Skitzocow David Anthony Stebbins / Acerthorn / stebbinsd / fayettevillesdavid - Litigious autist, obese livestreamer, elder abuser, violent schizo, ladyboy importer, hot dog enjoyer, wereturkey.

How much will David sue the farms for?

  • $0/no suit

    Votes: 118 5.3%
  • Hundreds

    Votes: 17 0.8%
  • Thousands

    Votes: 45 2.0%
  • Millions

    Votes: 184 8.2%
  • Billions

    Votes: 136 6.1%
  • Trillions

    Votes: 483 21.5%
  • A steamy night with Null in a lace negligee

    Votes: 1,259 56.2%

  • Total voters
    2,242
I'm excited to see Acerthorn unmask Bibi Faizi. Acerthorn, this is like scratching a lottery ticket. He could be a multi-millionaire. It's definitely worth your time.
And I don't know guys... The Judge warning Acerthorn that the case could be thrown out if he's rude again. That sounds kind of ABLEIST! Hopefully Acerthorn will set this BIASED judge straight before he even has the chance. You just know he's looking for ANY reason at all to screw over Acerthorn. (who is exercising his CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS!)

So the judge thinks the Morrowind review stream was fair use but the New Vegas one wasn't? It's been a while but I remember those are the two for Creetosis specifically and I think the Oct 13 one is NV. I don't see how you can find one fair over the other when they're both of a similar format but I'm not the judge.
The judge wrote
The Court does not hold that Creetosis's work is not protected by the fair use defense, but merely that the defense is not obvious from the face of the Second Amended Complaint.
And the Judge hasn't seen any of the videos.
 
He's going to appeal it. He always does.

I'm sure he's got more suits in the can ready to go either way. After all Stabby's gone after Sid like 3 times now and I don't see him stopping until he gets another Vex Lit label slapped on. He's got nothing but time to research the filmiest legal excuses to launch yet another suit on his critics.

Stabby loses nothing but filing these lolsuits, in fact he wins as he causes stress and legal costs to his "enemies" while he sits back, collects his welfare and gets all his legal fee's covered by the system.

It's despicable in every sense of the word. Stabby won't stop until he's dead so lets hope those wheezes and gobbles are sign of imminent demise.
 
No, I'm talking about his habit of when the court rulings do not go his way, he starts yelling that the judge has "unclean hands"

askshully...

Stabby's use of Unclean Hands is a legal term he uses to try to by-pass the fair use defence.

He's saying that his critics are trying to game the system by pleading fair use when their real purpose is to harass, mock, slander and intimidate him. As far as I know, @Useful_Mistake can correct me here, that Unclean Hands refers to a legal act done to cover an illegal motive.

So Stabby's consistent use of unclean hands is his way to trying to say that even those these copyright infringers technically are within fair use terms because they're only doing it to harass, slander and defame him the court should not apply the fair use doctrine to their copyright and thus must award Stabby eleven gazillion dollars.
 
I’d never want to be in one of his lawsuits but Stebbins’s legal filings are fun reading. He keeps finding new and interesting theories that boil down to “you’re wrong and stupid and pay me money forever”.

I was about to type that none of these plans had worked but then Zellzander had to go and break the streak by settling.
 
How many of those can someone get before a court limits their ability to file suits all together?

Some Vex Lits have filed thousands of bogus cases. It's very very hard to limit a person's access to the justice system for obvious reasons. It's just a shame that fuckers like Stabby can abuse it to try to enrich themselves and punish their enemies. I wouldn't expect Stabby to ever get fully sanctioned but the more labels he gets the easier it is to toss his cases su sponta
 
A new spree of filings by the lawsuit maniac.

Stebbins v. Rebolo 37
Acerthorn asks the Court if, by requesting a third amended complaint, they're "maliciously" trying to trick him into abandoning his right to appeal the Court's dismissal of claims against SidAlpha, Rebolo, ect.
StebbinvRebolo37.png
Stebbins v. Rebolo 38
UN
CLEAN HANDS. Acerthorn asks the Court provide reason for the dismissal of claims against SidAlpha and Rebolo whose hands are unclean.
StebbinvRebolo38.png
Stebbins v. Rebolo 39
Asks the Court to stay the deadline for his third amended complaint until after the above two filings are addressed.
StebbinvRebolo39.png
 

Attachments

Stebbins v. Rebolo 37
Acerthorn asks the Court if, by requesting a third amended complaint, they're "maliciously" trying to trick him into abandoning his right to appeal the Court's dismissal of claims against SidAlpha, Rebolo, ect.

Motion For The Judge To Admit They Are An Evil Bastard And Explain Themselves (While Undoing The Thing That Was Just Done)
 
Yah Stabby is shooting in the dark here again.

He's arguing the exact same shit he was last time he's just gussied it up a bit and threw in some nonsense, not even tangentially relatable case law.

No Stabby you cannot unilaterally state that your victims are to be denied a affirmative defence, in this case Fair Use, just because you think what they said is harmful. Yes, it is harmful to you, it is criticism which you compared to harassment but it's not. Which is exactly what the last judge said in your Accidental Live-stream case. Criticism is Fair Use you fat bloated sack of human waste and no matter how many times you say "oh noes they hurt muh fee fee's", it won't make it not so.

In the Atari vs Nintendo they're arguing about direct copying of computer programming code to gain a competitive advantage in business. Yes, Atari used Nintendo's code to create a comparable product so Fair Use did not apply. How the fuck does that related to people on the internet calling you a retard and you getting angry and making bad faith DMCA claims?

Hopefully the judge tosses this garbage ASAP as it's just the Stabby's standard trick of quoting one single line in a case that seems to support his claim but once you actually read the case law it has nothing to do with it.

TLDR: Get fucked Stabby. Your running out of chances. You-Tube's lawyer is going to crush your retarded suit in minutes. Hopefully they apply for another Vex Lit label like before and also terminate Stabby's channel for being nothing but a massive source of legal headaches for them.


Also Fuck you twice Stabby for making me root for Google to win.
 
Hopefully they apply for another Vex Lit label like before and also terminate Stabby's channel for being nothing but a massive source of legal headaches for them.
Many companies if you even imply you're going to sue they immediately cancel any business they're doing with you. I find it odd that YouTube doesn't do this, especially after actually being sued.
 
Many companies if you even imply you're going to sue they immediately cancel any business they're doing with you. I find it odd that YouTube doesn't do this, especially after actually being sued.

yah I agree. As long as Stabby has his You Tube channel he will use it to try to get rich by suing Google and other people over false copyright claims. Jew Tube should just ban his ass, crush the resulting lawsuit by citing their TOS right to cancel and deny any service for any reason and tell Stabby to get fucked. There is no way the pennies Stabby brings in in ad revenue is worth even a single hour of legal costs for Google.

Cancel the fucktards account and 90% of their headaches will go away.
 
Back