You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.
I know Nick won't be able to say anything to Ralph about it directly (for obvious reasons), but if Ralph figured out how much this could help Nick.... well... it would be a bad day to be a New York jew lawyer snake, I'll put it that way.
Wrong again, Kiwi child. Nick MADE Joe and what Joe is doing to him now is classic snaking. When Nick needs him most, Joe caved and sided with the Farms. If Nick went live and ripped Joe a new asshole I'd really have to respect him for it. It's the man thing to do.
gOoDLawGiC!!! gOoDLawGiC!!! More like good dick sucker. Bish.
I know Nick won't be able to say anything to Ralph about it directly (for obvious reasons), but if Ralph figured out how much this could help Nick.... well... it would be a bad day to be a New York jew lawyer snake, I'll put it that way.
I watched the beginning before he made the stream members only. He gave a long speech about how disingenuous it was for people who have always said cops are liars to automatically believe the cops when it comes to statements against Nick. The stream went members only before he really got into the analysis of the motion.
ETA: He also talked about how Nick is looking better on streams lately than he did 6 months ago so that means Nick is "clean" now.
This is just a wild guess, but I do wonder if Null's evil thought is that Rackets will eventually throw his wife under the bus in order to get off scot free and continue his degeneracy with April. Or it's possible he'll throw both of them under eventually once he finds another younger gal to get with (in my headcannon he'll run off with JuJu to form a polycube with Vito).
Damn dude, that's pretty fucked up. I didn't know all of that. I sure would hate for Ralph to cut a promo on Joe. Tbh he's pretty savage when he does that as much as I hate to admit it.
She is a willing participant in all this, she even distracted Aaron when Rekieta wanted to fuck his wife, she receives a fat disgusting pig on their house with open arms, a smile and possibly a blowjob. If she wanted out, she had the perfect opportunity to cut a deal, fuck the HIV skeleton and divorce rape him.
She is just a dumb bitch tied to a lying faggot forever, I dont know why people keep giving her the benefit of doubt...
Her self-pity just manifests in a different way to Nick's. She's just as incapable of being accountable as he is. People who want to change take steps towards doing so, even if they're only baby steps.
I don't doubt for a minute that Nick intimidates the fuck out of her but she's shown no signs of wanting to escape that. I'm not even sure how much support she'd have if she did. Nick fucking off to LA with April and leaving Kayla behind seems like the only way she'll escape the situation and he's probably too narcissistic to let her go.
I don't buy that. He doesn't care about either of them. The swinger polygamy thing (for him) is about his ego. He's so cool he has two chicks, bro. Masterson did this same thing, but because he is and always has been an open degenerate and wasn't trying to wear the skin of a professional small town Christian family man it was far less damaging to him (but still humiliating.) Think about how much validation Nick needs from Dax.
I don't understand how she can't see Nick is trying to replace her with this new woman, destroying their shared life of 20 years and 5 kids. I don't get how she can't feel angry at all about that. It's pathetic.
I'm not convinced Kayla isn't the one who started the drug and swinging thing. Even in her first appearance on YouTube she seemed like an overmedicated crystals and dreamcatchers wine mom who is really into music festivals. She got loopier and loopier before Nick started the hard spiral, and it was a lot more apparent because she was barely on the show. I kind of think both of them were always like this, and that they just finally had enough money with no strings attached to it beyond "Nick needs to get drunk and do cringey toasts to generate supes a few nights a week" that they could go full hedonist. For her I think the swinging thing is just Eat Pray Love spiritual enlightenment bullshit for a kind of dumb wannabe hippy woman.
All of them deserve the rope. Imagine having 5 kids and millions of dollars and not taking care of them.
A member of the tribe? From New York? Ok with sexual degeneracy, child neglect, and abuse? Incredible. I don't know how he can sleep on his blood stained matress in his tunnel at night.
His argument is that Because the cop couldn’t have had the exact original video, he couldn’t possibly have justifiable probably cause to ask for a warrant because he couldn’t possibly know if it was edited or not, and that the existence of Cog’s watermark implies digital manipulation.
British courts work very differently to US courts. Here, even if the police had ignored some rule in the collection of evidence, nine times out of ten, the judge will still admit it. Judge might tell them off, but they aren't going to throw it out.
But this is just retarded. How do you know whether any piece of evidence is edited or not? You just have to accept it on the face of it. If you've got some evidence that it WAS faked, then show that. Otherwise, just shut the fuck up. All the warrant does is give them the right to go and collect actual evidence of a crime. If there's no crime, there won't be any evidence of it, will there?
She has money, drugs, the attention of an older man, and is destroying a 2nd marriage.
And she doesn't have to work, at all. Not even on a live stream.
That bitch ain't goin aaaannnnnyyyyywhere.
I often find the attitude towards women displayed on Kiwifarms a bit perplexing. Many people have an image of women as lazy, stupid and disloyal that just hasn't been my experience of the women in my life.
Then along comes Nick Rekieta and not only is he surrounded by the kind of hoebags who fit this stereotype, he's actively simping for them. Which might be at least comprehensible if they were really hot, really charming and utterly delightful in all sorts of other ways. But they're a pair of worn out old coke whores, FFS.
I was able to review the stream. I posted summary in the LawTube thread.
If you've watched Joe, his take is not surprising. He waxes philosophical about what is 'best for his family' and for Nick and the ethics and morality of the situation that he likes to pontificate on. He moral-fags on people who are commneting more critically. He makes minor critiques of the motion, spends too much time navel gazing, and ends up saying that if he had to guess, he doesn't think Nick will prevail.
He only got halfway through it in 90 minutes. He is as long-winded witha topic as Nick.
I was watching the Kino Casino and they said Rekieta posted a Judges phone number on twitter. Is this bullshit? Because that seams way to stupid even for Rekieta.
It's the death blow in the court of public opinion. You can get away with being a drug addict swinger and still have an audience, but that potential audience dwindles to very near nothing if the prevailing narrative is that your 9 year old daughter is testing positive for drugs.
The best lie (which even could be the truth) here would have been, "I do not know anything about why my daughter's hair tested positive for cocaine. I'll let you know when I have more information about the circumstances. I had nothing to do with it." But because Nick can't put forth a narrative without blaming someone else and he's too retarded to tell a good lie, he invents a wild-ass conspiracy about how literally every single person in county is in a conspiracy against him.
It was just as retarded when Null said it as when people ITT said it. That's not how criminal charges work. They live in the same fucking house. She can't just say that he didn't know shit and was a good boy and dindu nuffin. He literally told the cops it was his bedroom where he sleeps that they found the cocaine in. Thinking that she could take the fall is complete brain dead shit.
Not to mention that it was April's credit cards found with the coke pile. As far as we're aware, Kayla doesn't even drive? Did she get the coke home delivered and hide it without Nick or April's knowledge.
If Nick's going to really continue doing this creepy throuple shit and act like everything is normal, he'd be better off abandoning them, divorcing Kayla, and paying child support. Everything he's done indicates he wants to be with April, and he doesn't give a shit if it destroys his children or his marriage.
Nick knows sketchy lawyers and I seriously doubt he'd have any hesitation about using them for his own benefit. It's unlikely Kayla did her own independent research and chose a lawyer who would best represent her interests and to hell with how that affected Nick.
If you've watched Joe, his take is not surprising. He waxes philosophical about what is 'best for his family' and for Nick and the ethics and morality of the situation that he likes to pontificate on.
If you've watched Joe, you know he's a greaseball who slavishly sucks Nick's dick. In defense of Nick he claims 5-6 years should be able to bathe themselves with no parental supervision. That his kid is alive suggests that he knows that's horseshit.
Anyways, I would have been surprised if he did jump ship. I am glad I asked so that we could straighten this out.
If you've watched Joe, you know he's a greaseball who slavishly sucks Nick's dick. In defense of Nick he claims 5-6 years should be able to bathe themselves with no parental supervision. That his kid is alive suggests that he knows that's horseshit.
Anyways, I would have been surprised if he did jump ship. I am glad I asked so that we could straighten this out.
Watching supposed 'professionals' say things like this with a straight face has built up my own self-confidence. It has also allowed me to whittle down the number of commentary channels I consume. Most of them are autistically specific cooking or history.
I often find the attitude towards women displayed on Kiwifarms a bit perplexing. Many people have an image of women as lazy, stupid and disloyal that just hasn't been my experience of the women in my life.
Nick's not a true Internet user, otherwise he'd know the rule that there are no women on the internet. And that the men are men, the women are men, and the children are FBI agents.
But this is just retarded. How do you know whether any piece of evidence is edited or not? You just have to accept it on the face of it. If you've got some evidence that it WAS faked, then show that. Otherwise, just shut the fuck up. All the warrant does is give them the right to go and collect actual evidence of a crime. If there's no crime, there won't be any evidence of it, will there?
In the US federally there's the Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE) 1001(d) which stipulates rules for electronic evidence evidence. States have a similar thing.
I think Nick's whole angle is not his idea originally, this was an issue in the Rittenhouse trial I recall where they used a lower resolution than the original resolution since it had been compressed by airdrop or something retarded.
Federal rule Rule 902 describes what is "Self-authenticating" and the video is not self-authenticating. It would be correct to attack this evidence but I think not in the method Nick did in my non-practicing lawyer opinion.
Watching supposed 'professionals' say things like this with a straight face has built up my own self-confidence. It has also allowed me to whittle down the number of commentary channels I consume. Most of them are autistically specific cooking or history.
Some of the videos in fabrication work (machining) are pretty good. Only because you actually need the skills to back it up physically as well. Wheras any retard can file a motion in the US pro se.
EVS says that Nick told him that the police touched his daughter's hair with cocaine on their gloves and that is why his daughter tested positive. Nick also claimed that it is on video (bodycam footage?). Is this something Nick tells people to try and control the narrative, or is he really wanting to try this as a defense? Is this the "full story" he keeps saying will come out? I wonder if he means to admit that there was cocaine in his house or if he intends to say the police brought cocaine into his house.
Bundling these together for answering. *Technically* there could have been external exposure causing the [hair test] results, but it was less likely,less researched and needs a more specific test to test ratio of metabolites to delineate between exposure and ingestion.
Thanks fren. There's a deep dive on the hair test technicals that I wrote up here, discussed on the hair test thread for those interested that didn't see it previously.
By far the most likely explanation for the positive hair test is Nick's daughter ingested cocaine...BUT...
A false positive is possible but would require:
1. the transfer of 20mg ( about two grains of rice) worth of cocaine to the child's hair and scalp.
2. Rubbing it in somewhat.
3. Leaving the transferred cocaine on the hair and scalp for several days without washing it off.
4. Waiting approx one week (or more) after the contamination to take a hair sample and perform the hair test.
If this cross contamination actually happened, it could be differentiated from true ingestion by looking at the ratios between the following three para and meta hydroxy cocaine metabolites found in the hair as described in this paper
p-OH-COC/COC
p-OH-BE/COC
m-OH-BE/COC
We don't know if the lab routinely does this or not.
Regardless, I think Nick's latest claim that the cops contaminated his kids hair is total bullshit.
Why?
During one of Nick's early hearings, before his daughter tested positive, Nick already was bringing up excuses in open court for why his children might test positive. Huge red flag.
Nick was telegraphing his kids testing positive was a big concern for him before any hair tests had been run by CPS. Why the concern? Who worries about this if you didn't give your kid coke?
Common sense would suggest you wouldn't be worried about your kids testing positive for drugs even if you were a drug addict unless you gave it to them on purpose, or knowingly exposed them (i.e. Nick knew the kids inhaled his second-hand crack smoke or something)
When the positive hair test result first became public, Nick was giving out ridiculous excuses about how cocaine particles could spontaneously jump through the air to the childrens' heads. I think he even claimed cocaine metabolites could transfer into sweat and then jump into the air and onto another person!
Nick finally settled on blaming the police months later. Why did the story change?
Well Nick's story changed because he reads his thread/s obsessively, and after we discussed hair test false positives and cross-contamination here on Kiwi Farms, Nick took that excuse and ran with it because he's a pathetic lying faggot that can't admit he made a mistake.
Anyway to put a bow on this, it's seems highly unlikely that the police, wearing gloves, would examine the various mystery powders found in Nick's house, then soon after, extensively touch his eight year old daughter's hair and scalp without changing gloves.
And even if that was true, the cop's glove would need to have more than just a trace of cocaine residue. Like it would have to be a good bit of coke powder all over the gloves. Where the cop then held and stroked the child's hair to transfer 20mg of cocaine down to the scalp and hair follicles.
Then the child's hair would have to stay unwashed for several days after the accidental transfer.
I just don't believe this fairy tale. It's not impossible, but it's so extremely far fetched that it borders on nonsensical.
I should also add that many police are scared shitless of white powders because of fentanyl. It's hard to believe cops are going to be so careless raiding a drug addicts house (field testing various white powders) that they transfer a dose of one of the powders to a child's hair.
I don't believe it. I won't unless there's video footage of it happening.
The only three categories of exposure that I accept are:
On purpose: Nick gave the eight year old daughter cocaine on purpose, whether in a misguided attempt to "treat her ADHD", as a reward, or some other crazy fucking reason, OR
Accident: She was accidentally exposed by someone doing cocaine at the house (cocaine in her food, she played with Nick's coke paraphernalia, direct transfer hair contamination from a parent doing coke then extensively touching the child's hair, or other accidental type scenario)
Hard to believe: The eight year old got curious and took it herself.
Regardless, a well-equipped well-staffed lab following the academic paper could (in theory) tell whether the child's cocaine exposure involved ingesting the drug or not.
And I sure hope the prosecutor pursues additional testing to prove the type of exposure.
I think Nick's whole angle is not his idea originally, this was an issue in the Rittenhouse trial I recall where they used a lower resolution than the original resolution since it had been compressed by airdrop or something retarded.
Federal rule Rule 902 describes what is "Self-authenticating" and the video is not self-authenticating. It would be correct to attack this evidence but I think not in the method Nick did in my non-practicing lawyer opinion.
Probable cause is a much lower standard than evidence, and the Rittenhouse thing was really egregious. Binger wanted to show the jury a 6-pixel tall gunfight that had been blown up onto a huge TV with default ipad nearest-neighbor interpolation and basically coach them through a Rorschach test on what the blurry grey blobs were doing to each other. It was insane, and if I remember correctly Rittenhouse's defense didn't even have to allow that footage into the trial. Glowniggers had given it to Binger after discovery and Richards was just like "yeah, whatever, you can just show that to the jury with no experts or anything" and Sherafisi had to bail them out and explain to the judge why this was fucking nuts.
I think you might be right. Nick really is just borrowing from Rittenhouse and Baldwin. What other major trial that he covered will we see? I guess we won't get to see him crib from Depp until the divorce.
I'm going to guess that Nick is planning to toss one of them once the trial is over and the danger of them flipping is done with. He might have promised April that he will divorce Kayla when this is all over and promised Kayla that he'll lose the skank after she can no longer rat on them. I don't think either woman is happy with the other being in the house but will keep playing pretend because they both think they'll be the eventual "winner"
I think with the plea deal Nick was attempting to have Kayla fall on the sword for a few years of probation, as a mother and primary caregiver (at least on paper) she'll get a lot more leniency than Nick will, so her taking the wrap will be less damaging overall, now that Kayla has her own lawyer that plan seems unlikely.
