I've now reached a point where I've given fuck all about trying to fit in socially, people suck, idc and I am going to stick by my principles. Despite this being one of my favorite threads (it's fascinating) I have chosen not to interact with it because of my social circles and I don't want it reflecting on what I say. Oh well, idc anymore. After dealing with someone who is a pathological liar, hypocritce ripe with privilege (you know, actual privilege, not the wokey shit they say to make themselves feel better) yesterday I have decided fuck it. The following is pretty poorly written, most of you will know this shit and this is mainly notes. It was written in like an hour. I have sources available for this stuff, but this is something I want to write more about soon.
So:
The Trans Bandage:
Trans Rights are - The Trans movement is nothing more than an attempt to assimilate multiple differing groups, into one overarching group. This group is relative based on location, this is not a conspiracy, there is no reason to suggest that there is a centralized body explicitly advocating this on an international scale. This may exist locally with NGOs and charities but such a phenomenon is restricted to purely local scenarios. At best, it may stretch across some countries across multiple continents but the world is large enough, and diverse enough for such an occurrence not to take place. It is not George Soros who is responsible for the outlook of East Asian countries, or Muslim countries. Rather, it is the complex and local history of each of these cultures that gives way to different perspectives on the construct of gender and how we ought to interpret it.
The Chinese eunuch certainly predates Soros, and the stereotypes associated with them are not in play to that of the modern trans stereotype. One does not see JK Rowling tweeting about how governments around the world are being played by eunuchs, who are the real vestiges of power. The term eunuch has become entrenched within popular culture, one can think of ASOIF (A Song Of Ice and Fire) as one of the main examples of this. The eunuch Varys worked to manipulate political affairs, climb through the ranks and ultimately become one of the most powerful men in the seven kingdoms working to bolster his overall position, push his goals and allow conflict, seek conflict; To prevent the conflict from ending, to prevent competent leadership so long as it was under his name. Of course, the character Varys was whitewashed in the show. He claims to explicitly be serving the good of the realm. This contrasts with his book counterpart. But, like a great many things he and his friend Tyrion Lannister are not the same character and were whitewashed for the delight of the audience
I define the Trans-Agenda as the pushing of the notion that transitioning to a perceived, construct, re. It serves to reinforce the regressive notion that identity ought to be grounded in perceived norms relative to others. In the case of those transitioning, identity ought to be grounded in cultural, marketing petitions that seek gender as 1: A means of conformity, and 2: To advertise and serve products by repeatedly insinuating that one must like A because they are a part of X. It prohibits people from expressing their sense of self, and instead promotes a uniformity grounded explicitly in the norms of gender. Those transitioning, undertake a process to become a perceived identity based upon their interpretation of constructs and how that interacts with them. There is not one sole example of this.
Modern attempts to push ideas of trans identity explore it as coming out of a cage, to becoming something that you were always were, something that was always hidden. Of course, if gender is a social construct built upon notions of masculinity and femineity then that must mean they are not true, but rather it is a mental perception which assumes a belonging to said group. There were times that such notions were defended on the grounds of there being a “male” and a “female” brain, a ludicrous sexist claim that tried to group and justify the existence of transpeople by trying to ground the mind-body problem in science by giving a causal reason as to why a brain may act in a certain way. Such regressive notions seek to regurgitate and enforce the traditions, and conservative norms for which the idea of transitioning explicitly tries to infiltrate and subvert to make their own.
Of course, the routes of Blanchard’s dichotomy of HSTS (Homosexual Transexual) and AGP (Autogynophile) cannot be escaped. For those privy to trans history, they’d be well aware of how transition was associated with being gay. Historically, Casablanca became well known in the 50s for performing what we now refer to as “gender reassignment surgery”, which is the process of constructing the neovagina with the explicit purpose of purveying the image of a straight, heterosexual couple such that they could be married. This was most common in the West during the 1950s and onwards, in particular the United States as it was the only way for it to be socially acceptable to be gay. Lose the dog to get the dog. This practice remains in practice in countries such as Iran where those who are homosexual are persecuted on the grounds of religion, where undergoing surgery and being forced to take upon a new identity is the desirable path forward.
Of course, not all Homosexual Transexuals have such a sob story. Rather, this is gay men who transition.
The Autogynophiles are the biggest concern for discourse for advocates for the explicit expulsion of trans individuals from any community. The main reason why is those that who are Autogynophiles, get a sexual kink out of it. The reason though as to why this is important is because women generally have a fear attributed towards those of the male sex. This is for many reasons, such as overwhelming strength, the male libido and size to name a few. Needless to say, when there is a hulking threat in drag, women are wary.
It would be wrong to deny the very existence of the Autogynohpile when other men may get off of “genderbending”. Just as we may think of the man who likes to get a little freaky in the night, and put on tights and whatnot (think of the sissy) we get proof that there is the window for sexual pleasure from this. Crossdressing is nothing new. The myth of trans genocide in itself is built upon the murder of Trans prostitutes, and the creation of a victimhood myth made explicitly because it was some plot to eradicate “trans folk”. – Remember the ladyboys!
However, only men seem to have been mentioned so far when it comes to transitioning. Indeed, this is one of the actual flaws with the dichotomy in that it was only men who were really related to it. This is no surprise; one only needs to be aware of the “beware” duology to understand the focus that men like to get in media. Both boys and girls ought to beware of those yucky men!
Yet, the dichotomy is something that can be built upon (but it will no longer be a dichotomy). First, is what I term as the “Neurotypical Transsexual”, that is someone who is neurotypical and seeks to construct a new identity in the hopes of improving their well-being. We can think of this as an evolved step of the practice of masking, that seeks to construct a replacement identity that filters out the undesirable attributes of the sinful Neurotypical who dares to not fit into societal norms because no one wishes to hear upon the inner workings of a Class 225 for hours on end. In the context of the Neurotypical Transsexual, transitioning means essentially mask and moving away from their past, sad experiences. They blame their past for the reason why they don’t fit in and argue that being the other gender would make things so much easier. This could arise from trauma, this could arise from a myriad of different reasons. Transitioning, again, is not monocausal irrespective of the “Gender Dysphoria” casus beli. There is not one cause of cancer, there is not one type of cancer why should we assume that there is one cause factor for Gender Dysphoria?
There too are what I would like to call other types of transgenders. These are those that have other mental illnesses, but the point of transition is that it is done as a means of trying to create a placebo to direct their mental illnesses towards and blame it on gender. Are they depressed? Must be bc they are a repressed dood. Are they starving themselves? Must be because they don’t like their tits! This is wrong, what we are doing is not teaching people to learn to live with themselves, and accept themselves but rather teaching them to learn to live with someone else, that they are not and accept the mask. This will not last, it will crash and burn. It is cruel, and not in the patient’s best interest.
There are also other examples, more popular with women, that have women transition as a means of trying to fit in or adapt to a social group through social contagions. More has been written on this elsewhere.
What trans rights serve is nothing more than an attempt to assimilate different groups into a perceived, unified umbrella with the explicit goal. If our goal is to help people, then we ought to be trying to encourage them to live a healthy life full of compassion. Not some wretched act done for the bemusement of pharma or whatnot. Forcing them into a drug cocktail meant to cause bodily change, causing bodily surgery and forcing them to maintain a consistent mask, which causes severe mental harm when it flounders is not help. It is not compassion, it is trapping someone in a cage poking them constantly until they break. The transition may work for some, but it does not work for everyone. The history of healthcare and medicine is proof that assimilation does not work. One of the sexes, women, have an immune system that is typically twice as strong as men’s. For vaccines, they only need half the male dose. There have been countless examples of other racial groups having different responses to medication.
Pushing Transgender rhetoric primarily serves to explicitly destroy groups, and serve to mould them into a perceived better. We can think of this in the traditional routes of transition being used to target those that were gay, and how it is now focused on the neurodivergent. Whilst, incorporating multiple different groups which allows different stigmas and prejudices to arise.
