Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 21.6%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.4%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 83 28.4%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 42 14.4%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 100 34.2%

  • Total voters
    292
what are the chances that rackets basically created it and the lawyers filed for him? all the seething about aaron in these filings indicate to me the lawyers are being brow beaten into filing these dogshit appeals and such.
If they're doing it that way, they're the stupidest sons of bitches ever. Your ass is attached to everything that has your signature, you're literally speaking the words that are on the pages.

To appease Nick by looking like incompetent fucks is a weird way to protect your brand.
 
First Randazza and now the Barneswalker Nick picked up off of locals, there's a good reason you don't hire out-of-state attorneys.
The Barneswalker isn't out of state, just about as far away as he could be without being out of state.

Also Randazza would be worth the money if you needed him. The thing is there was no good reason to take an incredibly expensive interlocutory appeal making arcane arguments instead of just treating this case as what it is, a garden variety defamation case, and settling it because it clearly has merit.

Even if Monty loses, which is always possible for someone who is at least a limited purpose public figure, it would still be substantially cheaper to settle than fight a case where you're obviously a gigantic asshole to the bitter end. A real man would have manned up and apologized for lying.
If they're doing it that way, they're the stupidest sons of bitches ever. Your ass is attached to everything that has your signature, you're literally speaking the words that are on the pages.
My opinion is the general strategy is Nick's idea but the poor execution is because the Barneswalker simply sucks.

I think the speculation is the filings are so bad no practicing lawyer would file them.
 
They completely whiffed. Couldn't be bothered to follow the most basic of rules that guide and govern appellate practice in their state.

Why does he keep paying these guys if they're the ones making arguments? Do you like being cucked out of your shekels, Nick?
When the lawyer (Nick) is amped up on meth and the client (also Nick) is huffing jenkem, details tend to be missed.
 
In the supplemental report one of the anonymous parties advised that they didn't believe that the two eldest daughters were being homeschooled at the time. This would include the daughter who tested positive for cocaine.

These motherfuckers were running a full time orgy house. They couldn't be bothered to cook for their children or provide them with clean clothes, they sure as hell weren't going to be bothered with sitting them down in front of the books for seven hours a day to supervise their education.

Why does he keep paying these guys if they're the ones making arguments? Do you like being cucked out of your shekels, Nick?

They're Ma and Pa Rekieta's shekels, not Nick's. Whether it's an incompetent lawyer or a black dancer from Hedonism II faking a pregnancy, Nick's attitude to the money is exactly the same -- easy come, easy go...
 
This might be more suited for the Weeb Wars thread but it's weird that Marc Randazza worked with Nick even though the guy is apparently also friends with Greg Doucette, another lawyer who hates Nick and who I thought hated the chuds.
 
The only person in Nicks orbit making any sense is Kayla - and she is saying nothing which sounds like the hallmark of a more serious person; and probably someone who is not high.
Star Trek reruns are serious business.

I suspect Nick berates her as 'stupid' every time she opens her mouth (like when she talked to their son at court). By keeping quiet she forces Nick to punch his own head.
 
If they're doing it that way, they're the stupidest sons of bitches ever. Your ass is attached to everything that has your signature, you're literally speaking the words that are on the pages.

To appease Nick by looking like incompetent fucks is a weird way to protect your brand.

Well, when we know that some lawyers, like your colleague Joe Nierman, sign various legal documents without apparently knowing what's inside, it's not surprising to me that some lawyers will just sign off on whatever a fellow lawyer writes when they're their client.

EDIT: What I'm trying to suggest here, just to be clear, is that when money is involved, many professionals will discard their ethical and professional principles very quickly. Such is life.
 
Last edited:
Small nitpick but wasn’t that during sweeps visit to the crackden?
No, it was at court. The children over 12 attended. As far as I know, the oldest son, parents and Sweeps were never present together at the Crackden. He wasn't there during the warrant and they were removed from crackden that day. They were all present at the custody/removal hearings.
 
Its from the initial petition from May 24:
"It was confirmed by the older children that if their tests were positive, it was because they were exposed to someone else using drugs."
I mean the older kids did not specifically say that the cocaine user they were exposed to was the 9 year old. But that is clearly what they were implying. I mean who else could it be?
 
He's back at it again (archive)

View attachment 6663941
No matter what he does for the rest of his life, he will forever be known as the man whose nine-year-old daughter tested positive for cocaine. If only somebody, a friend perhaps, had warned him to pull up from his nosedive while there was still time.
A sane person would read the fact he was charged with endangerment before the tests results would mean it is completely independent from the drug tests so they would range from additive to inconsequential (if they are "weird and/or funny). Rekieta is not a sane person.
 
Back