Brianna Wu / John Walker Flynt - "Biggest Victim of Gamergate," Failed Game Developer, Failed Congressional Candidate

Tech community: What do you think of the idea of the government slamming its massive bureaucratic cock into your field?

tech-png.174386

Wow, this is such an ill conceived idea it boggles my mind.

There are thousands of open source projects, and only a tiny fraction of them contain anything remotely security critical. Of those, probably less than 100 or so are what I'd call obligate security critical, by which I mean they definitely need to exist and are unavoidably part of a computer's attack surface.

All of the major projects that are depended on as internet infrastructure are already sponsored either directly or indirectly by private industry. Either directly in that they are developed by a company, or indirectly in that the programmer(s) are employed by companies who allow them to develop the software as part of their job.

There is nothing that giving extra money direct to the developers is going to achieve in terms of additional security. How would you even measure the performance of these grants anyway? Government money could conceivably be usefully spent on sponsoring security researchers to find bugs and produce code analysis tools, and the governments of any number of countries worldwide already spend quite large sums on pure research to find new cryptographic techniques, which generally find their way in to the public domain in the course of time.

Wu just doesn't understand anything about software development. It's amazing how she seems to think of herself as more knowledgeable about technology than the average politician, but every time she opens her mouth on the subject she embarrasses herself by demonstrating her ignorance. I want to see Randi Harper have another catfight with her over this shit. As terrible of a programmer as Randi is, at least she does kind of understand something about how software is produced if only by osmosis from working with actual developers.
 
All of the major projects that are depended on as internet infrastructure are already sponsored either directly or indirectly by private industry. Either directly in that they are developed by a company, or indirectly in that the programmer(s) are employed by companies who allow them to develop the software as part of their job.
Yeah, this. Just to take the most famous example, Linus Torvalds has by now spent a fair chunk of his career essentially being paid to be Linus Torvalds and work on Linux. All without Wu's brogrammer welfare legislation!
 
Wu just doesn't understand anything about software development. It's amazing how she seems to think of herself as more knowledgeable about technology than the average politician, but every time she opens her mouth on the subject she embarrasses herself by demonstrating her ignorance. I want to see Randi Harper have another catfight with her over this shit. As terrible of a programmer as Randi is, at least she does kind of understand something about how software is produced if only by osmosis from working with actual developers.

Wu doesn't understand government or subsidies either. A coordinated hacking attack on a website for people committing adultery? We obviously need to spend taxpayer dollars paying out grants for "free software" to whoever hits a few bullet points.

Forget funding any experts doing studies or directly contracting digital security firms to test US intelligence networks, DNC's internal networks, or any government security.

We need the Solyndra of free software tech.
 
Here's mine:
I love Hilary Clinton but I can't really think of any moment in the campaign where she didn't feel scripted. I just think in 2017 this old way of running for office where you have every talking point worked out and stick to a script and you're not real, I think it's dated. It goes back to this world where you got elected to office by winning newspaper endorsements. Bernie Sanders and even Donald Trump were wildly successful by being genuine and open and honest with the voters about who they are. There's a real sense when you're watching them that you're seeing the real person. I've gotten pretty far in my career by speaking my mind. I'll bring that approach to Washington. More upfront, direct, unapologetic about LGBT issues and the economy. I think people respond to honesty.

Wu being honest. :story::story::story::story::story:
 
Wow, this is such an ill conceived idea it boggles my mind.

There are thousands of open source projects, and only a tiny fraction of them contain anything remotely security critical. Of those, probably less than 100 or so are what I'd call obligate security critical, by which I mean they definitely need to exist and are unavoidably part of a computer's attack surface.

All of the major projects that are depended on as internet infrastructure are already sponsored either directly or indirectly by private industry. Either directly in that they are developed by a company, or indirectly in that the programmer(s) are employed by companies who allow them to develop the software as part of their job.

There is nothing that giving extra money direct to the developers is going to achieve in terms of additional security. How would you even measure the performance of these grants anyway? Government money could conceivably be usefully spent on sponsoring security researchers to find bugs and produce code analysis tools, and the governments of any number of countries worldwide already spend quite large sums on pure research to find new cryptographic techniques, which generally find their way in to the public domain in the course of time.

Wu just doesn't understand anything about software development. It's amazing how she seems to think of herself as more knowledgeable about technology than the average politician, but every time she opens her mouth on the subject she embarrasses herself by demonstrating her ignorance. I want to see Randi Harper have another catfight with her over this shit. As terrible of a programmer as Randi is, at least she does kind of understand something about how software is produced if only by osmosis from working with actual developers.

You were expecting her to know what she is talking about?

Listen, we support her and big her up so when she fails we get lulz.
 
Because, you know, there's no tech industry in Massachusetts. None at all. If only they had some kind of... institute? Of technology? Maybe this mythical "Massachusetts Institute of Technology" or "MIT" for short could help with that.
Oh, wait. John is an idiot.
I want Wu to give a speech about the dearth of tech in MA and have a Boston Dynamics robot break through the wall like the Kool-Aide Man and MS Speak "EX-KYUZ ME MIZZ WUH. EYE WOULD LIKE TO OFFER A REBUTUTUTAL."
 
I can't help but feel Flynt must have gone to a private school given the family wealth and how we can't find shit on him any earlier than the first college years. Probably an all-boys school at that since Wu never talks about their childhood out of context blatant lies.

I don't know what schools he attended in earlier grades, but it's been documented that he graduated from Hattiesburg High School -- a public school -- in 1995.
 
Inc: How will you reach voters?

Wu: I am a nationally known person. I have legions of women who are very excited about my candidacy. Also every tech person I know is angry about encryption policy and the loss of privacy. We are going to target technology workers like no political operation has ever targeted them before, and we won't dumb-down to them. I'll talk to them like I talk to any engineer. Twitter will be huge. I think I will be the first congressional candidate to work with [live steaming platform] Twitch and go play video games with people and reach out that way. I will keep speaking on college campuses.

:story:
I am sitting here in front of the screen, trying to comment on this.
But this is so dumb, I literally can't even...
 
Inc: How will you reach voters?

Wu: I am a nationally known person. I have legions of women who are very excited about my candidacy.
Binders full of women, even!

Make that one for the drinking game: Drink for every time Wu says or does anything that would inadvertently put her in line with her hoped-for hipster voter base's Republican nightmares. Two shots if it's Trump in particular. Waterfall when a formerly friendly puff-piece news site turns on her for precisely that reason.
 
There's a new interview. My favorite part:

Third, [incumbent Democratic Congressman] Stephen Lynch comes from the steel industry. I come from tech and my husband comes from biotech. I think tech and biotech should get a lot more attention. I want more federal funding for tech and biotech in the 8th district. With better leadership Massachusetts can look more like Silicon Valley than it does today.
Another puff interview for a deranged pathological liar. Can't figure out why no one takes the media serious anymore.
 
Can we all admit Zelda series hit its low point with The Wand of Gamelon? Stop letting Zelda be the hero.

#PlayingZeldaSucks

I'm not sure what she means by "be the hero," either. She played a very substantial heroic role in the story of Ocarina of Time under the guise of Sheik. Does Bri not know the word "protagonist?"

I bet Wu never figured out who really was Princess Zelda in The Wind Waker.
 
Back