Skitzocow David Anthony Stebbins / Acerthorn / stebbinsd / fayettevillesdavid - Litigious autist, obese livestreamer, elder abuser, violent schizo, ladyboy importer, hot dog enjoyer, wereturkey.

How much will David sue the farms for?

  • $0/no suit

    Votes: 118 5.3%
  • Hundreds

    Votes: 17 0.8%
  • Thousands

    Votes: 45 2.0%
  • Millions

    Votes: 185 8.2%
  • Billions

    Votes: 136 6.1%
  • Trillions

    Votes: 483 21.5%
  • A steamy night with Null in a lace negligee

    Votes: 1,259 56.1%

  • Total voters
    2,243
He appealed back in August and reeeeee'd at a court a few times to suspend the schedule. The court told him no. Fast forward until now, and the court gently reminded him that they didn't get his money yet. Speeeeeeeeaking of money. New finances:
View attachment 6476335
View attachment 6476336
View attachment 6476337
View attachment 6476338
View attachment 6476339
View attachment 6476340
View attachment 6476341
View attachment 6476342
ZellZander mentioned. Also, Acerthorn admits to not paying taxes
Could we get the turkey in for tax fraud?
 
Tired of what exactly? Did he even have to respond? Just checked, no he hasn't. So why the fuck is he doing this?
He said he blew through the first 50K he raised as Stabby files again and again and again and again and each time he has to pay for his lawyer to read through and respond to the briefs even if they are terrible and pointless.
In the two cases filed against him, Sid Alpha had not needed to respond to either (feel free to correct me if I am wrong). If he really blew 50k, then he probably pulled a Keffals.
It's worse than that. Attorney Bill Richmond, recommended to SidAlpha by The Quartering, never filed anything. In fact Bill Richmond can't operate in California. SidAlpha was asked to pay another $10,000 for a lawyer that can
Embarrassing. So, what, he spent $60,000 for nothing being done?
 
It's worse than that. Attorney Bill Richmond, recommended to SidAlpha by The Quartering, never filed anything. In fact Bill Richmond can't operate in California. SidAlpha was asked to pay another $10,000 for a lawyer that can. Sid explained how the funds were spent in this video
Why the fuck would you take advice from the Hamburglar on a lawyer? I mean seriously the guy is legit a retard.
 
Tired of what exactly? Did he even have to respond? Just checked, no he hasn't. So why the fuck is he doing this?

In the two cases filed against him, Sid Alpha had not needed to respond to either (feel free to correct me if I am wrong). If he really blew 50k, then he probably pulled a Keffals.

Embarrassing. So, what, he spent $60,000 for nothing being done?
Not really. The Quartering recommended Sid hire a specific lawyer for a case that was in California. Said lawyer proceeded to vacuum up the donated money and then at the end go, "Oh yeah, I can't actually practice in California. There's a guy I recommend that costs 10k."
 
Not really. The Quartering recommended Sid hire a specific lawyer for a case that was in California. Said lawyer proceeded to vacuum up the donated money and then at the end go, "Oh yeah, I can't actually practice in California. There's a guy I recommend that costs 10k."
He should sue pro se. He has nothing to lose. Unless he was warned about this. I mean, he basically got 50 grand stolen from him.
 
Aaaaand we're back with the Zellzander case.

On the last episode: the judge told Stebbins to cool his jets and give Jones at least 45 days to cooperate with establishing his net worth.

And now:
  1. In Dkt. 94, Stebbins complains that Zell has not cooperated. He lists all of the (completely bonkers, imo) requests he made of Zell, including "a complete profile on the other Jarrod Jones in Everett, WA." Apparently Jones provided his employment history but resisted other requests, and Stebbins' argument is that Jones doesn't get to question what he styles as "civil discovery" requests. He wants compulsion of cooperation and a "a $1000 fine, paid to me, would probably suffice."
  2. In Dkt. 95, Stebbins says that Zell missed the October 5th payment per the settlement. He wants Zell held in contempt of court and another $1000 fine paid to him.
I am interested to see how the Court reacts to Stebbins' "discovery" requests. I would think for Zell to show his net worth, it would be sufficient to just show (for example) a summary of his bank accounts. I don't see how or why he should have to provide a complete biography on the "other Jarrod Jones."

On the other hand, if Zell agreed to a monthly settlement payment and missed a payment, I don't have a great defense for him. Were I in his shoes I would pay up quickly and make a show of earnest contrition to the judge (which might be taken more favorably juxtaposed against Stebbins' fuming), but then again were I in his shoes, I never would have agreed to this asinine settlement in the first place.
 

Attachments

I am interested to see how the Court reacts to Stebbins' "discovery" requests. I would think for Zell to show his net worth, it would be sufficient to just show (for example) a summary of his bank accounts. I don't see how or why he should have to provide a complete biography on the "other Jarrod Jones."
Most everything Stebbins asks for is burdensome and though several items are relevant they are also likely out of bounds for the normal course of these kinds of cases.

Zell provided information from the IRS and can likely provide a snapshot of his bank accounts, if any. He can make a sworn statement that this is a true and correct accounting of his net worth and Stebbins can go pound sand.

Compiling a dossier on someone else? No. Providing Discord logs and emails between himself and the IRS? Nah. Stebbins will definitely file endless motions about this stuff but he confuses “good faith effort” with “give me everything all the time”.

Doesn’t PayPal have an automatic payment option? Set that up so your payments are always on time ya goof. You’re already mired in the tarbaby’s trap, the least you can do is set up some automation so you can slowly pull away from this mess.
 
Aaaaand we're back with the Zellzander case.
In Dkt. 94, Stebbins complains that Zell has not cooperated. He lists all of the (completely bonkers, imo) requests he made of Zell, including "a complete profile on the other Jarrod Jones in Everett, WA." Apparently Jones provided his employment history but resisted other requests, and Stebbins' argument is that Jones doesn't get to question what he styles as "civil discovery" requests. He wants compulsion of cooperation and a "a $1000 fine, paid to me, would probably suffice."
What Acerthorn is demanding from Jones
1) his past five 1040s (tax returns)
2) all correspondence Jones made with bank and IRS to obtain the "non-records" he sent Acerthorn
3) A complete profile on the other Jarrod Jones in Everett, WA, who makes between $150-175k
4) his complete employment history
5) a response from WIS International (current employer) regarding his employment status

#3 is insane. Not only does Jones have to provide a dossier on himself but also a dossier on someone who happens to share his name.

In Exhibit B Acerthorn demands Jones export ALL of his Discord DMs using a 3rd-party chat export tool. It's very obvious this has no legitimate purpose for determining Jones' net worth and is only to get info on Creetosis.
StebbinsvJones_94b.png

Video "How to Export Chat DM History on Discord"
website dht.chylex.com
github https://github.com/chylex/Discord-History-Tracker
This tutorial is so convoluted that I don't think Acerthorn could export his own DMs without having a panic attack and sperging out on a tech support subreddit.

I saw this post on Avvo, an anonymous legal help website. Acerthorn is asking if he can sanction Jones if Jones makes a "single frivolous argument" in his answer brief.
avvo_6104204.png
 
In Exhibit B Acerthorn demands Jones export ALL of his Discord DMs using a 3rd-party chat export tool. It's very obvious this has no legitimate purpose for determining Jones' net worth and is only to get info on Creetosis.
Acerthorn pinata bashing thread? Sounds based.
 
It appears that we have an unexpected? lolcow crossover.
About couple weeks ago Stabbins has started a new litigation attempt (sort of archive of a link). This time, among the people he wants to subpoena a new face appears, previously not mentioned in any other Stabbins documents, for what I know.
It is Spectre Report!
Five things have been filed there, one of which is an emergency motion.
My upload capability is extremely scuffed, so here are two first ones, the second of which contains the aliases, cropped out down below for quick recognition.
snip_of_ded2.png

P.S. @Useful_Mistake , can I have assistance on that front?
 

Attachments

Stebbins is winning, he's figured out that if you sue big corporations for billions then they'll fight it in court and win. But if you conduct lawfare against random people, it'll either result in free money or result in causing so many problems for them that they lose either way.

I think Stebbins knows that he can't win, but he's content with making everyone he hates lose.
 
Stebbins is winning, he's figured out that if you sue big corporations for billions then they'll fight it in court and win. But if you conduct lawfare against random people, it'll either result in free money or result in causing so many problems for them that they lose either way.

I think Stebbins knows that he can't win, but he's content with making everyone he hates lose.
This is a win state right up until you cross someone who values human life as little as he does and the concept of inflicting pain sexually excites them. He will get clumsier is his shotgun blasts of frivolous litigation and one of those are going to hit someone he really didn't want to hit.

And this is the only way to punish him in modern day American legal system because he has everything to gain and absolutely nothing to lose. Someone has to go and physically terminate him, otherwise he will churn out vexatious lawsuits at random targets with the efficiency of the post WW2 war economies.
 
Last edited:
They are all available in the courtlistener link you provided
Usually you would attach the documents and/or post pictures, so I thought I'd ask.

literally who and who?
Against better judgement and common sense I will treat this question as genuine and not a mild trolling which it probably is.

The context of who those might be is in these threads/posts:
one two three four five six
One of them is a ReviewTechUSA orbiter/detractor, and another is a youtube video commentator/essayist (community feature post). Second one covered a video of first one, first one DMCA'd the coverage, Youtube sided with Quantum. Fair Use when all parties are in US? Nah, who cares.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Un-Clit
Google has enter the chat.

Que David shitting his pants again.

Good times ahead!


I do wonder what Stabby has in mind here. His turkey gobbling, hot dog scarfing video has already been declared non-copyrightable so it must be something else. Now I know that ArtemisWolf is a confirmed zoophile so I have zero fucks for what happens to her. In fact I'm rather torn. Would I rather the fat, smelly, retarded, father stabbing grease ball get a win to put pain on a dog fucking lard-bucket or do I want the dog fucking lard-bucket to be Stabby's first real win so she suffers?

Can't they both just die? Is that an option here?
 
Last edited:
Back