe a lopsided relationship that has been consumed and controlled by one person’s addiction. It grew in popularity and became shorthand for any enabling relationship.

Healthy relationships are mutually beneficial, providing love and support to both parties. Codependent relationships, on the other hand, are one-sided, casting one person in the role of constant caregiver. By being caring, highly functional, and helpful, that person is said to support, perpetuate, or “enable” a loved one’s irresponsible or destructive behavior. For example, helping an inebriated spouse navigate an embarrassing situation or providing living quarters for a substance-using adult child is said to be counterproductive, a way of forestalling recovery and actually perpetuating the problem.

In a healthy relationship, both parties give and receive equally and are able to retain their own identity separate from the other person. In contrast, codependent relationships are an unhealthy alliance where one individual gets stuck in the caregiver role, enabling the other to take without providing support and care in return. The giver longs to be helpful and “rescue” their loved one, but may end up enabling harmful behaviors instead.

Also (recall Kayla's "I just feel so worthless" confessional):

How do Narcissism and Codependency Impact Relationships?​

For those potentially in a toxic relationship dynamic, the impact of either narcissism or codependency can be significant and far-reaching. The consequences of these relationships affect friends, family, and both partner’s broader social circle.

Participation in these relationships can lead to unhealthy patterns that carry over into other relationships and potentially undermine trust, respect, and mutual support with friends and family.

Erosion of Trust and Communication​

In dysfunctional relationships, trust and communication suffer greatly. Narcissists, driven by their need for admiration and control, may resort to manipulation, gaslighting, and emotional abuse to maintain their position of power.

This behavior can deeply erode trust, leaving the codependent partner feeling confused, insecure, and unable to voice their needs or concerns. The lack of genuine, empathetic communication further isolates the codependent, making it difficult for them to seek help or support.

Patterns of Abuse and Control​

The emotional toll on both partners can be significant. Codependents may experience feelings of worthlessness, anxiety, and depression as they struggle to meet the impossible demands of their narcissistic partner.

Their self-esteem becomes increasingly tied to their ability to please the narcissist, leading to a cycle of self-neglect and emotional depletion. Narcissists, on the other hand, may experience frustration, anger, and dissatisfaction when their expectations are not met, leading to further manipulations and abusive behaviors.

The Cycle of Reinforcement​

The interaction between a narcissist and a codependent can reinforce and exacerbate the unhealthy traits of both. The codependent’s actions enable the narcissist’s behavior while neglecting their own needs and boundaries.

This dynamic not only reinforces the narcissist’s belief in their superiority but also deepens the codependent’s sense of dependency and low self-worth, trapping both individuals in the dysfunctional cycle.

More on both:

symptoms of codependency fall into five patterns: denial, low self-esteem, compliance, control, and avoidance.

Denial Patterns Include:

• The inability to identify their feelings and how they are feeling
• Denying or minimizing how they really feel about something or someone
• See themselves as unselfish and dedicated to the well-being of other people

Low Self-Esteem Patterns Include:

• Problems deciding for themselves
• Feeling not good enough and judging themselves harshly
• Unable to identify and ask for what they need or want

Compliance Patterns Include:

• Compromises in the person’s values and veracity to avoid being rejected and to avoid other people’s anger at them
• Extreme loyalty, even when the relationship is harmful
• So sensitive to the feelings of others, they take on the same feelings

Control Patterns include:

• The belief that people cannot care for themselves
• Gets angry when people do not take their advice or accept their help
• Uses sex to gain approval

Avoidance Patterns Include:

• Avoidance of sexual or emotional intimacy to keep from feeling vulnerable
• Allows themselves to behave in a manner that gives them the rejection, shame, and anger they expect from others
• Is harshly judgmental of what others do or say

People who exhibit the behaviors and thought patterns described here, plus many more that were not included, are codependents and need help to pull away from the destructive life patterns they are caught up in.

Who are Narcissists?

Narcissists are people, most commonly men, who have an inflated sense of self-importance and an excessive need for admiration. A narcissist cannot handle criticism and shows a blatant disregard for the feelings of those around them. Narcissists also lack empathy and refuse to take the blame for their actions. Narcissists usually go for jobs that place them in positions of power and seek relationships to fulfill their need to bully.

Some of the symptoms a narcissist exhibits are:

• Narcissists exhibit a grandiose vision of themselves
• Narcissists have an inflated sense of importance
• Narcissists demand loyalty even when they do not deserve it
• They have blurred boundaries and ignore those of others
• Narcissists will not honor or acknowledge any boundaries you set
• They believe they always know what is best for themselves and others
• Narcissists cause others to “walk on eggshells” around them to keep them from attacking them
• Narcissists are manipulative and will use another person’s flaws or vulnerabilities against them
• Narcissists often will treat the people in their lives as though they can do whatever they will with them

Narcissists are people who will destroy the lives of those around them if they are allowed to do so.

I often find the attitude towards women displayed on Kiwifarms a bit perplexing. Many people have an image of women as lazy, stupid and disloyal that just hasn't been my experience of the women in my life.

Then along comes Nick Rekieta and not only is he surrounded by the kind of hoebags who fit this stereotype, he's actively simping for them. Which might be at least comprehensible if they were really hot, really charming and utterly delightful in all sorts of other ways. But they're a pair of worn out old coke whores, FFS.

Make it make sense!

See above. Narcs seek people who are codependent or who can be molded into one. It may or may not be conscious on either side

Narcissistic as he is, Nick doesn't care about the court of public opinion.

Sure he does. He just thinks he can mold public opinion to accept and admire him. That's why he's mad when people refuse.

In the US federally there's the Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE) 1001(d) which stipulates rules for electronic evidence evidence. States have a similar thing.
I think Nick's whole angle is not his idea originally, this was an issue in the Rittenhouse trial I recall where they used a lower resolution than the original resolution since it had been compressed by airdrop or something retarded.

Federal rule Rule 902 describes what is "Self-authenticating" and the video is not self-authenticating. It would be correct to attack this evidence but I think not in the method Nick did in my non-practicing lawyer opinion.

Yes, but authenticating the stream or comparing stream recordings would be an issue at trial (which it won't be bc what the cop watched shows the exact/materially the same thing a live watcher would see). All he's presently aiming to do is to say THE COP IS A LIAR in the application for a warrant in the hope a judge might toss the warrant based on "cop's language was clearly intended to commit fraud on the court." Even though it clearly was not, and that no matter where you found a recording it shows the same behavior that the cop evaluated with an educated eye and, along with other data, gave rise to probable cause.

Second, if that fails, to suggest the cop is shady and disingenuous and can't be trusted for anything.

Actual accuracy of the thing would be a later issue...and I'll bet a dollar that if it gets to that point we'll see the question dropped.

I'm going to guess that Nick is planning to toss one of them once the trial is over and the danger of them flipping is done with.

I think he'll keep it going as long as possible. The ego boost is too much to reject, unless and until someone becomes problematic.

He might have promised April that he will divorce Kayla when this is all over and promised Kayla that he'll lose the skank after she can no longer rat on them. I don't think either woman is happy with the other being in the house but will keep playing pretend because they both think they'll be the eventual "winner"

I think with the plea deal

What plea deal?

 

[thebigdream]

I should also add that many police are scared shitless of white powders because of fentanyl. It's hard to believe cops are going to be so careless raiding a drug addicts house (field testing various white powders) that they transfer a dose of one of the powders to a child's hair.

I don't believe it. I won't unless there's video footage of it happening.

Keep in mind that Nick has seen the bodycam footage. If there was smoking gun evidence of a cop rubbing coke through his kid's hair like a retard, Nick would be jumping up and down like a chimp with glee and shouting from the rooftops in court about it. But he hasn't because it didn't happen.

 

[Low IQ Doctor]

For it to negatively impact Rekieta, you'd likely have to show that Ralph is doing this on Nick's orders. The problem with that is that Ralph just does this stuff every couple of months. It's a pattern of retardation.

Of course, if the issue were to be pursued, Ralph would probably flip and blame things on Nick anyways. Then there's the issue of Ralph being a non-credible alcoholic pill head with a long history of shitty behavior.

I still think Aaron is a shitty witness. He looks/sounds like he has an axe to grind and has a bad history.

 

[Bepis]

For it to negatively impact Rekieta, you'd likely have to show that Ralph is doing this on Nick's orders. The problem with that is that Ralph just does this stuff every couple of months. It's a pattern of retardation.

Of course, if the issue were to be pursued, Ralph would probably flip and blame things on Nick anyways. Then there's the issue of Ralph being a non-credible alcoholic pill head with a long history of shitty behavior.

I still think Aaron is a shitty witness. He looks/sounds like he has an axe to grind and has a bad history.

I feel like they could probably at least make a coherent argument that Ralph might be doing it on Rekieta's orders, especially if they know about the "Tell Rekieta to send me the check" (or whatever the specific wording is) clip. At the least it would be very funny if it came back to bite them both in the ass.

 

[Schmeated Ted]

For it to negatively impact Rekieta, you'd likely have to show that Ralph is doing this on Nick's orders. The problem with that is that Ralph just does this stuff every couple of months. It's a pattern of retardation.

Of course, if the issue were to be pursued, Ralph would probably flip and blame things on Nick anyways. Then there's the issue of Ralph being a non-credible alcoholic pill head with a long history of shitty behavior.

There’s also the issue where Nick would never outright ask Ralph to do it over text, maybe in person, but we know how he talks when asking after things over DM.

 

[LiquidKid]

But this is just retarded. How do you know whether any piece of evidence is edited or not? You just have to accept it on the face of it. If you've got some evidence that it WAS faked, then show that. Otherwise, just shut the fuck up. All the warrant does is give them the right to go and collect actual evidence of a crime. If there's no crime, there won't be any evidence of it, will there?

It’s retarded because an arrest warrant doesn’t need to be beyond a reasonable doubt, it just needs to prove probable cause. Even in the event where the video is completely fake, if it was convincing enough where the police could believe it implied Nick had drugs in his home, that’s enough to get a warrant.
Nick is arguing that there couldn’t be probable cause because the cop lied and claimed he had a video he couldn’t have possibly had

 

[StannisTheMannis]

He might have promised April that he will divorce Kayla when this is all over

April's MO is to stick around with Nick until she sources richer (and more stable) penis. This 'Hollywood' hangout was more of a new cock-hunting venture than a fun social event with cool frens. The moment she lines up a new guy is the moment she'll sing like a canary to the courts (like she did to the cops during the arrest) and throw Nick under the bus in a heartbeat.

Unless she developed full-blown coke-induced retardation, she has to be aware that her future is Jennifer Connelly in Requiem for a Dream if she remains with Nick (which she deserves btw).

 

[East_Clintwood]

Sorry if this post is considered late, but I was out touching grass all day.

So, this is all heading toward porn, right? (Assuming these people avoid jail.) Either Nick is going to create April porn or co-star in it? At least, those are the vibes I'm getting from all these weird posts with April fetishized for Lord Balldo's amusement.

What are the chances that Nick is already an amateur pornographer, and he's already put April on as some Onlyfans or camgirl site? I can definitely see a career as a sleazy porn producer in Nick's future.

Between his going on about how he could make more than Riley/Mint on OF, and how kids of OF thots shouldn't be bothered because it means their parents can buy them shit like PS5's, I'm surprised he hasn't whored one or both out on camera by now.

 

[keke]

Nick was snorting coke on a live stream, hired a crackwhore nanny, and Kayla was mixing more drugs than anyone can count. They also had 25g in their bedroom, with residue everywhere. Nick can make whatever argument he wants to try and plant doubt for the jury, doesn’t make it more plausible than what obviously happened.

Also, this thread spergs about the same shit and wasted like 100 pages on if some random court chick was hot. It is really difficult for newfags to “lurk moar“ when it’s shit up constantly.

Bundling these together for answering. *Technically* there could have been external exposure causing the results, but it was less likely, less researched and needs a more specific test to test ratio of metabolites to delineate between exposure and ingestion.

The test is for metabolites and screens out external exposure. It is not perfect because no test is when done affordably, there are exceptions. It is still designed with that in mind though. “Technically” is just playing Nick’s game.

 

[florida_cat_enjoyer]

Can anyone source the claim the VIP event was 10,000 dollars? I tried looking at the tickets and it said "call to RSVP."

 

[BlastMonk]

I didn't realise April was 29. I thought she was in her mid to late 30's and kept wonder why even thought she looked so bad for her age. Hard drugs really fucking age you huh

 

[repentance]

Not as many people talk about it and public opinion already has him marked as a cokehead. He probably doesn't want even more shit attached to his name, so he's hopeful that's a detail people will just forget over time.

If you told me the ketamine was Kayla's, I'd 100% believe it. She's the one who seems to prefer being as dissociated from real life as possible.

 

[A Cardboard Box]

ALL of that shit. Our only problem is that while WE may feel that shit is fascinating as all Hell, the prosecution may not view it as terribly useful.

This.

Realistically there's enough probable cause to really go all in, all the way up to and including wiretapping Nick, but it won't happen. As has been said, while all of this is fascinating drama, for the state, this is just some coke head faggot. Moreover, the state already has him dead to rights on everything that matters, and as an agency funded by taxpayers, they're charged with being responsible with their budget. It would reflect poorly on them if they spent an inordinate amount of money doing something that could be viewed as both unnecessary and vindictive.

 

[Major]

Between his going on about how he could make more than Riley/Mint on OF, and how kids of OF thots shouldn't be bothered because it means their parents can buy them shit like PS5's, I'm surprised he hasn't whored one or both out on camera by now.

I hope so, because then the curse of humiliation will be permanent.

 

[Fapcop]

I hope so, because then the curse of humiliation will be permanent.

OH BOY I SURE HOPE NICK DOESNT START AN ONLYFANS WITH APRIL!!

We’d be SO humiliated! An eternal Kiwi L!

Why can you imagine if Nick started an OF with say… A month of free trial access and maybe some galleries with free April pics? We’d be so felted the forums may just close down!

(It’s a shame we don’t know more about how his trust fund works. Given how terribly his very irregular streaming income has been lately, there’s no way he doesn’t need the kind of cash porn may bring. You know things aren’t good when he does those awful scam ad reads for like 50$ a pop.)

 

[TexOffender]

OH BOY I SURE HOPE NICK DOESNT START AN ONLYFANS WITH APRIL!!

We’d be SO humiliated! An eternal Kiwi L!

Why can you imagine if Nick started an OF with say… A month of free trial access and maybe some galleries with free April pics? We’d be so felted the forums may just close down!

(It’s a shame we don’t know more about how his trust fund works. Given how terribly his very irregular streaming income has been lately, there’s no way he doesn’t need the kind of cash porn may bring. You know things aren’t good when he does those awful scam ad reads for like 50$ a pop.)

April would need to use a fake dick for pics since Nick wields a softee.