Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 62 16.3%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.0%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 95 24.9%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 65 17.1%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 155 40.7%

  • Total voters
    381
That's because he IS gay.
He was in the male cheerleader group and met Qayla there. They likely began the relationship as friends, going shopping together and trying/swapping lingerie outfits.
I'm not kidding, he talked about wearing lingerie on his show.

Then comes pappy and mummy Raekieta, seeing their son with this seemingly upstanding, well kept and good character Christian girl. They sat him down for some serious shower calls and pressured him into persuing her so he can propagate the Rekieta lineage. He came up with this FUNNY and WEIRD story of pretending to be gay. From Qayla's perspective, she's smitten too because "my pussy turned a gay man straight!". You'll be surprised at how many men and women think like this and gets turned on by it. That's why he's still comfortable with cross-dressing.

It's all a cope.
I think Nick's just a bisexual hedonist that'll fuck anything

A completely gay man with no interest in women would never be so horny over mediocre wine aunt pussy that he'd willingly tarnish his online reputation over it
 
Holy shit his dad kind of looks like Stephen Root!

2. Given the age of the older sister, she could be either Celeste or Bob's child from before their marriage. There is no firm evidence one way or the other.
Didn’t we confirm his older sister as Celeste’s? Based on the Facebook friends and the fact that Bob wasn’t previously married?
All evidence pointed to her being Celeste's from another marriage. There were a few of us facebook sleuthing back in late June / early July timeframe and we were certain that we found Nick's sister's dad (Robert Macleon III). The name matched marriage/divorce records for Celeste prior to Rekieta. IIRC he has a guy from Hawaii listed as his son. That guy list's Nick's sister as his half-sister on his facebook page. @anionfarflung did some amazing research on the family trees! This was the last post between us of substance about this subject but if you follow some of the conversation back it will show the train of thought for getting to Nick's sister being Celeste's bio daughter but not Bob's.

Except her maiden name is Rekieta. That would normally indicate that she's Bob's daughter from a prior relationship or marriage.

Are we assuming that Bob adopted her? This would mean that...

- Celeste had a prior marriage and the bio dad went MIA
- Celeste had a child out of wedlock and, perhaps, never declared a father

Either option isn't very Catholic. Am I missing something?
See above. I'd be willing to put my left nut on the line that he adopted her.

For all we know Celeste could have been a widow when she married Bob. Or she could have been a never married single parent. Or a divorcee who remarried in another church. Who knows how much influence Louis and Peaches had over their adult children prior to becoming rich and who knows when Celeste became religious. There are a lot of unknowns and for the most part they aren't worth researching.
The guy we identified as most likely being her previous husband (Robert Macleon III) was still alive as of early July.

I read an interview with Celeste a couple of years ago where she talked about continuing her parents' legacy. It's where I found out that Louis and Peaches gave each of the grandchildren $1500 a year to donate to charity in the hope of instilling the habit of philanthropy early. I wish I had bookmarked it as she also talked about her own faith.

It's very possible that the family have decided that the foundation isn't the ideal vehicle for giving. It was originally set up with the involvement of a woman called Dawn Franks who acted as paid Executive Director in 2019 and 2020.
I was unable to turn up the article, but I found something that may suggest Celeste continued the tradition with Nick:

1728692114631.png

Bob and Celeste gave much more:

1728692194912.png
I found these back when I was looking into Celeste's first marriage. They're big spenders!
Minnesota Zoo - To Save Wildlife - 2016 Report to the Community
Minnesota Zoo - Where Wildlife Thrives - 2017 Report to the Community
 
I propose he streams sausage reviews while deepthroating them live, if it worked for Lowtax it should work for Nick.
View attachment 6512846
Might look something like this cursed work in progress:
Summer Sausage Draft.jpg
‘Tis the season for spooky scary skellys.
 
Seeing Kayla's starry-eyed expression like Gollum holding his ring as she comes home from a hotel meetup with a Trekker and Nick knows he's been bested by someone he sees as so much smaller and less impressive than himself.
Aaron's account that Nick was obsessed and jealous about the details of Aaron/Kayla's sexual activity would track, considering Nick's smuckling about how Aaron is pathetic and a cuck afterwards. He clearly thinks he's superior to Aaron, and got one over on him trading the worn out DESTROYED ghoul for a new model- but he was tortured psychologically that Kayla was falling in love with Aaron.

Also, Celeste seems like she’s the more manic parent. Bob seems to be responsible, but in a way where he’ll put up with her bullshit and the responsibility of her actions. Kind of a weak fag. The more I see of Celeste, the more I think she wasn’t as much as a parent as Bob.
A child's first model of love and relationship is their parents, and all of us emulate that model, or learn what not to do to one degree or another. I think Nick might have seen his parents dynamic and sublimated it into his own relationship. He on his most fundamental level thinks that it's the husband's job to be the quiet accepting pushover who lets his crazy wife be a kooky weirdo, laugh it off and allow her to run her course. "Blank blank blank, which is fine..." is his response to every single friction in his relationship. That's not a solution, it's avoidance.

Didn't the money come along much later? I may be misremembering. But even if it was an expected thing, it clearly wasn't an immediate windfall, and I doubt Nick was diligent enough at 23 (or ever) to plot out a 10-15 year long game involving that particular and susceptible girl and a projected 5 or 8 or 15 kids just to get a bigger piece of pie. I'm sure he multiplied with full knowledge that he would be able to afford kids, but for real, though he's a twit and a schemer, he's not enough of one to fake a religious breeder mind-state and create kids until he reached some optimal proportion of whatever money could come his/their way. His current life situation pretty clearly shows he is no mastermind 9 steps ahead of everyone else.
Photos from their early marriage show a dweeby, less evil looking Nick without a front tooth. The affluent do not rock a busted grill. Celeste may be an oil heiress or whatever, but I think she came into her inheritence once her children were already grown up. This would track with Nick's account of being a hood nigga from the skreets of Houston, whose parents struggled when he was young. He grew up middle class, and once he was a young adult his parents were able to assist him financially, and felt obligated to since he had "done the right thing" by going to college and getting married and being Christian and having kids. While people are capable of forming good marriages young, most people aren't fully baked and don't understand how expensive their children will grow to be.

People live their lives, then write their autobiography to make sense of it at a later date. Nick's "life story" as he left his thirties and entered his forties was that he was a successful, happy papa and husband, a trad dad small firm lawyer with a hot wife and a happy marriage. The pride he exhibited over his five kids is probably a stark difference from the struggle and grind it took to make them. I don't think he set out to have a big Christian family, that's just how the chip fell, and he wrote the lore to justify the ledger.

Any co-mingling of funds (e.g shared accounts) from the trust is fair game for Kayla. This is relevant for Nick because we know that he is chronically disorganized. She has a right to approximately half because it is considered a marital asset. Say Nick owns 100 shares of Tesla that he bought from trust funds.
Minnesota isn't a community property state, but when they got married they had nothing, and came up together. She didn't work and raised his kids (at least on paper). He's fucked, because he did not enter the marriage with any assets separate from her. He owes her alimony and child support x5. I guess if he can wait a year it'll only be child support x4.

Nick thinks his future lies in LA, not Bumfuck MN, so I doubt that he'd care if a settlement was negotiated where Kayla keeps the house until the youngest is an adult.
His five kids should be his legacy, his future. He sees them as his past :(
I think his pedantic faggotry about words is technically correct when he talks about not having a trust.
IMG_4040.gif

Either option isn't very Catholic. Am I missing something?
I disagree- catholic girls having a hoe phase then retvrning is all too common, and the most common cause of all is a bastard. I know... maybe dozens of women who were lapsed or lax in their faith, fucked around and found out, and came back to the faith and scored a good stepdad and father for their new children.

to be in good standing with the Church
yeah, if you go to a boomer Catholic Church and ask around, you're going to find your fair share of boomers. And when you're asking around, you're not going to bump into the people in the town who say they're Catholic but show up at Easter and Christmas. We don't know if Celeste was married in the church the first time, second time, whether she was a good standing Catholic when her daughter was born or Nick was born, whether she went to mass every Sunday or got her kids baptized. Nick is a flaming heretic so I somehow doubt they were praying the rosary and observing holy days of obligation. A whole lot of people profess being Catholic without giving two shits if they are in good standing with the church.
 
I went back and looked at a lot of his older content, even as early as the Maddox v Dick days he wasn’t quite as accurate as he could have been. He could explain the most basic of basic to someone completely out of the know, but he was far from an expert. He got by with subject matter and being approachable.
he has neither the good subject matter or approachability that he did back then.

His 3 biggest successes, Vic, Rittenhouse, and Depp were all extremely unique cases that he was one of the only actual lawyers covering. The field has changed so much that now every case gets YouTube coverage by people who actually do understand the law.
With Rittenhouse your choices were Nick, Law & Crime, and Ralph.
Back then he had a certain arrogant air about him that have the strong impression that he knew what he was talking about so nobody questioned it. Once he outed himself as an actual retarded degenerate, that air fell to the side so it was clear he was always just faking his competency in law. Even during the three cases you mentioned Nick was more of a color commentator than a lawyer because all the actual law was being discussed by the guys he had in the panel. In fact, Nick would regularly be late, wasted, or not even on camera during big portions of those cases.
 
Speaking of charity, I think the Kiwi Kouncil needs to finally let Nick stream. He is in dire need of cash, and getting superchats from super fans and alogs is the only way he can do it. Show some compassion. He's already lowered the price of his Balldo Bunker... what's next? Selling the Rustang? Selling his artwork? Those things mean more to him than his family and the pain of losing them would be like the taking of a thousand transformers... Please think of this from Nick's perspective and show him some mercy so he can support his polycule. What do you want him to do instead? Sell pictures of his wife and Ape on OnlyFans? Sell pictures of his children to Patrick Melton?

Please think about the repercussions of not letting Nick stream.
 
He is in dire need of cash
He wants to pretend he's had such hardship growin' up in da hood on the streets and sheeit.

So having a little less money than before should be a walk in Compton the park for him.

Those things mean more to him than his family
No way, he's a traditional family man, and there's plenty of examples showing how he loves his family more than anything, such as
 
View attachment 6513098

Imagine crying because Aaron wouldn't be your boyfriend.
I don't know how the fuck you guys make these things, but they more than a little disturbing.

But also brilliant.

is nick balls or no balls?
Dude, he wears a BALLdo. What do you think?

Speaking of charity, I think the Kiwi Kouncil needs to finally let Nick stream. He is in dire need of cash, and getting superchats from super fans and alogs is the only way he can do it.
Tough shit. Drop April off in Minneapolis to walk the streets.

Also, when he asks the council to stream, we must be sure he asks in a heterosexual manner, and not in a "faggy way."
 
Not to sound like a dick, but please let's not make excuses for his shitty life decisions.
I have absolutely zero interest in defending Nick, he deserves to be buried under the prison, I just find it a bit irksome that even after everything there are still some posters determined to absolve Kayla of any wrongdoing because she's just some UwU manic pixie dream girl (FapCop is exempt from these criticisms).

As I said in the inciting post, the 'knock me up or divorce me' theory was pure speculation on my part. It's not like we have much else to do in this thread unless the Kouncil sees fit to let Nick stream again.
 
As far as I'm aware, we only have Nick's word that she's constantly zoinked out on pills,
Kayla has talked about her prescription drug use on stream before.
There was also that one time she tried shilling some CBD oil shit on Nick's channel - the chat was quite vocal in its (overwhelmingly negative) opinion, and you can tell that Nick was reading it all.
 
I have absolutely zero interest in defending Nick, he deserves to be buried under the prison, I just find it a bit irksome that even after everything there are still some posters determined to absolve Kayla of any wrongdoing because she's just some UwU manic pixie dream girl (FapCop is exempt from these criticisms).

As I said in the inciting post, the 'knock me up or divorce me' theory was pure speculation on my part. It's not like we have much else to do in this thread unless the Kouncil sees fit to let Nick stream again.
People in the thread have been absolving Kayla of wrongdoing for years now. A large consensus seem to believe she’s borderline MintSalad levels of retarded and therefore is completely brainwashed and controlled by Nick.
But for me, I almost find her to be worse than Nick.
Nick’s a shitty hedonistic alcoholic, but she’s carried all of those children in her body for 9 months And allegedly suffered depression after two miscarriages…yet still let the kids starve and be neglected while she was busy doing cocaine and making snow angels with Arron Imholte.
Kayla Rekieta is a disgusting human being who deserves a punishment just as bad as Nick’s. I want both to rot in prison for the full 25 years. Would it be taking parents from children? No, these people weren’t parents. They were monsters
 
Last edited:
Kayla has talked about her prescription drug use on stream before.
There was also that one time she tried shilling some CBD oil shit on Nick's channel - the chat was quite vocal in its (overwhelmingly negative) opinion, and you can tell that Nick was reading it all.
Oh well that changes everything. A whole two vague, off-the-cuff incidents is all I need to confirm she is a braindead junkie and absolutely nothing is her fault.

Thanks for Correcting The Record, $1 is currently winging its way to your crypto wallet.
 
Back