Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 62 15.4%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 6 1.5%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 101 25.1%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 72 17.9%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 162 40.2%

  • Total voters
    403
Rate me late or retarded or whatever for this, but I just realized: so it’s ok for someone to commit the cardinal sin of being obese when they sweep it up for Nick? Sean is fat, so he’s bad. But Melton is an obese hunchbacked whale, and he’s good? Also a point Sean made last night: Melton calls Aaron “mooby” because Aaron has bitchtits (he does)…but doesn’t Melton have tits too?

The whole thing is just weird because Nick is convinced his skelly look (and really thin men in general) is the ultimate attractive male look. Being the guy with buggy whip arms with an emaciated body and countable ribs isn't a position that you can look down on other guys from. Beyond that, Nick's whole "I'm the prettiest girl in the room" mentality is as stupid and gay when he does it as when Dax does it.
 
The whole thing is just weird because Nick is convinced his skelly look (and really thin men in general) is the ultimate attractive male look. Being the guy with buggy whip arms with an emaciated body and countable ribs isn't a position that you can look down on other guys from.
Don’t forget, Nick has a mini-hunchback similar to his buddy Melton. If you look up a photo of “nerd neck”, it matches Rekieta to a tee. Likely from all his hours on the phone refreshing Xitter and his Kiwifarms thread to stay on top of people’s opinions about him.
 
Is his obsession with Aaron because he thinks he is punching down and by making him look bad, Nick would automatically look good? I know it´s a teenager crackhead way of thinking but it´s Nick after all. Or is it he just misses Aaron´s cock that hard?
You know what, it is cock. With Nick is always about cock, he is even trying to embarrass his former lover with cock talk; Nick is just addicted to cock.
 
Rate me late or retarded or whatever for this, but I just realized: so it’s ok for someone to commit the cardinal sin of being obese when they sweep it up for Nick? Sean is fat, so he’s bad. But Melton is an obese hunchbacked whale, and he’s good?
Yes and yes.

Melton calls Aaron “mooby” because Aaron has bitchtits (he does)…but doesn’t Melton have tits too?
According to Nick, no. Because Melton kisses the Lawpope ring. As does Ralph.

If you look at those photos of Dax Herrera at the jigsaw puzzle competition, he’s got a bit of a beer gut going there too.
Dude, have you seen Juju lately?

fatdax.png

To answer your question simply, Nick doesn't really care what your body type is. You can be as fat as a whale, or thin as a meth head. What matters is whether you are sucking his dick or not.
 
He's lying when he says he can make it very expensive for the state. All of his bullshit motions get bushed aside, and they got him dead to rights.
A trial is always expensive. It's a little less harsh on the state because they have a stable of experts who do cases in volume for less than a privately hired expert would get and this for a minor bullshit case likely to get nearly the same result in the end.

He can't break the bank, even of a small county DA, but it's enough to have a bit of leverage.

Now they can make it harder for him for doing that, like going hard on him over the "hacking" shit or requesting an upward deviation from sentencing guidelines, and retaliating against a potential witness in the case against him to attempt to obstruct justice would certainly be the sort of aggravating factor that would apply.

I'm not sure where in the process in Minnesota they're required to do that, but generally an upward deviation requires facts proven at trial beyond a reasonable doubt, so at the very latest, it would be before the finder of fact deliberates on the subject and might require a special jury questionnaire, since most jury forms simply have the option of "guilty" or "not guilty," and deviations require specific factual findings. (If it's the judge as fact-finder, the judge has to issue a written findings of fact.)

Now the state clearly has the best hand here, and if Nick tries to play 72 like it's aces, he's going to have a bad time, but he's not entirely without leverage. He just doesn't have much and they know it.
- It sure sounds like he failed at least one drug/alcohol test. He larps on about how they get the reports a week later, how the alcohol could be in a sauce from cooking. (I mean...)
B-b-b-but maybe I have an evil twin and it's his cocaine! Or. . .the cocaine gnomes left it!

God shut the fuck up Nick you cringy, embarrassing faggot.
 
To answer your question simply, Nick doesn't really care what your body type is. You can be as fat as a whale, or thin as a meth head. What matters is whether you are sucking his dick or not.
Wait, is Juju expecting the baby not Marie? I figure it would be hell to find the father among all the Burning Man cocks he rode...
 
He got sentenced to two months in federal prison, they confiscated his guns, and he's still a felon to this day. Rekieta has gotten off so much easier, and he still cries harder than Kyle ever did.
Unfortunately for Kyle, the "deep state" or whatever you want to call it actually WAS conspiring to get him.
I thought it was John Goodman @AnOminous
I stole it from Franken too.
 
Probably late but leading toxicology expert thinks you can piss hot from eating food seasoned with spirits:

He really is incapable of understanding the concept of thresholds, isn´t he?
His notion of the world is incredibly childish... does he think drug tests are accepted as predictors of drug consumption without controlling for negligible exposure? Like everywhere in the world people recognize the predictive value of those tests but no one in the whole wide world has the same intelligence to question scenarios where a false positive could be returned and already accounted for it. He is really really dumb...
 
Last edited:
Just thought of this during my morning workout. Nick wants people to simultaneously believe 3 things related to his kids.
  1. They are all shockingly smart and talented, and are all way ahead of their peers in public school. They read a lot and know many things.
  2. Nick has previously said that he regretted his parents didn't let him know about sex stuff, and with the April tweets (that Nick wants to disavow) he has told his kids about sex stuff (so they can be cool).
  3. Somehow his kids are so sheltered that they don't know anything about drugs, so much so that the 17 year old young man didn't know cocaine was a powder and that you snort it.
How is it possible that Nick has bragged about how knowledgeable his kids are, has also regretted that his parents didn't teach him about more worldly things (like sex and sex toys) and also wants us to believe that his kids are so sheltered that they don't know anything about drugs and didn't understand why they were taken away from Nick and Kayla, and didn't understand what the problem was with the police?

Just saying I have known some extremely sheltered people in my life (like the kind growing up they weren't allowed to read Harry Potter) and they knew what drugs were and basic functions (like you snort cocaine and smoke meth).
 
Yes and yes.


According to Nick, no. Because Melton kisses the Lawpope ring. As does Ralph.


Dude, have you seen Juju lately?

View attachment 6737821

To answer your question simply, Nick doesn't really care what your body type is. You can be as fat as a whale, or thin as a meth head. What matters is whether you are sucking his dick or not.
Fat Fuck DiddlerDax can't stop pounding in those Double Doubles from In-N-Out by the looks of it.
 
Just thought of this during my morning workout. Nick wants people to simultaneously believe 3 things related to his kids.
  1. They are all shockingly smart and talented, and are all way ahead of their peers in public school. They read a lot and know many things.
  2. Nick has previously said that he regretted his parents didn't let him know about sex stuff, and with the April tweets (that Nick wants to disavow) he has told his kids about sex stuff (so they can be cool).
  3. Somehow his kids are so sheltered that they don't know anything about drugs, so much so that the 17 year old young man didn't know cocaine was a powder and that you snort it.
How is it possible that Nick has bragged about how knowledgeable his kids are, has also regretted that his parents didn't teach him about more worldly things (like sex and sex toys) and also wants us to believe that his kids are so sheltered that they don't know anything about drugs and didn't understand why they were taken away from Nick and Kayla, and didn't understand what the problem was with the police?

Just saying I have known some extremely sheltered people in my life (like the kind growing up they weren't allowed to read Harry Potter) and they knew what drugs were and basic functions (like you snort cocaine and smoke meth).
It doesn't make much sense. Also in an earlier cope, Nick said that his daughter has never seen cocaine. How does she know she hasn't seen (or used) cocaine, if she doesn't know what cocaine is
 
How does Nick still have Locals supporters? how does he still have people defending him? he's barely streamed in an entire year, you could probably count the number of times on both hands, there's no value return in supporting him unless you enjoy his (very) occasional seething butthurt streams. But more than that he's gone back on every belief and principle he once espoused, he's a hollowed out shell of man, a pathetic loser nerd trying desperately to be one of "the cool kids" while in his 40's. Who the heck is left for him and why?
Retards. As far as the eye can see.

Drugs?
 
Lester Burnham is Jesus (I don't understand this either)
In the words of Rev. Nicolas Robert Rekieta, Defender of the Faith He does the thing... before he does the thing
From translate.google.crackhead: Lester gets martyred by a Nazi for wanting to fuck Mena Suvari, but not really because he does not fuck her, but the intention counts, but ah fuck it this dumbass doesn't even understand American Beuty. Lester got killed by a closeted fag for rejecting his advances, not for scoring (or not) with Mena. How can you not get this?
 
1733862563095.png
"false positive FOR USE."
Is this a backhanded admission that his daughter did ingest cocaine at some point, but now we are using the cope of "she didn't use it voluntarily"? I seriously can't keep up with the different lies and excuses Nick uses just on this one issue, never mind the myriad of other lies and copes he uses about everything else in his life.
 
Ive always wondered who the guy throwing the horns next to JuJu the Cow (a man who likes to get fucked in the ass while dressed as a cow) is? Is the the only one immune to the Curse?
The first one to fall victim to it?
The creator of it?

So many questions.
I asked in Gunt chat, where the history & lore of the Sektur resides, & it’s been determined that the gunt reveal photo came from that guys twitter account. His moniker at the time was Mister Misanthropic.
:gunt:
 
The only way "false positive for use" would make sense is if the cops force-fed the kid with coke. Or another game of 315689164 questions where "false positive for use" means "she is not a drug user, it was an accident and well ackshually Pomplun tripped on a ziplock bad and it tore open and all coke flew into her mouth".

There's this thing called "Bayes Theorem" that mathematically-inclined people like lab technicians know about and know how to apply to tests that can show both false positives and false negatives. The chance of a kid testing OVER 9000 on a coke metabolite hair test, then test the same again, is about the same as BossmanJack scoring 5 blackjack hands at once.
 
View attachment 6737969
"false positive FOR USE."
Is this a backhanded admission that his daughter did ingest cocaine at some point, but now we are using the cope of "she didn't use it voluntarily"? I seriously can't keep up with the different lies and excuses Nick uses just on this one issue, never mind the myriad of other lies and copes he uses about everything else in his life.
No, he means she was contaminated by the cop handling the drugs.
 
Back