- Joined
- May 17, 2021
What you're saying is, you CAN be locked up for actions committed before your probation agreement. You just don't get your probation breached as a consequence. But that's the opposite of what you wrote above.
Context and reading comprehension? What are they? The post I replied to was scant centimeters above mine in the same post.
If you’re thinking about the same post I’m thinking about, that was unrelated. He made a separate post specifically about the appeal filing and he seemed pretty pleased with it. See below:
Yes, the atrocious appeal post was another case.
What I think more interesting to contrast now are the panegyric posts that we uncovered where he wrote about his 'Seargent', (was it?) who gave him a chance in life? I know people said it was strange to refer to military rank outside the military at the time, and those posts made it seem like they were close.
Jail was extremely unlikely for Nick. The result of the trial would have also resulted in something incredibly similar to what is being talked about in terms of the plea deal.
The trial would cost some money. But the risks involved were not all that great. The main compelling reason Nick has to take a plea deal is to keep much of the information in the case out of the public record.
Of course, jail is unlikely. I believe most came to that conclusion after many barrister posted about it.
Theory time: I believe Nick the benefit Nick is trying to get is confidentiality and/or access to April. I doubt significant reduction in length of term is on offer because of how ironclad the State's case is. They are negotiating on the small concessions that mean little to them, I would think.
i love the irony of him getting slapped in the last month.
This... is not irony... it is comedy.